Slashdot Mirror


Romanian Bitcoin Entrepreneur Steps In To Pay OpenBSD Shortfall

New submitter MrBingoBoingo writes "Recently it was announced here on Slashdot that OpenBSD was facing an impending shortfall that jeopardized its continued existence. A sponsorship to save OpenBSD has been announced, and it wasn't one of the usual culprits that saved OpenBSD, but a Romanian Bitcoin billionaire."

209 comments

  1. If he's a real billionaire... by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 2

    .... he's not going to want the attention, lest he get kidnapped.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:If he's a real billionaire... by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      He's got his harem to protect him.

    2. Re:If he's a real billionaire... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Have you seen the history of leu? It probably explains why he got into Bitcoin - he wanted to convert his savings into a more stable currency. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:If he's a real billionaire... by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 0

      "If he's a real billionaire..."

      He's a real billionaire in the same way the Monopoly Guy is wealthy with a phat stack of Monopoly Money.

      --
      Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
    4. Re:If he's a real billionaire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      For those not in the know. The Monopoly Guy paid OpenBSD's electric bill with Monopoly Money last year. Back then, one unit of the Monopoly currency was worth about $800.

  2. Re:Perhaps... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's still better than someone who gave nothing but cheap hot air.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  3. Hmmmm by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting....

    I hope it works out for OpenBSD, but the proof is in the pudding.... or the check clearing.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but I've never found a proof in a pudding.

    2. Re:Hmmmm by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 2

      I have, but my theory was mashed Twinkies tasted better in butterscotch pudding. After my experimentation resulting in a tasty combo - my proof WAS in the pudding. Science never tasted so good...

    3. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that sounds awesome!thanks for the research!!now to go get some of each.

    4. Re:Hmmmm by pankkake · · Score: 1
      --
      Kill all hipsters.
    5. Re:Hmmmm by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      I'll see your pudding dipped twinkies, and raise you Mandarin oranges in chocolate pudding FTW!

  4. Re:Perhaps... by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 2

    In Canada that actually should be rather easy.

  5. Hey - NSFW by symbolset · · Score: 0

    How about we be a little more careful with twitter links, K?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Hey - NSFW by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      It's the right link.

    2. Re:Hey - NSFW by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In Canada that actually should be rather easy.

      1. What's NSFW about the Twitter page? A guy with an open shirt?
      2. It's after 9pm PST on the MLK weekend. Where do you work?
      3. What are you doing surfing Slashdot at work for anyway?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re: Hey - NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Twitter is NEVER the right link

    4. Re:Hey - NSFW by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      It's Monday evening east of the international date line. Slashdot has an international readership...

      Where I'm from, NSFW stands for New South F'ing Wales, Australia. Yet this article is about Romania, not Sydney. :)

    5. Re:Hey - NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasting company time on slashdot is always NSFW.

    6. Re:Hey - NSFW by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Not really. For some monitoring and influencing social media - including /. - is their work.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    7. Re:Hey - NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're cold fjord, then it is your work.

    8. Re:Hey - NSFW by el+momia · · Score: 1

      3. What are you doing surfing Slashdot at work for anyway?

      I surf slashdot like 60% of my working hours

    9. Re:Hey - NSFW by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      I'm in Tulsa, ok - so I live under the buckle of the Bible belt. I've gotten "in trouble" at corps from these tiny icons that show skin, for some reason the people walking by my cube being nosy claimed "it looked like they where naked" from a 1 inch pic as they quickly glanced over. Very annoying, but some of us have to be careful for certain things...totally insane but my only solution is to move out of the state.

    10. Re:Hey - NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The southwest (e.g. Arizona and New Mexico) aren't nearly as uptight. You might give that a go.

    11. Re:Hey - NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So move out of the state. Why should those of us living in free states and countries be accommodating of your local crazies on your behalf?

  6. Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He sells futures, which he refuses to honor if he loses.

    He steals from people.

    OpenBSD should refuse his donation, the funds are the proceeds of crime.

    1. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      He honors his losses. Links please?

    2. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assume everything you say is true, it seems to me there are two outcomes possible:
      (1) Donation accepted:
      criminal has less money
      OpenBSD safe for another year (or whatever)
      (2) Donation refused:
      criminal has more money to perpetuate further crimes
      OpenBSD remains in danger of shutting down

      In what universe is (2) a better outcome?

      Now if Popescu is attempting to buy considerations that might change things, but being a criminal doesn't automatically mean you can't be an honest philanthropist, just look at Bill Gates. (Okay, so maybe not the worlds best possible example of honest philanthropy, but still)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (3) MP is arrested for wire fraud all assets are confiscated, records of payment to openbsd foundation are found and they are required to return them (as the proceeds of crime)

      OpenBSD is now in serious debt and likely the principles end up in federal prison

    5. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never mentions not paying futures, I just see retards arguing.

    6. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps Obama could chip in some of the bitcoin seized from Silk Road to keep OpenBSD afloat. :)

    7. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      Pretty much retards trying to dirty Mircea while pumping their scams. Bitcointalk is the worst place for BTC news.

    8. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Bitcointalk is the worst place for BTC news.

      There's someplace where there's more Bitcoin news than Slashdot? Dear God!

    9. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by r.freeman · · Score: 2

      If that is how "wire fraud" works then you need to change your law. But isn't it like that in biggest police state (the USA), but less so in Canada?

    10. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by r.freeman · · Score: 1

      Or we could be like civilized people and demand some evidence instead of believing random black pr.

    11. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Links? Go an read bitcointalk. This guy is a real scum.

      From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64962.0:

      As to your last point: there do seem to be a significant number of scammers floating about, so I can easily understand the "assume everyone's a scammer" attitude, I imagine it works well in a majority of cases. However Mircea Popescu is both well known and well respected in the bitcoin community and beyond, so this'd be one case of the minority.

