Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Dumping License Fees For Windows Phone?

Nerval's Lobster writes "For years, Microsoft remained adamant about its licensing fees for Windows Phone: if a smartphone manufacturer wanted to include the software on its devices, it would need to pay Microsoft a certain amount per unit. That was a logical strategy for Microsoft, which became a very big company thanks to licensing fees for Windows and other platforms. Unlike some of those other products, however, Windows Phone has struggled for adoption in its marketplace, which is dominated by Apple and Google. In response, suggests the Times of India, Microsoft may have dumped licensing fees for two Indian smartphone makers, Karbonn and Lava (Xolo). Microsoft's biggest rival, Google, gives its Android mobile operating system away for free, a maneuver that helped it gain spectacular market-share in a relatively short amount of time. If Microsoft pursues a similar strategy in different markets, it could encourage more smartphone manufacturers to produce Windows Phone devices, which could increase the platform's market-share—but there are no guarantees that scenario will actually play out. The smartphone market is increasingly saturated, and Microsoft's opponents have no intention of allowing Windows Phone to gain any ground."

125 comments

  1. Does this mean by abednegoyulo · · Score: 2

    from MS' perspective, you are the product?

    1. Re:Does this mean by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it means Microsoft shareholders should buy some Google stock...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Does this mean by khasim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt it. I think it's just a temporary measure so that they can get some market share and then start charging again.

    3. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. It means that Microsoft still does not understand what the word free really means.

    4. Re:Does this mean by turgid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, it means Microsoft shareholders should buy some Google stock...

      But Microsoft collect a "license fee" from all the major Android phone vendors for "patents" used in the Linux kernel.

      I wonder what the various national courts around the world will make of this... giving your own OS away for free while running an extortion racket for protection money from your competitors?

    5. Re:Does this mean by davester666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it means that even when a salesman was in charge, they couldn't figure out how to sell their completely revamped product into a market with several mature competitors.

      they are down to trying to be the low-cost competitor by dumping their OS for free, while still demanding royalties for one of their competitors os's [android].

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    6. Re:Does this mean by LordThyGod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it means Microsoft shareholders should buy some Google stock...

      It actually means Ballmer has left the building, and reality is staring them in the face. They've spent too much time fucking themselves. And now it don't feel so good.

    7. Re:Does this mean by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Insert Goat.cx here (pun intended)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    8. Re:Does this mean by symbolset · · Score: 1

      If the US Supreme Court rules software patents invalid, that will be the end of that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    9. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from MS' perspective, you are the product?

      You have been for a long time now.

      Microsoft is using your data to target political ads on Xbox Live

      Microsoft is trying to persuade politicians to take out targeted ads on Xbox Live, Skype, MSN and other company platforms as midterm elections begin heating up around the country. To plug the idea, Microsoft officials handed out promotional materials Thursday at CPAC, the annual conference for conservatives.

      It's the latest move by tech companies to seize a piece of the lucrative political ad market. The ads, which would appear on the Xbox Live dashboard and other Microsoft products, combine Microsoft user IDs and other public data to build a profile of Xbox users. Campaigns can then blast ads to selected demographic categories, or to specific congressional districts. And if the campaign brings its own list of voter e-mail addresses, Microsoft can match the additional data with individual customer accounts for even more accurate voter targeting.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

      MS marketing just likes to pretend they're not so they can keep their nasty competitor-bashing Scroogling campaigns going. This is a very dirty, unethical company, people. Don't trust anything they say or do.

      Of course, Slashdot won't post this is news, because Microsoft pays them not to.

    10. Re:Does this mean by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the various national courts around the world will make of this... giving your own OS away for free while running an extortion racket for protection money from your competitors?

      I used to think the same, but I've mellowed a bit after detaching my emotions and looking at it logically. Presumably Microsoft gets money from Samsung per Android phone sold. I'm pretty sure Samsung wouldn't just pay Microsoft without at least first checking to see if there's any validity in the patent claims. The fact they haven't tried taking Microsoft to court suggests to me that Microsoft might have some basis for their claims, even if they haven't been made public. It's not as if Samsung doesn't have the cash to challenge them if they really though Microsoft's claims were ludicrous.

      So, with the situation of basically no-one challenging Microsoft regarding these Android patents in court despite the big guys being able to afford it if necessary, I ask you, what conclusion would you draw?

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    11. Re: Does this mean by VTBlue · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, leave your "logic" at the door.

    12. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Slashdot won't post this is news, because Microsoft pays them not to.

      No it is because it is a shill story planted by competitors, that is why there is no proof. Apparently they handed out materials yet nobody can seem to produce them, there is no evidence whatsoever that this happened at all.

    13. Re:Does this mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is because it is a shill story planted by competitors, that is why there is no proof.

      Huh?

      I don't know what you're smoking, but this isn't even new. MS inserted ads for Obama into XBox content back in 2008. N.B, the link is to an organisation you probably already get your news from...

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/2...

    14. Re: Does this mean by Thanosius · · Score: 1

      Heh. I suspect just I keep falling for the fallacy that since there's so many Linux users around here, and using Linux is supposed to mean a higher level of intelligence and hence a higher aptitude for reason and logic, that logic would be more evident.

      I guess everyone's susceptible to thinking from the heart rather than the head though.

      --
      Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
    15. Re:Does this mean by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      This means , might as well get into the smartphone hardware business.. Micro$fot might as well pay you $150 per phone .. To run windoze phone on it . This is called reverse licensing :-)

    16. Re:Does this mean by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      But Microsoft collect a "license fee" from all the major Android phone vendors for "patents" used in the Linux kernel.

