Slashdot Mirror


The Tangled Tale of Mt. Gox's Missing Millions

jfruh writes "What went wrong to produce the spectacular implosion of bitcoin repository Mt. Gox? Well, according to some preliminary investigation from the IDG News Service, pretty much everything. There was a lack of management oversight and 'culture,' the code running the site was a mess, and the CEO seemed more concerned about his plans for a 'Bitcoin cafe' than he was about his Japanese bank closing the company's account."

191 comments

  1. "Sight"? On slashdot? by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Really?

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    1. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Jeslijar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot has turned into a great web sight

    2. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, really. Are you not paying attention?

    3. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eye have a spelling chequer,
      It came with my Pea Sea.
      It plane lee marks four my revue
      Miss Steaks I can knot sea.

      Eye strike the quays and type a whirred
      And weight four it two say
      Weather eye am write oar wrong
      It tells me straight a weigh.

      Eye ran this poem threw it,
      Your shore real glad two no.
      Its vary polished in its weigh.
      My chequer tolled me sew.

      A chequer is a bless thing,
      It freeze yew lodes of thyme.
      It helps me right all stiles of righting,
      And aides me when eye rime.

      Each frays come posed up on my screen
      Eye trussed too bee a joule.
      The chequer pours o'er every word
      Two cheque sum spelling rule.

    4. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bad omen. I see YouTube-level discourse in the near future.

    5. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have great incite.

      --
      Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
    6. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by edibobb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tried to mod up, but it won't work (even though I have 15 mod points). Slashdot seems as competent as MtGox.

    7. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Sorry - Slashdot gave out all the mod points to ACs like me. They are now mod point bankrupt,

    8. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      That kind off spelling is bad four your eyesite.

    9. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      I think it was an inside job. Some employee of Dice absconded with all the mod points!

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    10. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...definitely time to go to http://soylentnews.org/

    11. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by hb253 · · Score: 1

      I wonder who has taken the reigns?

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    12. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Opyros · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, it isn't "Mt. Gox". It's "Magic, the Gathering online exchange".

    13. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you meant rains instead of reigns, didn't you?

    14. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      Wow. It's a real pity this was posted as AC... I can see this becoming a meme...

    15. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      I think it was an inside job. Some employee of Dice absconded with all the mod points!

      So where did you buy yours? :)

      And how much is "+1 Interesting" worth in Bitcoins now, anyway?

    16. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh?

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    17. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by FriendlyStatistician · · Score: 1

      It's not new. I suppose you could say it already is a meme.

    18. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Double-whoosh. A reigning monarch reins in when it rains.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    19. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by sabri · · Score: 2

      Eye have a spelling chequer,

      When I put the sentence "the code running the sight was a mess" in MS Word, it does not show up as spelling error.

      How do you call someone that speaks two languages? Bilingual.
      How do you call someone that speaks three languages? Trilingual.
      How do you call someone that speaks one language? American.

      Moral of the story: stop complaining about people who learned English as a second language and be happy that they did.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    20. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I call a motherfucker that cannot speak English?

      A target.

      Fuck off and die.

    21. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      Typical timothy.

    22. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by porges · · Score: 1

      Or, as some other columnist has been writing since the debacle, "Empty Gox".

    23. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Also, it isn't "Mt. Gox". It's "Magic, the Gathering online exchange".

      Totally emphasizing their proper place in the world --- trading Magic cards, not currency.

      Although, I suppose if they hadn't shortened it --- they could be at risk of trademark action against them from the owners of the Magic the Gathering game.

    24. Re: "Sight"? On slashdot? by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

      It's knot a bout the sob knitter, it' a bout the nun ax is tin editin.

    25. Re:"Sight"? On slashdot? by Pope · · Score: 1

      When I put the sentence "the code running the sight was a mess" in MS Word, it does not show up as spelling error.

      Because none of those words is spelled incorrectly?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  2. Outta sight, man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Stop relying on your spelchekker, people. It's like everyone sees your lips moving while you read.

  3. The Sight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, my soar eyes.

    1. Re:The Sight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That spelling error really greats on my nerves.

    2. Re:The Sight? by Chas · · Score: 1

      Probably better than soar ayes.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  4. Shouldn't it be understood... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that all scrip currencies are going to find themselves subject to attack from all sides? Wasn't it obvious that governments are going to have a problem with it due to a lack of ability to regulate/tax, banking systems are going to have a problem with it due to their not having a role in something that could be lucrative, and criminals are going to be interested in exploiting the lack of government oversight in order to either profit through its use or through outright theft?

    A coworker previously had sang the praises of Bitcoin, but it sounded like he was approaching it from a stock market speculation angle, as in the more it grows the more he was interested. This wasn't long before it started making the news big-time, and like all bubbles, once everyone is involved it usually means that it's time to get out. And also like other bubbles, it has started experiencing the bursting that kills value.

    Bitcoin is interesting, but for something so libertarian requires way too much third-party interaction in order to practically use it, and those third-party gatekeepers are the perfect targets.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if you don't want to rely in third-party gatekeepers, how most people will use it? In your phone? in your (for the majority, windows) pc? You can't use gatekeepers because a lot got hacked or just run with the coins, and you can't have them yourself because the most used platforms are ripe for external exploit, either making the user do something or just making popular good looking trojans.

      And if that insecurity is not enough, having over that government sponsored weakened encryption algorythms and mandated backdoors don't help a lot.

      We are still not ready for a distributed digital money in those terms.

    2. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wasn't it obvious that governments are going to have a problem with it due to a lack of ability to regulate/tax,

      No, just the opposite in fact, because of the block chain. It's clearly more trackable than regular money. Governments might oppose it, but not for this reason.

      banking systems are going to have a problem with it due to their not having a role in something that could be lucrative

      Yes, this is obvious. The problem with bitcoin for banks is that inflation is mathematically defined - they can't just print more on a whim, they have to actually do something to generate more.

      I imagine it is possible that a bank-designed crypto currency could have properties that are favorable to the banks in this way, but I think those might have a hard time gaining adoption. We've already got a currency that robs its holder of 2% of its value every year by design, why would we need another?

      criminals are going to be interested in exploiting the lack of government oversight in order to either profit through its use or through outright theft?

      Did you not already mention bankers? Non-banker criminals who are wise will stay well away from anything that has a list of all transactions ever associated to it by design. I think that we probably want criminals to choose crypto currency because they will be easier to prosecute!

      Wise criminals probably just go into banking.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^ very good post . +1 from me . Wall street bankers probably steal more than any "thing" else on this planet.

    4. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is interesting, but for something so libertarian requires way too much third-party interaction in order to practically use it, and those third-party gatekeepers are the perfect targets.

      Bitcoin was designed to remove the need to use gatekeepers or third parties. There is absolutely no need to use any exchange once you enter the ecosystem. Once you have some bitcoins and accept bitcoins for payment there is no need to store your assets in hot wallets or exchanges especially since you can purchase almost anything directly with bitcoin right now.

    5. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by TWX · · Score: 2

      It also doesn't help that Bitcoin, in of itself, has no intrinsic value, and it can be argued that as far as real-world value goes it's actually a detriment as it takes fairly significant resources to run the computers to competitively generate bitcoins and it's possible and even quite likely that people will lose their private keys and thus will lose access to bitcoins.

      Money relying on specie that is also itself a valuable material for manufacturing will at least maintain the value of exchange for that manufacturing. Gold is a good example of that given its use in the electronics industry and the jewelery industry, among others. Same could be said for platinum or palladium, and this is the strongest argument in favor of a specie-backed currency.

      Money whose value is market-based and is sponsored by government is inexpensive to produce, which is its strong suit. Printing bills is inexpensive- printing the $100 costs the government just about the same as printing the $1. Generating money electronically in the form of credit at the prime rate is also inexpensive, and while computers are involved they're not working as hard in parallel competition to generate the money.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    6. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      And if you don't want to rely in third-party gatekeepers, how most people will use it? In your phone? in your (for the majority, windows) pc?

      Once you begin to use wallets on smartphones and your personal computer you begin to realize how much easier it is and more secure(If you follow a few basic rules) than anything else. It is easier, more flexible, and a lot more inexpensive than online banking. The problem with Bitcoin right now is that it is still in its early developmental stages where even though I find it extremely easy to secure, my grandmother doesn't without relying on a third party. Software and wallets are becoming more user friendly for the less technical people everyday and pretty soon hardware wallets will shrink down to the size of a key chain attachment and be found everywhere.

    7. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      We've already got a currency that robs its holder of 2% of its value every year by design, why would we need another?

      USD actually robs users of 7-13% a year; 2-4% inflation is a ruse. The CPI was "adjusted" to not include tracking inflation from items such as fuel and food, which IMHO are essential to us all. USD and the Euro are far better than many other currencies which further emphasizes the need for Bitcoin because it isn't just about solving first world problems but lending assistance to countries with hyper-inflation or the unbanked.

    8. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...especially since you can purchase almost anything directly with bitcoin right now.

      HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh wait...you're serious, aren't you?

    9. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "third-party gatekeepers are the perfect targets"

      Mtgox is not a target here, mtgox is the attacker. By now its pretty damn certain that mislaying half a billion $ worth bitcoins did not happen by accident. Make no mistake, nobody stole from mtgox, mtgox itself pulled off the biggest heist in bitcoin history. Mtgox-es sad story about how they got hacked holds no water, its nonsense.

