Slashdot Mirror


Ford Rolls the Dice With Breakthrough F-150 Aluminum Pickup Truck

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "USA Today reports that Ford's next F-150 pickup truck will be made mostly of aluminum, instead of steel, in a bid to save weight. It will likely either be hailed as a breakthrough product to buyers who've made F-150 the bedrock of its business or one that draws comparisons to a 'rolling beer can.' The automaker has asked Alcoa, which makes aluminum blast shields for battlefield-bound vehicles, to lend some of its military-grade metal for the automaker's display, according to people familiar with Ford's plans. Ford's sales job will be considerable: The company is eager to demonstrate the toughness of aluminum, which is lighter than steel, to pickup buyers at next month's Detroit auto show. 'This is already the most significant debut at the auto show,' says Joe Langley. 'Everybody's going to be dissecting that thing for a long time, especially since Ford will be taking such a big gamble.' As a transformative product with a potentially troublesome introduction, the new F-150 has drawn comparisons with Boeing Co.'s 787 Dreamliner — an aircraft developed under the company's commercial airplane chief at the time, Alan Mulally, who in 2006 became Ford's chief executive officer. Because of the complicated switch to aluminum from steel in the F-150's body, IHS Automotive estimates Ford will need to take about six weeks of downtime at each of its two U.S. truck plants to retool and swap out robots and machinery. Ford is apparently trying to squeeze more than 700 pounds out of its next generation of pickup trucks. Using aluminum to cut weight would help meet rising fuel economy standards in the United States, which is requiring a fleetwide average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025."

37 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. 20 year old news? by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:20 year old news? by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, it's one of THOSE things. Like, not the first HUMAN to do a feat, but the first black female human over the age of 33 and under 150 pounds with size 8 sneakers to do a feat.
      Kinda sounds like "Everybody gets a trophy" day.
      Anybody remember Hyundais in the 1980s? Aluminum.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:20 year old news? by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are kind of missing the point.

      All of the examples you pointed out are for higher end performance cars. These cars are usually handled in a genital manner. I remember a story where Prince Charles got angry at Di after she sat on the hood of his car at a polo game and left a bum imprint. That is not going to cut it for a “work” truck which is constantly being banged into, sat on, having things tied on, etc.

      Personally, I am trying to figure out how these things are going to get repaired. If I understand it correctly, repairing steel parts is very different than aluminum. (FYI, I know quite a few farms who take a DYI attitude towards auto repair. I don’t think they will be happy.)

    3. Re:20 year old news? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And Obama wasn't the first black man in the world. But he was the first one to be elected President of the United States.

      This is the big time. The F-series is America's best-selling vehicle for the last 28 consecutive years.

    4. Re:20 year old news? by MisterSquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      These cars are usually handled in a genital manner. I remember a story where Prince Charles got angry at Di after she sat on the hood of his car at a polo game and left a bum imprint.

      I respect your anatomical specificity and historical knowledge, but just to be clear Diana's bum is not technically part of her genitals.

      --
      blog
    5. Re:20 year old news? by njnnja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The F-150 is the best selling vehicle (car, truck, or suv) in North America,and has been for almost 20 years. This isn't some niche manufacturer that is going to sell 50,000 units and be happy with it. Ford is expecting to sell millions of these before then can do another redesign, so if it isn't successful it's a serious problem, and therefore it's a huge risk.

      Furthermore, losing 700 lbs on every one of the millions of these that are going to be sold over the next few years will do more to reduce dependency on foreign oil and co2 emissions than all of the zero emission vehicles put together. So as cool as the technology behind electric and hybrid cars is, if you want to burn less gas, you have to root for advances in truck technology such as this.

    6. Re:20 year old news? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The weight savings were not small.

      Gross weight for a class 8 tractor trailer combination on US highways is 80,000 pounds. Guys who had all steel tractors and trailers were sometimes unable to load 43,000 pounds. Most were able to load 45,000 pounds. Just about no one was able to load 47,000 pounds, and still be legal. With my aluminum Mack and aluminum Cobra trailer, I routinely loaded 51,000 pounds, and scaled it legally.

