First Hard Evidence for the Process of Cat Domestication

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

First Hard Evidence for the Process of Cat Domestication

Posted by Unknown on Monday December 16, 2013 @08:04PM from the mittens-will-eat-you-when-you-die dept.

sciencehabit writes "Cats have been part of human society for nearly 10,000 years, but they weren't always string-chasers and lap-sitters. Ancient felines hunted crop-destroying rats and mice for early farmers, and in return we provided food and protection. At least that's what scientists have long speculated. Now, they can back it up. Cat bones unearthed in a 5000-year-old Chinese farming village indicate that the animals consumed rodents and that some may have been cared for by humans. The findings provide the earliest hard evidence of this mutually beneficial relationship between man and cat."

9 of 144 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Backwards by AmiMoJo · 2013-12-16 20:14 · Score: 5, Funny

These guys have it the wrong way around. Humans didn't domesticate cats, cats domesticated humans. Within about half an hour of yge first cat realizing it could get foods and grooming from a human just by looking cute and rubbing against their legs every nowand then it made the human its servant and lived a life of leisure. I bet it never bothered to kill anything that wasn't within a law's length of it again.

--
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
1. Re:Backwards by AmiMoJo · 2013-12-16 20:42 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  I must apologize for the above post. I'd like to claim that a cat walked over my keyboard but the reality is that autocorrect did its usual amazing job.
  
  --
  const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
  SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
2. Re:Backwards by reboot246 · 2013-12-16 21:52 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Indeed. Cats don't have owners. They have staff.
Re:Not entirely mutually beneficial... by crimson+tsunami · 2013-12-16 20:34 · Score: 5, Funny

summary says 5,000 years ago, so dinosaur accidents then :)
Cats, domesticated ?? by baileydau · 2013-12-16 20:51 · Score: 5, Funny

BS.
I've got one on my desk right now proving it certainly isn't domesticated. She's trying to eat everything in sight. Our other one has previously chewed right through my phone charging cable.
The difference between cats and dogs:
A dog thinks: You feed me, you house me, you look after me. You must be a god.
A cat thinks: You feed me, you house me, you look after me. I must be a god.

--
Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
1. Re:Cats, domesticated ?? by Opportunist · 2013-12-16 21:48 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  In other words, the cat trained you through negative reinforcement.
  
  --
  We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Re:Stop blaming autocorrect! by alexhs · 2013-12-16 22:19 · Score: 5, Funny

There is a reason you get are forced to preview your post before submitting.
And Muphry's law still applies :)

--
I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
Re:Stop blaming autocorrect! by Paradise+Pete · 2013-12-16 22:24 · Score: 5, Funny

And Muphry's law still applies
I see waht you did there.
Cats and editor religious wars by thogard · 2013-12-17 02:00 · Score: 5, Funny

While I agree that competent users of vi or emacs can all do the same things, I feel that the major difference between the two is related to what happens when a cat walks on the keyboard.