    10. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If you have specie based money (the gold standard) then you are limited in the amount of money (ie resources) you can have in circulation which limits the size of the economy which means that economies cannot grow exponentially which means that bankers can't get really, really rich which means that the entire artifice of the current world falls to pieces.

      Why do you hate America?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    11. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 2

      This is kind of bullshit, because even with encryption, you are still only a keystroke logger away from having all of your bitcoins stolen. Think, any time that you get a trojan, or become a botnet client, your money could be stolen... forever. Unlike credit cards and bank accounts, bitcoin transactions are not reversible.

    12. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 2

      Non-banker criminals who are wise will stay well away from anything that has a list of all transactions ever associated to it by design.

      This is misguided at best. Bitcoin transactions are not reversible, so unlike credit card/bank account fraud, the criminal can directly profit. In most cases, the theif is not in a jurisdiction that particularly cares, and their only impediment is finding a money mule with credentials to receive the money and re-transmit it in a non-reversible way (Western Union). I guess at least bitcoin protects the people who fall for Nigerian money mule schemes...

    13. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      It also doesn't help that Bitcoin, in of itself, has no intrinsic value, and it can be argued that as far as real-world value goes it's actually a detriment as it takes fairly significant resources to run the computers to competitively generate bitcoins and it's possible and even quite likely that people will lose their private keys and thus will lose access to bitcoins.

      So, it costs nothing to create a new wallet. Considering your regular online banking scenario which is vulnerable to all the same exploits, It's quite secure enough and far more economical to transfer some money into Bitcoin and send it to someone else who converts it back into the currency of their choice rather than pay a wire transfer fee. That is the value of Bitcoin to me.

      I'll also point out that the Bitcoin generation is incentive to sign the transactions, and the generation of Bitcoin will stop. When it does it will still be valuable as a transport medium for digital tokens representing currency, and the transaction fees will reflect this.

    14. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Arbitrage between existing currency and bitcoin is essential to its continued success.

    15. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Good point. There is a role for trustless decentralized exchanges and muti-sig exchanges here.

    16. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      Wallets only ask for passcodes when you spend or create new transactions so even if you have an infected computer it is very difficult to capture the passcode. The trojan would have to find and actively monitor the target for some time and thus is why such thefts are extremely rare at the moment.

      Cold storage makes bitcoin safe from all trojans and viruses. This is what I refer to when following a few basic rules that are easy for geeks but too complicated for my grandmother. This is why there is a role for multisig hot wallets to remove risk and hardware wallets in the future to eliminate these risks and still be usable by the technically illiterate.

    17. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by TWX · · Score: 1

      I don't actually want a specie-based economy, as either the value of the specie has to fluctuate with the value of the currency, or else as you state, the amount of money in circulation is limited.

      I prefer the other option I discussed for this very reason.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    18. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by TWX · · Score: 1

      It costs nothing to create a new wallet? What kind of argument is that? It's the contents that matter, not the wallet itself. If one loses access to all of one's accumulated wealth then one is done for.

      At least the banks, the FDIC, and the NCUA guarantee the money of depositors in the event of a banking system problem. If they didn't then no one would keep their money in banks

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    19. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by TWX · · Score: 1

      The block chain does not have names associated with it. Governments may well know that transactions have occurred, but they do not necessarily know who made the transactions, nor is there a method by which to automagically pay any required taxes during the transaction itself.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    20. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh wait...you're serious, aren't you?

      The fact that there exists individuals who live exclusively using Bitcoin as a currency is testament to the amount of items you can buy with it directly or you could always buy gift cards with gyft or egifter(I.E. amazon) for free to be able to fill in the gaps of possible items you can buy.

      Fuel, cars, land, and other big ticket items are now sold directly with Bitcoin.

    21. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 1

      With a known wallet application, a torjan need only sit and wait for someone to use it. For many users, good botnet trojans go un-noticed for months or years. Cold storage is much safer, and a hardware wallet would be great. Computer wallets are a false sense of security.

    22. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Is it really possible to have an exchange that is not based on trust? I have hesitated to buy any bitcoin, because Mt Gox did not seem trustworthy; but would gladly buy them from a bank.

    23. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      There are a couple decentralized multi-sig exchanges popping up but they are still new and ultimately if you are trying to invest in bitcoin with fiat you must temporarily trust the exchange until you withdraw the bitcoins.

      The correct way to invest in Bitcoin is the following:

      1) Localbitcoins.com to find someone locally to purchase from.

      2) Start accruing bitcoins by accepting them as payment for services or when you sell things

      3) Use a trusted and well regulated exchange like coinbase.com in the US and than transfer the bitcoins out from them to your own wallet in cold storage

    24. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      If by "now" you mean "not" then sure. Because you most certainly can not buy fuel, cars or land with Bitcoin. And you certainly can't remit the taxes on those sales using it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    25. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      Can someone please explain why this is not just a gigantic Ponzi scheme? I get the notion that people within the system can use the virtual currency to trade products & service. The gigantic swings in the exchange rate between the virtual currencies and hard currencies makes no sense. Are exchanges required to keep cash on hand, or in a traditional bank, to meet the obligations for the balance sheets? Are exchanges required to turn away transfers into "account holders" if they do not have cash on hand to convert the virtual currency into a hard currency?

    26. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Chas · · Score: 0

      Can someone please explain why this is not just a gigantic Ponzi scheme?

      No they can't. Because, all half-assed denials aside, it IS a gigantic Ponzi scheme.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    27. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      That's a plot spoiler for a very long trilogy of Neal Stephenson books :)

    28. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Fact eh? What's the name of this individual then?

    29. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Fact eh? What's the name of this individual then?

      Started with a reporter doing it for a week, than a newly married couple doing it for 100 days- http://lifeonbitcoin.com/

    30. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      If by "now" you mean "not" then sure. Because you most certainly can not buy fuel, cars or land with Bitcoin. And you certainly can't remit the taxes on those sales using it.

      The acceptance of bitcoin for fuel is dependent upon the owner as many stations are franchised. There are certain locations that accept it directly and all other can use options like - http://www.coinfueled.com/ I never mentioned taxes but you can pay your taxes with bitcoin with services like snapcard - http://www.coindesk.com/pay-ta... You may contest that these are in part, indirect methods of paying, but isn't using a credit card indirect as well where you have to pay a monthly check to your credit card company for their service of convenience?

    31. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone please explain why this is not just a gigantic Ponzi scheme?

      You seem to confuse Bitcoin and the exchanges. MtGox was a ponzi scheme, but that does not make Bitcoin a ponzi scheme any more than Madoff made US dollars a ponzi scheme.

    32. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by ttucker · · Score: 1

      Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law.

      No.

    33. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by Kalriath · · Score: 0

      I would indeed contest that they are in part indirect methods of paying. Because they are not in part indirect methods of paying, they are in whole indirect methods of paying. And considering you said "Fuel, cars, land, and other big ticket items are now sold directly with Bitcoin" - you are wrong.

      And no, a credit card is not "indirectly paying" either. It's directly paying as it is a direct transfer of funds from one party to another. Indirect is something like Paypal with an intermediary collecting the funds. And all those other options you mentioned are also indirect.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    34. Re:Shouldn't it be understood... by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      I would indeed contest that they are in part indirect methods of paying. Because they are not in part indirect methods of paying, they are in whole indirect methods of paying. And considering you said "Fuel, cars, land, and other big ticket items are now sold directly with Bitcoin" - you are wrong.

      Reread what I actually posted:

      "The acceptance of bitcoin for fuel is dependent upon the owner as many stations are franchised. There are certain locations that accept it directly .."

      As evidenced by multiple people .... one example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      I stand behind my facts as I never claimed taxes can be paid directly.

  5. U like it better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On "INVISO-POWER"...

  6. There doing they're best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The editors have a ruff job. Them have two get those articles up in time for us too sea abd meat there quota. Working four Dice must bee really hard considering that there job cold be sent oversees at anytime!

    1. Re:There doing they're best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The edit ores halve a ruff job. Them halve two get does art icicles up in thyme for us too sea and meat there quota. Whore king four Dice must bee rely hard con sidelining that they're job cold be send oversees at anytime!

  7. I don't want to be a spelling nazi but... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Informative

    the code running the sight was a mess,

    is particularly irritating.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  8. Learning from history by sphealey · · Score: 2

    I believe it was the Medici family which first documented the need for bank regulation in the 1500s, although it is possible that other civilizations with extensive merchant activity may have realized that earlier but not left records. Bank and banking system failures in the 1600s, 1700s, 1800s, and early 1900s led all nations with large merchant, industrial, and financial economies to pass and implement banking regulation, oversight, and auditing requirements.

    Bitcoin? "Freedom!"

    sPh

    1. Re:Learning from history by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is regulated. It is regulated by the users and the protocol rather than a central authority than can be corrupted or one in which sociopaths naturally gravitate to.

    2. Re:Learning from history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which first documented the need for bank regulation in the 1500s

      Not quite the first.

