Slashdot Mirror


Satya Nadella Named Microsoft CEO

Nerval's Lobster writes "As widely expected after last week's rumors, Satya Nadella has been named the new CEO of Microsoft. Nadella is Microsoft's third CEO, after co-founder Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer. He's been with the company for more than twenty years, eventually becoming executive vice president of its Cloud and Enterprise division; Nadella and his team were responsible for the creation of 'Cloud OS,' the platform that powers Microsoft's large-scale cloud services such as SkyDrive, Azure, and Office 365. Under his guidance, Microsoft's revenue from cloud services has grown by several billion dollars over the past few years. In his email to employees, Nadella said that he was 'humbled' by his appointment, and that he had asked Bill Gates to act as a close adviser in the months and years ahead." He devoted much of the rest of the email "to explaining his philosophy of technology, and how that will ultimately influence his leadership. 'The opportunity ahead will require us to reimagine a lot of what we have done in the past for a mobile and cloud-first world, and do new things,' he added. 'We are the only ones who can harness the power of software and deliver it through devices and services that truly empower every individual and every organization.' A lot of tech companies would disagree the assertion that Microsoft is the 'only' company capable of merging hardware and software into forms that businesses and consumers find appealing, but Nadella must do his best to reassert his company's position as a technology leader. Nadella indicated near the end of his email that he would follow through on the 'One Microsoft' strategy formulated under Ballmer, which includes a massive reorganization currently underway." Reader rjmarvin notes that "Nadella will take over as CEO immediately, allowing Steve Ballmer to retire early," and reader SmartAboutThings says that "John Thompson, a lead independent director for the Board of Directors, will take over the role of Chairman of the Board of Directors that Gates held."

43 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Office 365 by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, after being responsible for Office 365, what could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Office 365 by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Informative

      The whole concept of running a text processor on a remote server when you have a super computer from 20 years ago inside your pocket is just so stupid it prompts for decapitation. Also well deserved slavery.

      WTF are you talking about? Office 365 is subscription office for individuals (with other perks like some cloud storage and Skype credits) as well as hosted server products for businesses. You get the full Office suite, the same binaries you get if you buy the boxed version. They have been playing around with a web based version to allow editing when you are on the road or on a guest PC, but that is not the focus of the product at all.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Office 365 by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what's wrong with Office 365?

      Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

      Anything you store in Microsoft's cloud is subject to the PATRIOT Act and can be demanded with a secret warrant.

      And, as much as Microsoft likes to talk about Scroogling, you can bet your ass they are doing the exact same thing, and if they say otherwise they're lying to you.

      Lots of people love heroin too, that doesn't make it good for you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Office 365 by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

      In a lot of cases, yes. That doesn't mean that this particular implementation of a cloud office system is a poor one, nor reflect badly on it's exec, who was doing the job asked.

    4. Re:Office 365 by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you put that data in microsoft remote servers, in microsoft private formats, accessible for you when and how microsoft decides, and that shares it with whoever it consideres necessary or at least profitable, why you keep calling it your data?

    5. Re:Office 365 by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK before you even start kicking the cloud.

      Talk about the idea of storing your information in a propitiatory format using a subscription based software that you do not own.

      "Oh your millions of documents are all in our closed source format now? It would be a shame of our subscription service quadrupled in price... Then again the stand alone versions are even more expensive... That's OK however, you will only have to pay us monthly... for forever."

      Once you get by that stupid part, then you can go on to the stupid part about cloud based services... Also note that 99.99% of all those services are hosted in the USA where the NSA and every other government agency will be helping themselves to all your private data for whatever purposes they deem fit,

      SO yeah, very quickly 3 good reasons never to use, and that is before you even look at the actual price, software features, etc...

    6. Re:Office 365 by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole concept of running a text processor on a remote server when you have a super computer from 20 years ago inside your pocket is just so stupid it prompts for decapitation. Also well deserved slavery.

      WTF are you talking about? Office 365 is subscription office for individuals (with other perks like some cloud storage and Skype credits) as well as hosted server products for businesses.

