Slashdot Mirror


A New Use For Drones: Traffic Scouting

Nerval's Lobster writes "Renault's new concept car gives drivers an unusual companion: a small flying drone, controllable via tablet or preset GPS waypoints, which scans the area ahead for obstacles and traffic. The so-called 'flying companion' can exit the vehicle via a retractable hatch in the roof, and buzz around the immediate vicinity shooting video and photos; as this is a concept, actual hardware and software specs aren't available, although Renault's engineers envision something closer to the size of a small bird than some of the larger drones currently available. But how practical is a 'driving drone'? Considering all the accidents caused by people texting or Web-surfing while driving, it seems questionable to introduce a piece of hardware that could prove even more distracting—imagine trying to successfully guide a drone with touch-screen controls while navigating a fast-paced roadway, and you can see why the idea of a "flying companion" would raise the collective blood pressure of traffic-safety officials. Yes, it would be safer for a passenger to handle drone-flying duties while the driver concentrates on the road; but it's also a near-certainty, if such a concept ever went into production, that more than one driver would attempt to multi-task the navigation of two vehicles at once. Do you think this idea is feasible?"

144 comments

  1. Kill Beta! by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wow, did they actually disable the firehose because of the Beta protest? I can't seem to get to it.

    Boycott on next week!

    1. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They're also actually deleting posts now too. Quite a few of mine have disappeared. Amazing that they have time for this, what with all the effort they're putting into listening to us and modifying the beta accordingly.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:Kill Beta! by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not that I don't believe you...but I don't believe you. Find a hole in the post ID numbers where yours used to be. It looks like they're incremental, so if there is a post 47190001 and 47190003 but no 47190002, then we know something is wrong. (Same thing if they fill the gap with a later post and the timestamp on 47190002 is greater than the one on 47190003.) Yeah yeah I know it's a pain to track all the post IDs you make, but for something like this, if it's really happening to you, it would be worthwhile.

      One of the absolute core tenets of Slashdot has always been that they don't delete things (unless someone sues them for a billion dollars, and even then, only once). It's important to be able to prove it if it happens.

    3. Re:Kill Beta! by Bucc5062 · · Score: 0

      To be fair, many of the posts are variations of "BETA IS TEH SUKZ" and little in suggestions (other then shut it down). Perhaps constructive criticism would not hurt.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    4. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can't. The comment list is suddenly broken now too. I can only look at about the last 20 or so posts (the list end abruptly and there is no longer an option to go to the next page). But I looked back through the articles from this morning and can tell you that several of my posts that I know were there are suddenly gone.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    5. Re:Kill Beta! by zidium · · Score: 2

      Fuck Beta! Fuck Beta

      My Lord! The peasants are revolting!

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    6. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Quite a bit of constructive criticism has been offered (not just in the last two days, but for months now). The exact complaints are pretty damned clear at this point. The problem isn't that they aren't aware of the problems with the beta. The problem is that they've not been corrected, and now they're going to force the beta on us.

      I personally don't care about the beta, as long as we can keep the Classic option. But if you're going to force it on me, at least make sure that you're not stripping functionality away from me. Add whatever dumb feature you like (as long as it doesn't get in my way), but don't take away my ability to see a simple comment list with replies and mods listed. Quite a few others have also complained about the lack of Unicode support, the annoying whitespace issues, and onerous javascript.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    7. Re:Kill Beta! by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So from now on keep a list on your end of post IDs. Each time you post add the ID to your list. Next time one is deleted you will be able to prove it.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    8. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    9. Re:Kill Beta! by Bucc5062 · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be clear, I looked at the Beta site and am in line with the general thinking. Having been a /. member since 2000 there is something solid about the look and feel that has not changed much in over 14 years. Clearly the beta site is trying to look like other sites (presumably held by Dice?) and it does not work (or look good).

      I made my comment before I read some posts that advocated a protest/boycott. How funny though, with all the "we need to boycott" statements i've read in /. over the years taht was met with "grow up, boycotts don't work", here is now one called on the fertile soil of /. ... will this one work?

      I'm going otu on a limb and say, boycotts never work unless you can truly convince the vast majority to join in and I'm guessing that demographics of /. have changed. Current owners figure they can weather the storm.

      As for me, I may check out this very young upstart I just read about here on this site. Though I'll hang with this ship for a bit, I'll check out the upstart and at the least, add my voice (I cannot help code as I don't do python).