      Well then, Google shareholders and maybe Linus should buy and flip some Microsoft stock.. Try to get that money back. It seems that's how this little game is played. Like car dealers moving their inventory from lot to lot, or out of state to evade taxes. I mean license fees are a deductible business expense, right? Money goes to Microsoft for a while and it comes back through other venues. All this money movement is "good for the economy".

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    17. Re:Does this mean by turgid · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Samsung wouldn't just pay Microsoft without at least first checking to see if there's any validity in the patent claims.

      I guess you don't follow the news too closely, then.

      The patent claims are hogwash. Microsoft tried deliberately to keep the patent claims secret and/or vague (in contravention to the spirit and word of the law) in order to intimidate companies into paying up.

      They've tried every dirty trick in the book to prolong legal action to keep the extortion racket going.

      The FOSS community has tried to get the claims aired in public to disprove them (trivial, obvious, prior art, nonsense etc.) or to be able to replace any infringing code with non-infringing implementations.

      However, some individuals and corporations with deep pockets have simply decided to pay off Microsoft (and their henchmen) to avoid even more costly legal battles (only the lawyers win etc.).

      Anyway, Microsoft has put itself in a very strange situation with this. Let us adopt Douglas Adams' proof of the non-existence of God here.

      Microsoft says to the world, "You people (companies and so on) using, developing and distributing Linux are infringing on our patents. We demand $5 for each smartphone shipped with the Android OS (i.e. Linux kernel) installed. [And, by the way, if you buy a license for SuSE Linux, we promise not to sue you for any of our patents which it infringes, but that's another story...]"

      "Oh," replies the world, "But you are now thinking of giving Windows Phone OS away for free to any smartphone manufacturer who wants it."

      "Yes, that's business!" Says Microsoft.

      "Oh, I suppose so," Says the world, "But Windows contains lots of wonderful technology that only Microsoft engineers could possibly have thought of, inspired by the greatness of the corporation."

      "You've got it in one!" Replies Microsoft smugly.

      "And those stinking un-American pinko-commie hippies who right FOSS (Linux, cancer) must have stolen Microsoft's ideas."

      "There is hope for you yet, young feller!" Guffaws Microsoft.

      "But in giving Windows Phone away for free, you are admitting that there is no intrinsic monetary value in pre-compiled, closed-source software, in this case a mature, well-understood technology (i.e. and Operating System. And as such, these wonderful patents of yours have no monetary value."

      Silence from Microsoft.

      "So if your software and patents have no value, how do you justify charging other people for them who have come up with independent implementations of the same old (ancient) technology?"

      "Oh dear, I hadn't thought of that!" Says Microsoft, who promptly disappears in a puff of logic.

  2. Open source software makes Microsoft irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft's fears of FOSS software (in the Halloween documents) came true when Android was released..

    This is the only way they can retaliate. But since Android is so far ahead, things aren't looking good for them in the mobile space.

  3. Windows Store by EndlessNameless · · Score: 2

    If they get a cut of all the app purchases, this is an obvious win-win. Manufacturers get cheaper devices to the market, and Microsoft increase its user base.

    I can't speak for everyone, but I have spent more on apps than the price of my phone over its lifetime. (The unsubsidized price, at that.)

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    1. Re:Windows Store by lgw · · Score: 2

      It does make a lot of sense. Windows phone outsells iPhone in the more price-sensitive areas of Europe, but hasn't seen the same traction in Asia. Getting app parity is a different story, of course, but MS did finally get the big commercial shops onboard. Now it just needs to be easy for the hobbyist to write apps, as it is for Android.

      I really wish MS would step up and officially support C# on Android, and cross-platform dev in VS (third parties actually sell this today, c'mon MS). Anything I wrote at home I'd like to be as cross-platform as possible so my friends (the only audience for my hobby coding) could all use it! Much as I like C# in VS, I need at least Android side-loading as a target platform, and ideally iPhone too.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Windows Store by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft aping competitors' tactics years behind them has worked so well of late.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Windows Store by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      You must have a shitty phone. There's not that many apps worth purchasing.

    4. Re:Windows Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't speak for everyone, but I have spent more on apps than the price of my phone over its lifetime. (The unsubsidized price, at that.)

      I estimate that you are the 1 percent.

    5. Re:Windows Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's an achievement wh^H^H^H hunter, then it's entirely possible. There's a good # of WP games (good #, not that all are actually good) that are integrated into Xbox LIVE's ecosystem, particularly the whole GamerScore/Achievement system. Most of those aren't free, although the OP doesn't state whether his payments also include In-App Purchases (IAP) for "free"-to-play games (or even those you pay upfront for).

      Sadly, development for Windows Phone 8 also requires a Windows 8 OS as the development environment. That does limit the # of developers, particularly hobbyists.

  4. Generic Hardware by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    How about phone makers make generic hardware, like PC makers do? Then we can just install the OS of our choice on it.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Generic Hardware by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think Vodafone, AT&T, T-Mobile, or any other carrier would like that very much.

      --
      signature is pants
    2. Re:Generic Hardware by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I don't think they get a say in the matter if consumers buy their own phones.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Generic Hardware by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      No, because phone makers don't sell phones to us, they sell phones to the cell phone networks. And the cell phone networks don't want you to have control over your hardware. That's why you don't get root unless you crack the phone's security and force it to give you root.

    4. Re:Generic Hardware by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy my phone from a network operator. Unlocking the boot loader and rooting it is covered in the documentation.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    5. Re:Generic Hardware by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      That's great, consumers buy their own phones with their own OS on them. Who are the consumers going to call if none of the network providers will handshake with their RMS-OS phone? The network providers might well claim that unless the radio and network connection stacks are well-tested and not likely to cripple their towers by DDoSing them then they don't get to play in their sandbox and for that the stacks have to be "blobs" under their control.