    12. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Slashdot, where the most charitable man in world history by amount given can be lower than a known criminal because he invented Windows. I mean, even Hitler didn't invent windows right guys?

    13. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :)

    14. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Hitler does influence my mistrust of crappy artists...I'm always now suspecting any failed artists will attempt to implement a world-wide genocidal fascist regime!

    15. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually Hitler did invent Windows. However since back then, almost nobody (including himself) had ever heard of a computer, nobody (including himself) could make sense of it, so he considered the idea worthless and threw it away. However it happened that he missed the rubbish bin, and the paper went behind some cupboard where nobody considered it worth getting it out to throw it away.

      After the war, some American soldier found the paper with the notes, did not know what it was, and so it got forwarded up along the command chain until it went to General Failure. He couldn't make sense of it either, but took it home for further study in his off-time.

      However his little son, who had no idea about what it was, took the paper to make his children's drawings on them. He put those drawings into a drawer, where he forgot about them. His father never found out what happened to it. However his career was ended by losing those notes. It was at that time that "Failure" became synonymous with "no success", and that the term "Failure is not an option" was coined, initially used when looking for candidates for high positions.

      Many years later, when going to Harvard, the son found his old drawings, and noticed the notes on the paper. He also couldn't make sense of them, but thought they looked interesting, so he took the paper with him to Harvard. Later, when he had learned about Computers, he finally could understand those notes. He concluded that nobody would want to use such crap anyway and threw it into the next paper basket.

      Then Bill Gates came along, looking in the paper basket to see whether there's something interesting in it. He found the notes, saw the marketing potential, and took the papers with him. Years later, he implemented it and sold it under the name "Windows".

      Captcha: tyranny ;-)

    16. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Luthair · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have no idea who any of these posters are but the PR person's posts certainly have all the hallmarks of a scammer.

    17. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about lower? Do you disagree with either of the following statements?
      * Bill Gates, as CEO of Microsoft, is guilty of repeatedly engaging in criminal monopolistic behavior.
      * Bill Gates, as a philanthropist, has a reputation for engaging in a lot of "philanthropy" that seems to have more to do with expanding the power of his philanthropic empire than actually helping people. (Note that I am NOT denying that he also does a lot of good)

      That makes Bill Gate an excellent well-known example of a criminal who is also a philanthropist, but not necessarily the best example of an "honest" philanthropist.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    18. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links? Go an read bitcointalk. This guy is a real scum.

      From https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=64962.0:

      As to your last point: there do seem to be a significant number of scammers floating about, so I can easily understand the "assume everyone's a scammer" attitude, I imagine it works well in a majority of cases. However Mircea Popescu is both well known and well respected in the bitcoin community and beyond, so this'd be one case of the minority.

      LOL! Dude, you are an idiot. This crap is written by MPOE-PR aka the village idiot in bitcointalks.
      Only idiot who respect him, is that same PR clown (some say it is Mircea) and probably few confused idiots.
      Get a life and stop sucking up to scum like Mircea Popescu.

    19. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And calling Bill Gates a criminal is also a stupid example. Now fuck you.

    20. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Was he not he at the helm of a company repeatedly convicted for engaging in criminal monopolistic practices under his guidance? That he was a criminal is difficult to deny, regardless of the personal immunity afforded him by the corporate veil.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    21. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      do you have any real proof to your assertions other than you unfounded opinions. it is trivial to slander anyone posting as AC. Do you have links to arrests, investigations, complaints to law enforcement or any such?

    22. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Theo long ago burned his bridges with the US government, back when they were giving OpenBSD money. That's a big reason why they are perpetually under funded.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the US military paid some of the exploit mitigation work, it would be logical. The rest could be used for repairing some 100-year old infrastructure and perhaps fixing those vulnerable computer systems in water facilities and power systems. Pirates, they fund the society, arr.

    24. Re:Mircea Popescu is a criminal... nothing more by tender-matser · · Score: 1

      Assume everything you say is true, it seems to me there are two outcomes possible:

      [...]

      It's not that simple.

      OpenBSD already has an image problem; it has been already viciously attacked by various trolls, using means that border on criminal (like creating a fake deraadt twitter account). Unfortunately, most of shit thrown at it has stuck.

      At this point, being publicly associated with such a primitive, obvious con-man like this "Mircea Popescu" may very well be the death-knell for them.

      It's not only sad, it's ridiculous.

  7. Re:lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Te mekkora egy fasz vagy, b*meg.

  8. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Canada that actually should be rather easy.

    So people keep saying. Let's see it *actually* happen.

  9. Re:Perhaps... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cheap hot air is actually great if you have a gas turbine and a generator and can sell the resulting electricity.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  10. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this modded +2?

    Coinbase.com makes it trivially easy. For people who are willing to put in some legwork, there's localbitcoins.com

    I haven't tried bitpay.com but I understand that it works just as well as coinbase. Stop spreading FUD and educate yourself.

  11. HERE I AM TO SAVE THE DAY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A bitcoin story with .. ah, who cares with what - IT IS BITCOIN AND IT HAS SAVED THE DAY !!

  12. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From personal experience, I've had no trouble converting ten times that to Euros.

  13. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is definitely a gypsie...

  14. Re:Perhaps... by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

    it has been done in more difficult locales before.

  15. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by _merlin · · Score: 1

    And you sir are way too shovinistic.. do you also have problems with jews and everything that is not your kind?

    The word you're looking for is "xenophobic". Also, you should learn to spell "chauvinistic" in case it actually is the word you need at some point.

  16. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by noh8rz10 · · Score: 0

    Really? How do you know his nationality? The Roma minority is 3.3 % in Romania. He would have better changes of being hungarian..

    an interesting blank box...the summary says "romanian bitcoin billionaire". so is he romainian by nationality, that is, he was born in the state of Romania, or is he romanian by heritage (i.e. gypsy) meaning that regardless of where he was born, his parents are of romanian heritage.