      Spoken like a true shill. In that you completely blew off the GP's point about the entire concept of running a text processor on a remote server being patently absurd and instead just drove straight on forward with the marketing spiel. Well-done, EvilSS! Your bonus will be signed by Mr. Nadella himself this month!

      And again I find myself asking: WTF are you talking about? In what way does "running a text processor on a remote server" have ANYTHING to do with Office 365?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  2. I wouold argue by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    that Steve Ballmer retiring now is not 'early'. About a decade late.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I wouold argue by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

      Will Satya Nadella support developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers though?

    2. Re:I wouold argue by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's not retiring; he has simply outsourced his chair-tossing to an Indian guy.

    3. Re:I wouold argue by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I disagree; I think Ballmer should have been retained as CEO indefinitely.

      If they really had to replace him, they should have picked whoever came up with the Microsoft Songsmith commercial.

  3. Doomed by js3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hate Ballmer all you want but that dude knew how to make money.

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:Doomed by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No doubt, but he didn't know how to innovate or even keep up with new technologies and markets. Microsoft has been floundering for the past decade, riding the momentum they built up in the 80's and 90's but never successfully adding to it. Their strategy lately is almost monkey throwing darts. Let's try this! No, this! No, that!

      At the same time they poisoned their own corporate environment and created a ton of churn in their lower ranks, bleeding young new talent to rivals and startups.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re:Doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hate Ballmer all you want but that dude knew how to make money.

      I would rather state that Microsoft was profitable, despite Ballmer was at the helm.

    3. Re:Doomed by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The reason that he's leaving is that the shareholders surmise that MS made money despite Ballmer not because of him. MS has two main sources of revenue and profit: Windows and Office. These were the same when he took over. Even then Windows is starting to decline. Windows Vista was hated and so is Win 8. They still made money because OEMs really have no choice.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Doomed by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are 100% bang on when you say " Let's try this! No, this! No, that! " -- Microsoft is running around like a chicken with its head cut off.

      It is because MS doen't have a freaking clue about *good* User Interface or User Experience. To understand UI you need to understand TWO things:

      1. S/N and
      2. Flow.

      Here is the perfect example of Microsoft being total fucktards: google: visual studio 2012 menu all caps

      https://www.google.com/search?...

      We use uppercase and lowercase in books to make it EASIER to read. Reading off a screen is already harder on the eyes why the hell would you make it even more so?!?! Oh, and let's get rid of those underlines so people can actually *see* and *learn* the hotkeys / keyboard accelerators. Let's dumb the UI down to full retard mode because how dare anyone suggest you can design a UI for novices and the power user!

      Microsoft will never understand that you need to take advantage of the strengths AND be aware of the weaknesses of the hardware to massage the Software + Hardware + User Experience. Microsoft has all the arrogance of Apple without understanding why Apple makes some of its changes. (Apple is by no means a saint, but they tend to have a more consistent User Experience.)

      > they poisoned their own corporate environment

      Yup! Stack Ranking has to be the dumbest move ever. As a company you want to motivate your employees; it is also import to not demotivate them.

      Again, MS is clueless.

  4. In other words ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The opportunity ahead will require us to reimagine a lot of what we have done in the past for a mobile and cloud-first world, and do new things

    In other words, Microsoft is going to proceed with a vision which may or may not be of interest to consumers, and once again tell us what we want instead of listening to us.

    So now the same idiot who was in charge of XBox being an always on-line nuisance is going to ram this philosophy through the rest of the product lines.

    They might find this to their detriment.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:In other words ... by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cloud services is one of the few parts of MS that is both making money and growing. I'd say that's a pretty strong signal about who their customers actually are, and what those customers actually want.

      You want MS to be Sony, Nintendo, or Apple. Unfortunately the dream of that MS died when the skunk works team behind the original Xbox were squeezed out. Better they become a productive business company than continue as a half-assed consumer one.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:In other words ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      don't see Steve's Apple doing much listening either

      Steve Jobs, also, told us what we want. The difference: he was right in what he chose to offer.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  5. Give him a chance by jones_supa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, let's at least not destroy this guy immediately. Maybe he has something good to bring to Microsoft as the CEO.