    6. Re:Generic Hardware by davester666 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the carriers are quaking in their boots for this to happen.

      carrier sales completely dominate the industry vs direct consumer sales of phones. Probably by at least 2 orders of magnitude.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Generic Hardware by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      They do. They can block your IMEI number, for one thing. For another, they can lean pretty hard on manufacturers who hope to sell phones in their stores.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Generic Hardware by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Because of the discounts offered by the networks (in exchange for locking you into a contract), you are a very small minority. The market for directly bought phones is very small and no cell phone maker is willing to put effort into it.

    9. Re:Generic Hardware by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Yeah awesome, I'm sure everybody would love chasing up drivers for all their hardware for the specific version of their particular OS of choice.

    10. Re:Generic Hardware by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Ever since the tethering settlement the open access rules require Verizon to allow any device on their network (the 700Mhz LTE block that is).

    11. Re:Generic Hardware by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Only in the US.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Generic Hardware by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Well back when Symbian was king and before Kickstarter, there was a phone platform for tinkerers - Neo 1973/Freerunner.

      Suffice to say it died. A main reason was software - few people wanted to pay for a half-finished platform. Today, numerous alternatives exist to windows phone and iOS. e.g. Android, Sailfish, Tizen, Firefox OS.

      So a feasible crowd-funded project might be to hire, full time, a few kernel hackers to write blob replacements for replicant and integrate the free GPU efforts of rpi/lima/freedreno. Outsourcing the hardware to ZTE and Geeksphone, based on schematics from the Google/Moto modular smartphone project Ara.

    13. Re:Generic Hardware by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No, because phone makers don't sell phones to us, they sell phones to the cell phone networks. And the cell phone networks don't want you to have control over your hardware. That's why you don't get root unless you crack the phone's security and force it to give you root.

      Really? I bought my phone off my office mate. My last phone I got from a shop. All on the same sim-only contract.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  5. Is that legal? by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering that Microsoft charges money for Android (anybody using Android has to pay Microsoft for patents), can they really get away with giving away Windows Phone for free?

    1. Re:Is that legal? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's legal and yes they can get away with it. There's no law, that I know of, titled "The fishy sounding business practices law".

    2. Re:Is that legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      When the Microsoft haters defend the old anti-monopoly lawsuit, they insist that regardless of the social effect of one company giving away a web browser for free, it was an abuse of an existing monopoly because they had most of the consumer PC market buying Windows. When challenged with comparisons to iOS doing exactly the same frelling thing (but on a cell phone), they argue that Apple lacks the 90% market share to qualify as a monopoly, and thus can get away with anything.

      Since one of the favored memes of Slashdot is that no one uses Windows Phones, they clearly don't have a monopoly and thus are free to price their mobile software at whatever they want. Similarly, Google is free to write a version of Android that doesn't use Microsoft patents, removing that minor fee from their mobile OS.

    3. Re:Is that legal? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "Considering that Microsoft charges money for Android ...can they really get away with giving away Windows Phone for free?"

      Come on, after all we're talking about 2 phones or so.

    4. Re:Is that legal? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Sure. And they are free to integrate Bing, Bing maps, Office, Outlook.com and the kitchen sink. Good luck with that.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    5. Re:Is that legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're missing is that the laws aren't against monopolies, but against anti-competetive practices.

      While having a monopoly lowers the limit of what you can do before getting a slap on your wrist, it's not strictly necessary.

      In this case, MS should better allow other appstores (and whatever else brings them profits in WP), or they very well might be called out on predatory pricing. There were complaints about Android being free, which didn't go anywhere as you _can_ actually use it without giving a cent to Google.

      If MS going to make WP "free" as in freemium, that'd be quite a different arrangement.

      PS: Apple did actually get in hot water with anti-trust laws early on in mobile phase, even without a monopoly - it was for initial arrangement of only selling iPhones with AT&T contracts.

  6. In other news.... by XB-70 · · Score: 1
    Microsoft open-sources it's code and goes to a support model of doing business.

    The tides stop.

    Republicans and Democrats dance together in the streets.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
    1. Re:In other news.... by Amtrak · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that the cubs can finally win a world series and the lions a super bowl in the same year! GASP!

    2. Re:In other news.... by AlphaBro · · Score: 0

      The R's and D's already dance as one atop the lower classes.

  7. Times of India? by MurukeshM · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that's the source? They are like the Fox News of India.

  8. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Any theory that does not provide a method to falsify and validate its claims is a useless theory.

    See also: The entire bible.

  9. gets paid for android by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Android right now has up to 80% of the world marketshare. MS has 5%. The number of phones MS sells is insignificant. They could afford to give them away for free if they wanted to build marketshare. It probably costs more to manage the Licensing program that the program collects in fees. At this point, the fees is purely a philosophical endeavor for MS. Cutting them to build market share makes sense, but it probably is not going to encourage others to start making MS phones. Nothing they have done in the past has worked.

    In any case, remember that Samsung, which is what most people buy when they buy an android phone, pays MS $10-20 per phone. This is clearly where MS future lies, collecting patent fees. The only reason that it needs to have a phone is so it is not labeled as patent troll.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  10. Other mobile OS? No, thanks by spark89 · · Score: 1

    What MS WP could give customers that Apple iOS and Google Android cant? I'm seriously doubt that MS will obtain some impressive share of market in the near future.