      --
      [taiwanjohn: posting as A/C to preserve mods]

    3. Re:Learning from history by sphealey · · Score: 1

      = = = Bitcoin is regulated. It is regulated by the users and the protocol rather than a central authority than can be corrupted or one in which sociopaths naturally gravitate to. = = =

      Yeah, as I noted that system ("regulated by the users") was tried from 1500-1880. It didn't work so well, for exactly the reasons now afflicting Bitcoin.

      sPh

    4. Re:Learning from history by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      = = = Bitcoin is regulated. It is regulated by the users and the protocol rather than a central authority than can be corrupted or one in which sociopaths naturally gravitate to. = = =

      Yeah, as I noted that system ("regulated by the users") was tried from 1500-1880. It didn't work so well, for exactly the reasons now afflicting Bitcoin.

      sPh

      Correct, but the system you refer to wasn't able to solve the Byzantines' general dilemma as bitcoin can. This technology is balanced so it can work. Time will ultimately tell as to whether we are right or not. Ultimately, most of you may begin using it anyways as a protocol or for escrow services, or because the store gives you a 5% discount like many stores are now, or because some other internet technology using the security of the blockchain for some other service like a DAC .

    5. Re:Learning from history by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      Can you explain how Bitcoin solves the problem of 'undoing' transactions made by mistake or fraud?

    6. Re:Learning from history by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      Can you explain how Bitcoin solves the problem of 'undoing' transactions made by mistake or fraud?

      If you give your bitcoins to a stranger it offers no more or less protections than giving cash to a stranger. If fraud is committed against you by an individual or company where the identity is known you can take them to court as judges have already prosecuted bitcoin theft.

      Bitcoin has more protections not found elsewhere such as-

      If you want to do business with a stranger and want to be protected against risk you can use an escrow service like www.Bitrated.com with mutisig authentications. Bitcoin allows you to do 2 things not found with traditional escrow systems:

      1) Free escrow when no dispute is made(90+% of transactions)

      2) No counter party risk. The protocol makes it impossible for the arbitrator or escrow service to steal the funds

    7. Re:Learning from history by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. I watched half of the video. It had a lot of talk but not much information about how it works. Based upon some of the comments on this thread the developers at Mt. Gox were very poor I would not trust my bank account to unprofessional hacks. What assurances are there that there are not vulnerabilities in the method discussed in the video. Just because something is Open Source does not make it secure and bulletproof. Cryptography is a complicated subject and one must look at end-to-end implementation of all protocols involved to determine vulnerabilities.

    8. Re:Learning from history by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      What assurances are there that there are not vulnerabilities in the method discussed in the video. .

      There are never 100% assurances with anything including traditional banking and investing. That being said if you can lower your risks by understand how Bitcoin works and diversifying your risks. Don't leave bitcoins in any exchange and if you prefer to use a hot wallet only leave a little money in one. Buy small amounts at a time and transfer them immediately into cold storage from a trusted exchange. This way even if the trusted exchange has an issue you are only at risk for the small purchase and you are constantly testing the responsiveness of the exchange by securely transferring Bitcoin.

  9. It aint fishy .. it's sea food by invictusvoyd · · Score: 2

    Presiding over it all was CEO Mark Karpeles, who uses the online moniker MagicalTux. The attendant image of Karpeles as a stage magician may now inflame Mt. Gox customers who suspect their losses are due to sleight of hand, not sloppiness or outside thieves.

    I make exchange sight
    I get beetcoin
    I get more beetcoin
    I get some more beetcoin
    some more ....
    and .. POOF .. it's all gone ..
    Thank you come again

    1. Re:It aint fishy .. it's sea food by Chas · · Score: 1

      One for you.
      One for me!
      Two for you.
      One, two for me!
      Three for you.
      One, two, three for me!
      Four for you!
      One, two, three, four for me!
      Five for you.
      One, two, three, four, five for me!
      Six for you.
      One, two, three, four, five, six for me!
      Seven for you. ....

      I trust you can see where this is going.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
  10. Get your popcorn ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin can't and won't survive without regulation, and all (most) countries have said they won't, so... Many a fool and his money shall soon part. ; ) it'll be interesting to watch. 500 million dollars go missing, and the funny thing is governments don't really seem to care that anti-government investors lost their ass. LOL

    1. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bitcoin can't and won't survive without regulation, and all (most) countries have said they won't, so... Many a fool and his money shall soon part. ; ) it'll be interesting to watch. 500 million dollars go missing, and the funny thing is governments don't really seem to care that anti-government investors lost their ass. LOL

      What's important to realize is that the dollars won't go missing. They're still around - they have just changed hands. And that seems to be the real purpose of Bitcoin - have real money change hand, and mostly to the early adopters and those who get out in time.

      In itself, bitcoins have no value. The only value comes from what other values people exchange bitcoins for. It's a parasite economy that depends on non-bitcoin money for backing.

      And it's irrelevant. Can we forget it soon, like we've forgotten other ponzi/pyramid/tulip schemes? It's not worth mentioning - let fools and crooks shift real money around between themselves. The losers will deserve it, and while the winners don't, they're not worth losing sleep over.

    2. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      In itself, bitcoins have no value. The only value comes from what other values people exchange bitcoins for. It's a parasite economy that depends on non-bitcoin money for backing.

      By this logic, paypal, western union, moneygram, ect.. are all worth nothing and the stockholders are being fleeced.

    3. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      In itself, bitcoins have no value. The only value comes from what other values people exchange bitcoins for. It's a parasite economy that depends on non-bitcoin money for backing.

      What distinction do you think you're striking between BitCoin and "real money"? You can just as easily use your same construct to (correctly) say, "in itself, the U.S. dollar has no value. The only value comes from what other values people exchange U.S. dollars for." This is the very definition and role of currency.

      And it's irrelevant. Can we forget it soon, like we've forgotten other ponzi/pyramid/tulip schemes? It's not worth mentioning - let fools and crooks shift real money around between themselves. The losers will deserve it, and while the winners don't, they're not worth losing sleep over.

      I don't understand how you qualitatively distinguish the BitCoin bubble from, for example, a stock bubble, or even the price of a stock being moderately driven up higher than its fundamentals will bear. The same thing happens -- when the music stops, the last to buy gets left holding the bag, right? Do you consider yourself to "deserve it" when your 401(k) goes down because your fund manager didn't get out in time?

    4. Re: Get your popcorn ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a parasite economy that depends on non-bitcoin money for backing.

      Well, it depends on people to accept it as payment, just like any other fiat currency. The notion that bitcoins should be tied to real world money, that exchanges are required, etc is probably were the current trouble with bitcoin resides.

    5. Re: Get your popcorn ready! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Look at the very title of this submission. The "Missing Millions" are a reference to money, not Bitcoin.
      That pretty much sums up Bitcoin and how it doesn't stand on its own.

    6. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      The value of a currency is often predicated on having enough of a market in which to spend it.

      The US government backs the USD in two important ways; the first, though FDIC et al, by ensuring that there are safe places to store your USD while you're not using them. As we can see, that's not an insignificant benefit.

      The second is by guaranteeing that you'll be able to use those USD to pay all of your public debts - taxes, fees, permits, &c. That automatically grants a critical mass as far as having places to spend USD, which means that other people will accept the currency, which then snowballs until you have an effectively universal acceptance rate.

      Currently, no Bitcoin backers offer anything close to either of those two benefits.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    7. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      So where do dollars enter and leave the system with the price of Bitcoins going up and down?

    8. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by Chas · · Score: 1

      By this logic, paypal, western union, moneygram, ect.. are all worth nothing and the stockholders are being fleeced.

      No. Because, outside of Paypal (which is a scam that's been going on for FAR too long), Western Union, Moneygram, and various such services are regulated. And all transactions are cash transactions. They're simply applying the money you put in to the account of the person you're sending it to. Almost like a bank account. The money transfer fees just come off the top. They're not using some other form of currency or commodity to represent a nebulous, volatile cash value.

      Also, if the money gets applied to the wrong account, the funds can be retrieved and applied to the proper account. With BTC, it's "Toughski Shitski".

      So go shill someplace else.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    9. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how you qualitatively distinguish the BitCoin bubble from, for example, a stock bubble

      I suggest that you learn how to understand it instead of complaining about it to those who do.

    10. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Wow, really? That was a polite way of asking someone to justify what is on its face an irrational theory. Sorry you missed the subtlety.

    11. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No, not very polite, but more polite than writing "who is this creep trying to justify the scam he is part of by pretending he's too stupid to be able to see the differences between it and the stock market".
      In other words your petty little tactic of pretended stupidity has been seen through.
      Are you getting the hint yet?
      I'm getting offended by being seen as fresh meat to be taken advantage of by scammers.

    12. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      No, not very polite, but more polite than writing "who is this creep trying to justify the scam he is part of by pretending he's too stupid to be able to see the differences between it and the stock market". In other words your petty little tactic of pretended stupidity has been seen through. Are you getting the hint yet? I'm getting offended by being seen as fresh meat to be taken advantage of by scammers.

      Ouch... lose some money in BitCoin or something? No need to take it out on me.

      And if you really know me and my supposed involvement in BitCoin, pray do post the details here for the world to see. Since I've never touched the stuff, you'll just make yourself look like a bigger fool than you already have.

