Slashdot Mirror


Using Nanotechnology To Build Thinner, Stronger Condoms

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Discovery Magazine reports that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has granted $100,000 to Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) and Boston Medical Center (BMC) to develop a nanoparticle coating for condoms that will make them more comfortable and stronger while simultaneously keeping them thin to preserve – and increase – sensation in order to make them more appealing to use. According to the Gates Foundation, in the time that condoms have been in use, not much has changed: '[Condoms] have undergone very little technological improvement in the past 50 years. The primary improvement has been the use of latex as the primary material and quality-control measures, which allow for quality testing of each individual condom. Material science and our understanding of neurobiology has undergone revolutionary transformation in the last decade, yet that knowledge has not been applied to improve the product attributes of one of the most ubiquitous and potentially underutilized products on earth.' The nanotechnology that the Boston doctors intend to use for their improved condoms will be superhydrophillic nanoparticles that coat the condom and trap water to make them more resilient and easier to use. 'We believe that by altering the mechanical forces experienced by the condom, we may ultimately be able to make a thinner condom which reduces friction, thereby reducing discomfort associated with friction increases pleasure, thereby increasing condom use and decreases rates of unwanted pregnancy and infection transmission.'"

53 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you know, ladies.

    1. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Definitely need to make them so they give more sensation.

      Frankly, I find them akin to eating steak with one on your tongue.

      A lot of effort, for no sensation at all. Hell, I find it hard to blow a nut with one on, hence I rarely use them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wishing there was a "Too Informative" right about now...

    3. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Nano condom, sounds like a description of the size you buy in the stores.

    4. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by lgw · · Score: 5, Funny

      So close to the right joke.

      Gates Foundation gives $100,000 to help invent micro, soft condoms.

      There we go.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Can you imagine how embarrassing it is to ask the clerk for a nano condom?
      ("sorry, do you have anything smaller, say in the micron range?")

    6. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hence I rarely use them?? Ahem, this is slashdot... THAT is why you rarely use them....

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    7. Re:TLDR, Boston, nano-condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nano is less than Micro.

      Nerd FAIL, turn in your Geek Card.

  2. Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    News for nerds.

    1. Re:Thinner, Stronger Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thinner, Stronger Condoms:
      Stuff that matters.

      Condoms:
      News for nerds.

  3. Reduced Friction? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't friction what generates sensation? That's part of the problem with condoms now, no feeling.

    1. Re:Reduced Friction? by BringsApples · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not completely. Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis. I don't know what the sensation is like for women, but they seem to hate them as much as men.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    2. Re:Reduced Friction? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

      This is what Trojan Magnums are for.

    3. Re:Reduced Friction? by Antipater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm).

      This is important. I hope, while they're redesigning the materials, they also do something to combat the "one size fits all" myth of modern condoms. Many people's aversion to condoms are a result of a size mismatch. Penises come in many different sizes, not just "regular" and "magnum", so what's comfortable for one man may not be for another. A condom that's too tight can cut off all sensation, while a condom that's too loose can slip or tear. Nobody advertises one-size-fits-all running shoes, but one-size-fits-all condoms are our only option. I hope Mr. Gates works to fix that as well.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    4. Re:Reduced Friction? by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Informative

      It depends on whose sensation we're talking about. :-) The wearer should experience almost no friction from the latex itself, since it's supposed to stay more-or-less in place. But the latex is thin enough that he can sense the temperature and "grip" of his partner, which is probably the primary stimulating sensation for him.

      His partner, on the other hand, would certainly experience friction from the latex, which is one reason you should use lube with condoms -- too much friction, and thrusting becomes difficult for the pair and especially irritating (or painful) for the person being penetrated. That leads to irritation, soreness, and an eventual halting of adult activities.

      (PSA: Make sure to choose the right lube for the condom you use -- some lubes will cause the material of the condom to fail, which leads to babies, and possibly also a halting of adult activities. But also talk to your partner -- certain women report high incidents of yeast infections after using certain types of lube.)

      So I can see a thinner, lower-friction condom being a boon for both partners, as it would increase sensation for both, and also lead to fewer incidents of vaginal/anal tearing from friction, which are not only not fun but which also which increase risk of STD transmission.

    5. Re:Reduced Friction? by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Informative

      "one size fits all" myth of modern condoms

      This doesn't exist. Condoms come in multiple sizes, and anyone who thinks there is a one size fits all is actually very misinformed about condoms.

    6. Re:Reduced Friction? by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 5, Funny

      you'll need an outlet store with a computerised fitting system by the sounds of it. here, poke your member in this hole while we 3d scan it. oh, and watch this porn.