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    10. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

      I found an example. One of the them is comment #46185253. You can still see it here if you go to it manually. But if you go to the actual article, it's gone. It was under the top "Why?" thread. But now it's gone from the comments when you look at them in the article.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    11. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

      You can't even see it if you expand out the "Why?" thread all the way. Here.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    12. Re:Kill Beta! by cfulton · · Score: 1

      Wrong I see comment #46185253 in both places. Are you wearing a tinfoil slash hat TWiTfan? Cause you post is still there. Or maybe they put it back. Or maybe they have just deleted it so only you can't see it.

      --
      No sigs in BETA. Beta SUCKS.
    13. Re:Kill Beta! by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      I hope you're right. But I sure didn't see it before. I even did a search, expanded out every sub-thread--nothing.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    14. Re:Kill Beta! by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1

      They certainly are! Sorry, someone had to complete the joke...

    15. Re:Kill Beta! by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      "Delete the beta source code and fire the devs/managers responsible for designing it" (which is, effectively, what is being said when people post "BETA IS TEH SUKZ" in the numbers that they are IS constructive criticism. The problem is that Dice and/or the Slashdot managers don't want to hear it...

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    16. Re:Kill Beta! by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      We're discussing why the beta suck, not why Slashdotters don't have girlfriends. Try to stay on topic.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    17. Re:Kill Beta! by claar · · Score: 1

      Simple explanation on this, actually. That article has a ton of comments, so I had to click "Load More Comments" before I could see your reply #46185253.

      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous...
    18. Re:Kill Beta! by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I see it in Classic, but i had to press "Load more" on the beta site probably 10 times before it magically appeared where it was supposed to in the nested tree (which is total shit, nobody's going to scroll back up to see if new replies were loaded in the middle of all the stuff we just read through.)

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    19. Re:Kill Beta! by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      One of the absolute core tenets of Slashdot has always been that they don't delete things (unless someone sues them for a billion dollars, and even then, only once). It's important to be able to prove it if it happens.

      Indeed, which is why talk of post deletions is so important to verify. Has it really become that kind of site? Just another barely concealed attempt to exploit an actual community into providing advertising impressions?

      Deleting posts would be the death knell for me. The way we use the site is important, but the ethos of it is moreso. A Slashdot that arbitrarily deletes things it deems unwanted isn't one I'd like to contribute to.

      I'm sure we'll find out, one way of another.

    20. Re:Kill Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They deleted several of my posts too, all well worded, funny , insightful anti beta jokes mainly

    21. Re:Kill Beta! by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "Next time one is deleted you will be able to prove it."

      That does nothing to prevent, or prove, other methods of stifling dissent--moderation abuses.

      I've been posting the following in several places at once--AFTER I watched the first one get modded up to +5, and almost instantly (less then 30 seconds) go back to +1)--and every single time...it gets modded up, then back down and then, once the body of the post is no longer visible, STAY THERE.

      So, fuck you, Dice. Here goes again.

      US5722418
      +
      US5644363
      +
      GoogleGlass
      +
      Acceptance
      =
      ????

      If history is any sort of an indicator, any rights we sell today, our children must buy back with blood tomorrow

    22. Re: Kill Beta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That used to be a fun feature back in the bbs days. We (sysops) could flag a user so that they were the only one who could see their posts. So a troll would come on, be a troll, and get flagged. Then continue to troll but nobody would (be able to) respond to them anymore...

    23. Re: Kill Beta! by FUCK+BETA,+FUCK+DICE · · Score: 1

      That would be an interesting remedy for this beta shit they are trying to push on us. Just activate the flag so they are the only ones who can see it :-)

      FUCK BETA

    24. Re:Kill Beta! by suutar · · Score: 1

      i was able to see it by going down to the bottom and hitting "load a few hundred more comments" a few times.

    25. Re:Kill Beta! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      They're also actually deleting posts now too.

      So beta really is some PHB's pet project, then.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  2. Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
      http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415

    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441

    Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

    1. Re:Fuck Beta by Salgak1 · · Score: 0

      OK, we've seen this countless times today. You've made your point. At this point, the "Fuck Beta/Kill Beta" is SPAM. . .

    2. Re:Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care about beta anymore. Deleting posts and modding down stuff that they don't care is MUCH WORSE - THAT'S whats really killing slashdot.
      So farewell. See ya at reddit.