      Once again from the top: BitCoin is speculation. Stocks are speculation. Gold is speculation. Belly up to the bar like the rational adult you supposedly are and tell me why I'm wrong, or kindly take your ill-directed bitterness somewhere else.

    13. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Ouch... lose some money in BitCoin or something? No need to take it out on me.

      Never took part in it and very much dislike being seen as prey.

    14. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      pray do post the details here for the world to see

      If you are not part of the scam why the loud advocacy and why demean yourself by pretending to be so stupid?

    15. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Oh dear. One more time, for whatever good it'll do.

      Me:

      BitCoin is speculation. Stocks are speculation. Gold is speculation. Belly up to the bar like the rational adult you supposedly are and tell me why I'm wrong, or kindly take your ill-directed bitterness somewhere else.

      You:

      If you are not part of the scam why the loud advocacy and why demean yourself by pretending to be so stupid?

      Please be so kind as to direct us all to the specific language above that you characterize as "loud advocacy" on my part (I assume for BitCoin, but you didn't really say that).

      As to your continued vitriol, I reissue and clarify my challenge: If the distinction between BitCoin and any other target of a speculative bubble is so blindingly obvious, it should be quite simple for you to marshal a very succinct collection of words in the English language to make that point. Care to do so?

      I find that people who don't say anything more than, "it's so clear I don't have to explain it to you" or "if you don't see why I'm right, you must be stupid" generally do that because they realize they're backed into a corner, have nothing substantive they can say, and thus try to get out of the situation by waving their hands and pounding the table. Looking forward to your thoughtful, rational reply.

    16. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      They're simply applying the money you put in to the account of the person you're sending it to. Almost like a bank account. The money transfer fees just come off the top. They're not using some other form of currency or commodity to represent a nebulous, volatile cash value.

      Also, if the money gets applied to the wrong account, the funds can be retrieved and applied to the proper account. With BTC, it's "Toughski Shitski".

      So go shill someplace else.

      With those companies they provide a service to do the following - Take my USD cash> convert it to Paypal/Moneygram/W/U digital Tokens in their private ledger> than transfer those tokens back to Fiat Cash on the receiving end in person or through an ACH.

      With Bitcoin its the exact same thing but with a public ledger if you use it as a payment protocol.

      It really is a ridiculous claim that Bitcoin has no value when the marketplace clearly states otherwise. I would even go so far as to posit Bitcoin will always have value as long as their are humans who are aware of it as there are always individuals willing to transfer their other assets to hold onto a finite piece of important history.

    17. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by DeathToThePatriarchy · · Score: 1

      With the run of successful attacks, bitcoin looks more and more like a pump and dump scheme. The early folk get out with lots of actual money and the latecomers end up holding the empty bag. Also -- what is with the Mt. Gox orthography. It is MtGOX, which makes the poorly run site and other issues seem easily foreseen.

    18. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Also -- what is with the Mt. Gox orthography. It is MtGOX, which makes the poorly run site and other issues seem easily foreseen.

      Not everyone realize it stands (or stood) for "Magic-The-Gathering Online eXchange".

      But the origins of a company name doesn't seem to stop companies from being successful. Google is named so because one of the founders couldn't spell "Googol", Sprint derives from Southern Pacific Railroad, and "Pepsi" is named for the digestive enzyme you usually associate with heartburn and vomit.

    19. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think dbill is like a lot of us, including me. I'm getting fed up with all these bitcoin scam artists who prey on people. Bitcoin is simply a way to transfer the wealth from the wealthy in fiat dollars to the wealthy in bitcoins. It makes no sense at all why someone with fiat money would convert their fiat currency to bitcoins, and now be less-rich vs. the early adopters of bitcoin. Bitcoin is something for the young, poor, and uneducated to jump onto.

      There is nothing to bitcoin that can't be re-done with a brand new crypto currency. There are plenty of them. If the masses don't support bitcoin, it fails. If the masses DO support bitcoin, you're now rich. Looks like I can understand YOUR reason for wanting it to succeed - good luck convincing non-early adopters, which is why bitcoin is a big fail.

    20. Re:Get your popcorn ready! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Still going yet still pretending disinterest?

  11. Irony at all? by Notabadguy · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else find it ironic that THIS messed up sight is posting an article about another messed up sight?

    Timothy, you're not literate. Don't be hypocritical. Yeah, Mt. Gox was screwed up. So is Slashdot. And /. beta. And you.

    1. Re:Irony at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find it ironic that THIS messed up sight is posting an article about another messed up sight?

      I hope you're trying to be ironic.

      Timothy, you're not literate. Don't be hypocritical. Yeah, Mt. Gox was screwed up. So is Slashdot. And /. beta. And you.

      Slashdot is fine. And when the Betoddlers did their little boycott the other week there was a marked improvement in discussion quality, which actually makes me want Slashdot to accelerate the Beta schedule. That, and the fact that a feature complete Beta looks likely to be a HUGE improvement over D2.

      Please, go to Soylent News and leave us adults alone.

      - squiggleslash (posted AC because this is off-topic)

    2. Re:Irony at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of god! It isn't Mt. Gox. It is MtgOX or possibly M:TGOX. Magic: The Gathering Online Exchange.

  12. Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Most people think bitcoin is an anonymous digital cash, totally untraceable. But the basic fact is, bitcoin is the very opposite of anonymity. All the transactions of all the people are public and is verified by multiple entities. Bit coin blocks are like pages of a bank ledgers and multiple copies of are floating around the world, copied and replicated.

    The only anonymity the users have is the notion, these bitcoin wallets exist only in the bitcoin universe and it can not be linked to real life entities. This is a big assumption to make. Whenever bitcoin universe intersects real universe there is potential for the anonymity to be broken. A vendor delivering goods maintaining records like "bitcoin wallet xxx placed order for yyy delivered to address zzz" will link the wallets to real identities and clues.

    I thought "These blocks go well into the past, so people who have conducted illicit transactions in the past also have their wallets linked to the transactions. These can not be erased or modified. Multiple copies of the blocks exist. So the law enforcement can catch them years from now". More informed slashdotters explained that those "expired" blocks have been purged from most miners. Only their final checksums were carried forward. So past transactions to buy drugs or something can not be decrypted.

    But NSA and other agencies have been sucking up internet traffic like a giant vacuum. They know more about the value of the blocks being validated (Mining is a misleading term. Mining is repeatedly validating the block till the checksum meets a criterion). Those blocks exist in the vault.

    So yes, every time a drug dealer or a hired assassin gets nabbed and his/her bitcoin wallet gets decoded, all the wallets that dealt with him will be recovered. The web will grow. There is potential for a very large number of people to be caught by the law years after their "illegal" activity happened. If it is a time bound offense they might be lucky. But there is no statuette of limitation for murder and other higher felonies. Bitcoin blocks might turn out to be a huge law enforcement tool after all.

    But most likely to catch illegal downloads than drug dealing, given the tenacity and connections of MPAA and RIAA.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by goodmanj · · Score: 2

      Agree. The ratio of people talking about Bitcoin to people who know *anything* about how it works is astounding.

      More informed slashdotters explained that those "expired" blocks have been purged from most miners.

      When I first read the details of the Bitcoin system, this is the point at which I got a gigantic sinking feeling in my chest.
      The documentation said, "Look, we keep a distributed record of all bitcoin transactions!", and I said,
      "Well that does make it vulnerable to law enforcement, but that means it can't be stolen which is awesome." And then it said,
      "And then after a while we throw those records out."
      "...so all I've got to do is conceal my theft until the records get purged?"
      "Pretty much!"
      "..."

    2. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 2

      oh...and the idea that someone might have been throwing the daily blockchain into a git repos probably never occurred to anyone, not even developers or exchange makers or government agencies whose job it is to track everyfuckingthing we do on the net.

      like you said...
      "..."

      --
      never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    3. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by kencurry · · Score: 2

      Doesn't this story of MtGox completely invalidate the idea of Bitcoin? It was made to appear safe due to an algorithm, but obviously it can disappear without a trace and then what? There was never any sovereign authority behind that currency. Thus no international muscle to go track down the bad guys or figure out what happened. If anything, the international banking community will simply say "told you so..."

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    4. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      "And then after a while we throw those records out." "...so all I've got to do is conceal my theft until the records get purged?" "Pretty much!" "..."

      This is factually incorrect. Transaction pruning or using Simplified Payment Verification clients like electrum only is an option for those not wanting to run a full node and download the whole blockchain. Many run full nodes and there will alway be distributed full records of all transactions.

    5. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      Doesn't this story of MtGox completely invalidate the idea of Bitcoin? It was made to appear safe due to an algorithm, but obviously it can disappear without a trace and then what? There was never any sovereign authority behind that currency. Thus no international muscle to go track down the bad guys or figure out what happened. If anything, the international banking community will simply say "told you so..."

      Exactly the opposite. Mtgox's failure stresses the need for the original purpose of Bitcoin; removing the need for counter-party trust. Storing your assets in any third party or hot wallet goes against the intention of the Bitcoin protocol and is foolhardy. Bitcoin is just as susceptible to being stolen by con artists, governments, and corporations as greenbacks are. Some users learned the hard way that Bitcoin is as safe or dangerous as you choose to make it.

