Slashdot Mirror


Satanists Propose Monument At Oklahoma State Capitol Next To Ten Commandments

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "The Tulsa World reports that in their zeal to tout their faith in the public square, conservatives in Oklahoma may have unwittingly opened the door to a wide range of religious groups, including satanists who are now seeking to put their own statue next to a Ten Commandments monument on the Statehouse steps. The Republican-controlled Legislature in Oklahoma authorized the privately funded Ten Commandments monument in 2009, and it was placed on the Capitol grounds last year despite criticism from legal experts who questioned its constitutionality. But the New York-based Satanic Temple saw an opportunity and notified the state's Capitol Preservation Commission that it wants to donate a monument too. 'We believe that all monuments should be in good taste and consistent with community standards,' Lucien Greaves wrote in letter to state officials. 'Our proposed monument, as an homage to the historic/literary Satan, will certainly abide by these guidelines.' Brady Henderson, legal director for ACLU Oklahoma, said if state officials allow one type of religious expression, they must allow alternative forms of expression, although he said a better solution might be to allow none at all on state property. 'We would prefer to see Oklahoma's government officials work to faithfully serve our communities and improve the lives of Oklahomans instead of erecting granite monuments to show us all how righteous they are,' says Henderson. 'But if the Ten Commandments, with its overtly Christian message, is allowed to stay at the Capitol, the Satanic Temple's proposed monument cannot be rejected because of its different religious viewpoint.'"

4 of 1,251 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Though, given how much they like Muslims, who are closer still, I suppose that it may be a matter of hating your competitors even more than people in a different industry altogether.

    Actually, Muslims/Islam is a greater threat to religious freedom (i.e. including the freedom to disbelieve anything) than the Satanists. The Satanists, AFAIK, don't have a geopolitical agenda to convert the world to Satanism. Whereas Muslims have converted territory equivalent to a continent first by war, when they had the capability, and later by terror & proselytization, when that power slipped away.

  2. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    As soon as gays and lesbians can have children without scientific intervention, they can get married, until then, they can be lovers/friends/partners, but not married - that is reserved by definition for couples that can, under normal circumstances, conceive children for the survival of the human race. All religions have this built into their mantra some place or another.

    States started with the marriage licenses to prevent brothers and sisters from marrying each other. Aside from that, nothing the state does gives a true marriage, they are called civil unions. Go and civil unionize yourselves to your heart's content, it will never be a marriage.

    Now, as to satanists gettting to put up a monument. as soon as they can get a 3/4ths majority vote to allow it, be my guest.

    Just because something the majority does offends a minority, doesn't mean the minority gets to offend the majority.

    You do not have the right "Not to be offended"...

    Them's the breaks.

  3. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by cumhur+pulat · · Score: -1, Flamebait
  4. Re:Fireworks in 3...2...1... by cumhur+pulat · · Score: -1, Flamebait