Slashdot Mirror


Weird Asteroid Itokawa Has a Dual Personality

astroengine writes "We care about how asteroids are made, in large part because if one were aiming to smash into us, we'd like to know what we can do about it. The structure of asteroids is also a matter of scientific curiosity, as it tells us a bit about the formation and evolution in our solar system. ... 25143 Itokawa is a relatively small near-Earth asteroid that was visited by the Japanese Habayusa spacecraft in 2005. It has also been monitored by Stephen Lowry of the University of Kent and his colleagues over a twelve year span with the 3.58 meter New Technology Telescope in La Silla, Chile. In that time span, Itokawa has made five near approaches to Earth. And what did they find? The asteroid is composed of two lobes of different densities, suggesting that Itokawa is in fact a merged binary." ESO is hosting a preprint of the paper.

13 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. Summary named the sattelite wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's the Hayabusa, not Habayusa... Thank you and good bye.

    1. Re:Summary named the sattelite wrong... by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 2

      It's relevant to the article (very un-/.) but the poster probably didn't notice the summary is a quote or read the article (very /.) or he/she/it would have known that Hayabusa is spelled wrong in the source material. It's the journalist's job to spell-check names, not editors here. Their job is to...umm...something something...whatever, I'm sure it's very important.

  2. NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you move me to the beta slashdot abortion i'll add this place to the block list and never visit again.

    Too many other news sites regurgitate the exact same storys i see here. And all of them don't look as shitty as the beta slashdot.

    Stop being stupid.

    1. Re:NO! by Iskender · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It could look like anything for all I care, if it *worked*.

      But the beta is a huge discussion functionality downgrade. Might as well read comments on Ars Technica to get that masochist interface kick...

  3. re: NO by Antipater · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had never seen the Beta site, so I was curious what all the fuss was about; it couldn't be that bad! I clicked the beta link, and now I can't get OUT! There's no un-beta link, and I'm auto-redirected back to beta every time. What the actual fuck.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
  4. Re: NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Terrible, isn't it? Occasionally I get directed to it and keep reloading/pressing the back button until I don't.

    The Slashdot Beta is fucking terrible, and has gone the route of Way Too Much Whitespace and looks like shit.

    Whatever drunken idiots think it's a good website should be flayed, castrated, and then shot.

  5. Re: NO by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not just this site which decided that usefulness should be jammed down the sewer in favor of shiny, take a look at NBC's redesigned site. It looks and acts like Windows 8!

    Once again, Rule #3 that should never be broken:

    Never let a web designer design your web site.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  6. Maybe by P1h3r1e3d13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's a “Slashdot Classic” link in the footer.
    For reference, it goes to http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1

    1. Re:Maybe by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But from what I can tell of the little message that came up, at some point they intend to shut down the classic site. That's why I sent them an email telling them I'm gone once they do that.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  7. Can inanimate objects have a personality? by Virtucon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the correct definition would be dual properties comprised of different materials and densities. Other than that you better send like Risperdal or Prozac to the asteroid immediately and sign it up for a guest shot on Dr. Phil.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  8. Re:beta by choprboy · · Score: 2

    For everyone complaining about the beta format. They put a link right up on top of the pages now. Don't just post rants here (personally I doubt anyone in charge reads the comments here) send them emails telling them how much of an abomination it is.

    No one is willing to do that any more because it is quite clear that they do not read the emails. By all appearances, by sending an email you are sending your comments to /dev/null. As a side affect, no one else (read: the general Slashdot user base) will know that you also do not approve of the beta abomination. Emails to a dead mailbox, uncounted or analyzed for content, can easily be dismissed as a vocal minority.

    In contrast, posting comments in the stories is a very public statement that everyone sees, everyone knows about, and can not be denied later when it is a complete failure. And the "editors" (I use that term very lightly) most definately do read the story comments... they themselves frequently comment on stories.

    Over and over again for the last several months you will see long comment strings speaking very explicitly to the problems with the beta redesign, including:
      - Massive waste of screen space. Do Slashdot readers really need to see "Latest Tech Jobs" and "Top SourceForge Downloads" taking up 1/3+ of every screen? What about the massive whitespacce this leaves down in the comment sections.... you know, the portion people actually look at? What is next in the beta, to fill these areas with massive flashing/dancing graphics 'ala a Japanese bulletin board site?
      - Useless graphics that contribute nothing to content or understanding articles. Huge pictures, often taking more screen space than the story summary itself.
      - Complete disruption of comment readability and flow. With the existing format one can easily scan 15-30 comments in a single pageframe and scroll for more. The new format lets you see 3-5 at most in the page frame and you continually have to click "Load More" to see additional comments... a format that completely breaks page refresh and following a link off-page and then back.

    And the many, many other insightful analysis of the existing beta problems brought up by other regular readers for months. To date, as far as I can tell, Slashdot has failed to address any of these issue, give any response to complaints, or given any accounting of acceptance rates, email/click-thru/or otherwise. Slashdot has repeatedly posted blurbs about how great the new website is, and how everyone likes it. The comments in existing stories show quite the opposite. We have all seen website crash and die, and regular readers all see Slashdot pulling a Digg death-dive with this new beta.

  9. Re: NO by runeghost · · Score: 2

    Terrible, isn't it? Occasionally I get directed to it and keep reloading/pressing the back button until I don't.

    The Slashdot Beta is fucking terrible, and has gone the route of Way Too Much Whitespace and looks like shit.

    Whatever drunken idiots think it's a good website should be flayed, castrated, and then shot.

    You're being far too kind. The auteur of the beta Slashdot design should be torn into itty-bitty pieces and buried alive. Count me in as another long-time slashdot reader who will be adding the site to Leechblock as soon as I can no longer access class Slashdot. And given the trend topics that have been making it to the top of the pile lately (with this one as a nice exception) I'm kind of wondering why I'm waiting...