  17. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We aren't talking about more difficult locales, we're talking about Canada.
    Stay with us, here.

  18. Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by hackus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That sort of an electrical bill is a crap explanation in my opinion to support the development and deployment of OpenBSD developers and users.

    Poor management is more likely the explanation.

    I mean, for example to not watch the cash flow, and all of a sudden require a huge cash intake is something I don't understand.

    This sort of problem should have been apparent YEARS AGO, anyone managing the infrastructure could have seen coming and there should have been PLENTY of time to correct the issue.

    Am I missing something here people if so please do explain.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 4, Informative

      This electricity bill was explained last Slashdot post. OpenBSD builds for VAX. OpenBSD builds for 68K. I for one am happy someone builds modern software to let the Vaxen run.

    2. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Pinhedd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's purely poor management. From what I understand, the build servers are absolutely archaic beasts that had they been replaced long ago would not have led to such astronomically high bills. It also doesn't help that they seem to be located in Theo de Raadt's basement.

    3. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by tftp · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be more practical to replace a VAX with an R-Pi or BBB? You gain performance this way, and save a lot of electric power :-)

      Regardless, I seriously doubt that there are recent builds of any other software for VAX; so what's the point of having BSD on them if there isn't much else to run?

    4. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      The point is that OpenBSD (along with the myriad softwares packaged with it and available through ports) is useful enough on its own. Not everyone's idea of useless is "doesn't play World of Warcraft."

    5. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The major use of OpenBSD, AFAIK, is for firewalls; that needs a minimum of two Ethernet ports. The R-Pi only has one Ethernet port, and adding a second one off the USB bus isn't going to be particularly good for performance.

      But the thrust of your point is a valid one; there's little to be gained by running OpenBSD on such crusty hardware (except, perhaps, a little security through obscurity.) The only really good reason I can think of for keeping an old VAX around is to run VMS (and even then, a second hand Alpha system shouldn't be that expensive, and would probably be significantly cheaper to run.)

    6. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of fun to be had running OpenGenera. Don't knock it until you try it.

    7. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the community of people running vaxes should donate the computer time (and electricity) required to keep their community afloat.

    8. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't get modern hardware for those architectures...

    9. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This subject has been discussed to death already, why the hell do such ignorant comments keep making their way to +5?

      OpenBSD runs on many old, archaic architectures which have no modern replacements.

      Why? Firstly because it helps them find bugs, by putting code into a variety of strange situations. Secondly, because it helps them retain developers - OpenBSD is hardly the most popular project out there, and if they let go of these architectures they would be letting go of significant parts of their dev team.

      OpenBSD is against emulation of these architectures because it doubles the possible points of failure - bugs could exist in the emulator, as well as the code itself. Theo himself is wary of emulation due to prior experience, trying to hunt down bugs in OpenBSD that actually only existed in the emulator it was running in.

      It also doesn't help that they seem to be located in Theo de Raadt's basement.

      de Raadt has claimed that his basement is more efficient:

      "The power bill is around $1500/month, to run 2.5 racks of equipment with really good air conditioning. Relative to this, 1 full rack in a Calgary datacenter is over $1000/month."

    10. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by labawi · · Score: 1

      According to the messages on OpenBSD mailing list, running on old and vastly different hardware means they can test software on different architectures and find bugs more easily. So running on the old architectures among other things helps fix software on all architectures, even other operating systems.
      AFAIK most new (and more efficient) hardware is vastly more similar than the older architectures.

    11. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Because some OpenBSD neckbeard or another thinks it's cool to keep compatibility with '80s hardware and probably has such a computer or three at home.

      IMO it's nice in a "hey, your code has great platform independence" way, but I don't see much point in it either.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    12. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Nimey · · Score: 1

      One wonders if simply compiling and running on a SimH virtual machine might be a better use of electricity, especially considering that even an Atom-powered server is going to be much faster than a real VAX.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    13. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      You can't correct a lack of donations without some sort of crisis. Typically, that crisis is advertising a lack of funding.
      Years ago they identified the same problem and worked to fix it. Obviously it was not permanent.
      So no, in your sense, management is not the problem.
      But management refuses to use donated rack space and insists on testing on real hardware for obscure platforms.
      Some say that's poor management, some say it is needed.
      Still others say if it were needed it would be funded, yet more others say corporate freeloaders use the code but don't give back, and if they did there would be no funding problem.
      Where you stand depends on your preconceptions mostly, and whether you read about previous shortfall announcements.

    14. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, platform independence was nice in the early 90s when there were something like 5 RISC platforms competing for dominance, and both Unix and NT were vying for control of all platforms - x86 and RISC. Today, all the RISC platforms are fringe platforms as far as general computing goes (ARM tablets or phones or PPC consoles or MIPS routers not included here), and so it makes sense to develop the most optimal solutions for those, and then freeze it at that.

      So yeah, it would make more sense if they would look at either the R-Pis or Arduinos or something actively manufactured today - including Chinese or Taiwanese boxes. Rather than something that ever owner has either retired already, or is looking @ retiring soon.

    15. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the nature of the project, they probably require physical security that couldn't be guaranteed in a generic server room.

    16. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There are good points above, but the points raised by people making the suggestions are also valid.

      It's true that there are diverse developers developing this on now dead machines. But that's one of the things contributing to the excessive power consumption in Theo's basement. If his devs have it in theirs, it's one thing, but for what he has, he should consider the options:

      • - Try get hold of modern equivalents to some of the machines. Like instead of Power MACs, get hold of some IBM P series boxes - obviously 2nd hand. Similarly, instead of SPARCstation 20s, get current boxes that Oracle sells.
      • - For the others, like the SGIs, VAX/Alphas, Motorola 68k, have no more than 1 box of any architecture.

