Slashdot Mirror


How An Astronaut Nearly Drowned During a Space Walk

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "About 44 minutes into a 6.5-hour spacewalk last July, Italian astronaut Luca Parmitano noted that water was building up inside his helmet – the second consecutive spacewalk during which he reported the problem. As Parmitano worked his way back to the air lock, water covered his eyes, filled his ears, disrupted communications, and eventually began to enter his nose, making it difficult for him to breathe. 'I know that if the water does overwhelm me I can always open the helmet,' wrote Parmitano about making it to the airlock. 'I'll probably lose consciousness, but in any case that would be better than drowning inside the helmet.' Later, when crew mates removed his helmet, they found that it contained at least 1.5 quarts of water. In a 122-page report released Wednesday, a mishap investigation board identified a range of causes for the near-tragedy, including organizational causes that carried echoes of accident reports that followed the loss of the shuttles Challenger and Columbia and their crews in 1986 and 2003. Engineers traced the leak to a fan-and-pump assembly that is part of a system that extracts moisture from the air inside the suit and returns it to the suit's water-based cooling system. Contaminants clogged holes that would have carried the water to the cooling system after it was extracted from the air. The water backed up and flowed into the suit's air-circulation system, which sent it into Parmitano's helmet (PDF).

The specific cause of the contamination is still under investigation but investigators also identified deeper causes, one of which involved what some accident-investigation specialists have dubbed the 'normalization of deviance' – small malfunctions that appear so often that eventually they are accepted as normal. In this case, small water leaks had been observed in space-suit helmets for years, despite the knowledge that the water could form a film on the inside of a helmet, fogging the visor or reacting with antifogging chemicals on the visor in ways that irritate eyes. NASA officials are not planning on resuming non-urgent spacewalks before addressing all 16 of the highest priority suggestions from the Mishap Investigation Board. 'I think it's a tribute to the agency that we're not hiding this stuff, that we're actually out trying to describe these things, and to describe where we can get better,' says William Gerstenmaier, associate administrator for NASA's Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate. 'I think that's how we prevent Columbias and Challengers.'"

30 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Quarts? by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Later, when crew mates removed his helmet, they found that it contained at least 1.5 quarts of water.

    Or at least 1.5 liters of water, if you're Canadian.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Quarts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not beer, so they don't really care.

    2. Re:Quarts? by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mouthfuls

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
    3. Re:quarts? by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      Well if you were from Burma, you wouldn't have been confused

      So, how many *shaves* per quart?

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  2. On the bright side by tippe · · Score: 5, Funny

    at least it wasn't a failure of the space suit's urine collection system...

    1. Re:On the bright side by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 2

      at least it wasn't a failure of the space suit's urine collection system...

      which begs the question... is there an efficient fart collection system? In space, no one can smell you toot.

    2. Re:On the bright side by OakDragon · · Score: 2

      Well there was a "turd on the run" on Apollo 10. Tellingly, no one owned up to it.

    3. Re:On the bright side by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      which begs the question...

      It does no such thing.

  3. summery by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Was that actually a good summary for once, or the entire article!

    I guess it stops the usual misinformed, ignorant posts based on a couple of sensationalist headline based loosely upon something that was slightly related to the article from being posted.

  4. Re:I'm confused by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

    A quart is a quarter of a gallon, not a quarter of a pint. Now pint off, you tablespooner.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  5. Stupid question by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Couldn't he have, you know, drank the water that was building up?

    --
    Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    1. Re:Stupid question by scotts13 · · Score: 2

      Couldn't he have, you know, drank the water that was building up?

      That IS a stupid... No, actually, it's not. I'm going to assume, however, that drinking a fluid that's probably floating around as globules inside your helmet, without choking on it, would be tricky. Also, "Ewww, helmet water!"

    2. Re:Stupid question by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd still pick "eww" over drowning, as drowning is supposedly one of the more painful ways to die.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    3. Re:Stupid question by danomatika · · Score: 5, Informative

      Couldn't he have, you know, drank the water that was building up?

      Without gravity, water floats in bubbles you can't easily blow out of the way and the surface tension can keep the film intact over your nose & mouth if their is enough. If you inhale a bubble, all you have is the force of your breath to blow it out. You can easily imagine a scenario where you run out of air in your lungs as the bubbles keep floating in front of your face in the helmet. Scary is putting it mildly.

    4. Re:Stupid question by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I haven't heard any dead people complaining about it.

    5. Re:Stupid question by gerardrj · · Score: 5, Informative

      The liquid floating around in the helmet would have eventually drowned him. Doing nothing was 100% certain death; the liquid water was effectively toxic.
      Drinking the liquid (which may have been toxic) would have prevented the drowning and provided more time to evacuate him to the interior of ISS. If the liquid were poisonous, medical attention could then be rendered and an evacuation to Earth would be possible.

      This is similar to being stranded in the wild: it is always better to drink even smelly water than to die of dehydration. You will most likely be found and returned to civilization before any toxic effect or biological infection from the water you drink would cause any serious health risks. Not drinking could cause your death in a few hours, toxic water would usually take at least a few days to a week to kill you (if you remain untreated).