      Since I got paid a percentage of what the load grossed, you can see that I was effectively being paid for ten loads, with the same time and effort that other drivers were being paid for nine.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:20 year old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Get your facts and reasonable arguments the fuck out of here. Almost like you though this place was used for discussion rather than epeen measurement, one upmanship, "same as in my day"isms, cynicisms, and conspiracy theory airing. Asshole!

    8. Re:20 year old news? by rts008 · · Score: 3

      We can just chalk it up to bad aim by the Prince.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    9. Re:20 year old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This comment always made me laugh. The only reason why Ford trucks were the best selling trucks in the world is because GMC split their models into two - Chev and GM (stupid as it may be).

      Check the graph at http://wap.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html

      You will see the that GM actually out sold Ford in 2012 by 62,000 units in the light truck market (F-150 is a light truck) and are outselling in 2013 by 50,000 units.

    10. Re:20 year old news? by CaptSlaq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder when I can get an aluminum Mustang so I can polish it like a P-51.

      Sweet.

      Have something a little more interesting.

  2. Make it nearly 70 by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Land Rover.

    1. Re:Make it nearly 70 by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhm, the Landover is the British equivalent of the US pickup truck, you would certainly not be out of place hauling half a tonne of cinder blocks in one, or even almost a tonne of paving slabs as I did a couple months ago in my Defender...

    2. Re:Make it nearly 70 by Hall · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the United States, Land Rover = Range Rover and these are "upscale" SUVs here. Rich people, celebrities, etc drive them.... They're a completely different animal than the Land Rovers that my uncles and cousins have in N Ireland with rubber floor mats, vinyl seats, bench seats in the back that run lengthwise, and so on !

    3. Re:Make it nearly 70 by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      F150s can be for work, but the majority of people I see buying them never put anything heavier then ikea furniture in the back and would not even know where the hitch is.

    4. Re:Make it nearly 70 by rtkluttz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lighter truck just cannot do the same work as a heavier truck. Even if it were made out of theoretical indestructible materials. Modern trucks have had engines and bodies capable of hauling/pulling loads many times greater than they can effectively stop. Weight is about STOPPING a load and trailering it in a stable fashion. Even if it had an unlimited energy drivetrain and was built with theoretical indestructible materials, a light truck will get pushed down the road or thrown into a ditch by an unstable load if it doesn't have the weight on top of the tires. Lighter truck = less work done safely. Period.

      --
      Digital is, by definition, imperfect. Analog is the way to go.
    5. Re:Make it nearly 70 by Above · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When they first came out, that was true:

      • F-150 == 1/2 ton
      • F-250 == 3/4 ton
      • F-350 == 1 ton

      (And for my fine foreign friends, that's US ton, 2,000 lb, or 907 kg.)

      However, that is no longer true, and the wide variety of sub models makes it even more complicated. Here's a payload capacity chart for the 2014 F-150.

      The lowest is an SVT Raptor with only 980 lb payload capacity, while the highest is a staggering 3,120 lb for a regular cab, 4x2 with the heavy duty payload package and a v8 engine! That's a 1.5 ton capacity!

      F-250's and F-350's have similar ranges.

    6. Re:Make it nearly 70 by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, there are lots of normal tenant farmers who use a Landrover, and as such its pretty much the standard vehicle you see on a British farm other than the usual tractor et al. You can drop the attempt at making it into a rich persons vehicle, as it is far from it - its just a damn good investment, the same as a tractor or other farm tool.

      A brand new Landrover Defender will set you back a fair whack, but as they are fairly indestructible you can usually pick up a 30 year old model which will do you nicely on the farm, be easy to repair and still run for the next decade or more with normal maintenance for less than $5000. As its the main vehicle of the British armed forces, there are always surplus vehicles being pensioned off and you can pick these up at auction for less than $5000.

      You buy a brand new Defender if you want to pick the exact configuration you want, but most people make do with a second hand one which will run just as nicely.

    7. Re:Make it nearly 70 by ApplePy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Eh... it's not a limit or anything. It's a general rating category. I'm honestly not sure how they arrive at those categories. The higher the rating, however, the beefier the suspension, mostly.

