Slashdot Mirror


Satya Nadella Named Microsoft CEO

Nerval's Lobster writes "As widely expected after last week's rumors, Satya Nadella has been named the new CEO of Microsoft. Nadella is Microsoft's third CEO, after co-founder Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. He's been with the company for more than twenty years, eventually becoming executive vice president of its Cloud and Enterprise division; Nadella and his team were responsible for the creation of 'Cloud OS,' the platform that powers Microsoft's large-scale cloud services such as SkyDrive, Azure, and Office 365. Under his guidance, Microsoft's revenue from cloud services has grown by several billion dollars over the past few years. In his email to employees, Nadella said that he was 'humbled' by his appointment, and that he had asked Bill Gates to act as a close adviser in the months and years ahead." He devoted much of the rest of the email "to explaining his philosophy of technology, and how that will ultimately influence his leadership. 'The opportunity ahead will require us to reimagine a lot of what we have done in the past for a mobile and cloud-first world, and do new things,' he added. 'We are the only ones who can harness the power of software and deliver it through devices and services that truly empower every individual and every organization.' A lot of tech companies would disagree the assertion that Microsoft is the 'only' company capable of merging hardware and software into forms that businesses and consumers find appealing, but Nadella must do his best to reassert his company's position as a technology leader. Nadella indicated near the end of his email that he would follow through on the 'One Microsoft' strategy formulated under Ballmer, which includes a massive reorganization currently underway." Reader rjmarvin notes that "Nadella will take over as CEO immediately, allowing Steve Ballmer to retire early," and reader SmartAboutThings says that "John Thompson, a lead independent director for the Board of Directors, will take over the role of Chairman of the Board of Directors that Gates held."

21 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Office 365 by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, after being responsible for Office 365, what could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Office 365 by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Informative

      The whole concept of running a text processor on a remote server when you have a super computer from 20 years ago inside your pocket is just so stupid it prompts for decapitation. Also well deserved slavery.

      WTF are you talking about? Office 365 is subscription office for individuals (with other perks like some cloud storage and Skype credits) as well as hosted server products for businesses. You get the full Office suite, the same binaries you get if you buy the boxed version. They have been playing around with a web based version to allow editing when you are on the road or on a guest PC, but that is not the focus of the product at all.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Office 365 by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what's wrong with Office 365?

      Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

      Anything you store in Microsoft's cloud is subject to the PATRIOT Act and can be demanded with a secret warrant.

      And, as much as Microsoft likes to talk about Scroogling, you can bet your ass they are doing the exact same thing, and if they say otherwise they're lying to you.

      Lots of people love heroin too, that doesn't make it good for you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Office 365 by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

      In a lot of cases, yes. That doesn't mean that this particular implementation of a cloud office system is a poor one, nor reflect badly on it's exec, who was doing the job asked.

  2. I wouold argue by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    that Steve Ballmer retiring now is not 'early'. About a decade late.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I wouold argue by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will Satya Nadella support developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers though?

    2. Re:I wouold argue by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's not retiring; he has simply outsourced his chair-tossing to an Indian guy.

    3. Re:I wouold argue by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I disagree; I think Ballmer should have been retained as CEO indefinitely.

      If they really had to replace him, they should have picked whoever came up with the Microsoft Songsmith commercial.

  3. Re:Doomed by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No doubt, but he didn't know how to innovate or even keep up with new technologies and markets. Microsoft has been floundering for the past decade, riding the momentum they built up in the 80's and 90's but never successfully adding to it. Their strategy lately is almost monkey throwing darts. Let's try this! No, this! No, that!

    At the same time they poisoned their own corporate environment and created a ton of churn in their lower ranks, bleeding young new talent to rivals and startups.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  4. Re:Doomed by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason that he's leaving is that the shareholders surmise that MS made money despite Ballmer not because of him. MS has two main sources of revenue and profit: Windows and Office. These were the same when he took over. Even then Windows is starting to decline. Windows Vista was hated and so is Win 8. They still made money because OEMs really have no choice.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  5. Give him a chance by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, let's at least not destroy this guy immediately. Maybe he has something good to bring to Microsoft as the CEO.