    3. Re:Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly did this get modded as Troll? oh yeah...fuck beta! No /. next week ;-)

    4. Re:Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deleting posts is the the worst. That violates one of the absolute core principles of Slashdot. It's the ultimate Slashdot heresy.

    5. Re:Fuck Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Posts that bash Microsoft, for instance, may go from +5 back and forth to -1 in a matter of days. That's absolutely infuriating. But deleting posts and stories? I'll go somewhere else, where the community decides who gets the vote.

      Actually it's the ultimate microsoft, to own slashdot, think about it!

    6. Re:Fuck Beta by PGC · · Score: 1

      Who knew spam could be functional. Fuck Beta.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    7. Re:Fuck Beta by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      You guys are retarded. Tons of accusations of deleted posts but not one verifiable instance?

  3. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DAT SLASHDOT BETA DOE

  4. Beta Slashdort: Symptom of Capitalist Decay by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 0

    Beta Slashdort is a product of the irreversible decay of the profit system. The only way out is COMMUNISM via workers revolution!

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
  5. Does this idea make sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure, if your car is the only car doing it.

    1. Re:Does this idea make sense? by skids · · Score: 1

      Eh, it will give us something else to prop up against telephone poles alongside the lost hubcaps.

    2. Re: Does this idea make sense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      It makes absolutely no sense for more than one person to be scouting out the traffic ahead. This is the perfect example of a scenario when everyone needs to have essentially the same information, and it would be a massive waste of time (not to mention dangerously crowded) if everyone felt it necessary to personally check it out.

    3. Re:Does this idea make sense? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      This is supposedly targeted at large cities where the larger avenues already have networked cameras accessible to the public. Since cars are getting connected and getting apps an app to direct the nearest camera in front of you to the in dash display would effectively do the same thing. Now in the woods this would be great for scouting prospective camping/hunting areas prior to venturing out.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:Does this idea make sense? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Now in the woods this would be great for scouting prospective camping/hunting areas prior to venturing out.

      That's actually a great idea - these would be great for wildlife management/observation. Choppers are loud, these are nowhere nearly as loud.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Does this idea make sense? by Garridan · · Score: 1

      No. This doesn't even make sense if there's only one car doing it. The idea of a human controlling such a drone is laughable... landing on an aircraft carrier in an open ocean is hard enough for experienced, trained pilots with hundreds of logged hours -- an untrained civilian landing on a car swerving around in traffic, while possibly controlling said car? With a rat's nest of utility lines, traffic signs, street lights, business signs and tunnels directly overhead? Bullshit.

      Even assuming an AI that can land on a moving car every time, sensors and planning algorithms are decades away from being able to handle the overhead rat's nest.

      So, the drone will almost certainly crash-land in its first few flights, and necessarily have a powerful enough engine to catch up to a car doing 80mph on the freeway. That powerful engine weighs a good 10 pounds at a minimum. Ever see how much damage a 3 gram pebble can do to your windshield? There is no way that this will ever get off the ground.

      This idea: bullshit.

  6. It's been done before by demontechie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:It's been done before by kimgkimg · · Score: 2

      Actually more than 30+ years ago (see the 'G' control button): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    2. Re:It's been done before by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall sketching up this idea when I was 10 years old, just after watching Smokey and the Bandit. No drones then, so the passenger (navigator) in the car flew an RC plane ahead to look for Smokey...

    3. Re:It's been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes back even further than that. Around 1966, the television version of "The Green Hornet" had a scanner that was launched from a hatch on the car (the "Black Beauty"). The scanner flew ahead, sending a video stream to a monitor mounted in the car.
      http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/02/07/1848225/a-new-use-for-drones-traffic-scouting#

  7. Why manual controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would you need to manually control the drone? It could easily know the route you are intending to take, and could be 100% automated...

    1. Re:Why manual controls? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you need to manually control the drone? It could easily know the route you are intending to take, and could be 100% automated...

      And the airspace over heavy traffic will be totally clear, right?
      You will be the only drone user on the road?
      All the drones will be maintained in 100% working order, just like the cars are?
      And all drivers will resist the urge to watch their drone?
      And no one would think of hacking them, right?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Why manual controls? by eliphalet · · Score: 1

      Controlling the drone manually suggests that the controller is watching via the camera in the drone. In California, at least, watching video visible from the driver's seat is illegal.

