Slashdot Mirror
95% of ATMs Worldwide Are Still Using Windows XP
BUL2294 writes "95% of the world's ATM machines are still running Windows XP and banks are already purchasing extended support agreements from Microsoft. (some of the affected ATMs are running XP Embedded, which has a support lifecycle until January, 2016). 'Microsoft is selling custom tech support agreements that extend the life of Windows XP, although the cost can soar quickly—multiplying by a factor of five in the second year, says Korala. JPMorgan is buying a one-year extension and will start converting its machines to Windows 7 in July; about 3,000 of its 19,000 ATMs need enhancements before the process can begin...'"
https://xkcd.com/801/
The cost of the support agreements, would still be less than the replacement of several thousand ATMs and internal systems. There is a reason why people do this, and it's not just lazyniess..
Windows XP is the only operating system stable & secure enough to handle sensitive transactions such as cash dispensing.
My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
Is a bad choice anyway. Not just a Microsoft bash, but aside from all the security issues, windows is XP is a desktop platform, not a OS to be putting on dedicated devices ( even the so-called embedded version really isn't any more appropriate for this, don't let the marketing folks fool you )
An ATM should be running off a custom embedded OS targeted for this purpose, not a commodity OS.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
"95% of the world's ATM machines are still running Windows XP
Yes, but what about the *automatic* ATM machines? Those are the ones I most am concerned about.
To hell with 7. Please put Windows 8 on the ATMs instead! I already love how ATMs do a wonderful job of selecting the wrong option for me after finally getting the card to take, only to then take me into the Spanish menu, spitting out a receipt, and then not accepting my card again while the line forms behind me! Metro can only enhance this lovely experience! Hell, add a kinect to it so when I flip it a golden salute it recognizes my input and doubles the ATM fee! Gotta keep up with the bank's great customer service these days!
'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
As someone who has worked with Diebold, they have never have more than 3 programmers and they only use and have ever used Visual Basic. This is why their ATMs (and voting machines) are required to run Windows.
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
Actually, that doesn't worry me nearly as much as Windows for Warships.
Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
OS/2 was entrenched. The ADA a couple of years ago declared that all ATMs must have blind support. That meant adding sound. The OS/2 machines could in the main not support that service and as such were retired. It was a field day for NCR, Hyosung and Diebold with hundreds of thousands of new ATMs being purchased. These new ADA compliant ATMs were replaced mostly by Windows XP driven ATMs, with the promise that the ATMs could be upgraded to Windows 7 when it became necessary.
I have only been working with Diebold, but they are refusing to hire sufficient (or maybe any idk) additional hands to deal with the necessary surge in maintenance to upgrade to Windows 7.
All that being said, the XP ATMs are perfectly safe. They are behind some rather crazy firewalls. It would be rather difficult to get into them to take advantage of any potential problem. (The issue for the bank / ATM driver / card processor not being the loss of the cash, but rather the loss of the customer information.)
Hmmm. Better post this anonymously.
I worked for an ATM software development shop called Phoenix Interactive. The software we wrote was mostly C++, with some C mixed in to deal with updating the main software. The main ATM manufacturers (Diebold, Wincor, NCR) all only create Windows drivers (or did, 10 years ago when I worked there). The OS is locked down hard, while you may see the occasional blue screen, even if you had a keyboard plugged in you would not be able to stop the software from running or move it to the background without triggering a restart and a tamper alert back to the bank. Windows can be locked down just as well as Linux, it's just a royal pain in the ass to do so.
Because Microsoft can be sued if they need to?
Ah, no. Not going to happen.
Your hardware, you installed the software,
You managed it for the last 10 years,
You probably didn't apply patches...
No way that ever gets a dime out of Microsoft in court.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
All that being said, the XP ATMs are perfectly safe. They are behind some rather crazy firewalls.
Nope.
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/173701-atms-running-windows-xp-robbed-with-infected-usb-sticks-yes-most-atms-still-run-windows
And another successful attack vector using Plotus http://www.atmmarketplace.com/article/221087/Mexican-ATMs-fall-prey-to-new-cyberattack
Successful malware attacks (both gaining access to the local cash and screen scraping and keystroke recording of customer information) through ATMs have been going on since 2008 and Diebold would most certainly be well aware of this, even if they are choosing not to bring it to your attention.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
why would they chose XP in the first place
XP was a very good choice compared to Linux as it was 12 years old. Cost of Windows ($50 per copy?) was entirely immaterial. The important things were maturity, support, features, and toolchain. Linux in the year 2000 was light on those. Where in Linux's Event Viewer is the Security Log? How many objects can be audited in Linux? In NT - a lot, and it all was available immediately. In the toolchain department even today autotools give you a horrifying experience compared to MSVC.
Developers of ATM took the most complete foundation for their work (the OS) and then added what was custom. If they started with Linux, or BSD, or DOS, they'd have to add far more - and the more you write yourself the more you have to maintain. If they started with Linux that would be kernel 2.0.x - and today we are on 3.x, with gigabytes of patches applied to libc and other essential components of the system. It would be extremely difficult to upgrade and maintain.
and why have they not moved to something else in the last decade?
Who is going to pay money for fixing what isn't broken? It's not broken even today, that's why they want to keep the machines running. It's pretty expensive to send engineers to tens of thousands of ATMs to upgrade them, since doing it remotely might be too scary. The hardware also probably went through ten revisions, so each ATM runs its own set of drivers that were customized to the hardware that is installed. Your upgrade task would require you to support all that old hardware - and that is a dead end job. Better to just keep the thing running until it falls apart, and then replace it.