    1. Re:Give him a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are a 300 billion dollar company and between the 4th and 6th largest company in world (depends on fluctuating stock prices). I realize you probably get all of your info from Slashdot comments, but in the real world they are doing quite well.

  6. Let the hatred commence... by HerculesMO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been on Slashdot long enough to know that unless Linus accepted the CEO spot, whoever got it was going to get a lot of hate here.

    The only thing I can say is that Microsoft is in dire need of engineering, and they promoted an engineer to the top spot. I think that's refreshing. What happens from here on out depends on what the roadmap looks like, but if the Surface Pro 2 is any indication, they are actually going down a good path on the hardware end of things. Time will tell on the software end.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  7. Re:In other words ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't see Steve's Apple doing much listening either

    Steve Jobs, also, told us what we want. The difference: he was right in what he chose to offer.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  8. Your tinfoil hat is on too tight by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

    I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight. There are plenty of cases where the data isn't all that confidential. It's not really all that hard to store confidential things locally or offline while using cloud storage for less sensitive items. We use Google Drive in our company to store work instructions and forms. If someone at NSA want's to look at those then they can go right ahead. It's nothing that requires deep levels of secrecy but it does require efficient controlled distribution and multiple person access.

    1. Re:Your tinfoil hat is on too tight by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

      But it doesn't work if it's not tight. :-P

      I've worked in private industry, and I've done consultant work with government -- and any non-US government or large industry using Microsoft cloud services is opening themselves up for problems.

      The entire world that isn't the US should avoid any of Microsoft's cloud services. So, if you're an American entity, go ahead and use them. If you're not, and you use them, you're an idiot and your data will be potentially used illegally with neither your knowledge or consent.

      So the easiest solution is to not use the service at all.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  9. Re:Doomed by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are 100% bang on when you say " Let's try this! No, this! No, that! " -- Microsoft is running around like a chicken with its head cut off.

    It is because MS doen't have a freaking clue about *good* User Interface or User Experience. To understand UI you need to understand TWO things:

    1. S/N and
    2. Flow.

    Here is the perfect example of Microsoft being total fucktards: google: visual studio 2012 menu all caps

    https://www.google.com/search?...

    We use uppercase and lowercase in books to make it EASIER to read. Reading off a screen is already harder on the eyes why the hell would you make it even more so?!?! Oh, and let's get rid of those underlines so people can actually *see* and *learn* the hotkeys / keyboard accelerators. Let's dumb the UI down to full retard mode because how dare anyone suggest you can design a UI for novices and the power user!

    Microsoft will never understand that you need to take advantage of the strengths AND be aware of the weaknesses of the hardware to massage the Software + Hardware + User Experience. Microsoft has all the arrogance of Apple without understanding why Apple makes some of its changes. (Apple is by no means a saint, but they tend to have a more consistent User Experience.)

    > they poisoned their own corporate environment

    Yup! Stack Ranking has to be the dumbest move ever. As a company you want to motivate your employees; it is also import to not demotivate them.

    Again, MS is clueless.

  10. Re:Never mind Nedalla, why is Gates stepping down? by netsavior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think he is obsessing about his charity more and more, and even a ceremonial roll is too much. Also, leaving the board is like a vote of confidence in Nadalla. "See I had to babysit Steve 'developers-developers-developers' Balmer, but this new guy is totally fine."

  11. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because he would sink the ship, as he did with Nokia.

  12. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need Elop, not Nadella!

    No worries - Elop will still be well rewarded for his efforts. Expect a new VP in MSFT soon.

    (I only wish this were a conspiracy theory...)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  13. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed. For one, I hoped that Microsoft was took over by a woman, which could mean that finally someone who cares about the look-and-feel is in control of the company. By the way, he's Indian, so it looks like it's a normal name there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    And people complain management is never outsourced