    1. Re:Give him a chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are a 300 billion dollar company and between the 4th and 6th largest company in world (depends on fluctuating stock prices). I realize you probably get all of your info from Slashdot comments, but in the real world they are doing quite well.

    2. Re:Give him a chance by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, I think it's really a mixed bag. Microsoft is of course continuing to make money, and some of their recent products have shown noteworthy improvement. On the other hand, it's been clear that they've been floundering a bit for years. They've had several major blunders and screw-ups that would have buried any company that didn't start out with a monopoly in a lucrative market. That is, if they hadn't had a steady income from Windows/Office/Exchange, from customers who pretty well have to buy those products whether they like it or not, then they wouldn't be able to stay in business selling their other products. And even those products have been mishandled.

      But you're right, yes, they continue to make massive amounts of money from those products in spite of the mishandling. But "doing quite well"? I would say that if they were doing quite well, they wouldn't have dropped Ballmer.

  6. Re:"humbled"? by sideslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a way of being polite and classy, and saying "I know there are a lot of really qualified people around me, and your selection of me has forced me to honestly reflect on my weaknesses." It's more a communication to his peers who were just passed over for the job than to the underlings who were never in the running.

    Now, did you really need that explained to you, or were you just running your mouth?

  7. Let the hatred commence... by HerculesMO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been on Slashdot long enough to know that unless Linus accepted the CEO spot, whoever got it was going to get a lot of hate here.

    The only thing I can say is that Microsoft is in dire need of engineering, and they promoted an engineer to the top spot. I think that's refreshing. What happens from here on out depends on what the roadmap looks like, but if the Surface Pro 2 is any indication, they are actually going down a good path on the hardware end of things. Time will tell on the software end.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
    1. Re:Let the hatred commence... by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been on Slashdot long enough to know that unless Linus accepted the CEO spot, whoever got it was going to get a lot of hate here.

      If Linus did become CEO of Microsoft I suspect you would see more hate than ever before!

    2. Re:Let the hatred commence... by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good Start, breaking bad quickly once the rest of the announcement is read!

      Unfortunately, Gates and Ballmer left, but they are both mega shareholders, still on the board, and whoppee, Bill Gates is coming back to be more involved in new products "working one day a week" as a rumor out of Redmond says an "anonymous source."

      The quote "'We are the only ones who can harness the power of software " is emblematic of the arrogance and lack of analysis of competitor's products, considering that most products now are integrated hardware products.

      How come I've already lost interest in what Satya says.

  8. Re:"humbled"? by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    (C) He thinks that being made CEO is a punishment for some mistake he's made in his current job.

    Or maybe a past life

  9. Your tinfoil hat is on too tight by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because storing your private/confidential information in a cloud is a stupid idea, because you don't really have control over your data.

    I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight. There are plenty of cases where the data isn't all that confidential. It's not really all that hard to store confidential things locally or offline while using cloud storage for less sensitive items. We use Google Drive in our company to store work instructions and forms. If someone at NSA want's to look at those then they can go right ahead. It's nothing that requires deep levels of secrecy but it does require efficient controlled distribution and multiple person access.

    1. Re:Your tinfoil hat is on too tight by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think your tinfoil hat is on too tight.

      But it doesn't work if it's not tight. :-P

      I've worked in private industry, and I've done consultant work with government -- and any non-US government or large industry using Microsoft cloud services is opening themselves up for problems.

      The entire world that isn't the US should avoid any of Microsoft's cloud services. So, if you're an American entity, go ahead and use them. If you're not, and you use them, you're an idiot and your data will be potentially used illegally with neither your knowledge or consent.

      So the easiest solution is to not use the service at all.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Your tinfoil hat is on too tight by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

      > If someone at NSA want's to look at those
      Is that a plural? So why the apostrophe, moron?

      You are the moron I think. Consider: The NSA is so bloody possessive; the apostrophe is warranted in my book!

