Slashdot Mirror


The Biggest Tech Mishap of 2013?

Nerval's Lobster writes "Some high-profile tech initiatives really crashed-and-burned this year. Did BlackBerry executives really think that BlackBerry 10 would spark a miraculous turnaround, or were they simply going through the motions of promoting it? That's the key question as BlackBerry 10 devices fail to sell. Then there's Facebook's misbegotten attempt at 'skinning' the Android OS with its Home app. Or maybe Healthcare.gov counts as 2013's biggest debacle, with its repeated crashes and glitches and inability to carry out core functions. What do you think was the biggest software or hardware (or both) mishap of the past twelve months?"

41 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. My company by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company got bought by private equity. It's depressing to watch as the company is managed by people who don't understand our products and don't care.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:My company by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I'm get hired for my skills and one of my skills

      is clearly not proofreading grammar in the morning.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  2. NSA leaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    NSA leak was the most damagind and biggest tech fail.
    They still don't know what was taken.

    1. Re:NSA leaking by MobSwatter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then why does the economic damage predate the leak? Everyone knew what was going on from the days of the AT&T disclosure, Snowden only provided the physical evidence for Americans to act on it. I happen to have a little experience with the intelligence community, had a great uncle that was OSS when it incepted to be the CIA in 1947. Keep secrets they did, spy on Americans; no they didn't, weaken encryption resulting in fraudulent sales of security devices, no they did not, were they saints, not really however that was a matter of prospective, but as a nation we were stronger. Our constitution meant something then, so did a mans word, and sworn oath.

  3. Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    taco must be turning in his grave

    1. Re:Slash!dot Beta by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      taco must be turning in his grave

      Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta! Bring out your beta!
      Here's one
      9 pence
      I'm not dead!
      What?
      Nothing, here's your 9 pence.
      I'm not dead!
      'ere, he says he's not dead.
      Yes he is.
      I'm not!
      He isn't?
      Well, he will be soon, he's very ill.
      I'm getting better!

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Slash!dot Beta by chromas · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's a good Python script you got there. Unfortunately, Slashdot is written in Perl.

    3. Re:Slash!dot Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are you using that gawdoffal interface? Just use the classic interface. I tried the beta for all of two minutes, UGH!

      It's telling, though, that the beta interface is so horrible that an offtopic comment that only mentions how horrible the beta is gets moderated 4, insightful. Slashdot staff, are you listening to your users?

  4. I'd say the target hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They lost credit card numbers... pin codes!? and the c v v codes?!?!?!? what. the. fuck.

    Why were they even storing those. at all. thats some world class fuckup that's going to cost many thousands of people real money. Theres no writeoff for regular people unlike businesses. People are Fucked...

    Altho it's slightly more than a "mishap".

    It's either that or the obamacare fuckup. But really who expected a goverment website to work right... Thats like a normal fuckup for us.

    Or maybe the NSA being such treasonous completely useless wastes of space and money who should all be swinging at the end of a rope.
    But that goes beyond just this year too. They've been shitheads for a long time. We just now know about it for sure.

  5. My vote is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The NSA's exfiltration detection system...

  6. Snowden by supersat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm pretty sure it was hiring Edward Snowden as your SharePoint admin.

    1. Re:Snowden by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      Or, more importantly, giving your Sharepoint admin who has a copy of the constitution sitting next to his keyboard, wears an EFF hoodie that mocks the NSA to work every day, and has turned down promotions due to moral objections to the agencies activities full admin access to everything you have.

  7. Obligatory by dubdays · · Score: 5, Funny

    The year of the Linux desktop. But, dammit, 2014 is DEFINITELY going to be THE year!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory by binarylarry · · Score: 2

      Windows 8 is definitely helping the cause
      Linux dominates the mobile world with Android
      ChromeOS (another Linux-based operating system) is apparently very popular and already has nearly 25% of new laptop sales in the US
      There's SteamOS which is a big question mark still

      ZOMG It could actually happen in 2014!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  8. Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For demonstrating that forcing a tablet interface on desktop users does not help your bottom line.