      Once this is done, look at streamlining some of the architectures. You don't need 5 RISC platforms to optimize your OS for RISC. Similarly, 1 little endian - x64 - and 1 big endian - say current SPARC - should be adequate. Things like superscalar vs superpipelined architectures won't matter as far as instruction sets go. But given that power consumption is high, having Alphas or Vaxes downstairs is a luxury.

      He is welcome to ignore these suggestions, but then, they don't have too much of a case when they refuse to do anything to sensibly bring down their costs.

    17. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      wrong. one machine per architecture? you speak out of ignorance of how the OpenBSD build and test process is done.

    18. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      not poor management at all, the varying architectures with their alignment issues expose bugs, many of them. Did you know projects like Linux have huge alignment bugs that cause major security holes that crop up again and again because they mainly build and test only on x86-32 and x86-64? If you follow the CVE you'd know this.

      The power requirements are not astronomical at all, those of us in the business of caring for racked servers in HVAC controlled areas know this.

          here's a post from Theo about the power:

      "It is not a lot of power; that is a myth.

      The power bill is around $1500/month, to run 2.5 racks of equipment
      with really good air conditioning. Relative to this, 1 full rack in a
      Calgary datacenter is over $1000/month. Considering this is 2.5 racks
      the current operation is VERY COST EFFECTIVE RELATIVE TO THE
      ALTERNATIVES."

      -- quoted from here
        List: openbsd-misc
      Subject: Re: Request for Funding our Electricity
      From: Theo de Raadt
      Date: 2014-01-18 3:38:05
      Message-ID: 201401180338.s0I3c5jF003813 () cvs ! openbsd ! org

    19. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      if you would look at actual market share stats, plenty of other architecture than x86 or x86-64 still have significant chunks.

      openbsd exposes bugs when compiling on various architectures, one of the big reasons they do so. Linux continually has alignment security holes (look at the CVE) because it focuses on x86 and x86-64

    20. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      The last Vax were produced in 2005, not the 1980s.

      UltarSparc, PPC, various MIPS, even Itanium still account for billions in system sales per year.

      You only know what your PC has, I take it.

    21. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no software? there are a couple thousand binary packages and even more in the ports tree for OpenBSD on Vax to run.

    22. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't like self-hosting operating systems, do you?

    23. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're having trouble paying the power bill - I'm not sure their hardware budget allows for buying new boxes..

    24. Re: Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      They have found emulators aren't perfect. They'd be in the emulator debugging business. And the devs who do alternative architecture for openbsd are familiar with various pipular emulators as those of us who follow obsd newsgroups know. Those project machines get heavy use for test/build

    25. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      Similarly, 1 little endian - x64 - and 1 big endian - say current SPARC - should be adequate No, there are also alignment issue variations, not just endian ones. Current Sparc is bi-endian, by the way. You aren't into OS development or systems programming, I take it.

    26. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Nimey · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of ARM and MIPS machines out there, yes, but today generally in the embedded space (although this may change), and the remaining architectures are statistical noise. IA64 is dead, SuperH is dead, Power is irrelevant for OpenBSD's use cases, Sparc is nearly irrelevant period outside of Oracle servers.

      The picture changes when you consider older machines like Sparcstations, PPC Macs, etc., that aren't supported by their mfrs anymore, yes, but there's a world of difference, performance and utility-wise, between a Power Mac G5 and a MicroVAX.

      On the gripping hand, it's their hobby and it's not hurting anyone besides their ability to pay for electricity.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    27. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by Pinhedd · · Score: 1

      I made no comment about the varying architectures, I made a comment about the build servers themselves.

      2.5 racks of ancient equipment is too much equipment. Modernizing those servers would cut the physical and electrical load down by at least 80%. Moving it to a more effective location would go even further. There are some places in the states that rent out a full 42u rack with a 20 amp supply and an unmetered gigabit link for around $700 a month. Colocation in Canada is more expensive across the board but there are comparable services in the GTA.

    28. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Then drop support for them, unless people who actually use them in real world foot the bill.

    29. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      Two of openbsd newer supported architectures are octeon MIPS64 and beagle ARMV7.

      Don't know why you seem to imply embedded space is different than openbsd space. You do realize openbsd is used in the embedded space, even in some commercial elevator controllers (and plenty of other embedded system)? Some of their ports are for embedded devices

      Still plenty of 64 bit sparc around, used for more than Oracle if we're just talking major uses. MRP, EPR, statistics packages, project management/scheduling, engineering, insurance all still markets for that iron. note #4 supercomputer in the world is sparc based. so still around and still relevant for things other than oracle. As for what openbsd will support, all the way up to Fujitsu Sparc64-VII with the 64 bit port.

      Itanium not my favorite chip, but sales of servers based on it still over 4 billion USD a year. FreeBSD, Linux support some of those and NetBSD has port in the works. not an OpenBSD port but you seemed to think it was "dead". not yet, and intel will make new models until 2020 at least as per contract.

      sure it's the developers hobby, but their wares are everywhere, from elevator controllers to routers to printers to servers.

    30. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      USA would be worst place possible for hosting project with focus of openbsd, that's a country that claimed encryption was a munition in the past, and still restricts it now. Modernizing? some platforms don't have any current system to modernize to, it's a question of getting used systems. the openbsd project does have a list of desired donation equipment: http://www.openbsd.org/want.ht...

    31. Re:Serious Questions about OpenBSD infrastructure by hackus · · Score: 1

      Ok well than that is fine.

      I am not arguing about how the implementation of the development should proceed. If they truly need specific older models of hardware to do on point engineering of the OS kernel that demonstrates superior debug outcomes, fine.

      BUT PLAN THE BUDGET TO DO SO.