    3. Re:Why manual controls? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Every drone could have it's own small radio transmitter. If it detected the signal of another drone (the inverse square distance law), it could adjust it's course automatically.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  8. Would it not be easier.. by _hAZE_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would it not be easier to just install traffic monitoring devices along roadways, and let your car's on-board navigation system interface with those? That way you don't need the traffic scouting drone, and the inherent risks that come with trying to operate one while driving.

    I could see it now.. inattentive drivers/operaters causing the traffic scouting drones to collide with other traffic scouting drones, creating drone "road kill". What a mess.. No, this is a Bad Idea(TM) all around.

    --

    Don Head
    UNIX/Linux Administrator
    1. Re:Would it not be easier.. by icebike · · Score: 2

      Would it not be easier to just install traffic monitoring devices along roadways, and let your car's on-board navigation system interface with those? That way you don't need the traffic scouting drone, and the inherent risks that come with trying to operate one while driving.

      Everybody is carrying a traffic monitoring device in their pocket or purse. Its pretty accurate and up to date too.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Would it not be easier.. by xlyz · · Score: 1

      Would it not be easier to just install traffic monitoring devices along roadways, and let your car's on-board navigation system interface with those?

      and that how is supposed to be fun?

    3. Re:Would it not be easier.. by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      In the ideal world, you'd share your drone with other views, broadcasting like TV.
      You'd have a database of channels for segments of road and would flip between them, automatically.
      The traffic authority would operate the drones, which would be automatic because they are GPS guided.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    4. Re:Would it not be easier.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not having them, and when you stuck... you can play tag with your fellow drivers one against the other... :)

      What else could go wrong?

      As usual, a solution for a problem that shouldn't exist in the first place...

    5. Re:Would it not be easier.. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Will it stream me uncensored video of the gory carnage that's blocking the road?

    6. Re:Would it not be easier.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a mess.. No, this is a Bad Idea(TM) all around.

      *buzzes in*

      WHAT IS BETA?

      I'll take swords for 500, Trebek.

    7. Re:Would it not be easier.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no problem with a barely maintained minidrone falling out of the sky into traffic and smashing into someone's windshield at 70+mph or hitting power lines, etc.

    8. Re:Would it not be easier.. by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Exactly how I see it playing out. There will be more traffic jams and crashes in the sky from all of these drones filling the air. Yes - parts will rain down from the sky and kill small children. The sky will go black from the flocks of drones. Did they get this idea from playing Call of Duty?

      Next somebody will sell an accessory laser so your drone can shoot others out of the sky as a sort of crash avoidance system.

      Available only to the rich.

    9. Re:Would it not be easier.. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hey, Drone Wars would give us something to do while we sit on the parking lot er I75...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Would it not be easier.. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... or the traffic authority could just install static monitors. Like what they already do in some places...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:Would it not be easier.. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is practical - what Renault is showing is a concept car.

      Concepts usually include highly desirable (at first glance) features that never become practical enough for production. There are exceptions, but they are rare.

    12. Re:Would it not be easier.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wait what? No monitoring is evil, and bad. Google is just using their data to make advertising money.
      It can't possibly be that they use their tracking data to provide me something useful, remember I'm just a product! /Slashdot mentality.

      No seriously this is the mentality of some people here. I actually had someone try and tell me they'd rather have their taxes spent on a city based traffic monitoring scheme in every city in the world than to use something that people already have. What a wasteful idea.

    13. Re:Would it not be easier.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those traffic monitoring devices are called CCTV cameras, and you can usually visit them from a web page. All that needs to be done is to collect all those web addresses into a GPS indexable list, and you would have your smart navigation system.

    14. Re:Would it not be easier.. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      What you mean like this http://www.trafficscotland.org...

  9. How about a tethered kite instead of a drone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just winch it in and out as needed.

    1. Re:How about a tethered kite instead of a drone? by skids · · Score: 1

      Umm... bridges? Power lines?

    2. Re:How about a tethered kite instead of a drone? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Um, whoosh?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:How about a tethered kite instead of a drone? by glavenoid · · Score: 1

      Great idea! We can tie the kites to bridges. And power lines!

      --
      I, for one, am looking forward to the inevitable /. beta rollout fallout.
  10. Re:It's been done before - It was the "G" button.. by kimgkimg · · Score: 2

    Actually as far back as the 1960's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

  11. Re:Is beta gone? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Can I come back?

    No.