  9. HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No contest. It's got everything: hubris, cronyism, bureaucratic bungling, political idiocy, numerous huge IT errors, hundreds of millions of dollars. Once all the details come out, this massive fail will be studied in universities. Books will be written. The political consequences will last for years. Coming soon: the doctor shortages. And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No contest. It's got everything: hubris, cronyism, bureaucratic bungling, political idiocy, numerous huge IT errors, hundreds of millions of dollars. Once all the details come out, this massive fail will be studied in universities. Books will be written. The political consequences will last for years. Coming soon: the doctor shortages. And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

      Yep.

      The idea that there is even some question about what the biggest tech mishap of 2013 is says a lot about Slashdot/techie politics. When you go all in for someone, it's very hard to admit later that you were wrong.

    2. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And does everyone know that in 2014, the health plan tax kicks in? I don't mean the "Cadillac plan" tax, or the tax if you don't have insurance. I mean the 2% tax on every health plan. Yes, in order to make health insurance more "affordable," they are taxing health insurance! Words fail.

      Well, I'm assuming the goal is to use that money to provide health plans to those who can't afford them, obviously if more people get coverage than before and the costs per person don't go down the total will go up. Here in Norway it's a tax for employers when they pay me income, essentially for every 100 NOK I get they must pay 7.80 NOK to the government. If there's a street bum with no income, get still gets the same healthcare as me and obviously that's coming out of the pockets of everyone else. If we took away the tax and let everyone get their own insurance I'd be paying for just me, right? And the bum would probably die, but let's leave morality out it for a second.

      By making sure everyone is in good health and vaccinated, we reduce the spread of disease and infection. If some of the uncovered people could get back into taxable work they could become an asset or at least less of a tax burden. Desperate people who need money for surgery can lead to crime and exploitation. And most of all, we don't throw hot potatoes around in the system trying to deny or revoke their coverage. The overhead is far less. I'm also fairly confident I will get an appropriate treatment based on medical needs, of course our doctors and nurses are just as human as anyone else but at least I'm not fighting a giant insurance company who want my treatment to be cheap as possible without getting sued and lose.

      If you want to take non-tech mishaps then Obamacare is taking on all the challenges and costs of socialized medicine while providing little to none of the benefits other countries have. The Democrats sacrificed the soul of the system, while the Republicans have poisoned the apple so it's set up to fail. In a few years it'll be a disaster and everyone in the US will agree socialized medicine can't work, despite all the pointing to what happens in pinko commie land.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only input the Republicans had was forcing Congress to have to use the same plan. Any claim they changed the bill otherwise is an outright lie, period.

      The subsidies, to make it affordable, are tax credits. If you pay no federal income tax (47% of the country) you get no subsidy. If you make under $17K you get no subsidy. It caps out, so if you make over $43K you get no subsidy. The amount of tax you pay on $43K is not much because of our tax system and deductions, and if your subsidy is greater than what you pay in federal income tax you don't get that extra.

      The subsidies will help some people, but the LARGE MAJORITY will get nothing from it. The 47% who pay no taxes, or those who make too much, will get nothing leaving only a small percentage of citizens able to qualify for anything. Those who do qualify will get tiny amounts, regardless of what was promised by the web site.

      The DNC knows this and is trying to figure out how to spin it. One of their failed attempts is to blame the GOP for writing it bad, like the above poster did, but everyone knows the GOP had nothing to do with it and didn't vote for it at all. They even managed to call it Obamacare, and Obama himself said he was proud to have it called that, now he regrets saying that and people are spinning that its only called that because of the GOP.

      Just watch over the next year as the GOP is blamed for every single failure despite it being 100% written by, voted by, run by, and owned by the DNC.

    4. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's funny is that the person you are quoting barely even mentions the TECH mishap - he sums it up as "numerous huge IT errors" but then goes on a rant about things that have NOTHING to do with the fucked up launch of healthcare.gov, but you want to claim that other people can't seem to separate their politics from their ability to assess the success or failure of a tech project. What the ever loving fuck does someone saying there will be doctor shortages, or a 2% tax, have to do with the website sucking? Nothing. Stop projecting your partisanship onto other people.