      My old 3/4 ton Ford doesn't really break a sweat hauling 2 tons. (And those would be your 2,000 pound tons.)

      --
      That I'm right, and you don't like it, doesn't mean I'm a troll.
    8. Re:Make it nearly 70 by confused+one · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The rating system was created shortly after WWII at the behest of the U.S. Government. They wanted an easy way for procurement officers to know which vehicle to select when processing a requisition. Prior to this system you had things like Ford F-1's and Chevy 3100's which are the same category. So a simple rating system was devised: F-100, C-10, D-100, etc. were the "1/2 ton class" F-200, C-20, D-200, were the "3/4 ton class" and so on. The trucks have grown in size and increased significantly in capacity since then; so, the model numbers no longer have a basis in reality.

  3. It's probably necessary by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll note that my truck has a synthetic 'plastic' bed, it works great, and is probably as tough as a rhinoliner coated steel bed. I'm sure it saves weight/cost.

    The failure mechanics of aluminum is different than steel, but it is possible for it to be stronger for the weight. As a bonus, you shouldn't have nearly the rust problems. As usual, I'd be leery of buying the first year's model.

    I'm still holding out for my strong hybrid truck though.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:It's probably necessary by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure Ford's ability to make anything rust will transcend the laws of physics and we'll see aluminum transmute directly to iron oxide.

  4. It's probably not risky... by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people care more about the status symbol of the new shiney, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it used in a series of Dodge/Chevy ads. "Silverado, tough as steel" or some such.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:It's probably not risky... by minstrelmike · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most people care more about the status symbol of the new shiney, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it used in a series of Dodge/Chevy ads. "Silverado, tough as steel" or some such.

      Ford: Made battle armor tough.
      I don't think it'll be a hard sell at all to the macho guys. Buy a truck made out of battle armor that reinforced humvees!?! Are you kidding me?
      Calling it a "rolling beer can" is just frosting on the cake.

  5. Re:Aluminum shortage? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not speculation by Goldman Sachs but a little scam that they figured out how to do.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  6. And I Will Stop Buying... by deKernel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can tell that both the designers and people who think this is a great idea don't actually use a pickup for a living. I use a pickup on a ranch, and I use it HARD so that is where I am coming from. The new pickups in the last 10 years just don't last anymore because they are making them lighter and more economical to drive, and they just can't take the abuse that workers put them through on a daily bases.

    1. Re:And I Will Stop Buying... by thesandbender · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Aluminum is a perfectly sound material as long as it's used correctly. It's been used in aircraft, rockets and other vehicles that take stresses far beyond what you will ever do to your truck. Flying may seem like it doesn't generate much stress but the loads on a 747 or A380 when they are landing are tremendous. The regular compression/decompression cycles that a plane goes through when going from ground level to altitude are also impressive when you look at the numbers. The fact that we consider it so commonplace is a testimony to how durable aluminum is. The average person is shocked when they see the thickness of the tubing used in bicycles, including downhill mountain bikes which take one hell of a beating.

      But this is all contingent on how the aluminum is employed. If they have good, experienced engineers then this can only end well (I'd love to have a truck that didn't rust).

  7. You must be joking by dbIII · · Score: 5, Informative

    No one hauls a half ton of cinder bocks in a land rover.

    Of course they do. On the other hand I haven't heard of the F150 on battlefields while Land Rovers have had a lot of military use. Of course they are "for work".

    1. Re:You must be joking by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      US versions of Range Rovers tend to start at $83,000 and come - base - with nice leather appointments, heated seats, and the like. Not much like a Hummer at all (the original Hummer, that is) - unless you added a bunch of options.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  8. Re:Weight-saving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been bouncing the idea of a pickup truck for about 10 years. My wife wants an F150 and swears it will be our next car. Until that happens, I have a 4x8 trailer with a 1500lb capacity (I've used it for more on short trips) which I got about 10 years ago new for about $500. It costs nothing for insurance and only $8 a year in personal property taxes. I have a hitch on 2 of my cars. I use it for dirt, mulch, my ATV's, taking stuff to the garbage dump and picking up and transporting large objects materials and large stuff I buy from stores. I'd say overall it averages two uses a month minimum. I don't care about it's condition meaning I don't worry about tossing stuff in it, scratching it, using a shovel on it etc. I could not imagine myself spending $45k on a shiny new truck and taking it to the stock yard and getting a 1/2 yard of gravel dumped in it from a front loader. My trailer? Who cares.