      Don't hold everyone on all architectures hostage because a 1989 Vax system chews up 90% of the electrical bill.

      If people want that sort of support it has to be paid for SOMEHOW.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  19. Re:Perhaps... by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

    Well, Canada is an easy locale to turn a lot of BTC into local cash. An example of a hard locale would be Somalia.

  20. Before you accept anything from this criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Before you accept anything from this criminal, make sure you read bitcointalk.
    This guy is a bad news.
    Is OpenBSD really sure they want to be associate with this guy? I hope not.

    1. Re:Before you accept anything from this criminal by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      What, the place where MPOE-PR has been one of the few consistent voices of reason since the olden times.

    2. Re:Before you accept anything from this criminal by r.freeman · · Score: 0

      So far all we have few trolls writing random shit. It's really awesome that someone will send his money to help this noble cause. OpenBSD already did refuse money for murders and rapists, the US Army / DARPA, that's (related to) why they are not based in USA even (and patents/export).

    3. Re: Before you accept anything from this criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to do homework. Openbsd lived on darpa coin then had their grant revoked

    4. Re:Before you accept anything from this criminal by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Before you accept anything from bitcointalk, make sure you punch yourself in the face (and maybe read news ANYWHERE else when you are done). That site is a joke, still, is it always has been.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  21. There is always that *one* guy... by optical_phiber · · Score: 0

    I was going to post about nobody using BSD... but... there is that one guy in Romania... Hmmm... But there is still that question... Is this even newsworthy...? Check this out... http://aboutthebsds.wordpress.com/ o_p

    1. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by vikingpower · · Score: 1
      The article under the link makes a good point. So do you. Truth is, I am betting hard that next summer, when I will celebrate 20 years without interruption on the server side of the IT business ( programming & design ), I have never, never ever seen a production system relying / running on any BSD. Theo de Raadt was saved by the bell. This time.

      There, 'nuff said.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by Renegade88 · · Score: 1

      That's a well-known troll site, which should be obvious even to the uninitiated after reading 20 lines in. So either you're gullible or you are perpetuating that guy's troll intentionally. Neither option looks good for you, sorry.

    3. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You are a data point of one. I can ssh into about half a dozen production OpenBSD boxes right now.

      You've also likely used OpenSSH which comes from the OpenBSD project (unless you're a Windows only admin).

    4. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Granted for the first point. Second point: true, I use openSSH every day, in production. But that is quite different from an entire OS.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    5. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by optical_phiber · · Score: 0

      I thought a lot of BSD engineers are working on Apple projects (project Darwin, for example)... Therefore, they are not really 'voluntary hobbyists' in the traditional sense...

    6. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by optical_phiber · · Score: 0

      Troll or truth... that is the question... I was going to consider installing BSD but I got very concerned after reading that site, seeing this story and reading a few BSD forums regarding hardware support. It would apear (and this is my conclusion only) that hardware support is lacking and that BSDs remain less than adequately resourced on more recent hardware (at least for now). I installed Arch instead...

    7. Re: There is always that *one* guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow. you should get out more. Netflix runs on FreeBSD...

    8. Re: There is always that *one* guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite a ringing endorsement there.

    9. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by Kremmy · · Score: 1

      There are an awful lot of appliance-oriented BSD systems, like pfSense and FreeNAS. Are you sure you've never encountered one in a production environment?

    10. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by cmdrbuzz · · Score: 1

      Then you'd be wrong.

      Ever seen a Juniper switch, router, firewall?
      How about a Citrix NetScaler?
      Or maybe a NetApp filer?

      BSD is inside a hell of a lot of kit, unless you work inside your mothers basement then chances are, you've seen BSD production systems.

    11. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Citrix kit, but the other two are FreeBSD based, not OpenBSD.

    12. Re:There is always that *one* guy... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      Must be because I never get inside switches, routers or firewalls. I should have precised "production servers.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  22. Re:Perhaps... by r.freeman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Daily 12.000.000 usd worth of bitcoin is converted on biggest exchange ( http://bitcoincharts.com/markets/btceUSD.html ) Converting 20.000 usd is triviall.

  23. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great! You can use that electricity to generate Bitcoins, then you can sell those to get actual money!

  24. Re:Perhaps... by r.freeman · · Score: 2

    Even local bitcoins would do it: https://localbitcoins.com/buy-bitcoins-online/cad/ Or just set up account with mtgox, btc-e or any of various other exchanges, and get money wired to your bank account, what is the problem?

  25. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did that in November, worked fine for me.

  26. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I sold 25 Bitcoin for $23,000 with CaVirtex. It took me a couple of weeks to get my account verified, but I did get the money out.

  27. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by r.freeman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Mircea Popescu is very nice person, thank you for saving OpenBSD. Now, why are some a-holes here bouthmouthing one person that did something to help OpenBSD's problem?! And jumping to conclusions and all. Jesus Christ that will teach any future milionares to sponsor FOSS.

  28. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would get actual money from selling that electricity too and it would be much more efficient deal for you. In most cases you can just push the electricity back to the grid, and the energy company will pay you.

  29. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is trivial.

    I could literally convert this and have it in a bank account within 15 minutes.
    I will perform a demonstration if someone would be kind enough to send 20 BTC here:

    1NeWBRsxxU9wSENoNRGkBA7Qi1ka5nkJAB

  30. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Informative

    Romanian != Roma.

    Romania is a country whose inhabitants are called, in English, Romanians. The name of the country (and therefore the people) comes from Rome. The Roman Empire. THAT Rome. Romanian--like French, Spanish, and Italian--is a romance language descended directly from Latin. Some even argue that it's the Romance language that today most closely resembles Latin!