      Personally I hate the ACA because it isn't single payer and all it will wind up doing is delaying actual healthcare reform in this country by decades while simultaneously keeping a useless industry alive. In any case, this story isn't about politics, it's about tech fuckups in 2013. So:

      As an IT project, Healthcare.gov was an abortion. You had project management that was behaving in a fairly schizophrenic fashion (namely, political leadership who were battling over the ACA trying to repeal/defend it) leading to delays in starting implementation, you had incompetent contractors hired to put it out, you had incompetent developers building it (my god, the amount of pointless data streaming up and down was staggering, the front end code we could see was incompetent at best, the whole mess was completely non-performant) and then to top it off, as a post-mortem it seems that most were trying to assign blame and score political gotcha points and throwing up all kinds of irrelevant shit rather than just dealing with reality and trying to do a solid job implementing the law of the land.

      I do agree there can be no doubt that Healthcare.gov is the absolute biggest fuck-up of the year.

      Though my vote for worst tech issue of the year definitely goes to the NSA stuff - I'll take a thousand shitty websites over big brother any day.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    5. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by PapayaSF · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think the contractor deserves all the blame. They screwed up big-time, true, but they had a very difficult task, perhaps an impossible one. Communicating in real time with dozens of pre-existing government and insurance company databases is hard. They also had to dance to the tune of their political masters, so they got requirements late because the administration didn't want Republicans to know the gory details before the 2012 elections, and because the website flowchart was complicated by the fact that the administration didn't want visitors to see plan costs before subsidies, to reduce sticker shock.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    6. Re:HealthCare.gov, by a mile by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      The amount of tax you pay on $43K is not much because of our tax system and deductions

      Bullshit, I make a little more than that but I'm paying thousands in federal tax; I pay thousands in federal income tax and even more in SS and Medicare tax.

      As to Romney's "47% pay no federal tax", that's as much a lie as saying that Romney pays no Federal tax; his income is capital gains, which is covered by a different tax and not counted as regular income. Everyone who smokes a cigar or buys alcoholic beverages or drives or rides public transportation is paying Federal excise taxes on that tobacco, alcohol, and fuel. And the poor are probably paying a higher percentage of their income in excise taxes than Romney pays in capital gains taxes.

  10. Re:That's easy.... by dubdays · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Healthcare.gov? That's a junior league fuck-up... I nominate the NSA for getting pwned and punked by one Edward Joseph Snowden who walked out of their secure computer facility with all of Americas dirty laundry on a USB stick.

    Too bad it's pretty much amounted to nothing positive thus far. The president hasn't done shit to change anything, congress critters NEVER do shit (except contribute massive amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere), and the general public pretty much doesn't give a shit. Don't get me wrong, Snowden's a hero in my book, but the revelations really haven't had a significant impact on US society as a whole, sad as that may be.

  11. Re:All of the above by Onuma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Arguably, the mistakes RIM made with Blackberry go back about 7 years or so. When they didn't react smartly to the advent of the iPhone and Android devices, they started hammering the nails into their own coffin.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  12. I nominate: by Xeno+man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm gona throw in a nomination for EA and the launch of Sim City. While probably not the largest screw up, I would say they had the most warning. With security breaches or even building a new Health care website, there are unknowns. You can't predict when someone is going to steal your data or how they are going to do it outside of a few tech guys that know how their systems work and whos warnings go unheard. EA had everyone screaming at them to not use DRM but they did anyway. They were warned that if they did use DRM that servers would be maxed out on launch day. They claimed that they were prepared for it but obviously they were not. They were warned and people begged for them to listen but they didn't and come launch day, everything they were warned about happened. It wasn't a minor hiccup either as it took a month for everything to be sorted out.

    If that's not a screw up, I don't know what is.

