Slashdot Mirror


US Issues 30-Year Eagle-Killing Permits To Wind Industry

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Lindsay Abrams reports at Salon that the Obama administration is offering wind farms 30 years of leeway to kill and harm bald and golden eagles. The new regulations, which were requested by the wind industry, will provide companies that seek a permit with legal protection, preventing them from having to pay penalties for eagle deaths (PDF). An investigation by the Associated Press earlier this year documented the illegal killing of eagles around wind farms, the Obama administration's reluctance to prosecute such cases and its willingness to help keep the scope of the eagle deaths secret. President Obama has championed the pollution-free energy, nearly doubling America's wind power in his first term as a way to tackle global warming. Scientists say wind farms in 10 states have killed at least 85 eagles since 1997, with most deaths occurring between 2008 and 2012, as the industry was greatly expanding. Most deaths — 79 — were golden eagles that struck wind turbines. However the scientists said their figure is likely to be 'substantially' underestimated, since companies report eagle deaths voluntarily and only a fraction of those included in their total were discovered during searches for dead birds by wind-energy companies. The National Audubon Society said it would challenge the decision."

7 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. Holy Biased Presentation Batman! by rueger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm as green as anyone, but lordy that was some one-sided summary Hugh.

    Can I at least ask for some other numbers, such as the number of bird kills resulting from pollutants dumped out by the big coal fired plants in Ohio?

    1. Re:Holy Biased Presentation Batman! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 5, Informative

      But were they Bald Eagles? Cuz let's be honest, no one gives a fuck about sea gulls.

      In all fairness: most of the world doesn't give a fuck about bald eagles.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  2. No form of power generation is without costs. by Dputiger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is no perfect solution here. I'm not saying companies should erect wind turbines in the middle of nesting areas, but the truth is, there is no risk-free, cost-free, environmental-damage-free answer to the problem of power production. Coal mining is wretched for the environment and coal miners have a nasty habit of dying of black lung. Nuclear power has risks (and I'm a nuclear proponent). The long-term cleanup and environmental repair is very costly if something goes wrong. Solar power is expensive. Wind turbines kill birds.

    At a certain point, the question is "What's an acceptable loss ratio?"

  3. Re:Something has to give, buddy by Urkki · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My truck weighs 5,700lbs, or about 3 tons. You probably think that is insane. Maybe it is... but it is my right to own it because I like it...

    No, it's your right to own it, because you can afford it, and don't believe in taking any personal responsibility for common resources, even when it would not decrease your quality of life (a more sensible car would actually improve your quality of life, most likely).

    Because you want.

  4. Have you ever seen a video of this happening? by Snard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, I will probably be modded down for this, but it's worth saying. And for the record, I'm opposed to needlessly killing animals.

    The first time I heard about eagles being killed by windmills, I imagined one being cut down while flying from point A to point B, not noticing that there was this lethal windmill in its path. Then, I saw a video on a website of an actual eagle death by windmill (and I apologize for not being able to find & post the link here) and was very surprised bu what I saw. Basically, the eagle was "dancing" with the windmill, repeatedly flying around it over and over. Like a moth flying around a flame. Eventually, the two paths intercepted, and the eagle was hit by the blade.

    So part of me wanted to scream "stupid eagle!" and make the natural selection comment. But maybe there is something hypnotic going on that makes the bird want to investigate this strange whirling object?

    Maybe a solution to the problem isn't to grant power companies "permits" to kill eagles, but to find a way to repel them rather than attract them.

    --
    - Mike
  5. Re:Something has to give, buddy by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Informative

    So why bother with the exemption. If the number is so few, what possible difference can the equally small fine really amount to.

    Because killing eagles is illegal and there's thousands of the lawyers who'll just see "free money" and make people's lives miserable.

    --
    No sig today...
  6. Re:Something has to give, buddy by killkillkill · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure that would help eagles. I believe they rely on sight more than sound when finding and targeting small mammals as prey.