    1. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Great performance on lesser hardware. Windows Phone is more responsive on comparable hardware than Android or iOS. If it's free to license, I think you'll see Windows Phone make a good run at the lower-end phone market......it already does fairly well there in Europe, we'll see what this does for their position in India.

    2. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by LordThyGod · · Score: 1

      Great performance on lesser hardware. Windows Phone is more responsive on comparable hardware than Android or iOS. If it's free to license, I think you'll see Windows Phone make a good run at the lower-end phone market......it already does fairly well there in Europe, we'll see what this does for their position in India.

      Yea, but a lot of people have tried MS products. Why would they then buy a phone from them when there is low cost options?

    3. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by symbolset · · Score: 1

      So great on lower hardware that even Nokia is going Android to lower their BOM costs and get some emerging markets business.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great performance on lesser hardware.

      Second this. I'm in the Android camp for sure, with a Nexus phone replaced with the new version when I can afford it, but I've seen what people can do with cheap Windows Phones, and it really is quite something. As someone who would never touch a Windows desktop willingly, I would seriously consider a Windows Phone.

    5. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by aybiss · · Score: 1

      Great performance on lesser hardware... it might do, but I will never admit it nor will I care enough to find out for sure.

      I've watched MS destroy performance in every area they've entered. (Anyone remember the MS game Monster Truck Madness?) Meanwhile they've failed to give a shit and have even pushed their multi-tasking operating system back to being a single task interface.

      If anyone asks me, "Windows phones are slow and shit, just like Windows is on your PC." Also they crash more and are more expensive.

      Am I lying? Only as much as MS has about performance... not even.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    6. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Go check out the Nokia 520. http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-Lu...

      That's not a contract price, that's to buy it straight out. If you play with the phone, it's responsive and for the money, the specs aren't bad (5MP camera, dual-core 1Ghz CPU, etc.). There are apps that won't run on it, but most will. And it's the Nokia design. If you want to play around with Windows Phone development, it's a great dev phone.

    7. Re:Other mobile OS? No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should move the people who developed Windows Phone to develop Windows for PCs. Imagine Windows being 10 times as fast as it used to be.

      Or is that using the same measure as the people who claim that Windows 8 has lower system requirements than Windows 7, which has lower system requirements than Windows XP, which requires 256 MB RAM, with 512 being the recommended amount? I have yet to meet anyone making that claim who is willing to prove it, even when I offer to bring a PC with less than 256 MB RAM.

  11. Now if they wanted to be truly evil by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    Put together a large team that targets Android phones, particularly lower end phones with no support, and make Windows Phone perpetually free along the same lines as the good custom Android distributions. If they made a serious effort to get Windows Phone working as a solid, stable, fast OS on such phones and made really slick installers, they'd probably see a sharp increase in marketshare within a year. Not even 10%, but enough to cause concern at Google. The best part is that if they were to just stick to Nokia as their "official" handset manufacturer and make it clear that they'll happily support Windows Phone on other companies' platforms it'd probably evade antitrust scrutiny. What would the regulators say? It's illegal for them to make Windows Phone freely available with regular support for phones from vendors that don't even buy Windows Phone licenses? If they were to do that, then they might as well make Windows on Arm illegal, tell Linux vendors to stick to no more than 2 CPU architectures, etc.

    1. Re:Now if they wanted to be truly evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put together a large team that targets Android phones, particularly lower end phones with no support, and make Windows Phone perpetually free along the same lines as the good custom Android distributions. If they made a serious effort to get Windows Phone working as a solid, stable, fast OS on such phones and made really slick installers, they'd probably see a sharp increase in marketshare within a year.

      Yes, that's good math. Let's go from small marketshare and a license fee, to big marketshare, and zero license fee. So that means small income to... zero income. But hot damn, we've got marketshare!

  12. I like the Win8 Phone UI... but too few apps by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have to admit, I like the UI on the Windows 8 phones. While Windows 8 doesn't exactly translate well on the desktop... it works fine on the phone as far as I could see. It's at least drawn nicely and has a different design than iOS and Android.

    Unfortunately there are just too few apps available. I went to their app store and only a small handful of my apps had a presence there... and Google's stuff was all third-party wrappers to offer some Google stuff. Honestly, that was enough to turn me off.

    I guess it's circular... people won't want it if the app selection stinks, but the devs won't make apps because it's not popular.

    Note: I got an Android instead.

  13. It ain't the price by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the crappy software. Free isn't cheap enough, especially when you're 5 years too late to the party and a million apps behind.

    1. Re:It ain't the price by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 0

      Greatly exaggerated. I just got my first Windows phone (my Android-tablet-as-phone trial failed, so decided to get a real phone and try Windows) and the market is OK. I even found Grasshopper, an app to let me manage Micasa Verde's Vera.

      'course no Puzzles and Dragons is an issue, but I'll just play that on my tablet.

    2. Re:It ain't the price by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Agree. And then there is the integrated Bing, Outlook.com, inferior maps, and all the other "goodies" that aren't as good as the Google services you get on a $50 PAYGO Android phone.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:It ain't the price by xvan · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that the same thing people said when google launched the marketplace?

    4. Re:It ain't the price by LordThyGod · · Score: 1

      Agree. And then there is the integrated Bing, Outlook.com, inferior maps, and all the other "goodies" that aren't as good as the Google services you get on a $50 PAYGO Android phone.

      Just wondering if I could plug it into my Linux desktop, and copy files to/from easily or do I have to play for MS crapware to fully use. Just wondering, don't know, but that's part of the appeal for android for me, its pretty platform neutral. Including development tools.