    Besides, it looks like you've already posted several times in this thread.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  12. Finally! by mariox19 · · Score: 2

    Now we all get to be Speed Racer!

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  13. Wow, posted ten minutes ago and no comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commenting broken again? Testing...

    1. Re:Wow, posted ten minutes ago and no comments by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      The comment listing is broken now too (only shows one page, with no "Next" option). And it looks like the editors are trying to delete posts and downmod all the beta posters. Guess they found the time to do all that in between listening to us and changing the beta based on our valued input.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  14. Maybe for parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only use I could see would be for parking, everything else would be very dangerous to operate while driving that being said it could have a use when car's are self driving.

    Improved vision modes (Night Vision, Thermal (snow) maybe) would be far more useful but I don't see why you would need to see more than the current vehicle design allows (for cars) Trucks is a little bit different, it would be very useful in certain situation to be able to see around a corner (esp blind/sharp corners) before the truck arrived because of the time required to fully stop a truck is far far greater than any car.

    1. Re:Maybe for parking by Octorian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would love something like this for parking, especially if it could be semi-automated. Push a button, drone flies up and does a survey of the parking lot. It then finds a space and "squats" it for you while you drive there on the ground.

      I even thought of this idea like 10 years ago, when trying to come up with random ideas for fictitious gov't technology programs while bored at work. I think the name we coined was "OPLSS" (pronounced "Hopeless"), for "Objective Parking Lot Survey System".

      But, just like many superpowers we'd all love to have, this sort of thing is *only* useful if you're the only one who has it. If everyone had this capability, it would cause far more problems than it would solve.

    2. Re:Maybe for parking by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      There are already production cars with night vision and thermal vision.

    3. Re:Maybe for parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love something like this for parking, especially if it could be semi-automated. Push a button, drone flies up and does a survey of the parking lot.

      I park in a parking garage, you insensitive clod!

      Seriously though, there are times I've wanted just such a system (for an open air lot).

    4. Re:Maybe for parking by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      1) Open parking lot that provides open spot information to aware vehicles. 2) Sell video footage of spectacular crashes as multiple drivers race to the same spot. 3) Profit!

    5. Re:Maybe for parking by rHBa · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining a system where the drone's position isn't controlled by the driver/tablet app but instead it automatically stays directly above the car. The drone would have a 360deg camera underneath and the tablet app would just control the panning.

      The speed of the car would also be automatically limited while the drone is in the air so that the car can't get ahead of the drone, you probably wouldn't be able to launch the drone while moving anyway.

    6. Re:Maybe for parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'd have to fit my car with a scoop, allowing me to pick up your squatting drone as I park in "your" spot. Later on I can reset the firmware and sell it on ebay.

  15. More Feasible Than Beta by Akratist · · Score: 0

    Subject line says it all.

  16. Viper did this, and they got cancelled, so.... by StickyWidget · · Score: 1
    TLDW; Viper was a TV show using a Dodge Viper as the protagonist. There was no problem so great that it couldn't be solved with clever application of a steering wheel and gas pedal.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    ~Sticky

    1. Re:Viper did this, and they got cancelled, so.... by sliceoflife · · Score: 1

      Strange: When I search slashdot for "fuck" I get many results, When I search for "beta" I obviously get even more results. But searching "fuck beta" come up with no results!

  17. Re:It's been done before - It was the "G" button.. by mwehle · · Score: 1

    Absolutely, man! This was my first thought also - Renault needs to make a version of The Powerful Mach 5.

    --
    Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
  18. Re:No beta please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copy'n'paste FAIL.

  19. Drones Bomb Beta HQ by ShaunC · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Fuck Beta. The community should come together, put together a drone, and have it trail a banner over the Dice HQ building that says: "F U C K B E T A." I've got a five on it, if we can make this happen.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  20. Dangerous if two or more at once by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Err, what happens if two or three or more users are flying these at the same time, along the same ideal path and elevation? Until we get some real nice automated localized collision avoidance, you're going to end up with tangled wrecks of drones falling out of the sky into traffic.

    1. Re:Dangerous if two or more at once by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      mod parent up.
      How shall we handle many automated drones above a highway in a way that guarantees I won't get one into my windscreen?
      This not to talk about responsibility share in the event of such an accident, nor about the related laws that remain to be crafted...