    1. Re:I nominate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Sim City 4 screwup is even larger than DRM servers.

      They claimed the need the servers to simulate a total lot of the cities and that this was too much for the average PC. So the need to simulate the cities on the server. That was a lie. Sim City 4 is not really a good simulation, it works with very simplified models which create all kinds of odd occurances in the cities (which are totally unrealistic). For example? They simulate Sims in packs of 1000s, so skyscrapers are empty when one "sim pack" leaves. Every Sim drives the shortest route to the closest(!) place of work and also from there to the closest (!) free house. That leads to jammed roades even if a bypass freeway is near (and empty), this leads to entire regions where people cannot find work even if there's a lot of shops, these simplified simulations lead to all kinds of stupidity in a game that claims to be a "simulation".

      Everyone said their maps are too small. They ignored it and now people complain the maps are too small.

      People did want to build their city, but now are forced to build several small ones in their "regions", I guess the developers and publishers had the wet dream to create a large, buzzing online environment where ten people each build their small, specialised city in their own region and happily working together. But totally neglected that their audience wants to build their own megacity, not ten small pieces or one small piece and work with someone else.

      Sim City 4 is acutally a bigger screwup than you make it out to be and what sets this apart from other "bad" games are two things: First the lies and the deliberate deception of game magazines and customers before the release who much the game would actually simulate. Second, the screwups are not issues of bad implementation or limited budget of a small developer who planned and wanted too much. Many of the really big, bad issues of this games are actually working as designed. They are not bad code, incompetence of a few coders, bad planning what you can do, but fundamentally wrong strategy, misunderstanding what the franchise is, the attempt to turn it into something that cannot work with the franchise and planning from the very core by the publisher and game designers.

      So yes, I do say Sim City 4 fully counts and EA/Maxis screwed up much more and on a much deeper level than parent is giving them credit for.

  13. Nokia by jbernardo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know, it's a slow motion train wreck that started in 2011, but the death by Elop was consummated only in 2013, with the fire sale to Microsoft.

  14. Website makeover by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without a doubt, the biggest tech failure of the year is slashdot's new mobile site, and the horendous beta desktop site. I can't imagine the motivation behind the flashy, slow, non-functional mess. If classic.slashdot.org ever goes away, so too will I.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Website makeover by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Could not agree more, somehow a week ago I got directed to the beta site. All I could think was "What the FUCK are you guys doing", Slashdot has gotten worse and worse with each new version but if that shit that is in beta goes live this place will become a ghost town.

  15. Re:Windows 8.1 by dubdays · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The implementation of which (if you can call it that) is just as useless as not having one at all. MSFT basically said "fuck you" and gave us a useless little button that doesn't do anything new.

  16. iOS 7 by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple basically threw away everything that made iOS look approachable and polished.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:iOS 7 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend wanted an iPad Air for xmas, and when I suggested a Nexus 7 she thought I was just being cheap... So I got her one. I'm not that familiar with iOS or previous iPads but it was pretty disappointing out of the box.

      The box itself has the iPad, a USB charger and a cable. That's it. Not even headphones or a cleaning cloth or a stand or something. Turning the iPad on the first thing you see is a white screen that shows up how uneven the backlight is at the edges of the screen perfectly. The set up process is rather long... She set it to Chinese so I couldn't read all of it, but considering she already had an Apple account for her iPhone 4 I would have expected a single log-in to be pretty much all that was required. It seems to duplicate a lot of questions too, like asking you for interface language, then keyboards, then location... on a device with GPS, wifi and mobile network access.

      Once you get into the main OS it is slick enough, as smooth as my Nexus 5. None of her apps were installed though, she had to do that manually. That seems to be the way of iOS: it makes you work, do everything manually. For example, when you install an app it just dumps the icon on the home screen in the order you installed it. There isn't an app tray, no alphabetical list. You have to organize all apps yourself, sort and categorize them. No widgets, so you have to open an app to get some tiny bit of information. The notification area only has basic controls so most notifications require opening an app too. When you want to move data from app to app there is no simple sharing mechanism, it's a save/switch/load or copy/switch/paste operation.