    7. Re:Reduced Friction? by barlevg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this, I think, is more of a societal issue: not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls." Shopping on the internet is an option, I guess, but do you really want Amazon knowing your penis size? I can just imagine the targeted advertisements on BOTH ends of the spectrum.

    8. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Strangers in the night, exchanging rubbers.

      This ones much too tight, I need another.

      This ones much too loose, I'm losing all my juice.

    9. Re:Reduced Friction? by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A condom that's too tight can cut off all sensation, while a condom that's too loose can slip or tear. Nobody advertises one-size-fits-all running shoes, but one-size-fits-all condoms are our only option.

      Length isn't usually an issue (for most men) as can you roll as much as needed to the base. But as you've pointed out, girth is. The girth of a man's member can dynamically change based on arousal and any length of time. So while that "magnum" may feel right now, it can become loose later before climax has been reached. It's already an issue having to interrupt the moment to roll on a rubber, but having to choose which size works best depending on the mood already kills it.

      Preventing pregnancy aside, smart phones with terahertz scanning capability (say 6 years from now) might be able to detect STDs and other blood related issues in the future. Essentially a Tricorder that's not a medical device, but just as damn near as good. So if you're clean, and she's clean, to hell with the condom. Have fun! Just be sure to scan well before the mood sets in. Personally, i've never been promiscuous and trust is always important to me (I'm married). So all that technology is a moot point as far as i'm concerned.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:Reduced Friction? by hazah · · Score: 2

      It's definitely not psychological. According to my anecdotal evidence.

    11. Re:Reduced Friction? by SpankiMonki · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...not many men are going to feel comfortable going to the convenience store and checking out with a box of "size smalls."

      You're right! Small condoms should be labeled "Tall", with larger sizes labeled "Grande", "Venti", and "Trenta".

      I bet they could charge a lot more for condoms if they did that.

    12. Re:Reduced Friction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Condoms squeeze the guy, sometimes (depending on girth) causing complete loss of sensation (much like cutting off the blood from you foot or arm). This same squeezing also causes less, how shall I say it, 'back-and-forth' of the skin on the penis.

      Citation please?

      ...with pictures please?

    13. Re:Reduced Friction? by S.O.B. · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're right! Small condoms should be labeled "Tall", with larger sizes labeled "Grande", "Venti", and "Trenta".

      I bet they could charge a lot more for condoms if they did that.

      Over price condoms with pretentious names for the sizes...we can call them Starf*cks.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    14. Re:Reduced Friction? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't do very well in history class, but I'm pretty sure you're referring to The Battle Of The Bulge.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:Reduced Friction? by Zynder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Won't work. This falls into a category woman deal with all the time. In order to psychologically attract a buyer, many companies will sell tent size dresses that are only a size 6. No 2 company's size 6 will be the same either so it makes fitting a chore. A man with a small penis who's self conscious about it will not buy a 3", he'll want the 12" (even though it is actually a 3) and you'll find companies who will advertise "Our size 6's are bigger than all the competition!" And when I started typing this I intended to make it funny, but now that it's time for the punchline, I got nothing...much like my nonexistent penis.....sigh....

    16. Re:Reduced Friction? by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pregnancy is prevented the old fashioned way, pull out and splooge.

      The official medical term for people like you is "parents."

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  4. Diamond Age anyone? by squidflakes · · Score: 2

    How long before we're hiring kids to go pick up nano pore condoms off the beach so we can recycle them in to materials to keep the nanobots off our lawns?

    Probably never, but I finally get to make the reference!

    1. Re:Diamond Age anyone? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      How long before we're hiring kids to go pick up nano pore condoms off the beach so we can recycle them in to materials to keep the nanobots off our lawns?

      Probably never, but I finally get to make the reference!

      It's probably because I just finished Snow Crash last week, but when I read the headline I envisioned the scene where dread pirate Bruce Lee is randomly inspecting his men's condoms prior to mass-buggering Hiro.

      I wonder how Neil Stephenson would feel if he knew that articles about scientific innovation in the field of fucking invoked thoughts of his writings...

      Not as bad as Neal Stephenson would feel (ducks)

    2. Re:Diamond Age anyone? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      I wonder how Neil Stephenson would feel...

      Not as bad as Neal Stephenson would feel (ducks)

      You know the worst part? I bothered to spell check the last name.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  5. A nano condom... by freshlimesoda · · Score: 2

    for my size please. eeeehhhh....WTF!!!

    --
    I come to Slashdot only to read sigs. One you are reading is mine.
  6. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, the pregnancy prevention part is pretty simple - outpatient surgery will fix you right up.

