Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Lync Server Gathers Employee Data Just Like NSA

coondoggie writes "Microsoft's Lync communications platform gathers enough readily analyzable data to let corporations spy on their employees like the NSA can on U.S. citizens, and it's based on the same type of information — call details. At Microsoft's Lync 2014 conference, software developer Event Zero detailed just how easy it would be, for instance, to figure out who is dating whom within the company and pinpoint people looking for another job."

11 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. Assume all MS products are spying on you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to use Lync at work, and I'd just assumed it'd be cc'ing keywords etc to HR and management.

    1. Re:Assume all MS products are spying on you. by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Informative

      People should assume that with any means of communication they use in the workplace. There is no guarantee and should be no expectation of privacy when using an employer's systems.

  2. Can see how own network, messaging is being used!? by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm shocked and amazed. A company running their own messaging server on their own network can see how it's being used?!
    Next you'll tell me that my company's email administrator can see email I send at work, through the server they administer.

  3. And why should you expect anything different? by halo1982 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're instant messaging someone on the company's IM platform on the company's time why the fuck would you have any expectation of any sort of privacy?

    I know my company can see everything I can do when I'm logged on to their computer. This is part of the agreement I signed with them. It's also the reason why I don't do stupid shit on my company's network like look for another job or send out resumes from my company email address.

    Oh wait, the outrage is because it's Microsoft. Got it.

    1. Re:And why should you expect anything different? by Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you're instant messaging someone on the company's IM platform on the company's time why the fuck would you have any expectation of any sort of privacy?

      Because you're a human being and don't leave your humanity at the door when you show up for work. Yeah, I know that is a strange concept for americans, but in many other parts of the world, it is very much still alive. Employees are also humans - wow, what a revelation.

      Your expectation of privacy should certainly be different, but there's no sane reason it should automatically be zero.

      Real-world example: In a company I worked for a few years ago I helped write the policy on this very topic. The final agreement was that the company could look into your e-mail and stuff, but only if they went to the workers council (elected representatives of the employees) and made their case. So if they suspected you of wrongdoing, or you were ill and had crazy important documents in your mail or personal folders, the company could look through it - in the presence of someone representing your interests.

      The important difference is the same as in real-life criminal cases: With a system like this or the real world "must get a court order first" approach, you are innocent until proven guilty and it requires at least some reasonable suspicion before someone can breach your privacy. In a blanket surveilance environment, we're all guilty, period.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  4. Re:Can see how own network, messaging is being use by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why I prefer to do my job searches on a disliked co-workers computer.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  5. um, yeah ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... because that's the way to retain good employees, spy on them.

    1. Re:um, yeah ... by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Be careful, you are dangerously close to implying that it is good employees and not obedient workers that are actually in demand.

  6. Re:lots of products already do this by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ALL PBX type software does this.

    Anyone who wants to be able to bill internally HAS to keep this metadata to do internal billing.

    Its also something that has been collected for the entire 30 years I've dealt with phone systems, and its not like it was new when I first started in telephony.

    You're pretty fucking stupid if this is news to you.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  7. Re:Looking for a job on company equipment? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine, a database. Storing data. That you can run reports on.

    Simply amazing what computers can do these days.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  8. Re:Looking for a job on company equipment? by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, people really believe this sort of shit?

    If it bother you that your employees are looking elsewhere for a job, perhaps try harder to retain them? I have standing offers to work for a couple of places, places that make the top paying employers lists. At this point in my career I don't really have to "look" for a new job, I just stop ignoring the offers. Yet I'm staying where I am - and not based on pay.

    Want people to stay when they have plenty of choices? Try not pointlessly hassling them over shit like "using company equipment". You'd have to get pretty extreme with that sort of thing before you'd cost more than the cost of hiring someone new and them coming up to speed, even if you were such a dick that you even pay attention.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.