Slashdot Mirror


Investor Lawsuit Blames NSA For $12B Loss In IBM Value

Jah-Wren Ryel writes "IBM Corp has been sued by the Louisiana Sheriffs' Pension & Relief Fund which accused it of concealing how its ties to what became a major U.S. spying scandal reduced business in China and ultimately caused its market value to plunge more than $12 billion." While anyone can file a lawsuit, being sued by an institutional investor is a little different than being sued by John Q. Disgruntled.

4 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Re:6.4 percent by edibobb · · Score: 4, Informative

    In addition, IBM shares recovered almost all their 6.4 percent loss within a month!

  2. Re:Let Me Get This Straight by Fjandr · · Score: 4, Informative

    They may as well be suing the NSA, considering what would come out in discovery if this lawsuit is allowed to proceed. Or rather, what won't come out, in the interest of "national security."

  3. Re:Capitalism Democracy? by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your paranoia does not extend to established business, which have the option to fight back but choose not to.

    Oh how I pine for the day when I believed that shit. We were such a more innocent populace, weren't we? Go look up MKULTRA to start, and follow the Wikipedia links from there for a few hours. CEOs of companies, deans of universities, directors of hospitals, they were all in on it and that was the 1950s.

    You think that sort of thing isn't going on now? The "option to fight back," oh good heavens, someone catch me before I pass out from laughter.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  4. Re:Let Me Get This Straight by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Informative

    LOL cold, many NSA/US gov/mil whistleblowers have been in the US court system http://cryptome.org/2013-info/06/whistleblowing/whistleblowing.htm
    The US gov likes to try color of law, state secrets and really push the need for expensive cleared legal staff to keep the tame US press away.
    The US Constitution covers all actions by the NSA domestically and no US "gov" granted US "immunity" laws can legally out pace that :)
    In the end the staff are usually cleared and internal changes are 'made' just to make the cases fail to gain any more domestic traction and US press attention.
    Then you had Snowden who did the smart thing and went to the press, escaping the 'internal' US gov legal trap that is domestic whistleblower protections.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"