    5. Re: It ain't the price by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

      It has many deficiencies, but MAPS? At least on the Nokia phones is by far the best out there. Bing? Yeah, I'll give you that, but half the point of WP8 is to drive Bing traffic.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
    6. Re:It ain't the price by Chewy509 · · Score: 1

      Just wondering if I could plug it into my Linux desktop, and copy files to/from easily or do I have to play for MS crapware to fully use.

      IIRC, the Windows Phone MTP stack works really well with libmtp (the main MTP client stack in FOSS land), so for any modern distro it should be plug-n-play... (providing it uses a modern version of go-mtpfs, gMTP, gvfs-mtp or kio-mtp).
      I personally have an Android phone (HTC Desire X), so can't provide first hand experience with WP and Linux, but the libmtp mailing list/bug list has very few reports for WP8 issues.

      Disclaimer: I am the lead dev for gMTP.

    7. Re:It ain't the price by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Good to know, thanks! WP7 used MTPZ (Zune-extended/encrypted MTP) and was very Linux-unfriendly, but WP8 appears to use bog-standard MTP. I hadn't tried it on Linux yet but am not surprised that it's reported to work well.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    8. Re:It ain't the price by exomondo · · Score: 1

      My iPhone came with Apple maps yet I use Google maps, I don't use an iCloud email and the default search engine just happens to already be Google, but I can change that.

      So you do realise that just because something is the default doesn't mean you have to use it don't you? There is a simple browser setting to change the default search from bing to google. You also don't have to use Outlook.com just like on Android how you don't have to use Gmail. And you can use Google Maps through the website or through an app like Maps+.

    9. Re:It ain't the price by symbolset · · Score: 0

      No.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    10. Re:It ain't the price by exomondo · · Score: 1

      No you don't realise that just because something is the default doesn't mean you have to use it? Welcome to the world of basic customisation then!

  14. It ain't the price by spark89 · · Score: 1

    Totally agree.

  15. Not "anybody", just those who Microsoft has succes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft doesn't collect money from everyone, just those they've threatened successfully, which represents about 80% of the Android market.

  16. What apps didn't they have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when did you look?

  17. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Amtrak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't read all of your rant... because well it's long and i'm a slashdot user. But your argument about a watermelon being blue on the inside but turning red when cut open intrigues me. I think that it might be postulated that if a watermelon changes color when cut it must be because of some chemical reaction. Given this why not just put the watermelon in an air tight chamber filled with a noble gas and then cut it open from the inside. This should allow said watermelon hypothesis to be tested. An un-testable hypothesis isn't one at all. A hard to test hypothesis is just a challenge.

  18. Charge one company but not another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm wondering if they can charge some companies to use their OS but not others. That sounds anticompetitive.

  19. License fees come from Android deices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    P.A.T.E.N.T.S.

    The only question is, why it took the behemoth so long. Its downhill ends at XP yet its been coasting ever since.

  20. Nokia by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

    At the moment most of the really useful apps are Nokia's, and mostly only available on their handsets. The basic OS without these does not compare well with Android/iOS. It will be interesting to see if with the acquisition, MS makes these apps core, either for regularly licenced copies ir these free ones. I have a high-end Lumia925, more or less iPhone quality, and a Lumia520, which for less than £100 SIM free, is almost as good. WP8 really does run well on very cheap hardware.

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  21. LOL, they can't even give it away... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, Microsoft can't even give Windows Phone away. Just like Linux on the desktop.

    (What, you were expecting your prejudices to be catered to? Too bad.)

    1. Re:LOL, they can't even give it away... by LordThyGod · · Score: 1

      LOL, Microsoft can't even give Windows Phone away. Just like Linux on the desktop.

      (What, you were expecting your prejudices to be catered to? Too bad.)

      Why would MS event want to give LInux on the desktop away? Its already "Free". They'd probably fuck it up anyway.

    2. Re:LOL, they can't even give it away... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      "Ubuntu With Bing!" - shudder.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  22. "Run, Forrest... RUN!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You trolling piece of undereducated useless shit http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4885825&cid=46474817

    APK

    P.S.=> How many times do I have to show everyone here that you're a worthless piece of crap troll? This, is just yet another... apk

  23. Carriers are starting to itemize hardware by tepples · · Score: 1

    Because of the discounts offered by the networks (in exchange for locking you into a contract), you are a very small minority.

    These discounts for not bringing your own device are on their way out. Instead, the U.S. model has begun to shift toward the European model where the phone and plan are itemized as separate purchases. Instead of $20 per month subsidy spread over 24 months of a $70 per month contract, there's a $20 line item for the financed hardware and a $50 line item for the service. MVNOs were first to bring this model to the States, followed by T-Mobile, and three months ago even AT&T cut the price for BYOD and expired-contract customers to keep T-Mobile and the MVNOs from eating its proverbial lunch.

  24. Probably a mistake. by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    Instead of giving away WIndows, they should probably give royalty free apps store access to any entity for the first two years.
    That will probably draw developers faster then dfoubling or even tripling a nonexistent base. Especially the young hungry ones which should become established developers over time.

  25. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Example; if someone said a watermelon is blue on the inside, but turns red when you cut it open, how could you prove them wrong? How could they prove they're right? You couldn't and they can't. There is no method available to confirm or disprove what was said about the watermelon.

    I'll bite. You just cut open the watermelon and proved it wasn't blue. Logic seems not a strong point here.

    Any theory that can not explain how to both validate and falsify its claims in this manner can not be taken seriously.

    What kind of idiocy is this? Theories are based on numerous hypotheses. These can be proven or disproven but it is never up to the theory to explain how to validate or falsify the claims. Scientists validate or falsify the hypotheses. For example, Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren overturned decades of medical thinking that peptic ulcers were primarily caused by stress and lifestyle. Instead they argued that it was mainly due to a bacteria named Helicobacter pylori. To prove, it they gave ulcer patients antibiotics and they were cured. For this, they won a Nobel Prize.

