Slashdot Mirror


How Farming Reshaped Our Genomes

sciencehabit writes "The earliest farmers may not have been built for the profession. They may have been unable to digest starch and milk, according to a new ancient DNA study of a nearly 8000-year-old human skeleton from Spain (a hunter-gatherer who had dark skin and blue eyes). But these pioneers did already possess immune defenses against some of the diseases that would later become the scourge of civilization. The findings are helping researchers understand what genetic and biological changes humans went through as they made the transition from hunting and gathering to farming."

4 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Why is he unkempt? by BobMcD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://news.sciencemag.org/sit...

    Who says he let his hair and beard grow long? What evidence from the skeleton would have led to this conclusion?

    1. Re:Why is he unkempt? by E++99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Flynt is sharper than any copper knife.
      Obsidian is sharper than any copper knife.
      Tribal people shave with flint to this day.
      There is archaeological evidence of shaving going back 20,000 years.

  2. Re:Lack of milk digestion seems dubious by Baloroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All mammals are, by definition, born with the ability to digest milk, therefore they have the genes to do that. It can happen that those genes are epi-genitically turned off in adults that are not exposed to milk. However, the genes would be still there.

    The genes for digestion are still there, yes, but they shut off after childhood unless you have a specific genetic mutation that allows lifelong production of lactase. Source 1, source 2.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  3. Re:At the time .... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Possibly the introduction of high-fructose corn syrup into everything that's artificially sweetened.

    No, and also no. It's the rise of processed foods, which come without the enzymes which break them down and thus help regulate blood sugar, and then the substitution of vegetable oil with HFCS, not simply its inclusion. Using HFCS instead of sugar is barely different. Using HFCS+Citric Acid instead of vegetable oil packs food with unnecessary sugar instead of the fats which give long-term energy. Thus, HFCS is used to do evil, but it's not really inherently evil in its own right. Like a gun, or a bomb.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"