    Roma, on the other hand, is a name for a minority population of people that most probably emigrated from South Asia over a thousand years ago. AKA gypsies. The word Roma comes from some Roma dialect and has no connection to Romania or Roman other than as homonyms. Good example of a false congate--they sound alike, but there is no connection.

    Admittedly, the conflation is a common mistake to make, especially since there is a very large (comparatively speaking) Roma population in Romania.

  31. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here, here. Where was Tim Cook? Where was Steve Wozniak? WHere was the Oracle douche Ellison? Missing. What was here for the Open Source Movement? An mysterious Bitcoin Billionaire who likes young women nude in public.

  32. Re:Perhaps... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Cheap hot air is actually great if you have a gas turbine and a generator and can sell the resulting electricity.

    So can we fit one to the capitol building? Lots of cheap hot air is going to waste there at the moment.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  33. Welcome to 'new submitter' MrBingoBoingo by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you'll fit in here just fine. Has anyone told you what happened to John Katz yet? Oh, yeah. We Don't Talk About That.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    1. Re:Welcome to 'new submitter' MrBingoBoingo by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

      John or Joel Katz. Entrepreneurs are curious.

  34. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by r.freeman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You know most man like young women. More NEWS AT 11: most man like sex and many like beer. But keep on being hater, instead appreciating donations.

  35. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

    I never meant that as a negative.

  36. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Yes, very easy.
    http://buttcoin.org/easy

  37. A bitcoin billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does it mean to be a bitcoin billionaire?

    To own a billion bitcoins? Since there will never be more than about 21 million bitcoins, by design, this is obviously not meant.

    Maybe he owns a billion satoshi? Well, a satoshi is 10^-8 bitcoins, therefore a billion bitcoins is 10 bitcoin. That's about $10000, if I'm not mistaken. Which certainly is not nothing, but also not an extraordinary large number.

    1. Re:A bitcoin billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you'd expect, it means he owns a billion dollars' worth of Bitcoin stuff.

    2. Re:A bitcoin billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I expect dollars? As far as I know, the dollar is not the official currency in Romania.

      And if so, which dollar? The US dollar? the Canadian? the Australian? The Zimbabwean?

  38. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    You hear with your ears. The exclamation is 'Hear, hear!"

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  39. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by zazzel · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Romanian--like French, Spanish, and Italian--is a romance language descended directly from Latin. Some even argue that it's the Romance language that today most closely resembles Latin!

    I'd say it's the language that most closely resembles Italian. You can really confuse them, at least with your eyes closed. Of course, if you open your eyes again, you will easily spot the Italian: It's the one constantly using his/her hands to make gestures. Italian is probably the only language that doesn't leave out deaf people. You can essentially *see* everything that's being said. And of course, even if your hearing is somewhat impaired, you can also still hear it. At the other end of town.

  40. Re:Perhaps... by pantaril · · Score: 4, Informative

    This assumes that 20,000$ worth of bitcoins can be converted to real money.

    This assumption is correct.

  41. Re:Perhaps... by pantaril · · Score: 4, Informative

    The point is, there are no BUYERS. It will not happen. No one is going to pay $20k of REAL money for bitcoins.

    I don't know WTF are you talking about but converting bitcoins to 20k USD is non-issue on most existing exchanges like coinbase, bitstamp, mtgox or btc-e. Just go and see their daily trade volume.

  42. Re:Perhaps... by gigaherz · · Score: 0

    Unless you assume the bitcoins to grow in value over time, as the general trend is, in which case keeping those bitcoins may give you a better benefit than the interest a bank may give you for keeping the real money in it.

  43. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not if you are Cockney.

  44. Re:Perhaps... by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Cheap hot air is actually great if you have a gas turbine and a generator and can sell the resulting electricity.

    So can we fit one to the capitol building? Lots of cheap hot air is going to waste there at the moment.

    Hell, just strap a mask onto Al Gore and collect his hot air. Maybe that + Congress would solve all of our energy needs!

  45. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    He is the "MP" in MPEx, the major bitcoin exchange. Unfortunately, it's not a completely unique name and there is a few others with the same name...

  46. Re:Perhaps... by gox · · Score: 3, Informative

    OpenBSD already accepts Bitcoin donations:

    http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/donations.html

    Just sent 50 CAD worth, easy peasy. They get converted on the fly to the local currency by BitPay.

    Are you from 2010?

  47. So near and yet so far by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it have been so much better if it were "A Bulgarian Bitcoin Billionaire"

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
    1. Re:So near and yet so far by aliquis · · Score: 0

      Or a finish dogecoin billionaire.

      Serious money, much secure, such Theo de Raadt, wow!

    2. Re:So near and yet so far by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Don't get it.

      If it's DogeCoin shouldn't it be Venetian?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:So near and yet so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea. I just took another country.

      (I could relate it somewhat to OpenBSD by picking one where it's usually built.)

  48. Re:Perhaps... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    So can we fit one to the capitol building? Lots of cheap hot air is going to waste there at the moment.

    Cheap!

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  49. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Here, here.

    Where was Tim Cook? Where was Steve Wozniak? WHere was the Oracle douche Ellison? .

    Fuck that, where was Steve Jobs!

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  50. Re:Perhaps... by Keerok · · Score: 2

    Some languages reverse tje use of the period instead and the comma. The French definitely do it. Makes it a bit confusing I suppose, but the the groupings of 3 0s is a good indicator.

  51. Re:Perhaps... by Tynin · · Score: 1

    Yup, if you look at the 3 big exchanges that deal with USD, you'll see $1.4 BILLION USD changing hands in the last month for bitcoins. It isn't rare to see a couple million $$$ change hands in small handful of trades.

  52. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he has a better excuse than the rest.

  53. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I'd say it's the English language countries who reverse the use of the period and the comma. ;-)

    But joking aside, it makes more sense to me that the more visible character is used for the more significant meaning. The comma is more visible than the point. And while omitting the thousands separator doesn't change the meaning, omitting the decimal separator completely changes the meaning.