    Preventing microbe transfer when bodily fluids are mixed and parts are in direct contact - well, that's quite a bit more challenging without a physical barrier.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. Say... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Using Nanotechnology To Build Thinner, Stronger Condoms

    Seems like a dick move to me.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Say... by Cryacin · · Score: 2

      Let's just hope it doesn't stay in the traditional windows behaviour of bluescreening right when you finish your download.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  8. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    my wife and i will start having sex without a condom and i'll only put it at the very end
    after ten years of marriage we only have 2 kids

  9. Obligatory Tom Swifty: by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am not a homosexual necrophiliac, said Tom, in dead earnest.

    Thanks, try the veal.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Obligatory Tom Swifty: by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 2

      did you hear the other one about the homosexual necrophiliac? he was upset with his boyfriend, the rotten bum split on him.

  10. Re:Ohhhh by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I agree, this will be fantastic. I'm sick of wearing these bandages on my hands all the time.

  11. Re:Want to preserve sensation ? by Antipater · · Score: 2

    How about you not try to ignite a flame war on an unrelated story? This is about condoms, not circumcision. It's an issue for both cut and uncut men. Take your rant elsewhere, please.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  12. Re:Summary by biek · · Score: 2

    Condom nanotubes

  13. Custom condoms exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There already are different sizes condoms based on your measurements (96 available sizes). They-Fit is the brand and they have an on-line store (European company).

    I have tried them and they are pretty much spot on :-).
    Their largest size makes Magnum look like a condom for mice. And their smallest size goes to well veeery small.

  14. Re:Latex by BringsApples · · Score: 2
    Hell, I actually never knew that men could be allergic to condoms. I found this site: http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/id/QAA368178

    One interesting tidbit from that article:

    If you are affected, you can opt for polyurethane condoms, which protect against pregnancy just as well. Polyurethane is thin and strong and effectively conducts body heat and, according to some reports, is more compatible with sexual pleasure than latex.

    I've never heard of polyurethane condoms either. Hell if I didn't find them at Walgreens! ( http://www.walgreens.com/store/c/trojan-supra-lubricated-premium-polyurethane-condoms/ID=prod2303823-product )

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  15. News for Nerds??? by tekrat · · Score: 2

    A product that 99% of slashdotters will never get to use, despite the coolness of it being nano-technology. Then again, 99% of slashdotters don't get to use supercomputers either, but Slashdot reports on them. Maybe when we get sex robots, but then again you really don't need a condom for a machine unlikely to get pregnant.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  16. Biodegradable by ugen · · Score: 2

    While they are at it, could they please make condoms biodegradable. After plastic bags, condoms are probably one of the worst culprits in terms of emitting plastic into the ocean and nature (unlike plastic bags, condoms are often flushed down the toilet).

    1. Re:Biodegradable by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Latex, being a biological product does biodegade, it just does so slowly.

      Rubber, produced from petroleum, is not biodegradable.

      Most condoms are latex.

    2. Re:Biodegradable by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Latex, being a biological product does biodegade, it just does so slowly.

      Rubber, produced from petroleum, is not biodegradable.

      Most condoms are latex.

      Actually, rubber comes from the rubber tree -- and vulcanized rubber isn't very biodegradable as it has been chemically altered. Latex is just a product name for the type of rubber extracted from a particular rubber tree. Unvulcanized rubber is biodegradable, but is also prone to tears, so most rubber is vulcanized. You probably wouldn't want a non-vulcanized condom.

      Petroleum-based alternatives are things like polyeurethane, which is a less-popular alternative to Latex.

  17. Dupe! by hawkfish · · Score: 2

    Isn't this what the "wearable computing" poll was all about?

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  18. Re:There needs to be a completely different approa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Which is perplexing because you're infertile...

  19. Now, Bill go talk to the Pope and US teens by DaveyJJ · · Score: 2

    Bill Gates should use some of that clout of his to actually so some good re: condoms.

    First, get on the phone and blast that mysogynistic virgin running the Catholic Church and make him promote condom use, especially in Africa. Then get US teens some proper, frank, honest and mandatory sex ed classes with all the gory details so that you combat the US having the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the industrialized world, according the the Center for Disease Control, who notes that 30% of women below age 20 get pregnant in the US. If those happen, then he can claim to be doing some good re: sex and condoms.

    --
    DaveyJJ
  20. Re:what's a condom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You put it on your dongle to practice safe hex.

  21. in Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Multiple sizes come in condoms! ....I'll get my coat....

  22. Re:Mr. Gates by Zynder · · Score: 2

    640 micrometers should be enough for anyone!

  23. Re:phuck u by Immerman · · Score: 2

    >I hate you Citation Needed people so much.

    independent citation needed

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.