      This of course ignoring the entire question of HOW to drink the water.

      If I were NASA I'd take a two-step approach to the issue:

      1. Fix the damed leaks.
      2. Install a large hydroscopic surface area water/air separator inside the helmet with a straw within reach of the astronaut's mouth. In emergency you can breath through the straw.

      Regardless of this issue, it is apparent that the astronauts need an external "man down" signaling device they can activate from muscle memory. The device needs to alert on each of: the comms frequency, visually (flashing light) and on some other dedicated emergency radio frequency with detectors both within the station as well as on Earth.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:Stupid question by schlachter · · Score: 2

      the question is did he know it was drinkable "water" and not something toxic.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    7. Re:Stupid question by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now, perhaps microgravity does weird things, but my understanding is that the surface tension of water would cause beads of water to form spherical blobs. Any blobs that touch would generally combine to form larger spherical blobs, and so on.

      I didn't suggest blowing them out of the way. I suggested sucking them into the mouth, and then swallowing them. Presumably, if they're near the nose, exhaling through the nose would push them towards the mouth. If they're not near the nose or the mouth, then they're not a threat to breathing.

      I wouldn't expect water to create a film over any surface, as that would not maximize the ratio of volume to surface area (which is what surface tension accomplishes). I similarly wouldn't expect the water to exist as a fine mist or any other collection of small blobs, since surface tension causes water to "stick" to itself, resulting in the merging of any smaller blobs.

      Then again, I've never played with water in microgravity. Considering launching a kickstarter where you can fund my flight aboard the Vomit Comet, where I will attempt to drink blobs of free-floating water in microgravity while I wear a bikini and show off my moobs ala Kate Upton. Any takers?

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    8. Re:Stupid question by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm guessing you've never had a sip of water go down the "wrong pipe" ?

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    9. Re:Stupid question by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      Something more or less toxic than suffocation?

  6. Re:I'm confused by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's an African or European pint.

    Ask a King. They know such silly things...

  7. Space Seems Surprisingly Safe by Galaga88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given the fact that astronauts and cosmonauts have only died trying to launch from, and land on, the Earth, space itself seems surprisingly safe.

    It's probably because all the excitement and explosions occur at the taking off and landing, and most of our actual time in space is spent traveling in big circles.

  8. The Bravery of Coming Forward After Being Caught by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'I think it's a tribute to the agency that we're not hiding this stuff, that we're actually out trying to describe these things, and to describe where we can get better."

    Except you were hiding it, for years. You only revealed it when it caused such a crisis that it could not longer be hidden.

  9. normal deviants by minstrelmike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "normalization of deviance" is what caused the problems. I can see fundamentalists having a field day with that one.

    Actually looking directly at the problem is the only way to fix it ultimately.
    I like Bob Lewis' take on investigations in a blog he wrote about NASA vs other government Agencies.
    http://www.issurvivor.com/shop...

  10. Re:Why Didn't He Just Drink the Water? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    Can't read. TWO FUCKING THREADS UP! jackass asshole fucktard.

    There's not many minutes of difference in the timestamps of the two similar questions. It's possible that GP was reading the thread before the first question was posted and didn't refresh the page to find out the duplicate before posting his own.

  11. Re:What is wrong with you people? by Bigbutt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stupid people on the internet again. Hey, why not just bring up google and type in "convert 1.5 quarts to quatloos" or whatever your preferred method of measure is? Mandarin is the most common language on Earth. Why aren't we typing in a sensible language like Mandarin?

    Idiot.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  12. Re:Always the problem with NASA by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't think of a single death or significant injury/risk in the NASA programs where the end result of investigation was "well, it was an unforeseeable accident". Each and every case I recall there were engineers saying "there's a problem we need to fix" and managers just kept ignoring it.

    Your recollection doesn't match mine, and I've spent decades studying the space program. The loss of Challenger comes close, but even then the engineers had been complacent about joint blow-by and O-ring erosion until the eleventh hour - which contributed in a large part to managements confusion and distrust.

    I know there's a Cult Of The Engineer here on Slashdot, but it's badly misguided. Engineers are human, and they do fuck up.

  13. danger of water hugging skin by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Due to surface tension, water will flow along and hug a surface unless disrupted. So it does not have to fill the helmet, but just start crawling along the face into the nose and mouth. I've seen the micro-gravity video of someone slowly squeeze a water-full washcloth and the sheet of water crawl up his arm.

  14. Re:I'm confused by asylumx · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure what unit of measurement is bigger than a barrel.

    I believe you're looking for a "Library of congress" which is generally agreed to be larger than a barrel.

  15. Re:I'm confused by willy_me · · Score: 2

    Not all gallons are the same. Muros must have thought this was obvious. I thought it was obvious.

    If two people independently read the same meaning in a message you've written, it's unlikely the problem is with the reader.

    Only true with a small audience. When read by thousands, the two that could not figure it out are to blame.