Slashdot Mirror


Do Hypersonic Missiles Make Defense Systems Obsolete?

An anonymous reader writes "The Diplomat's Zachary Keck wonders why the U.S. government is doubling down on missile defense systems even as hypersonic missiles threaten to render them obsolete. Keck notes that hypersonic missiles pose two distinct challenges to current missile defense systems. First, they travel far faster than the missiles the defense systems are designed to intercept. Second, they travel at lower altitudes and possess greater maneuverability than the missiles the current systems have been built to destroy. Nonetheless, the U.S. was planning on spending $2 billion a year on missile defense through 2017, and now the Pentagon is asking for an additional $4.5 billion over the next five years."

6 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. Not Obsolete At All by KermodeBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, there may be these incredible "Hypersonic" missiles, but only the people with the capability to build or purchase them will have those missiles. Everyone else will be using conventional sub-sonic missiles. Also consider the many, many missiles (hundreds of thousands? I don't know) that currently exist right now and will be used in the future.

    Today's anti-missile systems will be useful for many years to come.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Not Obsolete At All by phayes · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Add to that the targeting dilemma where missiles at that speed are practically blind. Hypervelocity missiles are good for "journalists" in order to sell paper but not so much against the US Navy.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  2. Do Hypersonic Styles Make Slashdot Obsolete? by FUCK+BETA,+FUCK+DICE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Betas? We don't need no stinkin' betas! FUCK BETA

  3. Re:And this is why... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And once the anti-missile lasers are well-established, there will be a push for faster-than-light missiles.

    And then of course, we will have the technology we need to explore other star systems.

  4. Re:Bee Keepers and the Audience by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Old-school Slashdot user from the 90s here.

    I think what everyone is trying to say is that Slashdot should be left alone. No big makeovers, no big changes. We like it the way it is, and want it to be immune from the pile of suck that has taken over the rest of the web.

    Slashdot has remained one of the few sites that has changed little over the years. It is already perfect the way it is, and any change is just going to make it worse. Leave it the hell alone. There is nothing wrong with its usability, readability, etc. the way it is.

    Not only that, but... if you are trying to attract a different type of user to the site, you need to keep in mind that the people who are here LIKE the current company. If you attract scores of new users, it will be like an awesome small club opening its membership to all the drunk hobos in the city. The atmosphere and feel of the site are just not going to be the same, and us core, loyal, long time users will LEAVE.

    Do what you must, I hope my advice is at least read.

  5. Re:And this is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And then of course, we will have the technology we need to explore other star systems.

    ...and blow them the hell up!