    6. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wallet and address are not the same thing, an wallet should contain lots and lots of addresses, with no way from outside to see that any of these addresses are connected in any way.

      No bitcoin is not totally anonymous, but its not that easy to pin transactions to people as you make it out to be. With proper countermeasures (that you would certainly take if you were doing something illegal) it would be pretty much impossible to match money to person.

      If you pay for drugs and taxes from the same address you are simply being a moron and its your own fault for getting caught.

    7. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... no, no transaction ever gets thrown out, you can verify the entire blockchain starting from genesis block, no problems.

    8. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No not really, bitcoin is like cash, if you give cash to a crook, you are unlikely to ever see that money again. Same deal with mtgox, people trusted money to mtgox and bad news, people are not getting it back. And its a good bet that mtgox owners/employees themselves made off with it.

      Nothing wrong with bitcoin itself here. Lots of people simply got scammed by mtgox.

    9. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      The anonymous aspect is that when you mine Bitcoins you can do so anonymously. It isn't very practical any more as you need to be part of a pool to stand much chance of actually earning many, but in theory you can create them in an untraceable way (with the usual caveats about using Tor properly etc.)

      You can also spend them anonymously if it is only on stuff that doesn't require anyone to know your identity or interact with you, so basically donation. Might indirectly benefit you, such as a fund to have someone you don't like assassinated. For the most part though it is hard to actually use Bitcoins anonymously. You also have the problem of Bitcoin addresses being linked, so when mining you need to keep creating new addresses with each new coin you mint, and ideally spend them in exact multiples of one since spending 0.5 BTC twice from the same address links the two transactions.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that idea is that you somehow have to get the money to your addresses.
      It doesn't matter if you have 1000 of them. The transfer of dollars to bitcoins can and will be tracked.
      And if you use bitcoins to buy anything non-anonymous that address can be connected to you in that way.
      Of course you could set up an elaborate automated transaction script that continually creates new addresses and moves the bitcoins around through them.

    11. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      With proper countermeasures (that you would certainly take if you were doing something illegal) it would be pretty much impossible to match money to person.

      Qualifiers like "with proper countermeasures", "when it is done right", "if used in sufficient quantity" etc make the entire sentence meaningless. Anytime some one does get caught, you would just say "nah, he did not take proper countermeasures", "he didn't do it right", "he did not use it enough" etc.

      So let us change it to reasonable countermeasures. And throw in a law enforcement agency with great power and resources, and throw in entities like MPAA, RIAA and the copyright shakedown artists, what countermeasures would be reasonable and sufficient?

      My guess is, they won't use decoded dead blocks to track down assassins, it is hard work, but nothing more than glory as the paydirt. But torrent downloaders be on guard, they are gonna get you.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    12. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by mysidia · · Score: 2

      "And then after a while we throw those records out."

      No... the full Blockchain contains every transaction ever made.

      Not every Bitcoin client needs to download the full blockchain, which is what he must have been talking about.

      The Bitcoin network doesn't "forget" the details of transactions --- the record is indeed permanent.

    13. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this story of MtGox completely invalidate the idea of Bitcoin? It was made to appear safe due to an algorithm, but obviously it can disappear without a trace and then what? There was never any sovereign authority behind that currency. Thus no international muscle to go track down the bad guys or figure out what happened. If anything, the international banking community will simply say "told you so..."

      Exactly the opposite. Mtgox's failure stresses the need for the original purpose of Bitcoin; removing the need for counter-party trust. Storing your assets in any third party or hot wallet goes against the intention of the Bitcoin protocol and is foolhardy. Bitcoin is just as susceptible to being stolen by con artists, governments, and corporations as greenbacks are. Some users learned the hard way that Bitcoin is as safe or dangerous as you choose to make it.

      Worse. Let's say that you accept Bitcoin payment years from now and it turns out that that money was part of the MtGox heist. Congratulations, you've now received stolen property, which in many jurisdictions means that it may be taken away from you at any moment, all quite legally.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    14. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Worse. Let's say that you accept Bitcoin payment years from now and it turns out that that money was part of the MtGox heist. Congratulations, you've now received stolen property, which in many jurisdictions means that it may be taken away from you at any moment, all quite legally.

      What you are suggesting makes no legal sense. If you own physical USD that was once used in a crime(99.9% of greenbacks) do you automatically forfeit the assets? At most you have to prove how you legally obtained it under asset forfeiture laws if you are suspected and than its returned to you. Judges in the US have already legally defined bitcoin as Money FYI.

    15. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      A USD is a representation of a monetary asset; as of right now a Bitcoin is regarded more as a fixed asset, such as a stock certificate. It's not cash and isn't treated the same way.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    16. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make much technical sense either. There isn't an actual coin that you own, not even on a digital level. It's just a matter of the balance of transactions assigned to public keys for which you have the private keys to spend. What you receive isn't a Bitcoin, it's a signed transaction assigning some portion of an input balance to an output address that you control. IANAL, but that doesn't seem like it would stand up in court as receiving stolen property.

    17. Re:Bit coin is highly misunderstood by many by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      A USD is a representation of a monetary asset; as of right now a Bitcoin is regarded more as a fixed asset, such as a stock certificate. It's not cash and isn't treated the same way.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2013/08/07/federal-judge-rules-bitcoin-is-real-money/

      http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/08/06/Bitcoin.pdf

      Stare decisis for all future cases.

  13. I have no more sympathy for anyone by oscrivellodds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    who has lost real money by "investing" in Bitcoins than I have for anyone who lost real money by "investing" in beany babies. Like my momma always told me, "stupid is as stupid does".

    1. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      To be fair, beanie babies didn't have a limited production. When they flooded the market to where McDonalds was giving them out with happy meals, that was their demise. If they would have kept or even lowered production instead, they still might have value.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It's fine. You have no duty to sympathize for people who took a big risk and lost, on the other hand, if you withhold sympathy, then you have no right to envy those who took a big risk and succeeded.

      Personally... I think Bitcoin represents many huge opportunities. Not in buying coins, though.

      It represents an opportunity for businesses to accept coins as payment for goods or services (that they promptly convert back to fiat dollars).

      Since there are so few good Bitcoin-related businesses, and there is an ecosystem, with many people running around with Bitcoins, there are plenty of potential opportunities for business to profit, regardless of what direction the currency's value takes for the near term.

    3. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

      to be fair? You have misunderstood the fundamental concept of value. Limited production of something does not automatically confer value.

      For an extreme example that illustrates the point, I produce a very limited amount of poop each day, and after I die, there will never be any more of my brand produced, yet no one wants to pay me for it. As rare as it is, no one seems to think it has value, and other than as fertilizer for maybe one or two plants, they are correct.

      Beany babies, like bitcoins, had no value. They were a silly bean-bag toy the likes of which can be purchased for next to nothing at any toy store, but somehow got promoted sufficiently into fooling a few people into thinking they had value. The suckers have beany babies (bitcoins) and all the associated service providers who took advantage of them operated with real money. It's called "shearing the sheep".

    4. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

      Characterizing an "investment" in bitcoins as a big risk is being very generous. Bitcoin was designed from the start to be a vehicle to steal from those gullible enough to convert real money into it.

      I have a better investment idea- send me your money and I absolutely guarantee that you'll get 1/2 of it back. That's a better deal than you'll get with bitcoin! Does bitcoin offer a guaranteed return? Of course not.

    5. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Characterizing an "investment" in bitcoins as a big risk is being very generous. Bitcoin was designed from the start to be a vehicle to steal from those gullible enough to convert real money into it.

      You begin to sound like one of those Fragilistas. That might be why Mt.Gox was started; I don't know. But there are some significant advantages to antifragile systems such as the Bitcoin protocol.

      Did you even READ Satoshi's paper?

      What gives you the right to say 'Bitcoin was designed as a vehicle to steal' ?

      How come you are able to be so certain based on so little evidence?

    6. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      They had collector value. Just like old stamps and medieval scrolls have value. You can twist the definition of "value" into anything you want, but you aren't looking as smart as you think you are. The demand of beanie babies far outweighed their supply. When that wasn't true anymore, the value tanked. There is no psychological MBA horseshit here. Like an overpowered Magic The Gathering card, it's value is high, but if you decide to give one away free with a self-addressed, stamped envelope, it will be nothing more than rough toilet paper

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    7. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent's attempted point was that something does not gain collector value simply by being "rare", but instead must both be rare and sufficiently sought after. I had some eBay seller go apeshit on me a few months back because I refused to acknowledge that I got a great deal buying his "limited edition" whatever at the same price the "unlimited" edition sells, when both were almost equally rare productions, and moreover neither are very commonly sought.

    8. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

      >What gives you the right to say 'Bitcoin was designed as a vehicle to steal' ?

      I'm guessing that it has something to do with the fact that you are giving your hard-earned money to an unknown source to be looked over by unknown people by unknown means???

      Hey but that's just me - please feel free to send me any extra money that you have and I'll be sure to protect it for you and even give you a return on your investment when the price goes up! Hey - whata deal

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    9. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that it has something to do with the fact that you are giving your hard-earned money to an unknown source to be looked over by unknown people by unknown means?

      Perhaps that would be a bad decision, and those considering it have done more research to turn 'unknowns' into knowns.