  54. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dollar sign goes in front for US currency: $20,000

  55. Ignoramus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Actually he is correct - shovinistic is based on the Hebrew word Shova which means intolerant. AFAIK the etymology of Chauvinist is not related it to this, it is just a weird coincidence that they sound the same.

    Just because someone uses a word you do not know which sounds like a word you DO know, does not mean they spelt it wrong.

    Do you feel embarrassed now that you've been humiliated in front of those of us more educated than yourself, who you previously considered as peers but now realise that we are actually your superiors?

    1. Re:Ignoramus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jules: I'm sorry, did I break your concentration? I didn't mean to do that. Please, continue, you were saying something about best intentions. What's the matter? Oh, you were finished! Well, allow me to retort. What does Marsellus Wallace look like?
      Brett: What?
      Jules: What country are you from?
      Brett: What? What? Wh - ?
      Jules: "What" ain't no country I've ever heard of. They speak English in What?
      Brett: What?
      Jules: English, motherfucker, do you speak it?
      Brett: Yes! Yes!
      Jules: Then you know what I'm sayin'!
      Brett: Yes!
      Jules: Describe what Marsellus Wallace looks like!
      Brett: What?
      Jules: Say 'what' again. Say 'what' again, I dare you, I double dare you motherfucker, say what one more Goddamn time!

      BTW, citation needed. Can't find a dictionary with a definition of "shovinistic". Chauvinism comes from:

      Its eponym is a French soldier Nicolas Chauvin, who was badly wounded in the Napoleonic wars.

      chauvinist (n.) 1877, from French chauviniste, from Chauvin (see chauvinism). Related: Chauvinistic (1870).

    2. Re:Ignoramus by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well I think Chauvin was an asshole, but hell, if you'd been badly wounded in a war, you might be pretty cranky yourself.

  56. Very cool of him by ikhider · · Score: 1

    I am very glad to see these projects funded. I like a diverse ecosystem of operating systems and ideas as opposed to a homogeneous realm of only one flavor of GNU/Linux or BSD. The more things being tried, the better. Despite the bitterness expressed here with the OpenBSD team and the way they run things, I admire their dedication. They produce some lovely stuff like OpenSSH. I am not a fan of Godaddy, but was pleased even they sent a cheque for development of OpenSSH. It is a worthwhile goal. The more operating operating systems out there, the better. Especially ones focused on security. My understanding is some hospital and other critical infrastructure use OpenBSD.

    --
    "SO we bide our time, waiting for a purer kick to bloom and the future is still bleak, uncertain and beautiful" -GSYBE
  57. Beware Romainians bearing gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There might be something we're not being told about this transaction.

  58. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Italian is probably the only language that doesn't leave out deaf people.

    We're on Slashdot. Deafness not an issue here. Uh... let's see.. what else could a deaf person communicate in, besides typically audible languages with a written variant: sign languages, braille... nope, can't think of anything a deaf person could use!

  59. Re:Perhaps... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    How can you get to a bank account in 15mins? I can convert instantly but two business days are required to get it to my bank.

  60. keeping developers honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I understand, the build servers are absolutely archaic beasts that had they been replaced long ago would not have led to such astronomically high bills. /p>

    There are a variety of of build serves. There are ones for SPARC (and SPARC64), MacPPC, SGI/MIPS, VAX, etc.:

    http://openbsd.org/plat.html

    One of the reasons why this is done is help expose bugs. Some issues are only exposed on non-mainstream architectures, and if everyone only uses certain CPUs, then they won't be found (as easily). Back in the early 1990s, not many people used DEC Alpha, but by supporting it (both in the BSD and Linux world), it kept kernel developers "honest" when it came to supporting things besides 32-bit Intel. When AMD64 came along (and then Intel's uptake of it), the code was a lot cleaner and able to better support it with a minimal of fuss (Linus has himself so stated).

    Similarly if you supported RISC-y processors like 68K, MIPS, and SPARC, you would be better prepared for when ARM came along in the mainstream. Similarly support for big- and little-endian CPUs, and CPUs that are bi-endian, keeps kernel folks honest for things like alignment issues.

    This is why I also think that userland developers should developers should try running their software on non-Linux systems in at least a perfunctory fashion. When Debian made the switch from Bash to dash for /bin/sh it broken a lot of things. If developers had tried some simply tests of their software on (say) a BSD, they would have learned quite quickly that they had used Bash-ism and needed to either change their code, or simply explicitly used a shebang of /bin/bash.

    The computer world is not homegenous, and any developer (kernel or userland) who thinks otherwise limits themselves unnecessary and is asking for pain when their assumptions are proven false when reality changes (like the rise of amd64 and ARM, and with Debian's change of /bin/sh).

    1. Re:keeping developers honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      68k is CISC, not RISC. 68k assembler was used as an applications programming language by a lot of Amiga developers, for example.

    2. Re:keeping developers honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Similarly if you supported RISC-y processors like 68K...

      I think you meant 88K (68K being CISC).

  61. Re:Perhaps... by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Well, since you can donate the bitcoins directly, it really doesn't matter.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  62. Re:Bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital Money may not be popular but there is money in it!

  63. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know WTF are you talking about but converting bitcoins to 20k USD is non-issue on most existing exchanges like coinbase, bitstamp, mtgox or btc-e. Just go and see their daily trade volume.

    I dont know WTF you are talking about but actually getting your USD *out* of those exchanges is what the issue is.

  64. Re:Perhaps... by OverlordQ · · Score: 0

    Daily 12.000.000 usd worth of bitcoin is converted on biggest exchange

    Converted maybe, withdrawn? Hell no. Withdrawing USD from any of the exchanges is next to impossible.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  65. Re:Perhaps... by ttucker · · Score: 1

    I am SUPER CEREAL GUYS MAN BEAR PIG we have to fill the cave with MOLTEN LEAD.