    Unfortunately, Darwin never properly demonstrated how to falsify his theory

    Neither did Newton, Galileo, Einstein, etc. No scientists is required to provide ways to falsify his theory. Faulty logic on your part. In fact, on the subject of Newton, his theory on gravitation was incomplete as it never fully described why Mercury wobbles. Yet it was accepted because it adequately described gravity for the most part. Einstein later refined Newton by showing that Newton's idea of gravity is a good approximation in situations of low mass and low speed (like on the Earth) whereas Einstein's General Theory of Relativity covered broader situations and adequately explained Mercury's orbit (and the rest of space-time).

    which means evolution has not properly been proven, since it has never been demonstrated what the evidence does not suggest.

    Only if you willing to ignore the collective work of many scientists in paleontology, biology, microbiology, genetics, etc.

    So the following falsification method must be the perfect counter to Darwin's validation method

    Again, faulty presupposition and logic on your part.

    So one must demonstrate a method to prove beyond any doubt that in the event that evolution is not true, it can be shown to be such.

    No you are creating unreasonable demands on a theory you don't like. By your logic, Newton's idea of gravity must be thrown out as well as atomic physics and relativity as they conflict with each other.

    If the creation model is true, we can make verifiable predictions that disprove evolution.

    Bill Nye said it best when he said in the debate that it would only take one fossil out of place to disprove evolution. So far no one has done it. By your logic, you're wrong then.

    In order to demonstrate that the Creator is responsible for life and created life diversified to begin with, the word "kind" must be defined.

    Ah, the creationists method of defining words to mean what it favorable to their argument.

    A kind is the original prototype of any ancestral line; that is to say if God created two lions, and two cheetahs, these are distinct kinds. In this scenario, these two cats do not share a common ancestor, as they were created separately, and therefore are not the same kind despite similar appearance and design. If this is the case, evolution theory is guilty of using homogeneous structures as evidence of common ancestry, and then using homogeneous structures to prove common ancestry; this is circular reasoning!

    That's not circular reasoning. That's your lack of understand

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  26. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the koran and the book of mormon and dianetics and every other religious tome.

  27. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if so then he certainly trolled you good and proper, in fact he got you so good you're even replying to his other posts! damn it must suck to be able to be trolled so easily.

  28. Re:Not "anybody", just those who Microsoft has suc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft doesn't collect money from everyone, just those they've threatened successfully, which represents about 80% of the Android market.

    They claim patents on specific implementations in Linux, obviously Samsung (a company that continues to go toe-to-toe with Apple, a much more powerful and financed company than Microsoft, over patent claims) sees validity in those claims, Google also sees validity in those claims as it does not step up and defend companies using Android. It's not a matter of "threatening", it's a matter of paying license fees for patents which is what every company does for the many patents they use that are owned by various companies, just one of which is Microsoft.

  29. Remember Xbox by tepples · · Score: 1

    a lot of people have tried MS products. Why would they then buy a phone from them when there is low cost options?

    Probably for much the same reason that people who don't especially like Windows and Office bought an Xbox. If the new touch-controlled Halo game is exclusive to Windows, watch fanboys switch to this so-called Xboy.

  30. Physics Lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your watermelon seems like Schrodinger's Cat of Quantum Mechanics.

    1. Re:Physics Lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sadly, attempts to cut open the cat in a room filled with a noble gas to test the hypothesis was met with severe condemnation by PETA, eventually causing the experiment to be scrapped.

  31. Re:Not "anybody", just those who Microsoft has suc by exomondo · · Score: 1

    FWIW Apple collects $6-$8 from HTC for every device sold for patent fees too. Nokia and Qualcomm collect patent licensing fees as well. The point is that the innovators then cross-license, so the more you innovate the more you have to cross-license and the less you have to pay in licensing fees.

  32. Develop apps on the device by tepples · · Score: 1

    There are iOS-exclusive games and Android-exclusive games. Are there Windows Phone-exclusive games yet?

    Apart from games, Android has AIDE, a Java IDE that works on a tablet with a Bluetooth keyboard. I haven't tried it on an Android phone, but I'm guessing it might work on a phone with a Bluetooth keyboard and an HDMI output when the touch screen emulates a trackpad. Does Windows RT have anything like Visual Studio, Eclipse, or anything else to develop apps on the device? Does Windows Phone even support HDMI out? Instead of HDMI out, Nokia phones have DLNA streaming, which apparently has too much latency for actual interactive use because it's designed for movies, not apps or games.

    1. Re:Develop apps on the device by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter if a game is exclusive to Windows Phone? Although I've seen some Xbox games available on the platform.

      Maybe it's just the Lumia, but if games are not the central reason to have a phone, Windows Phone is just fine. Messaging is a breeze, and from their app store, I downloaded a bunch of simple apps that are genuinely useful - like using OneNote for shopping lists (I don't touch OneNote on a PC and had no idea what it was for, until I had the phone). In my experience, the typing experience on a Lumia 520 is a lot smoother than that on either an Android or iPhone. I've found myself using the phone a lot more than I used to use previous phones

      If games are important, however, then iPhone or Android is the way to go

    2. Re:Develop apps on the device by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      There have been WP-exclusive games since launch. I believe Wordament was exclusive when it launched two years ago, and it's only just recently appeared on non-MS platforms. A number of Microsoft/Xbox-franchise titles (like Halo and Fable) have WP-exclusive games that are either parts of the overall series, or companions to specific games in it. I'm sure there are tons of others.