    10. Re:I have no more sympathy for anyone by oscrivellodds · · Score: 1

      Comparing beany babies to old stamps or medieval scrolls is just silly. Beany babies were nothing special in any way, they had no historical significance, no utility, no rare or exotic materials, no special workmanship, and were mass produced as fast as they could be sold to "investors". It would be more realistic to compare them to the "rare, limited edition" plates with pictures of Elvis and similar junk that Franklin Mint churns out.

      The only difference between beany babies and my poop is that beanie babies were promoted, my poop has not been, at least not yet. Posters like you are making me consider promoting my poop. There may be some money there, if only I can get a few suckers, er, I mean "investors", to recognize its value.

  14. Nothing goes right when potheads run the bank. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mt. Gox was run by a drug-addled manchild. How is this outcome surprising at all?

    The drug culture is fundamentally incompatible with responsible adult life, and especially banking. Just look at what our coke-addled bankers did in the US! Nothing new here..

  15. Tulips are the next big thing by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy all you can. :)

    The only thing that cannot be fudged is that we cannot make. Gold keeps it's spending power over long stretches of time.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    1. Re:Tulips are the next big thing by Mashdar · · Score: 2

      Right. The value of gold is based on supply and intrensic industrial value. 95%+ of the value of gold is purely speculative. Just because it is shiny and limited does not make it safe. Anything used as a currency is going to have an artificial value far in excess of its tangible value. Hope you didn't buy in 1980, or you are still missing half of your money. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w...

  16. Turns out bankers aren't worthless. by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Turns out those evil corporate bankers with their evil statist money turn out to have some useful skills. Like, they know how to prevent the theft of a good chunk of all the money in their world. Apparently it involves boring stuff like spreadsheets and regulations and corporate hierarchy rather than algorithms, so that's kind of a drag, but so it goes.

    1. Re:Turns out bankers aren't worthless. by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Interesting bit of revisionism if you are implying that spreadsheets and regulations are more efficient at preventing theft. Con-artists and Sociopaths naturally will manipulate and steal from traditional investors and the Bitcoin community alike. The difference with Bitcoin is that it takes a majority of the community to steal wealth from the economy(and thus irrationally devaluing their own savings) vs less than 1% that routinely manipulate and steal with fiat.

    2. Re:Turns out bankers aren't worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that the majority of the community drove Mt Gox into bankruptcy?

    3. Re:Turns out bankers aren't worthless. by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that the majority of the community drove Mt Gox into bankruptcy?

      Why would you suggest a 10 person company equals a majority of the community? No, I was referring to the inherent theft which is a feature of fiat currencies were your savings are devalued by 5-13% per year in "stable" countries and 20-60% per year in countries with hyperinflation.

      It takes 51% of the users to change Bitcoin monetary policy with a hard fork and even after the fact there could exist 2 separate currencies where the other users aren't effected by the theft through inflation, bail outs, and quantitative easing policies. With fiat currencies a few people can make this decision on behalf of everyone even against their wishes.

    4. Re:Turns out bankers aren't worthless. by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      The Bitcoin priests have the Byzantine General problem in their corner, math they don't understand, and half baked software running on computer under constant attack. What can go wrong there? Nothing - right?

  17. "Missing millions" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trick question. There are no missing "millions", because BTC is a completely artificial construct with no actual value.

    The only "millions" that came out of BTC is all the extra revenue hardware manufacturers came up with with everyone decided to buy half a dozen video cards to cram into their PC for mining.

    1. Re:"Missing millions" by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      In short, buy AMD and nVidia stock. Especially nVidia, with their new Maxwell GPUs.

    2. Re:"Missing millions" by Baldorcete · · Score: 1

      Video cards are ineficient now for Bitcoin. Mining has moved to ASICs.

  18. good news imo by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 1

    "Tokyo police are now scratching their heads. "The National Police Agency seems to lack the ability to analyze the bitcoin trading history of Mt. Gox," a government official told a source probing the investigation."

    that's not a bug, it a feature.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:good news imo by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I swear the Japanese police 'scratch their heads' so often, they should be checked for lice.

  19. what a coincidence! by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Hey, what a coincidence! My company is doing poorly because it's run by incompetent idiots too! Small world, huh?

  20. I never really understood bitcoin by FuzzNugget · · Score: 0

    Now, I'm reasonably technologically proficient, but I couldn't ever wrap my head around it. So, there's this virtual currency that can be "mined"? What exactly is being mined? Cryptographic calculations? What gives it its value? Simply that it's a new calculation? It all seems like trying to making something out if nothing, which inevitably ends up being nothing.

    The value of real money is in being a by-currency for minerals and materials with actual, practical utility. Where is the practical utility for bitcoin?

    1. Re:I never really understood bitcoin by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      The value of real money is in being a by-currency for minerals and materials with actual, practical utility. Where is the practical utility for bitcoin?

      The practical utility of Bitcoin:

      1) Provides a deflationary currency in a sea of inflationary options. Useful if you live in a country with mild inflation like the US, extremely useful in countries with hyperinflation like Argentina.

      2) Allows you to use escrow for free and remove all counter party risk with mutisig authentications- bitrated.com is one example.

      3) A much cheaper and secure payment protocol where you can reduce merchant processing fees 2-7% lower than credit cards and not even worry about the volatility because you instantly transfer into fiat of your choice. - bitpay.com

      4) No chargeback risk is great for merchants.

      5) No risk of frozen accounts for consumers or businesses.

      6) Provide an option in third world banks for the unbanked or underbanked

      7) Ability to instantly send money around the world instantly and not have to wait days for wires or ACH payments.

      8) Cost to send money is half a cent to nothing for almost any amount you can think of.

      9) International currency that gives you the option of not worrying about merchants banning you. An option of free speech where you can donate to non-profits like wikileaks.

      10) Smart contract systems, Time locks, DAC's , Oracles, ect....

      The list is much larger than this but the important take away is that Bitcoin isn't just a currency but a new technology which is extremely useful because it has over a billion dollars worth of infrastructure behind it and efficiently solves the Byzantines' generals dilemma. It is likely that Bitcoin will be used by most in the future whether they are even aware of it or not because of what it can accomplish just like how most use HTTP and TCP/IP protocols daily and have no idea what they are.

    2. Re:I never really understood bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe U're close to understanding it .

      There's no practical utility
      The algorithm is inefficient and impractical at best
      The market it was supposedly used on is bust
      dangerously close to a ponzy scheme

      But, gave us glimpse and insight on how parallel economies could spawn in the future

    3. Re:I never really understood bitcoin by DoctorBit · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is actually a distributed peer-to-peer ledger that keeps track of who has the coins. The coins themselves don't actually exist. It's like if you and I both have bank accounts in the same bank and I write a check to you and you deposit the check. The bank reduces my balance and increases yours by the check amount. This works even if there are no actual physical dollar bills in the bank anywhere.

      Mining is doing that bank teller work (increasing and decreasing other people's balances when transactions are requested), and the tellers (miners) are paid for that work with small amounts of the same virtual coins for each transaction they process.

      The brilliance of the bitcoin protocol is how it automatically prevents both the bank tellers (miners) and bank customers (bitcoin users) from embezzling virtual coins or inflating the virtual coin supply.

    4. Re:I never really understood bitcoin by VikingNation · · Score: 1

      If one more person quotes the Byzantine's general dilemma on this thread I'm going to projectile vomit. Enough all ready with the pointy head nonsense,

  21. With oversight like this... by tomhath · · Score: 1

    around July 2013, Bitcoin entrepreneur Roger Ver visited Mt. Gox's Tokyo headquarters. He published a video saying he believed the company's withdrawal problems were caused by the "traditional banking system, not because of a lack of liquidity at Mt. Gox."...

    In an email interview last week, Ver recalled his meeting with Mt. Gox: "I watched him [Karpeles] log into his online bank account in real time and saw the balances with my own eyes. They had a huge amount of U.S. dollar liquidity at that time."

    Yea, that's how a CPA would conduct an audit. No chance of anything sketchy going on with that kind of oversight.

    1. Re:With oversight like this... by sparkydevil · · Score: 1

      I interviewed Mark Karpeles in May 2013. The first thing I did after I left the meeting was tell my friend, a guy who has worked for big banks all his life, that he should apply for a job at Mt Gox because it was very obvious they had no oversight whatsoever and needed someone like him to make sure they complied with basic financial software standards.

  22. Spaghetti code? by mveloso · · Score: 2

    "Spaghetti code" is what developers say when they're confronted by code that exceeds their capacity to understand complexity.

    1. Re:Spaghetti code? by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      I love this quote.

  23. The "sight"? by MXB2001 · · Score: 0

    Idiots.

    --
    01/01/01
  24. Total lack of controls by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The main problem with Mt. Gox was not that the code was a mess. It was a lack of basic financial controls. Mt. Gox lacked a chief financial officer, a controller, inside auditors, outside auditors, a board of directors, an audit committee, and a compliance officer. Yet they were doing a billion dollars of transactions a year. It's not even clear that they have a general ledger listing all transactions. Lack of financial controls is usually considered an indicator of fraud. I've been making this point on bitcointalk for the last year. None of the "Bitcoin exchanges" have proper financial controls. None have an outside auditor and published audits. Yet they're handling far too much money to operate that way.

