Slashdot Mirror


GCHQ Intercepted Webcam Images of Millions of Yahoo Users

An anonymous reader writes with more chilling news from the Snowden files. Quoting the Guardian: "GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not. ... The system, eerily reminiscent of the telescreens evoked in George Orwell's 1984, was used for experiments in automated facial recognition, to monitor GCHQ's existing targets, and to discover new targets of interest. Such searches could be used to try to find terror suspects or criminals making use of multiple, anonymous user IDs." Remember, friends don't video conference with friends unless they're using SIP and TLS.

8 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. Chatroulette Failed by number17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They first tried this experiment with Chatroulette only to find that the facial recognition software didn't work with cam pointed below the waist.

    1. Re:Chatroulette Failed by jolyonr · · Score: 5, Funny

      The document estimates that between 3% and 11% of the Yahoo webcam imagery harvested by GCHQ contains "undesirable nudity".

      But what percentage was desirable nudity?

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  2. The home of 1984? Really? by zerosomething · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is it that the home country of the author of 1984 just doesn't get it? How is it they are letting this kind of thing go on? It's truly amazing and sad!

    --
    It all starts at 0
    1. Re:The home of 1984? Really? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is it that the home country of the author of 1984 just doesn't get it?

      They've been treating it as a manual, instead of as a warning.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:The home of 1984? Really? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is it that the home country of the author of 1984 just doesn't get it?

      Plenty of us get it. Please remember that at no point did the general population of the UK ask for, support or condone this kind of behaviour, nor most of the other dubious things we've been hearing about lately that have supposedly been done in our name or for our protection.

      Also, the previous administration went from being elected on a technicality with a heavy majority of the population not supporting them to having a leader who everyone was promised at the election wouldn't take over if they voted for the party in question. And obviously nobody directly elected the current coalition administration, which doesn't even seem to be able to honour what it said it would do in the coalition agreement upon which it was founded consistently, never mind what was in the manifestos of the two constituent parties that people actually voted for.

      The last time we actually had anything resembling a government with a mandate in this country was nearly a decade ago, and they were the guys who then went to war, despite literally millions of people marching in the street to protest the decision, based on little more than trumped up rhetoric that proved to be every bit as made up as most of us always assumed it was.

      How is it they are letting this kind of thing go on?

      We demonstrably don't live in an effectively functioning democracy, by any credible definition of the term. Unfortunately, the political class have got very good at playing the game by the rules that currently exist and go to great lengths to avoid allowing those rules to change. Short of actually bringing down the government and replacing the system, hopefully in a non-violent way, this seems unlikely to change any time soon.

      As long as we have that limited system, a handful of big issues will inevitably dominate the one vote we get every five years or so, and there are way too many people who are (reasonably enough) more concerned with things like not having their homes flooded or whether they can get their kids into a good school or whether the grandparents will get proper treatment if they have to go into hospital for those of us who also consider points of principle when voting to have a significant impact.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  3. Tor is building an anonymous instant messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Forget the $16 billion romance between Facebook and WhatsApp. There's a new messaging tool worth watching.

    Tor, the team behind the world's leading online anonymity service, is developing a new anonymous instant messenger client, according to documents produced at the Tor 2014 Winter Developers Meeting in Reykjavik, Iceland."

  4. Re:Hey, GCHQ and NSA ... by SpankiMonki · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many fingers am I holding up now?

    Don't know about you, but I'm holding up one.

  5. WebRTC Solution by PineHall · · Score: 5, Informative

    WebRTC seems to be the best way now to communicate and avoid all the spying. It is supported by Firefox, Chrome, and Opera browsers. It does audio, video, text and file transfers. The media streams are all encrypted and once connected the media streams from browser to browser with no middle man/web site.