Slashdot Mirror


Bugatti 100P Rebuilt: The Plane That Could've Turned the Battle of Britain

concertina226 writes "A team of engineers is working together to recreate the Bugatti Veyron (or Bugatti 100P), an art deco-era fighter plane designed for World War II that would have broken the air speed record in 1940 — only the plane was never flown. Featuring forward pitched wings, a zero-drag cooling system and automated flight control assistance, plane was capable of reaching an air speed of 500mph, which would have made it the fastest and most advanced plane of its time."

8 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. Not a Nazi Plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Bugatti, who had gained French citizenship between the two wars, decided to hide the craft in pieces in crates in a barn in the French countryside to prevent it from being discovered by the Nazis."

    Learn to read.

  2. Two things by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get the computer controlled part, since forward swept wings are inherently unstable, but not how such control was going to be accomplished in 1939. Also, this 500mph historical plane, with modern fabrication and knowledge, is going to be limited to 200mph because they could only manage to fit 400HP of engine in it. And yet the original was supposed to fly 2.5 times as fast with only 2.25x the horsepower? Drag doesn't scale that way.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Two things by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its a paper plane. Paper planes always look great on paper.

  3. Oh my by muecksteiner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even by Slashdot standards, this is one of the dumbest headlines, ever.

    Bugatti was no Nazi. He lived and worked in pre-war France, and was not a Nazi supporter at all. The reason the thing did not fly back then was because Bugatti, who had build the plane in France prior to it being invaded by Nazi Germany, successfully hid it from the invaders so they would not get their hands on it. Or rather, the technology used in it: in any case, the plane in the form it was built was never, ever, a "Nazi plane". Nor would it have been useful at all as a warplane: this thing, amazing as it is, is a pure racer, with zero capabilities for being armed. Nor would it probably have been much good in a dogfight, either: that crate was built to be fast, with everything else being a secondary consideration.

    This headline is pure drivel, and really should be corrected ASAP.

  4. Sensationalist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From TFU:

    "The Bugatti 100P was not ready in time for the September 1939 deadline to enter the Coupe Deutsch aircraft race, ... If the Germans had been able to get hold of the Bugatti, it is believed that the plane could have outperformed the British Supermarine Spitfire planes during the Battle of Britain."

    Incredible how unrealistic/sensationalist how people can be. The prototype was not ready in Sept 39, it was hidden in France and hence can only be found there by the Germans after May 1940 and still it is assumed to take part in the Battle of Britain on the summer of 1940? And according to the title it is even supposed to win the war at that time???

  5. Re:What is "computer-directed flight control"? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Informative

    what exactly does "computer-directed flight control" mean for a plane from 1939?

    This whole article is full of lazy incomplete writing.

    To wit -

    WWII Bugatti 100P Plane Rebuilt: Jet Fighter that Could Have Won Battle of Britain for the Nazis

    A group of airplane enthusiasts have rebuilt the Bugatti 100P, an advanced fighter jet from 1940

    The word 'Jet' appears nowhere else in the article, nor does it appear the 'jet' was ever built as a 'fighter.'

  6. Re:Already Lost by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_335 could potentially beat the shit out of RAF .. and so could ME 262 . Just consider the allies lucky .. they were not built in large numbers ...

    They also lacked range. By the time they flew to London, they only had enough fuel to stay for a matter of minutes before returning to base. The RAF Spitfires were flying from local airfields, so could spend much more time in the fight. The really decisive fighter of WWII was the American P51 Mustang, not because it was the fastest, or most maneuverable, but because it could carry large external fuel tanks, greatly extending its range. It could accompany bombers from England to Berlin, or from the Marianas to Tokyo. It is not the best fighter than wins, but the best fighter that actually shows up for the fight.

  7. Re:Already Lost by PapayaSF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Superb aircraft.

    Oh, indeed. And the story of its origin is wonderful. In 1940 the British wanted North American Aviation to produce Curtiss P-40 Warhawks under license, but NAA thought they could make a better aircraft faster. And the first P-51 rolled out 102 days after the contract was signed, and first flew 47 days after that. It took a few years of upgrades and revsions to turn it into the best piston-engined fighter of the war, but compare that initial design and development cycle to the years and even decades it takes to get anything built these days.

    Interesting tech note: the P-51's distinctive radiator/oil cooler actually added speed to the plane: cool air came in the front, and the hot air exiting the back added some jet-like thrust.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot