Slashdot Mirror
Doctors Say Food Stamp Cuts Could Cause Higher Healthcare Costs
Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Lauran Neergaard writes at the Christian Science Monitor that doctors are warning that if Congress cuts food stamps, the federal government could be socked with bigger health bills because over time the poor wind up seeking treatment in doctors' offices or hospitals as a result. 'If you're interested in saving health care costs, the dumbest thing you can do is cut nutrition,' says Dr. Deborah Frank of Boston Medical Center, who founded the Children's HealthWatch pediatric research institute. 'People don't make the hunger-health connection.' Food stamps feed 1 in 7 Americans and cost almost $80 billion a year, twice what it cost five years ago. The doctors' lobbying effort comes as Congress is working on a compromise farm bill that's certain to include food stamp cuts. Republicans want heftier reductions than do Democrats in yet another partisan battle over the government's role in helping poor Americans. Conservatives say the program spiraled out of control as the economy struggled and the costs are not sustainable. However research from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts estimated that a cut of $2 billion a year in food stamps could trigger in an increase of $15 billion in medical costs (PDF) for over the next decade. Other research shows children from food-insecure families are 30 percent more likely to have been hospitalized for a range of illnesses. 'Food is medicine,' says Massachusetts Representative Jim McGovern, who has led the Democrats' defense of the food stamp program. 'Critics focus almost exclusively on how much we spend, and I wish they understood that if we did this better, we could save a lot more money in health care costs.'"
Welcome to the human race, you've discovered the truth of humanity.
A society exists to help those that contribute to it. Those who refuse to work or be productive and useful generally should be left out.
Well they could in many cases, except many people especially liberals throw a hissy fit whenver a bigbox store like walmart wants to open up and provide jobs that pay a wage. Shining examples of that one all over the place.
Om, nomnomnom...
Yes it is a poor problem. The rich fucks can afford their kids. Actually, the rich fucks are probably paying for their kids and the welfare wombats.
Because black people do not create wealth. They destroy wealth. White people create wealth. It's about productivity, or lack thereof. Look around the globe, look at all black-run cities/nations - there's not one of them where the standard of living isn't at the bottom of the scale and headed down. South Africa is just a nation-sized Detroit. Diversity= end of civilization.
Whatever the reasons, the truth is plain to those who aren't willfully blind to it.
Cue the libtard's squealing "racist" in 3, 2, 1.
You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Except for the problem that being a single parent is 100% an individual choice for individuals born with their reproductive systems on the inside.
Why would somebody choose to have children they can't afford? Perhaps it's because we have so many entitlement systems that having a child guarantees a middle-class lifestyle, and perhaps another factor is how much we privilege Mothers.
Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!