      The UI is inconsistent too. Maybe this is an iOS7 thing, I don't know. For example, there is no back button, so backing out or cancelling things is handled differently by each app. In some apps it isn't even obvious what is a button and what isn't, which is an issue for Android as well but at least you can always just hit back if you don't want to do something.

      I suppose it's okay as a tablet. You can learn to use it. Not having used iOS extensively I assumed most of the issues I knew about were geek things that normal people didn't care about, but actually a lot of it is basic usability issues. I guess with all the hype I was surprised, I expected more. Definitely expected more for the money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:iOS 7 by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I just wanted to offer some explanations for some of what you're talking about. I'm not really setting out to defend it, just explain it, since I agree with many of your observations.

      I know the iPhones come with a cleaning cloth and headphones with an in-line mic for use on calls. I'd assume the iPad comes with a cleaning cloth as well, likely tucked away in the back of one of the packages included in the box just like it is with the iPhones (I seem to recall it being folded neatly in the back of the package that had the manual or something).

      A single login really is all that's required if you've enabled iCloud backups, which have been around since iOS 5, if memory serves. It'll simply restore all of your apps exactly as they were on your old device onto the new one, along with settings, data, etc.. If you don't have that enabled for some reason, then that means that you've either chosen to stick with iTunes backups (which you can use to do a restore as well, though they're more of a hassle) or not doing backups at all (in which case you're on your own).

      Asking which keyboard you want to use after selecting Chinese as your language makes sense, given that there are several you may want to choose from, depending on your preference. If she had selected English, I'm fairly certain it doesn't prompt you the same way, though I may be mistaken. And asking you for your keyboard preferences before asking you to log in makes sense, since your login info might rely on input from a character set other than whatever default keyboard they might have chosen for you would have.

      I don't believe it prompts you for a location during setup. Rather, as I recall, it prompts you for whether or not you want to enable Location Services (i.e. the location-tracking technologies you're talking about), since by default all Apple devices have that functionality disabled in order to protect the privacy of the user. Since that functionality is important for a lot of features, however, they prompt you during setup to opt-in to having Location Services enabled.

      iOS 7 very much so has some issues with being clear about what is or isn't a button, since they removed a lot of the chrome indicating what users can or cannot interact with. Apple has a tendency to swing a bit too far whenever they completely overhaul a design, and then tone it down a bit with their subsequent iterations, and iOS 7 is no exception (see also: Final Cut Pro X, Mac OS X 10.0, the 2013 iWork overhaul, etc.). For instance, when OS X 10.0 originally came out in 2001, it had transparency and glow effects out the wazoo that were horrible for usability (but which they kept since the eye candy was a major selling point at the time). They started showing more restraint and toning the effects down by 10.2, and that trend continued until we've generally hit a point of equilibrium where they're only present inasmuch as they actually assist usability (which is why Mac fans got a chuckle out of Vista fans touting Aero's transparency effects, since OS X had already been down the path of overdone transparency and come back after realizing what a bad idea it was). Of course, they always find new things to overdo, be it brushed aluminum or this recent trend of minimalistic text-based interfaces.

      That said, I wouldn't say that the back button is a point of inconsistency, though I can certainly see why it'd seem that way if you're coming from Android. With the exception of games or apps that have fully custom UIs, the back button is essentially always in the top left corner of the screen on iOS. The difference with Android, however, is that iOS' back button is more like Android's Up button in terms of functionality (i.e. it takes the user back through a hierarchically organized stack of screens, staying within the current app, whereas Android's Back button takes a user back through a chronologically organized stack of screens, potentially jumping between apps), and apps label the button with whatever the user will be going back to, rather than just the g

  17. ...and the winner is: by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Tech Companies" for allowing the NSA infiltration for fear of the federal and state governments frowning upon them and shifting their privileges to other industries and companies. It's like a no-choice NDA; it's just put on you without your agreement or consent, but with an expectation of fulfillment or consequence. For shame no decent leaks came from Google, Apple, Microsoft, random users/hackers/crackers, designers and manufacturers, etc. before Snowden. Only now companies position themselves with the product/customer, saying they were forced but are glad they can admit to (and hopefully reform) it. Strange and mistrustful times.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  18. Re:Windows 8.1 by oji-sama · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you set it up to use the same background as on the desktop the transition is less disturbing. After tweaking the location of the little squares I find it usable, although not an improvement. I set a few updating columns to left, then a couple of columns of static icons related to different tasks and now along with the win+q (which doesn't open the whole modern UI anymore) can find/open stuff pretty quickly.