      --
      Herve S.
  21. Re:Is beta gone? by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

    No, but Timothy has PROMISED that they'll listen to us, the audience, and CONSIDER our recommendations. Honest injun. Pinkie swear!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  22. Driverless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would actually be a much better idea if you had a driverless car, so given they may not be far away, I would say this idea just might take flight, if you'll excuse the pun.

    Ps fuck beta!

  23. Arm it! by coinreturn · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll get one if it includes weapons for deployment on stupid drivers. Or even Kamikaze mode.

  24. beta beta beta by dciman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Please post this to new articles if it hasn't been posted yet. (Copy-paste the html from here so links don't get mangled!)

    On February 5, 2014, Slashdot announced through a javascript popup that they are starting to "move in to" the new Slashdot Beta design. Slashdot Beta is a trend-following attempt to give Slashdot a fresh look, an approach that has led to less space for text and an abandonment of the traditional Slashdot look. Much worse than that, Slashdot Beta fundamentally breaks the classic Slashdot discussion and moderation system.

    If you haven't seen Slashdot Beta already, open this in a new tab. After seeing that, click here to return to classic Slashdot.

    We should boycott stories and only discuss the abomination that is Slashdot Beta until Dice abandons the project.
    We should boycott slashdot entirely during the week of Feb 10 to Feb 17 as part of the wider slashcott

    Moderators - only spend mod points on comments that discuss Beta
    Commentors - only discuss Beta
      http://slashdot.org/recent - Vote up the Fuck Beta stories

    Keep this up for a few days and we may finally get the PHBs attention.

    -----=====##### LINKS #####=====-----

    Discussion of Beta: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=56395415

    Discussion of where to go if Beta goes live: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=3321441

    Alternative Slashdot: http://altslashdot.org (thanks Okian Warrior (537106))

  25. Drones + automated cars by StormyWeatherL33T · · Score: 1

    Considering the fact that driverless cars are also being worked on, all the drone would need to do is communicate the information to the car so that the car's computer can reroute/slow down/act accordingly. So, yeah. Seems pretty feasible.

    1. Re:Drones + automated cars by Ardyvee · · Score: 1

      But of course, by then you might as well just have the city/town provide the drones themselves instead of having thousand drones from a thousand drivers. I think.

      --
      I don't care if I'm wrong. I only care about everyone obtaining something from the discussion.
  26. beta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really, what is the problem?

  27. Re:No beta please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously a dice shill...copy paste is good in this cause.

  28. Mach 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Speed Racers Mach 5 have this and it could deliver messages caring a small payload.

    Ps. Death to /. Beta! Long live /. classic

  29. just stop by madmatty · · Score: 1

    How about we stop looking for ways to have to glue ourselves to some digital screen for every moment in our lives... And how much time is it going to save when you got idiots trying to find their lost drones.

  30. Go Speed Racer Go by KDN · · Score: 1

    Its amazing that technology and companies are finally catching up with the old Speed Racer cartoons.

  31. trains and bears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These would be good to use on trains. West of here on the tracks through bear country. Our freight trains kill a lot of bears on the tracks munching the ungulates who were munching on spilled grain when they were run over.

  32. Re:It's been done before - It was the "G" button.. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

    Now if they make it operate by pressing 'G', that will be cool. Something interesting stuck me watching that clip (besides the memories, I loved Speed Racer), the Mach Five was a little environmentally unfriendly. Cutting down trees without concern about the impact of the forest, for shame. I think later on there was a dump oil mod (or maybe that was the bad guys) which certainly did not help the environment either. Watching Speed Racer did not turn me into a race car driver, but in an odd way, I thunk it made me a better driver. At the least, it taught me to be aware, have good situational awareness otherwise the bad guy is going to run you off the road.

    Great post....and the obligatory "BETTTTTTAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaa"

    --
    Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  33. The only way this could be useful... by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    The only way this could be useful is if it unleashes a finger of doom from a minigun to do away with the "motorist" causing the backup.

    Although, I'll "settle" for having this scout go out, locate said "motorist" and send me back footage of why this one person is causing the 2 mile backup behind them.

