Slashdot Mirror
International Space Station Mission Extended To 2024
An anonymous reader writes with news that funding has been secured for the ISS through at least 2024. From NASA: "'...We are pleased to announce that the Obama Administration has approved an extension of the International Space Station until at least 2024. We are hopeful and optimistic that our ISS partners will join this extension effort and thus enable continuation of the groundbreaking research being conducted in this unique orbiting laboratory for at least another decade. ... A further benefit of ISS extension is it will give NASA and its private-sector partners time to more fully transition to the commercial space industry the transportation of cargo and crew to low-Earth-orbit, allowing NASA to continue to increase its focus on developing the next-generation heavy-lift rocket and crew capsule necessary for deep-space exploration."
"If you like your space station you can keep your space station."
Let's hope Obama wasn't kidding this time.
Thanks for spending my money on something I actually can get behind instead of just spending it on tracking my phone calls, funding terrorist organizations and god knows what else.
Maybe you can keep this up and we can have a real science budget in the USA.
Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
Ah, yes, because the unmanned probes are doing such a great job on the experiments where humans are the test subjects. At least those probes, carrying a dozen experiments each, are getting a lot of science done. After all, the ISS crew isn't busy or anything, right?
You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
The problem with that is that space is a bitch of an environment to maintain something as complex as the ISS over time. Unless you're only looking at another decade or two of life, you'll probably see it reach the point where it's cheaper and easier to build a new space station, moonbase or Mars base than it is to continue maintaining the ISS. There's also few practical options for preserving it as a piece of history, no matter how cool that would be.
I agree that all participants have to say yes. But the Ruskies, Europeans and the 'Muricans are the three largest investors, and therefore it is a step in the right direction that Obama made the money available.
They where already planning for the demise of the ISS. They where going to salvage parts that they owned and create their own orbiting platform for deep space exploration. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_Piloted_Assembly_and_Experiment_Complex
"File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
Good news for the Russian Space Agency. They get to ferry Americans up to space for at least another 10 years.
I wouldn't be so quick to make that assumption. There are certainly other vehicles which can take people to the ISS besides the Soyuz spacecraft, and one of which will be flying within the decade. I would even suggest all three will be flying routinely.
It is a collaborative effort of many people and many nations
Yes, it's a collaborative international effort and three quarters of the budget has come from the US.
That's an extremely one-sided view of scientific research. The private market only cares about discoveries that can be monetized within the next few years. Any big discoveries that would take too much time, money, or risk get thrown off the table. Those discoveries were usually funded by the government and led to such breakthroughs as going to the moon. At its peak, the U.S. used the combined might of our private AND public sectors to dominate nearly every corner of science and engineering. Now, many people such as yourself think that the road back to recovery with new big players in the game such as China can be handled single-handedly by the private sector. Well, you're getting your way as the U.S. is cutting back on government research in many different branches of science, and while that may line up with your political ideologies, I have a feeling that you, and the rest of our country, are not going to like the results.
When does INL turn a profit? Los Alamos? Amundsen-Scott? Those are all major laboratories doing basic research. The ISS justifiably fits right in there with all of those facilities, and I"m glad that it is treated as such.
Part of the problem is that the ISS really is incomplete to be able to support the personnel needed to make it really thrive as a research lab. It was supposed to have a crew of six astronauts on board full-time (that was the original design) where two of those astronauts would deal with station keeping duties (at least trading off the equivalent of two astronauts doing that work) while the other four would be doing basic research.
That hasn't happened The TransHab module in particular is needed to provide additional berthing arrangements (aka sleeping quarters) for the astronauts or at least another lab module that can expand the occupancy as well as one of the other partners (either ESA or NASA) needs to develop another spacecraft to bring astronauts up and down. NASA is working on that so it is just a matter of time.
Regardless, the ISS is doing some tremendous work right now, and it is disingenuous to suggest that spider webs are the only thing being studied. The number of experiments numbers in the hundreds that have already been completed. You can debate the merit of that research based upon the funding being done, but far less has been done with far more money in other endeavors of government activity. The entire ISS program, including all shuttle launches and training and all of the maintenance costs, is still less than the amount of money spent on air conditioning equipment used by the U.S. military in Afghanistan.
As for private stations going into space and trying to duplicate the features of the ISS, I would bet that Robert Bigelow would be willing to help you out if you had a good idea and some funding sources to consider. I agree it would be done much cheaper by private industry, but it already is built... so do you really think it needs to be thrown away and splashed in the Pacific Ocean?
RAND Paul for president!? LMFAO
down the tubes.. or into the vacuum as the case may be. The ISS has no major accomplishments other than being a gravy train for aerospace contractors. Is there research going on up there that provides sufficient return to justify a cost of $8.2 million per day if it were not funded through tax dollars? Now that the station is being serviced commercially it is time to pull the plug. If IBM or Intel or Merck or Pfizer or whomever want a research lab in space let them form a consortium with Boeing et al and build one that suits their needs. And if they are really in love with the existing station, sell it to them and get some tax money back.
This is going to be inflammatory, but I have good karma to burn.
You sad sick fuck. The world is not beholden to the economic views of market capitalism. Science and knowledge expansion requires the expenditure of resources that are NOT tied up in making the elite more elite. It's your viewpoint that has destroyed what was once the greatest scientific community and left nothing but a corpse picked over by weasels and hyenas.
The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.