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  10. Re:"humbled"? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

    To be humbled, to be made to feel small or modest. Pretty standard bit of English. Seems a natural reaction to being put into a massively auspicious position. You're not a robot powered by a 1900s dictionary and a copy of Stunk and White-Out are you?

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  11. Never mind Nedalla, why is Gates stepping down? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chairman is a mostly ceremonial role so the only reason I can see for him stepping down is that he can see the cliff coming and wants to get off before the company goes over. Either that or he thinks his image has been so poisoned by Ballmer that he suspects he needs to go to make the company's image bounce back.

    Very strange.

    1. Re:Never mind Nedalla, why is Gates stepping down? by netsavior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think he is obsessing about his charity more and more, and even a ceremonial roll is too much. Also, leaving the board is like a vote of confidence in Nadalla. "See I had to babysit Steve 'developers-developers-developers' Balmer, but this new guy is totally fine."

  12. Could be the "least bad" move by AlexOsadzinski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've met Satya. It was several years ago, as part of a larger groups of VCs who regularly met Microsoft execs. He comes across as technically knowledgeable, smart, decent "presence" and leadership. He didn't strike me as visionary, but that's hard to judge when you're in a group that's being given the corporate line.

    Knowing a little about the Microsoft culture, and having seen it over the past 20+ years, I personally think that an outsider would have a horrible time. First, in a company that is strictly a technocracy (and that comes from Bill himself), a non-technical outsider would be derided and would have a very tough time. A Gerstner->IBM type of hire probably wouldn't work. A technical outsider would still have to deal with the pretty inbred internal culture.

    We've seen disastrous "shake the company up with outsiders" hires at HP, Yahoo (not Marissa, the, um, previous errors), Motorola, Nokia and others. Satya is probably, IMHO, a good hire, he knows the culture, and he has to simultaneously manage transitions in various product lines, and keep the money engine going. Remember, while many people talk as if Microsoft is dead and irrelevant, just look around you at almost any conference, or on a flight, and see how many people are using Windows and/or Office. And Microsoft is still worth around a third of a TRILLION dollars. A decent chunk of the US population invests in Microsoft, directly or through funds. A CEO can't take big risks with that market cap.

    I wish him the best. He's got a lot to do.

  13. wait for it... by bugs2squash · · Score: 4, Funny

    So he's the new chair man ?

    --
    Nullius in verba
  14. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because he would sink the ship, as he did with Nokia.

  15. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need Elop, not Nadella!

    No worries - Elop will still be well rewarded for his efforts. Expect a new VP in MSFT soon.

    (I only wish this were a conspiracy theory...)

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  16. IIT? by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He grew up in a privileged environment but didn't make it into IIT. What does that say about him and his technology skills?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  17. Elop now in charge of Xbox, Surface, WinPhone. by WiiVault · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I'm gonna bet those divisions are not going to see the focus they did under Ballmer. Assuming the company decides to shift away from chasing the competition with decent but never exciting consumer products. Makes sense too, the new CEO worked for a segment of the company that couldn't have been too thrilled to be bankrolling duds like those. It is pretty bizarre to think that Elop reportedly wanted to sell the Xbox (and Bing) group and now he has been put in charge of it. But maybe it was just a nice gesture to hand him some Ballmer legacy stuff that isn't really anything but an endless drain of company resources and focus. Or maybe they are just stupid and think that his skill at wreaking good organizations might have the the inverse effect on already broken ones.

  18. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Agreed. For one, I hoped that Microsoft was took over by a woman, which could mean that finally someone who cares about the look-and-feel is in control of the company. By the way, he's Indian, so it looks like it's a normal name there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    And people complain management is never outsourced

  19. Ohboy Skype credits! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Office 365 is subscription office for individuals (with other perks like some cloud storage and Skype credits)

    Because that's just what I need when I'm typing a business letter. Videochat.

    If Microsoft ran a restaurant each sandwich would come with a bowling ball.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  20. Re:NOOOOOOOOO by morgauxo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, we already knew he has a mental illness.

  21. MS logo-icon by markhb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone else miss the old BillG-as-a-borg icon? Using the former corporate logo is so... corporate.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.