      Windows Phone has TouchDevelop, which is essentially a scripting IDE that allows the developer to select objects by touch rather than needing to type everything out. You can develop apps with it, and even publish them on the store. It's created by Microsoft Research, and was first launched on WP7 something like three years ago. https://www.touchdevelop.com/

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:Develop apps on the device by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the typing experience on a Lumia 520 is a lot smoother than that on either an Android [...]

      You need to try swype. You'll never peck out anything on an on-screen keyboard again. It's truly incredible. It's the killer app on Android. I cringe whenever I have to peck out anything on an iPhone or iPod touch now. Never used WP.

  33. Just like CALS in early Windows Server by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    I doubt it. I think it's just a temporary measure so that they can get some market share and then start charging again.

    Likely. When Windows Server first came out, it had no CALS. Novell Netware charged a price based on the number of users. Microsoft only charged for the OS, and was much cheaper. After they had sufficient market share, they added CALS.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  34. "2-for-the-price-of-1", Tepples... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4895159&cid=46477883 + http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4895159&cid=46477951

    * :)

    (Sorry I don't "go for' playing the games that "politically correct" piece of shit play man, I only speak my mind & use facts (especially vs. the piece of shit trolls around here)).

    APK

    P.S.=> I do, however, truly *think* you'll ENJOY (& understand) what I am working on to supplement hosts though - that's in the 2nd link, & yes, it really works (not sure WHY you think my hosts technique doesn't work for subdomains here - it does, & not only for ME, but for others also, vs. beta)... apk

  35. "2-for-the-price-of-1" Tepples... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4895159&cid=46477883 + http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4895159&cid=46477951

    * :)

    (Sorry I don't "go for' playing the games that "politically correct" pieces of shit play man, I only speak my mind & use facts (especially vs. the piece of shit trolls around here)).

    APK

    P.S.=> I do, however, truly *think* you'll ENJOY (& understand) what I am working on to supplement hosts though - that's in the 2nd link, & yes, it really works (not sure WHY you think my hosts technique doesn't work for subdomains here - it does, & not only for ME, but for others also, vs. beta)... apk

    1. Re:"2-for-the-price-of-1" Tepples... apk by tepples · · Score: 1

      I saw them the first time and added them to my list of "interesting APK posts".

      Digression posted without bonus.

  36. It's not the OS, or the apps... by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a Android user (Nexus 4) and a former iPhone owner, I'm not so sure the OS is the real problem.

    When I used the iPhone, it was very obvious that I was outside the Apple ecosystem. ITunes on Windows sucks, and I could tell that Apple's goal was to push me away from Windows and join the Apple world, where things "just work".

    Now that I've moved to Android, it is clear that Google wants all my systems to work together, regardless of what it is or who it came from. My files stay synced between all my PCs, laptops, tablet, phone and even my old iPhone (now being used as an iPod). This is the killer app for me. Both Apple and Microsoft want their stuff to work better if you stick with their products. Google changed that game.

    Sorry Microsoft. Even if you fix the OS so it's the best, and give it away free, I'm still not interested. As Sun used to say, "The network is the computer", and Google gets that - while Apple and Microsoft want to build a walled garden. If Adobe and Solidworks ever offer a Linux version, I'm gone.

    --
    Place nail here >+
    1. Re:It's not the OS, or the apps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Seimans NX, runs in linux and arguably better then solidworks.

      Seimens owns the kernel used in both Inventor and SW.

    2. Re:It's not the OS, or the apps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Android user (Nexus 4) and a former iPhone owner, I'm not so sure the OS is the real problem.

      When I used the iPhone, it was very obvious that I was outside the Apple ecosystem. ITunes on Windows sucks, and I could tell that Apple's goal was to push me away from Windows and join the Apple world, where things "just work".

      Now that I've moved to Android, it is clear that Google wants all my systems to work together, regardless of what it is or who it came from. My files stay synced between all my PCs, laptops, tablet, phone and even my old iPhone (now being used as an iPod). This is the killer app for me. Both Apple and Microsoft want their stuff to work better if you stick with their products. Google changed that game.

      Sorry Microsoft. Even if you fix the OS so it's the best, and give it away free, I'm still not interested. As Sun used to say, "The network is the computer", and Google gets that - while Apple and Microsoft want to build a walled garden. If Adobe and Solidworks ever offer a Linux version, I'm gone.

      I have an iMac, a gaming PC, an iPad, and iPhones... but who the hell still uses iTunes on a computer?

  37. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever wonder why your life is that of a loser? My God, you think 'trolling" is some 'accomplishment". Grow up, get a real life, loser.

  38. A lot of this saw it coming by Shaman · · Score: 1

    Honestly, Microsoft... why not just build some really nice Android apps and call it a day? NIH is a sickness.

    --
    ...Steve
    1. Re:A lot of this saw it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never understood this slashdot mentality of trying to *save* Microsoft, it's like so many of you *want* them to fail but *need* them to exist (to have somebody to hate on). If they are dumping money into pointless endeavors then who cares? Don't use their products and let them fail, same with Windows 8. Just be happy they produced a product you don't like and can easily justify not using. But every time, without fail, that there is a story on Windows 8 it attracts hundreds of comments from angry slashdotters: why not use that energy to convert people to Linux rather than bringing more visibility to the fact that Microsoft has to fix Windows?

      Does anybody here really think anybody else is going to take notice of them because they spew some bile post about how "evil" Microsoft and Windows 8 is? People will listen to those that offer a. constructive solutions/workarounds or b. viable alternatives. But the "I hate Microsoft/Windows 8" crowd have no technical ability at all, that's why they provide no solutions and just a more emotionally charged version of the comments made by the people that seek their help. Useless people.

