Slashdot Mirror


Hawaii Desktop Stable Released, Powered By Qt 5.2 & Wayland

An anonymous reader writes "The Maui OS Project has made their first stable release of the Hawaii Desktop. Hawaii is still catching up with GNOME, Xfce, and KDE in terms of features, but it's written from scratch atop next-generation open-source technologies. In particular, Hawaii 0.2.0 is powered by the brand new Qt 5.2 tool-kit and runs natively on Wayland's Weston 1.3 compositor. Hawaii 0.2.0 carries all standard Linux desktop features but more advanced desktop functionality is planned while focusing around a Wayland design and eventually their own Green Island Compositor."

12 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Waiting for it to mature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll check it out when Hawaii reaches 0.5.0, and it better have the theme song play when I log in.

  2. Re:"next generation" my ass! by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That was funny! Wait you were joking right?

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  3. Re:"next generation" my ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sadly, web monkeys really do believe this even if the parent is joking (and one really, really hopes they are joking).

  4. Re:"next generation" my ass! by Desler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would QuickTime need to be web scale?

  5. Re:Way behind! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Funny

    Other than network transparency, what exactly of value does X do that Wayland doesn't?

    "Other than that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?"

  6. They get it by TuringTest · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They have a main webpage with a clean design, and they explain what they do and why anyone in the target audience should care, without falling prey to corporate-speak. That alone bests more than 90% of previous desktop environments, yet is the bare minimum than any user-facing project should have. Plus, the FAQ and About pages actually explain their motivations rather than a few obscure technical details.

    That "operating system, a suite of software that makes your computer run" made me shed tears of joy.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  7. Screenshots? by christurkel · · Score: 3

    Are there any screenshots available? I can't seem to find any.

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:Screenshots? by normaldotcom · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a few screenshots available on the Maui Project site: http://www.maui-project.org/#showcase

  8. Re:Way behind! by laffer1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    X works on my operating system.

  9. The Right Desktop is.... by tuppe666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another Desktop??? Can't we focus on getting ONE right?

    If only Windows 8 users had that option; how many would have taken it? I have moved from a full time Gnome User(Driven away by Gnome Shell) to KDE(Great Applications\Themeing....Poor Desktop) to XFCE(Like Gnome 2 at its best, with some cravats/advantages).

    The bottom line is there may not be One right, maybe many rights and many wrongs. Android is a great Phone OS but I would not like to use it full time as my Desktop...but to have access to its large catalogue of touchscreen games on GNU/Linux I would kill for, and there is no reason they can't run in a tradition WIMP environment.

  10. Re:Network Transparency ... solved by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

    You sed:

    sed s/sed/said/

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  11. Re:Network Transparency ... solved by CajunArson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    " You have no idea what "network transparency" really means."

    No... you don't.

    Me*: Network transparency means that applications can render graphics to a local terminal or over a network with zero changes in code path and zero need to know anything about the underlying rendering model. Therefore, any remotely modern version of X.org is by definition not network transparent since every since modern local rendering technique such as DRI and compositing is completely incompatible with the fallback socket-based path that is used for networking remote X programs. Consequently, modern X is not network transparent and people who can't understand that just because it is still possible to send X pixmaps over a network socket in a kludgy manner does not mean X is "transparent" should maybe do some research on how X actually works instead of hurling insults.

      Modern X-remoting is effectively pushing pixmaps over a socket in an inefficient manner. It is fundamentally different than the modern composited rendering path that effectively bypasses 99.9% of the original X server and is where Wayland is going. Additionally, if X were so beautifully perfect at network transparency then using it over a WAN connection wouldn't be one of the leading causes of suicide in network administrators and proxies like NX would never have come into existence.

    Where "Me" includes the X.org developers including Keith Packard BTW.

    You: "I MADE PRETTY PICTURES GO OVAR INTARNETS!! DARR!! NETWORK TRANSPARENT! SINCE SOME TYPES OF RDP ONLY TRANSFER DESKTOPS NOT INVIDUAL WINDOWS RDP NOT NETWORK TRANSPARENT!! DAR!!! X DEVELOPERS ARE STOOPID AND DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT X!!! DAR!!"

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.