    I still dislike the way right button is handled in the modern UI. Give me my context menus back. Unnecessary useless movements are unnecessary.

    --
    It is what it is.
  19. Re:International Space Station by savuporo · · Score: 2

    Actually come to think of it, Proton faceplanting spectacularly at Baikonur might be a bit bigger, in terms of explosive power

    http://www.parabolicarc.com/2013/07/01/spectacular-video-of-russian-proton-failure/

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  20. The Year No One Learned From Mistakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    2013 is notable for being the year the technology industry did not learn from its mistakes. There's no one single worst mistake. It's like the year Time magazine put a mirror on the cover - the entire industry is to blame!

    Windows 8. Gnome 3. Unity. iOS 7. What is the lesson? Users do not want gratuitous change that destroys workflow patterns and muscle memory, and yet technology companies keep cramming them down our throats. In 2013, Windows 8.1 came out and it was just more of the same. iOS 7 destroyed everything we knew about Apple's "it just works" usability, and threw in a snow-blindness photo browser with a white background just to put salt in the wounds. The only thing we can look forward to is more change for the sake of change.

    Healthcare.gov is just a symptom of a dysfunctional system of outsourcing to contractors who skim their money off the top, and then hire technology experts with whatever is left, insuring any technology project is going to fail. No one seems to care about quality. That's why software projects fail. Until structural changes are made in how technology is created, nothing will change.

    Lessons were there to be learned from, but in 2013, forget it - no one cared.

  21. Blackberry 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have the Z10. I don't play games. The phone was built around communication. E-mail, face book, phone calls, BBM. I feel sorry for anyone that chooses Android or iOS over a new Z10 or Z30 if they use it primarily for communications.

    There are less games/apps but I can do everything I want to do with it. There are enough games to keep me entertained. And with the exception of no Netflix, it does everything most would want. Thing is, you can install Android apps on the phone and support for that improves with every OS release.

    The phone's user interface also shows how last gen Android and iOS are.

  22. ObamaCare website by enharmonix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whether you agree w/ the Affordable Care Act or not, it is legally required that everybody have insurance. When you've got a government mandate to use a website* and that website doesn't work, that's a pretty big problem.

    * Yes, I am aware there are other ways to sign up. But a) have you ever had to wait for service at any office run by the government? and b) isn't this 2013? almost 2014?

  23. Fukushima by jasenj1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The disaster at the Fukushima nuclear power plant continues to be mismanaged. Incompetence and corruption abound and give a giant black eye to nuclear power in general.

    healthcare.gov is a great example of corruption in government contracts and the cost of rolling out something that isn't done. Maybe nerds around the world will now have another line for over-eager managers: "Do you want another healthcare.gov?"

    - Jasen.

  24. I'm sure you know this, but ... by dbIII · · Score: 2

    That's the responsibility which comes from taking on a contract that pays so well. If you can't get the resources together for such a thing you are not supposed to bid. If you don't have the expertise to communicate with the stakeholders then you are supposed to get people in who can or you are not supposed to bid.
    Whoever accepts the bid has only the track record of the bidder and their word to go by. Unless the bidder has a terrible, or complete lack of reputation, you can't really blame the person accepting the bid. The above poster has gone far beyond that - blaming the person that employs the person that accepted the bid of the people that fucked up. That's an insanely long chain of blame. As such it tells us that the above poster has an axe to grind and is grasping at straws to do it, or has been been conned by someone doing so.

    So just cheerleading.

    A complete waste of time on a technically leaning site where plenty of us don't give a shit about Republicans or Democrats but would like to hear about which contractors to avoid like the plague (or SAP, or IBM).