    My morbid sense of curiosity demands that I know who the fuck just backed up the turnpike.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  34. Beta protest by carlos92 · · Score: 1

    How about protesting (and not commenting) on even days and commenting normally on odd days? That way, Dice will be able to gauge how much of their so called "audience" that creates the actual deliverable of the site is leaving for good, while still preserving some value just in case they see the error of their ways soon.

  35. fuck beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck beta

  36. Re:No beta please... by demontechie · · Score: 1

    Not if it doesn't include working links...

  37. Re:It's been done before - It was the "G" button.. by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Also my first thought and glad I found the same thought here so I didn't become redundant.

    Question: Doesn't this qualify as Prior Art? It should.

  38. It's for off-road use by Animats · · Score: 1

    This might, marginally, make sense for serious off-roaders, which is what Renault is pitching. There's been a lot of interest in this in the military, where knowing what's over the next hill can save your life. For road driving, it's silly.

  39. wank wank wank by epine · · Score: 1

    you can see why the idea of a "flying companion" would raise the collective blood pressure of traffic-safety officials

    Noooooooooo! The stupidity of manual driver control (are there really people out there this fucking dumb?) would just give them the reason they're seeking anyway to clamp down on a showy and unorthodox public behaviour.

    Everyone else, you can boycott the BETA. I'm going to trash the stupidity of the story submission in the vast majority of stories that show up here now. To each his own.

    A proper geek knows the difference between one kind of blame masturbation and another. Most of our stories these days are wank wank wank random blame masturbation wank wank wank.

  40. Great for 1 pct Bad for 99 pct by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    This is the kind of military model scout concept that works great when the 1 percent do it - but utterly fails when the 99 percent do it.

    One drone over a traffic jam is one thing.

    6543 drones over a traffic jam crashing into planes and helicopters and police drones and DOT drones is a total catastrophe.

    People don't get that stuff that works when very FEW people use them is ok but when anyone can buy it, the impacts - and by this I mean the objects falling from 1000 feet through your sunroof and killing you or causing more crashes when they hit your windscreen - are a nightmare.

    They're just like the Slashdot Beta - great idea on paper, incredibly bad very bad insane idea in reality. Kill that with fire!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  41. Re:No beta please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The move to beta started October 1, 2013.

  42. Combine this with the kill switch and... by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    Combine this drone with the phone/tablet killswitch and much hilarity can be had!

    - or -

    A new sport. After all, skeets can't dodge, and mailboxes are just too easy a target... Highway drone shooting!

    ---

    I used to think /.'s biggest problem was dups! Now we've got BETA -- and I promise to NEVER complain about dups again!
     

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  43. Not really no. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    I have had this daydream before, many times actually. In theory it wouldn't really even need to be driven by the driver but could be nearly completely autonomous, or sync up to navigation systems already being used to provide more relevant data....etc. Sure.

    However, I doubt it would be that useful in many situations. Sure it may be able to bring back some nice shots, or something but, if you are stuck in traffic, you are stuck. If its about to clear up, it may clear up before your drone can return.

    Mostly it wouldn't be that useful since its only useful after you are already stuck. The situations where it might actually provide useful data, seem likely to be outnumbered by the ones where it is useless or, at best, frivilous.

    There may be uses of course, but, likely not for traffic scouting.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  44. Pissed off drivers, drones as.... by Rick+in+China · · Score: 1

    WEAPONS! So you got cut off. You've got a drone at your disposal. Imagine the possibilities.... hack that puppy into a lean mean traffic revenge machine! The roads just got safer my friends!

  45. How about a periscope instead? by unitron · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've often wished for one of those in the car.

    Especially after jacked up trucks with with tractor tires became popular.

    And please vote this out of the Firehose:

    http://slashdot.org/submission...

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    1. Re:How about a periscope instead? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Someone came around over 24 hours later to mod my suggestion for a periscope as a drone alternative off-topic.

      Is Dice sending out the goon squads now?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  46. Disapoint... by rizole · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's too many off topic comments here. Please stay focused, the topic is fuck beta.

  47. 3rd person view in 3...2...1 by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, while the 'scout' concept is flawed, a real life cam-bot that can keep up with traffic could be quite useful.

    There's no need for a human operator in this case because it's just keeping a static position relative to your vehicle.

    What do you think sirs? I'm quite anti-drone, but given that our Orwellian police state seems dead set on having them we may as well get a few perks too.