  39. Lava & Xolo by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    In response, suggests the Times of India, Microsoft may have dumped licensing fees for two Indian smartphone makers, Karbonn and Lava (Xolo)

    What the hell does Lava(Xolo) mean?
    Lava and Xolo are different companies. The article doesn't mention Xolo.

  40. Walled Garden by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    How is Windows Phone more of a walled garden than android? Can you give examples?

  41. Re:"Run, Forrest: RUN!!!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God, you think 'trolling" is some 'accomplishment".

    no, no i do not though some people clearly do. i feel sorry for the people who are so mentally dim that they get sucked into it and cannot help but spend time chasing all over forums with some desperate need to be validated by some pseudonymous person.

  42. Leverage existing users.. by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 2

    If Microsoft is really playing serious to make people switch to Windows Phone, they will have to somehow make syncing contacts, emails and calendars between Windows PC and Apple/Android not work as well as with Windows Phone.

    It would likely open themselves up to anti-trust suits but they already know how to handle that.

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  43. Microsoft isn't struggling; it simply never tried. by SuperNovaLovah · · Score: 0

    Microsoft assaulted and insulted its developers by replacing Silverlight and WPF with the misbegotten hated bastard WinRT.

    It has nothing to do with bad marketing. The Metro interface is actually unbelievably slick when you get used to it.

  44. dimko by dimko · · Score: 1

    and most manufacturers and user would take it for free...

  45. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

    "Something can not be proven to be true without showing that it is not false, and something can not be proven to be not true, unless it can be proven to be false."

    Since science is not concerned with proving things true or false, this is completely irrelevant. Evolution is a model based on observation, and it works. That's all that matters.

    If you can use the model of intelligent design to predict how disease will develop and other such questions in biology, then by all means, do so. So far the track record of intelligent design on the furthering of any and all fronts of biology is rather dismal. And that is what matters.

  46. love the Windows8 Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NTechTricks is a Technology blog which mainly covers Tricks and Tips related to Gadgets and also regarding Latest leaks, Rumors, Specifications, Features of Smartphone, Tablets, Cameras and much more stay tuned with us!
      Learn New Tech Tricks here

  47. Fair enough & a point... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do DO more than just the beta.slashdot.org equation to the Slashdot.org IP address (e.g. in hosts = 216.34.181.45 beta.slashdot.org ) & "hardcode" the rest into my hosts @ the top (since I use a large hosts file & thus, I have to turn off the usermode slower local clientside dnscache service, opting instead for local kernelmode diskcaching to take over, losing indexing though WHICH putting those hardcoded fav. sites of mine @ the TOP of hosts offsets (do the math, binary seek) up to 3++ million entries or so... & I am currently @ 2,289,227++ blocked known bad sites/servers/hosts-domains with 24 hardcoded fav. sites @ the top only)): IN FACT, here is the list of hardcoded favs from /. I hardcode in hosts (for your reference):

    216.34.181.45 slashdot.org - 216.34.181.45 beta.slashdot.org

    Rest of /.'s other subdomains ALL resolve + are hardcoded to -> 216.34.181.48

    * Lastly - I make HOSTS the primary & higher priority thus in the registry also:

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\ServiceProvider]
    "Class"=dword:00000008
    "DnsPriority"=dword:00000007
    "HostsPriority"=dword:00000005
    "LocalPriority"=dword:00000006
    "NetbtPriority"=dword:00000008
    "Name"="TCP/IP"

    APK

    P.S.=> Hope THAT makes your "interesting APK posts" (lol, thanks in a way) & helps you understand HOW what I do overcomes the redirects to beta (no cookies required)... between hosts blocking adbanners & threats (for more speed + security & reliability vs. redirects of ANY kind)? I am "all set" & hopefully? So can you be also... good luck!

    ... apk

  48. Re:How to Falsify Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evolution consists of two parts, each of which can be falsified:

    1. Children are not exact duplicates of their parents. To falsify this, you simply need to demonstrate that all children are exact duplicates of their parents.

    2. Survival of the fittest. To demonstrate this, you'd need to show that the fittest doesn't generally survive. That the lion prefers to pass the slower gazelles to catch the faster one, and the fish that cannot breathe under water is more likely to survive in the ocean than the one that can.

  49. Yes, a paltry 5% by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Yes, a paltry 5% of the one billion cell phones sold in 2013.

    5% of 1B...let's see...carry the knot...I make it a truly pathetic 50,000,000 units sold. Insignificant indeed. Especially when you compare it to the gargantuan sales of personal computers in 2013 (82M units). No comparison at all.

    My last three laptops cost about $300 each. Last cell phone (Nexus 5) cost $400. No comparison there either.

    --
    I come here for the love
  50. Not cheap enough, or soon enough by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has always tried to position their phones and tablets as "premium" devices, selling for more than comparable competitors. That's really hard to do when you are the disruptor, trying to break into an established marketplace. Google played the game right, coming into a smartphone marketplace that was dominated by iPhone, as a lower cost option that was "just as good." Over time, Android earned the respect of the marketplace, and eventually they gained dominance.

    Microsoft devices were, from the beginning, more expensive than comparable phones and tablets from other vendors. But they had no killer app, and a lot less apps to offer. So why should we all pay more for less?

    If Microsoft is serious about making inroads into the mobile market, they are going to have to push bargain-basement devices, until they, like Google, can gain enough market share to get a foothold with pricier models.

  51. I'd seriously look at a MS Windows phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My son-in-law has one, and he likes it better than his wife's android. He gave her the Adroid and picked up the phone. Its easy to use.