    As for "The National Police Agency seems to lack the ability to analyze the bitcoin trading history of Mt. Gox", that seems to be correct. One would think that the Japanese National Police Agency would have a cyber-crime division, but they don't. In 2013, they were trying to beef up their capabilities in the computer area. This is embarassing for a developed country. Today, any sizable financial mess involves computers, and Tokyo is a major financial center. Untangling any business collapse requires computer forensics and forensic accountants.

    The Tokyo police have a backup option - putting Mark Karpeles through one of their standard 23-day interrogation sessions. That's probably going to happen at some point.

    Mt. Gox didn't have that high a transaction rate. They only did two or three money transactions a minute on average. They had a lot of traffic from people querying their site for market info, but that's all read-only traffic, and they had nginx and Amazon AWS to help with that.

    Their use of PHP wasn't the real problem. From the leaked code, a big part of the problem seems to have been that the front-end system that talked to web users also handled the money. Banks have a separation between the front-end web system and the money system, with standard-format transaction items flowing between them. All those transaction items are logged, often by a third system that just does logging. This allows auditing. It's separation of function that's important, not the language. As far as anyone can tell, Mt. Gox had nobody on staff who understood this.

    This all screams "inside job". If you're running a business that handles a lot of money and you lack financial controls, you're scared that someone will rip you off. Unless you're the one doing the ripping off.

    1. Re:Total lack of controls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they only had 2-3 transactions a minute, wouldn't it be easy to see where, when and how transactions went wrong?

      That's basically traceable by a human.

    2. Re:Total lack of controls by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      If they only had 2-3 transactions a minute, wouldn't it be easy to see where, when and how transactions went wrong?

      That's basically traceable by a human.

      Only if they were recorded. The bitcoin side is certainly recorded in the block chain (though that is a lot of transactions to look at). The problem is the corresponding currency side of the transactions isn't recorded anywhere.

      For example, these are examples of legitimate transactions:
      You give me 1 bitcoin, I send you a bank transfer of $600.
      You transfer $600 to me, I deposit 1 bitcoin in the account number you give me.

      These are illegitimate transactions:
      You give me 1 bitcoin, I send myself a bank transfer of $600.
      You transfer $600 to me, I deposit 1 bitcoin in an account I control.

      If you look at the block chain all you see in all 4 cases is one bitcoin changing account numbers. You need all the other context to understand what is going on.

      A company doing a billion a year in transactions without a general ledger is INSANE. Small businesses with two employees should have them. A general ledger is just a fancy name for a checkbook, usually with a bit more metadata (though even just running the equivalent of Quicken will get you something).

  25. Depends on the developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is quite a good description of spaghetti code. However, there comes a point where complexity exceeds the ability to test and validate.

    Having seen the Mt Gox source code, I can verify that spaghetti is quite a good description:
    Everything from web rendering, to trade matching, to wallet management, support, database management in a single class
    Multi-thousand line procedures which perform complex disparate operations requiring dynamic SQL generation, string processing, input validation, business logic, wallet management, etc. and which might contain over 100 branches and a dozen function exit points
    Switch statements that approach 500 lines in length
    Large chunks of code commented out as a method of version control

  26. Fun even trying to open an account at mtgox by sjwest · · Score: 1

    I do not do bitcoin, i have neither the bandwidth to waste or the gpu hardware to mine and also not run microsoft windows that seems to scream btc fan.

    I do need bitcoin not much per year (under 100 dolars) , and so tried to open an account with mtgox.

    I got the governental forms [months pass], that got me a updated drivers license and passport and submitted them to magic the gathering exchange to verify my id. but I kept getting rejected. I had no value in the account.

    So three months after i start this and still getting nowhere with the identity verification i email them and say please cancel the account.

    Oddly that means approve in magic speak.

    Somehow that concerns me and this was last year so i do not anything with this thing, and spend some time getting an independent wallet which takes a couple of months to download. Then mtgox go bankrupt.

    I have a btc wallet, it has no money in it, and i have not spent money to do anything with bitcoin so far.

    Maybe i got lost in translation but i am glad i never had any further dealings with mtgox

  27. Also with a phone size is an issue by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The blockchain is currently about 15GB, and grows every time there's a transaction. That's a problem. Most phones don't have 15GB of free space. You'd have to get an SD card, just to hold it and that is only a temporary solution, since it'll keep growing.

    Also this would be a real problem if BTC was actually used like a major currency and not just played with by speculators as the number of transactions would be orders of magnitude higher, and thus so would the growth.

    So it would be totally unrealistic to just store it on mobile devices, which is something you'd probably want to do if you were going to use it as a general purpose kind of payment system, security issues aside and those are not minor.

    1. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      The blockchain is currently about 15GB, and grows every time there's a transaction. That's a problem. Most phones don't have 15GB of free space. You'd have to get an SD card, just to hold it and that is only a temporary solution, since it'll keep growing.

      Also this would be a real problem if BTC was actually used like a major currency and not just played with by speculators as the number of transactions would be orders of magnitude higher, and thus so would the growth.

      So it would be totally unrealistic to just store it on mobile devices, which is something you'd probably want to do if you were going to use it as a general purpose kind of payment system, security issues aside and those are not minor.

      The Blockchain is over 17GB now. Your post doesn't account for SPV clients, Block pruning, off chain transactions, technological memory advancements, ect... The problem isn't a large concern because smart phones now use hot wallets or SPV clients and home computers can run the full nodes. When the blockchain grows to 30GB or larger the developers will start introducing Merkle Tree pruning solutions that were discussed originally all the way back to the whitepaper.

    2. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 2

      A couple of years ago when I first read the bitcoin whitepaper and was very impressed and excited (how can you read that and *not* be impressed and excited?) I proposed a slight change to the bitcoin protocol to add support for messages querying for "elided" blocks, i.e. a means for querying a peer for blocks only relevant to a given transaction (the history of all addresses relevant to and leading up to that transaction). The elided blocks would just be the full details necessary to allow a client to validate a transaction, with the Merkel tree being used to elide most of the data.

      With a feature like this, a client would not need to download the entire block chain, they'd just need a) enough of the block chain to be able to validate elided blocks which wouldn't be much, and b) a peer willing to answer elided block queries for them. Since answering an elided block query takes real work (you have to have the entire block chain indexed in such a way as to make answering such a query efficient, which means storing alot of data, with proper indexes, and proper software, and connecting to the bitcoin transaction firehose, with the cost associated with that), I included a mechanism that would facilitate allowing the peer to 'charge' you for this service, using the same pseudo-anonymity of regular bitcoin.

      The idea being that a client should not have to trust a third party to handle their transactions for them, which is the only feasable way to do bitcoin transactions now unless you want to download 15 GB - not really feasable in most circumstances - and connect to the firehose - also not feasable in most circumstances, and would be much less so were bitcoin to actually become used with any real transaction volume on a global scale. For a small fee (probably cents per transaction I would guess) you could use a system that didn't require you to trust any peers (unlike the current "we'll hold your wallet for you and do your transactions on your behalf" services that seem to have proliferated to make bitcoin actually feasable for clients).

      I started to write it, but then gave up on it because I lost interest. All I got out of it was a couple of bitcoins I bought for fun, that made me about 2 grand (on paper of course, I never sold them and I don't really think it's possible to actually liquidate bitcoins into real money without serious work and headache).

    3. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by codebonobo · · Score: 2

      (on paper of course, I never sold them and I don't really think it's possible to actually liquidate bitcoins into real money without serious work and headache).

      Your post was interesting up until the point of the end and than became became puzzling. If you wanted to liquidate those bitcoins easily you could:

      1) Spend the directly with Overstock.com or tigerdirect.com

      2) Buy one of hundreds of gift cards with gyft or egifter for free

      3) Setup a coinbase.com account (easier to setup than paypal) and ACH them to USD fiat into your bank account with one click

    4. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Also this would be a real problem if BTC was actually used like a major currency and not just played with by speculators as the number of transactions would be orders of magnitude higher, and thus so would the growth.

      I think this is a real problem that needs a solution if BTC is ever going to take off. I too was shocked the first time I installed a bitcoin client and saw just how much space it needed to store the block chain. It wasn't the end of the world on my system, though if this were a laptop with an SSD it might cause concerns.

      However, the transaction volume for bitcoin is minuscule compared to real-world currencies. If every time anybody anywhere bought a can of soda there were a record in the database, it would grow at astonishing speed. Simply transmitting the most recent transactions might take up a considerable amount of bandwidth. Transaction fees would probably rise to cover this cost as miners would now need a lot more bandwidth to operate. Oh, and transaction fees are only recouped by miners, so a model where all bitcoin clients incur a substantial bandwidth cost might fail (nobody would want to run a client unless they were a miner, and miners are only rewarded in proportion to their computation spend, so simply doing casual mining on your client won't help much).

    5. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, shows how ignorant I am of how things have progressed in the bitcoin world after having stopped participating a couple of years ago. I was under the impression that turning bitcoins into anything else was difficult, but obviously I am not well informed. I tried selling a couple of fractional bitcoins on eBay and just got scammed (losing about $200 worth to thieves with stolen accounts). That's all I've done to try to liquidate them. I'll investigate the options you mentioned, thanks.