  48. Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see this installed in a new Chevy truck dubbed the Scout. Would make scouting and hunting trips much more productive. You could have a passenger fly the drone while the truck is parked at basecamp radioing animal positions to shooters.

  49. Classic - Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we just rename classic to Beta and tell them they win??? Then we can keep beta!!!

    Seriously I lose like 1/3 of my screen when trying to use Beta to read comments compared to maybe 5% with classic. No one that uses it likes it or at the least they are just a tiny minority. Also no one wants the pictures or 2 rows of Title bars at the top, or side panels that take up 1/3 of your screen. So you want some constructive criticism start with that.

    People are angry and spewing shit because they care.

    Learn from the NewCoke guys --- oops we fucked up - back to Classic, what were we thinking??? Profit!!

  50. Buck Feta! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buck it deep and hard!

  51. reddit by dave024 · · Score: 1

    Funny because reddit deletes posts all the time. Sometimes whole articles that are actively being commented on are removed either temporarily or permanently (Obama iama, Boston Bombing threads where people were locating relatives, etc.).

  52. Solution by wzinc · · Score: 1

    How about my car just takes-off? That way, I only have to control one device at a time.

  53. Or... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Just use Google Maps.

  54. I love drones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To help bring down the beta test. Fuck beta.

  55. Hit and Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should make it so when you get hit by another car, and it tries to drive off that the drone can follow it and get the license plate number and real time updates as to its position.

  56. that and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who the fuck wants to be followed by a drone everywhere they go?

    do people actually fall for this shit?

  57. It worked great on Speed Racer (TOS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they just getting the re-runs of the cartoon Speed Racer from the 70's?

    Speed could watch video from the bird-like drone he launched from the car....although I NEVER saw it return.....

  58. need cooperating drone swarm by Coop · · Score: 1

    By the time the drone has enough collision-avoidance to keep from crashing into everyone else's drones (probably using some kind of identifying beacon), it will be better to have the drones form a mesh network to transmit views from different places, than to have each drone fly to a point of interest to get their own (redundant) view.

    --
    "If you're not passionate about your operating system, you're married to the wrong one."
  59. Scan for DPS / Cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can make every commute a cannon ball run. **ALERT** DPS on right side 2 miles ahead slow down. Needs to be armed as well to take out / jam LEO traffic drones & watching for your high speed commute. Which radar detector company will be first? Certainly not Valentine -- they haven't updated their detector in about 10 years. Oh the future is gonna be fun. :)

  60. Challenge accepted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >...multi-task the navigation of two vehicles at once. Do you think this idea is feasible?

    Give me a guy with high mental dexterity, a legit gamer background, a few hundred hours of practice, and a driving experience free of environmental curveballs... ...and it'll still crash harder than the /. beta.

  61. If I owned a bird-sized drone... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Until bird-sized drones become as cheap as disposable cell phones, no one will fork out money for a one that's limited to the single use of scouting traffic, or limited to being able to communicate only with a Renault vehicle. It will have to be a general-purpose device, able to communicate via wi-fi (or similar non-proprietary means) with other computing devices.

    And there are better ways to gather data about traffic... such as the Waze app, which knows the precise speed and position of other Waze users who are themselves stuck in the same traffic.

    The concern about a driver trying to control two vehicles at once seems silly. Any consumer-grade drone is never going to ask that of its owner; it will be able to autonomously deploy, perform its task, and return home.

    Maybe Renault will release a sucky beta version of its drone.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  62. Slashdot wasn't brokenwhy did they "fix" it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was fine, the way it was.

  63. Go Speed Racer Go! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the 60's cartoon!

  64. Traffic cams do this already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why have drones doing this at all? There are already live feedsrovided by traffic cams.

  65. 2 examples in fiction by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Both on anime race cars, both used for scouting ahead and navigation.

    Speed Racer's Mach 5 could launch a fixed-wing drone that looked like a bird. Also good for shenanigans :-P

    The Cyber Formula (basically fantasy F1) cars from Future GPX Cyber Formula launched what we might today call "atmospheric satellites." It gave live maps and provided something like a GPS signal, I guess the authors thought GPS would never be available to civilians. Only slightly better than what you can get on a smartphone today. Also good for knocking open the landing gear doors on a hypersonic space plane :-P

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  66. Is it a bird, a plane, no its superman by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    I cant wait for my personal drone to fly me to worj=k, with Lois Lane in my arms

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  67. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not make cars talk to each other ?