Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's IE Is the Most Targeted Application By Security Researchers

darthcamaro writes "Though Microsoft hasn't yet patched its Internet Explorer web browser in 2014, it did patch IE at least once every month in 2013. According to HP's 2013 Cyber Risk Report, more researchers tried to sell IE vulnerabilities than any other product vulnerability. 'IE is the most prevalent browser on the systems that attackers want to compromise' said Jacob West, CTO of HP's Enterprise Security Group."

6 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Bear in mind by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IE is such a piece of crap to start with and that most users use it because it's there by default and they don't know any better (Which is a security issue in itself). Of course most Hac**** sorry I mean security researchers are targeting MS & IE. Just wait for MS to die off then we'll see them targeting Apple, Android and whoever the next big thing is.

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Bear in mind by glavenoid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not having used IE since ver 7 I was really surprised that IE 10 and 11 are actually decent enough to use for a while when some firefox or chrome update breaks shit, but it still has its fair share of annoyances. Please allow me to enumerate a few of my annoyances with IE 11:

      1. You can block flash fairly easily, but only on a site-by-site basis, and once you whitelist a site you can't remove it without removing *every other site* you've whitelisted. C'mon IE, I only want to allow flash to watch some stupid video on this site this one time...

      1.a Oh yeah, flash is baked in to the browser now, but it seems to be a shitty version that stutters on streaming videos making it a crapshoot whether or not it'll be watchable.

      2. There is a built-in tracking/ad blocker but again, there's no fine-grained control without really dicking around with some ... file.. somewhere. IOW it's not intuitive and it's very difficult to whitelist a particular site's ads without fucking IE's whole ad blocking program.

      3. IE finally renders shit correctly, uhh, except for all the "legacy" shit that was built with workarounds for older versions of IE, like e.g. vBulletin.. And I don't "get" IE well enough to tell it how to tell the site to STFU and give me the firefox version (which renders correctly in IE BTW) since IE doesn't seem to like to play nice with user-agent strings outside of its archaic F12 devtools..

      4. Fucking font rendering SUCKS. Microsoft took an enormous step backwards with their font renderer in windows 8/8.1 and it really shows in IE.

      5. IE is now reliable at recovering the pages when it crashes, which is good 'cause it crashes a lot.

      I'd like to interject that I sometimes use and enjoy IE now, but I just need to get this off my chest.

      6. Private browsing is good, unless you want to have 2 or more private browsers open on the same site like e.g. two or more gmail accounts open simultaneously, which you can't do because the cookies are shared amongst them... Well, you can if you have one open in the standard IE and the other in private mode, BUT NO MORE.

      7. it's finally reasonably secure, or at least the competition is now equally insecure.

      Any more I don't choose a browser because it has features I like, I choose a browser because the competition has pissed me off, and it's an arms race to see which one can get to the bottom first... Firefox is shitty, chrome is shitty, IE is shitty but which one is going to piss me off the most today?

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
  2. Re:But, we just said no one use IE? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You needn't use IE for it to be useful to attackers. It is the one thing present on EVERY SINGLE system running an OS from MS, and it is the one single thing on every MS OS operated PC that is not only well suited to making connections via internet but also the one that the MS firewall routinely allows to in the default setting.

    The good old "we send the user a bogus EXE in mail" isn't really good anymore because of the MS firewall and UAC. Works like a charm, though, with a bogus script abusing an IE vulnerability since IE is considered a "trusted" application by default.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Give credit where its due by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The low level coders on the ie team did a good job with graphics performance in IE9. Don't tar them with the same brush as the idiot management/marketing layer who think fancy features and bloat are more important than building a secure product from the ground up to start with (and I'm talking about the browser and OS)

    1. Re:Give credit where its due by ibwolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Atleast from IE9 onwards (OK and IE8 a bit) they started to notice that standards are a good thing

      No, they just stopped being able to ignore standards due to their shrinking market share.

  4. "Security researchers" by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ha. I always cringe when black hat crackers are called "security researchers". That's not research, it's malicious destroying of other people's systems and data.