    The one I have is similar to this:
    http://www.tractorsupply.com/en/store/carry-on-trailerreg%3B-5-ft-w-x-8-ft-l-specialty-single-axle-trailer-1500-lb-payload-capacity

    I put some plywood on the deck and and on the sides.

    If you have room to store one, they make great haulers.

  9. Is this really "rolling the dice"? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They didn't just have one guy say "hey, let's switch everything over to aluminum and see what happens". They had engineers work on it, they reviewed the costs, forecasted the risks and expected benefits, etc. They know what they are doing. There is little if anything left to chance on this. Most likely they did a number of aluminum prototypes and ran them around on the proving grounds with aluminum versions of existing body panels so as to not draw additional attention.

    Big companies like Ford don't just do things like this on a whim, they can't afford to. The American car companies still have the black eye of their quality problems from the 80s and 90s; they are one misstep away from corporate ruin. While the F150 is still the top selling vehicle on the planet, they can't afford to take it for granted or to leave its fate to chance.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  10. Most popular vehicle? Wow... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's just staggering, that this is the most popular vehicle in the USA. It's about the same size/weight as a European 8-seater minibus! And this isn't at all the biggest Ford sell, is it? I've seen things on the motorway there that are almost bus sized.

    --
    I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    1. Re:Most popular vehicle? Wow... by LordNacho · · Score: 4, Informative

      My thought as well. It's totally baffling that this beast is the world's top selling car. I'm a European currently visiting the US, and my wife and I are constantly pointing at what to us looks like a monster truck. I actually took a photo of me standing next to a random US pickup truck to demonstrate the ridiculousness of a car whose roof I can barely touch.

      The pickup idea is also completely foreign to me as a European city-dweller. Maybe it's because I have a family I can't see why they don't just put in a row of folding seats. I've never needed to carry anything that my Freelander couldn't handle.

      I love the names though. They really know how to name the giant vehicles. Ram, Silverado, Expedition, Armada...

  11. It might be time for you to upgrade by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can tell that both the designers and people who think this is a great idea don't actually use a pickup for a living. I use a pickup on a ranch, and I use it HARD so that is where I am coming from. The new pickups in the last 10 years just don't last anymore because they are making them lighter and more economical to drive, and they just can't take the abuse that workers put them through on a daily bases.

    Independent studies place the F150 basically equal (depending on which metric) in durability with the Silverado 1500 and Ram 1500. If you are wearing out your trucks it might be time you look in to the 250 (or higher) series. The 150 series trucks from each of the manufacturers are designed to match their usual working demands - most people who buy them live in the city and drive them mostly on the road. The most common cargo (in this country especially) in the bed of a pickup is air.

    The 150 trucks are designed mostly for the urban handyman who occasionally pulls around and launches his own fishing boat on the weekend. They're good trucks but don't try to overstate their purpose.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  12. Re:Minor problem with aluminum by LordNacho · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatigue_limit

    Useful graph. The wording "no limit" can be a bit confusing to people who haven't done a materials course. In this case, having a limit is good.

  13. 1948 by dbIII · · Score: 4, Informative

    The 1948 Land Rover had an aluminium body and so has all of it's direct "descendants" up to the current Land Rover Defender.
    I don't know why people here see fit to "correct" stuff they don't know about.

  14. Re:and the 2013 Range Rover by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first Land Rovers where built out of left overs from the war. England had a lot of aluminum for aircraft construction but where building few aircraft.
    Steel has some real benefits for car bodies like the fact that is is more springy than aluminum, it will flex a little and bounce back it is also easier to weld and tends to be harder. It is also stronger for a given thickness.
    Aluminum is much more corrosion resistant and stronger per mass.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.