  66. Re:Perhaps... by killkillkill · · Score: 1

    No one is going to pay $20k of REAL money for bitcoins

    Right, but many people will pay $20k of the "money" issued by the Federal Reserve.

  67. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Your sentiment is quite correct. I should have made it more explicit that I know nothing of Popescu except that he has made this generous donation to a worthy project, and my assumption was purely for the sake of argument.

    That said I should also say I know absolutely nothing about his "niceness" either, the quality appears to have no particular correlation with either generosity or alleged criminal behavior.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  68. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by Immerman · · Score: 1

    But then wouldn't it be " 'ear, 'ear", or should that be " 'ere, 'ere"?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  69. Proof? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    any proof that this isn't just someone typing into IRC?

    where is the announcement from Theo?

  70. Rumour by martinschrder · · Score: 1

    Till this is confirmed by Theo, this is nothing more than rumour, which might actually harm the project.

    1. Re:Rumour by ConstantineM · · Score: 1

      It has been confirmed:

      The MPEx Bitcoin stock exchange (run by Mircea Popescu) is listed on the significant contributors page.

      Also, according to Bob Beck, director of OpenBSD Foundation, 100k has been raised so far; their target goal for 2014 fundraising is 150k:

      http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/campaign2014.html

  71. dafuq lmao rofl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mircea Popescu a billionaire? Guys, this guy is lying about everything for at least 8 years. He spreads false rumors all the time. At least this was a good joke.

  72. Re:lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Racist. Not all Romanians are gypsies, and "gypsy" is a term with negative connotations anyway. I don't think they even self-iedntify as Romanian. Way to post anonymously, coward. And I wouldn't worry about OpenBSD being tainted by bitcoins. Bitcoins are fine, and OpenBSD is better alive than dead, no?

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  73. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is actually quite easy with OKPay. Also Bank of America supports transfers from the largest exchanges... do some research...

  74. wow! by cripkd · · Score: 1

    I'm in this branch for about 10 years and until last year I did support a FreeBSD running Apache and being used to host a site. So I was that lucky?

    --
    Curiously yours, crip.
  75. Re: Perhaps... you are a fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude 20K is 20-40 bitcoins. That gets sold every few minutes on the exchanges. How about you remove your head from your colon long enough to have a look around?

  76. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And being a grammar nazi when someone is pointing out bigotry is rather hypocrite. Fscking fascist.

  77. Let it die by simon1tan · · Score: 1

    Please just let it die so those programmers can focus their efforts on something more relevant.

    1. Re:Let it die by ralphsiegler · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's not relevant to you? Softwares from the OpenBSD project are in commercial controllers and appliances, in Linux distributions, in Mac OSX....

  78. Re:Perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't Bogart that joint, dude.

  79. Re:Perhaps... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

    only mtgox

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  80. Re:Perhaps... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    It matters to those of us who use bitcoin regularly. Also, the plural of bitcoin should be bitcoin not bitcoins. Whole units have no significance when handling bitcoin since there are no physical bits and you rarely hold or exchange even whole units.

  81. Re:Perhaps... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Admittedly I'm not dealing with sums anywhere near this magnitude, but so far I was able to withdraw every single cent of my proceeds from VirWoX (for a total of something approaching $1.5k over the last couple months). I'm using it because it was the easiest to set up, as they withdraw directly to your PayPal account, so all you need is to have one.

  82. Re:Perhaps... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    I don't know about instantly getting it into the bank account, but I can instantly have it in my PayPal account. From there to the bank then takes the usual 2 days, but I can spend it immediately in places which accept PayPal, which is quite a lot of them.

  83. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    > Romanian (i.e. gypsy)

    These are different things. Perhaps you are confusing 'Rroma' with 'Romanian'?

  84. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    > Romanian (i.e. gypsy)

    These are different things. Perhaps you are confusing 'Rroma' with 'Romanian'?

    did you read my post? obv not. btdubs the plural of roma is Romanian. it's different than the country! pay attention!

  85. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    I did read your post, and as a guy who speaks Romanian and has been to Romania and lives in a neighbor country - I am pretty confident in the fact that I understand this matter.

    The plural of 'Rroma' (also spelled as 'Roma') is 'Romani', not 'Romanian'.

  86. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    Romanian isn't a language. It's called Cyrillic. No stars!

  87. Re: lol @ Romanian "btc billionaire" by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    At this point I'm not sure if you're fooling around or are just misinformed, I will assume the latter.

    Romanian is a language, and Cyrillic is a form of writing. You can write Romanian using a Cyrillic alphabet if you really want to, but that's not how Romanians themselves do it.

    If you read the first paragraph of Wikipedias's articles on {Rroma, Romanian, Cyrillic} - you'll figure it out.

  88. Re:Mircea Popescu is very nice person by MrBingoBoingo · · Score: 1

    Lol

  89. Re: Perhaps... you are a fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until you realize none of that is getting physically paid out. The USD sits in mtgox forever, because they literally can't get it paid out. You'd have to be retarded to miss that fact.

  90. Useful products for entrepreneurs by sashidharan_b · · Score: 1

    I practice Business solutions. You can find some useful products for entrepreneurs here - https://www.instamojo.com/prac... You can also go through some articles related to entrepreneurship from the links below. Links: http://www.selfgrowth.com/expe... http://in.linkedin.com/in/sash... (Rated 'Expert' for profile strength) http://www.zintro.com/expert/s... ISSME Global SME Expert (www.issme.org) http://ezinearticles.com/?expe... Practice Website: http://sashidharanb.wix.com/bu... Products from practice: https://www.instamojo.com/prac...