    6. Re:Also with a phone size is an issue by codebonobo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, shows how ignorant I am of how things have progressed in the bitcoin world after having stopped participating a couple of years ago. I was under the impression that turning bitcoins into anything else was difficult, but obviously I am not well informed. I tried selling a couple of fractional bitcoins on eBay and just got scammed (losing about $200 worth to thieves with stolen accounts). That's all I've done to try to liquidate them. I'll investigate the options you mentioned, thanks.

      Yes, you are quite correct that there are a lot of scammers on Ebay buying bitcoins. The reason ebay is a dangerous place to sell is that bitcoin is secure and non reversable while stolen credit cards and paypal accounts are less secure(as a trusted way to RECEIVE money) and reversible. Only sell your bitcoins in person for cash with localbitcoins.com , or use one of three above options.

  28. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate the notion that one would need a chief financial officer, a controller, inside auditors, outside auditors, a board of directors, an audit committee, and a compliance officer. Having any of those wastes would not have made any difference whatsoever to the current outcome of bitcoin. I'm so proud of those guys for not going that route.

    All of those positions are a bunch of useless parasites who bring absolutely no talent to the table and suck any free flowing capital right into their own salaries and stock options.

    If you are reading this and are one of those said positions in real life, then I suggest you get a rope and hang yourself. Engineers have no respect for you, as you've never conceived one original thought of value in your entire existence. All you are to the world are useless top feeders who contribute nothing of value at all to a company or society.

    Glad we cleared that all up.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it so ?

      Then explain, why MtGox cannot operate any longer ?

      The sometimes strange looking (social and technological) systems of traditional banks have prevented the "primitive" kind of theft seen at MtGox. That does not mean that "second order" theft by means of risky investments (bringing in massive bonuses, threatening existence of bank later on) of bankers themselves don't exist.

      In other words, MtGox didn't get the primitve function (stopping bankrobbers) right. And all those different functions in a bank indeed exist to a large degree to fend off the bank robbers.

    2. Re:Awesome! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I hate the notion that one would need a chief financial officer, a controller, inside auditors, outside auditors, a board of directors, an audit committee, and a compliance officer. Having any of those wastes would not have made any difference whatsoever to the current outcome of bitcoin. I'm so proud of those guys for not going that route.

      We're talking about a $1B/yr operation. Sure, if it were smaller you could probably get by with only a few of those.

      My linux distro has a board of directors, and it only does maybe $10k/yr in financials. Heck, so does the local RC airplane club, and I doubt they own much in the way of tangible property at all.

      Sure, simply paying people doesn't make your bank secure. If they do their jobs it certainly helps though.

      The way it works is that nobody does business with a real bank if they don't have external auditors (which effectively includes government regulators, even though they're usually not counted as auditors). The various internal positions are then required to get all the work done needed to satisfy them.

      A lot of it is about division of responsibility so that one person can't just dip into the account and wire themselves $100M. Separating your front-end and back-end software is just sane security practice. You don't stick all your validation and business logic on a web-server that anybody can pwn.

  29. I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he robed himself (in other words his customers). I am not buying the incompetence claim. Did you guys know it was MtGox that reported the malleability bug?

  30. Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spelling isn't their strong point. Nor is grammar.

    Probably 50% of Americans who post online write 'more THEN' or even 'more THAT' instead of 'more THAN'.

    They also commonly write 'women' instead of 'woman', how stupid do you have to be to do that?

    They also commonly write 'an' instead of 'a'.

    America is almost lost, and the stupidity of most of its inhabitants is now evident for all to see.

  31. what the FFFFF didnt this bets crap die already?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the FFFFF didnt this bets crap die already??

  32. That's the entire point by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's elaborate window dressing and sexy crypto bait for geeks to hide the underlying ponzi scheme.

    If you can understand it enough to ask such questions as those above then you are not the sucker they are looking for.

    1. Re:That's the entire point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done a few Bitcoin transactions. I paid Bitcoins and received the goods promised. How was I scammed?

  33. I don't see it the same way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm wearing beer goggles but look; like anything, the only way you will ever get it 'accepted' is to use it. Once it becomes ubiquitous it's hardly as profitable as it was in the beginning. That is the reward the early adopters get for taking a risk on something better. I've never just used it as an investment instrument I just like it as currency. Fuck it's hard to type buzzed.

  34. Nothing Went Wrong - As Designed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing went wrong.
    Half a BILLION dollars went "missing" because it was SUPPOSED to eventually go missing.
    Nothing went wrong. A handful of people got extraordinarily wealthy and uncounted idiots who chose to put their money into an unaccountable source run by anonymous strangers with no track record of prior legitimacy or accountability - went bust.

    Bitcoin is like online poker but for more "intelligent" users (not enough hand-quotes in the world ...) - seriously what could possibly go wrong?

  35. Oh Really?? by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    >. All the transactions of all the people are public and is verified by multiple entities

    Oh really? So you know *all* the principle entities of Mt. Gox? You know just where they were storing/investing that HALF A BILLION DOLLARS ? You know the names of the independent accounting agency that oversaw that HALF A BILLION DOLLARS ?

    You know none of that and very little else.

    Why who ever would have thought that when you give have a f!@kig BILLION dollars to a more than less anonymous source(s) by anonymous means and with no oversight - why who every would have thought that maybe - just maybe - someone would be tempted to just walk the hell away with Half a BILLION??

    You know who didn't think that way? Some chump wanna-be geeks with too much disposable income and too little common sense.

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    1. Re:Oh Really?? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Every bit of bitcoin that ever passed through MtGox can be tracked, can be tracked both downstream from MtGox easily and can be tracked upstream too with some minor difficulty. But the trail will start and end in Bitcoin private keys and the user ids associated with those keys. If MtGox is a government regulated bank, if it has enforcement powers and subpoena powers it will be able to find the actual offenders and recover the money.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  36. Mt Gox Timeline by sparkydevil · · Score: 1

    For those who need an overview of the rise and fall of Mt Gox, I made a handy timeline

  37. Banks == Central Directories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The supposed nicety of BitCoin is Decentralization. There is no central directory which keeps records. The Block chain is distributed.
    But as we have seen, BitCoin does not properly scale. In effect, the traditional Bank principle (one institution managing records) has so far triumped over the BitCoin idea.
    MtGox was trying to be a bank and (allegedly !) got bankrobbed. But why did we need the MtGox Bank in the first place.

    Guys, here is the challenge: develop a massively scalable Crypto Currency. Post via TOR, sign using GNUpg to protect yourself.

  38. nothing went wrong at Mt Gox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was an audacious scheme on top of a pyramid scheme, and it worked.

  39. Based on what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Please sight your sources for that claim.

  40. If you can't tell the difference it's your problem by dbIII · · Score: 1

    If you can't tell the difference it's your problem.
    However it's very clear that you are just spinning a tale to bring in the marks instead of not actually being able to see the very large number of differences that you'd know of just growing up in a western society.

    This lying bullshit of yours is tedious.
    You are clearly pretending to be too stupid to be able to tell the difference - then calling others stupid who don't fall for your bluff.
    To make it worse you are trying to pretend that you haven't written the comments you have.

    If I want to hear "just try it you'll like it" stuff from slimy pieces of shit I can visit a prison and ask a drug dealer to let me hear his spiel.

  41. Re:If you can't tell the difference it's your prob by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    To make it worse you are trying to pretend that you haven't written the comments you have.

    Hmmm... still can't cite any actual words of mine to support your allegations, I see. We know from your past comments that you know how to quote. Cut and paste keys broken? LOL

    it's very clear that you are just spinning a tale to bring in the marks . . . "just try it you'll like it"

    And here, as unlikely as it might seem, your shrill irrationality reaches a whole new level. I've not breathed even a suggestion that you or anyone else should try BitCoin, and you can point to none. But you knew that -- it's clear now that you're just frothing at the mouth for reasons that even you may not understand.

    Here's the bottom line, my friend: after reading through a number of your past comments, it's abundantly clear that (1) you despise BitCoin with a passion; (2) you can't present a cogent argument why you do (hint: "look at the definition of Ponzi scheme and look at BitCoin -- DERP" isn't a cogent argument); and (3) when asked to justify your rhetoric, you lash out at the questioner on a personal level and declare them to be part of the conspiracy you imagine to exist.

    Given that you're doing exactly the same thing here, it's clear there's no productive discussion to be had (and shame on me, perhaps, for not realizing that from your very first post in this thread, where you broke into the middle of a discussion that didn't involve you and lobbed out one of your classic one-line insults). I think we'll both best be served by you getting back to counting black helicopters and finding another target for your rants. Please do have as good of a life as your angry, irrational, conspiratorial life perspective will allow.

  42. More pretended ignornace- how convenient for you by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The time to be polite about bitcoin stopped when the perpetrators started actively targeting people on this site for their scam a couple of years ago. Other reasons can now be found even in mainstream newspapers. So do I really need to put up a polite 5000 word essay in every bitcoin thread to gently point out what should be incredibly fucking obvious by now - and if I did would anyone pay attention?
    I think not, it's time to be blunt and use crowbars to get between these scum and their potential victims.