Slashdot Mirror


Dorian Nakamoto Officially Denies That He Created Bitcoin

sumoinsanity writes "A succinct and comprehensive rebuttal has been distributed from this Mr Nakamoto about being the founder of Bitcoin. His statement reads in part: 'The first time I heard the term "bitcoin" was from my son in mid-February 2014. After being contacted by a reporter, my son called me and used the word, which I had never before heard. Shortly thereafter, the reporter confronted me at my home. I called the police. I never consented to speak with the reporter. In an ensuing discussion with the reporter from the Associated Press, I called the technology "bitcom." I was still unfamiliar with the term.' Newsweek copped a lot of criticism regarding their original expose on the purported uncovering of a BitCoin founder following their two month investigation. They defended with, 'Ms. Goodman's research was conducted under the same high editorial and ethical standards that have guided Newsweek for more than 80 years. Newsweek stands strongly behind Ms. Goodman and her article.'"

21 of 102 comments (clear)

  1. Evidence? by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As I recall, Ms. Goodman had no real research beyond the facts that the name was similar and he happened to do some security work under contract.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Evidence? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even aside from the shoddy standards of evidence (Newsweek, shoddy reporting? Knock me over with a feather...), how well can something possibly go when a 'news' organization decides that what their readers really need is a human interest angle on this 'bit-coin' thing that the geeks are talking about. And not just any squishy 'human interest' bullshit; but squishy 'human interest' bullshit about somebody who (even if he were the creator) now has essentially no known or suspected activity (unlike, say, the large stable of colorful characters operating exchanges and controversial ASIC operations and so on).

      It's like a newspaper deciding that, in order to help readers understand the operations of the American government, they are going to entirely ignore all contemporary politicians and political happenings in order to write: "The Mysterious Writer Behind 'Common Sense' Unmasked!".

      The fact that they appear to be harassing a sick, troubled, old man for cheap pageviews is just ghoulish; but the very premise they started from is shitty journalism: "Well, we don't know anything about cryptography, and our readers wouldn't know a prime number from a subprime number, so we'll ignore that, and the (moderately high stakes, at times) contemporary wheeling and dealing in the exchange and mining arenas is all complex and stuff, so let's just unmask the mysterious mystery man, and maybe do some tepid armchair psychology about what made him act... Everybody loves that shit, and it requires no special skills, knowledge, or attention span, so it should move eyeballs."

    2. Re:Evidence? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Funny

      As I recall, Ms. Goodman had no real research beyond the facts that the name was similar and he happened to do some security work under contract.

      So? That does not conflict with Newsweek's claim that "Ms. Goodman's research was conducted under the same high editorial and ethical standards that have guided Newsweek for more than 80 years." Well, except for the "high" part.

    3. Re:Evidence? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not that kind of high.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Evidence? by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      Isn't this based on a rather simple assumption that his desire to be the anonymous inventor started before he published the paper on it. What if, he or she had written the paper and begun work under their own name, and later regretted it and decided it would be best to not actually be in the spot light?

      I mean no idiot would use their real name as a cover, however, if his real name is already out there, pretending it is a cover and not disabusing people who say its a cover from their claims, might serve to create enough confusion as to allow a person who regretted using his real name to fade away into obscurity....without going as far as trying to fake his death or anything.

      All that said, I am pretty doubtful as well, I don't think this guy invented bitcoin. Of course, I also don't think the association hurts his job prospects, especially if he hasn't found work in the industry in a decade.

      If anything, it may help his job prospects as people feel bad for this old engineer, or don't believe his denials and want the famed Satoshi Nakamoto on their payroll. I mean hell, even if he denies it, truth has never stopped a salesman from making winks and nudges at a client.

      Shit I can practically hear the conversation
      "Well I mean, we are the company with Satoshi Nakamoto on staff"
      "I heard about that, he claims he didn't invent bitcoin"
      "right, well publicly he claims that, yes."
      "Oh?"
      "You know I can't talk about that but... ::wink::"

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  2. Re:Quick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You are the WORST first date ever. Just so you know.

  3. Re:Bitcoin could harm your future job prospects? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    He's 64 and hasn't had a job in 10 years, so I doubt he's going to a lot of job interviews anyway.

    But he spent his career doing high security work for the government. Those jobs don't like the idea of you sitting on $600M worth of untraceable currency.

  4. High Standards? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They defended with, 'Ms. Goodman's research was conducted under the same high editorial and ethical standards that have guided Newsweek for more than 80 years. Newsweek stands strongly behind Ms. Goodman and her article.'"

    So, then, what you're saying here is that every Newsweek article written in the past 80 years is suspect? Having read Newsweek more than never, I can't say I disagree.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  5. Re:I don't blame him by ebcdic · · Score: 2

    If you were the maker of Bitcoin, you could afford it.

  6. Only the real messiah would deny that he... by bazmail · · Score: 3, Funny

    is the real messiah. All Hail Nakamoto!!!!!!!!!

  7. Re:I don't blame him by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

    So when did you finally decide to admit you were the founder of bitcoin?
    Was that before or after you stopped beating your wife?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  8. Re:Ssssure... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

    Oh great, so you need to be a Jew in order to make a formal denial? This atheist thing is starting to be more troublesome than I imagined.

  9. Re:I don't blame him by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    If I was the maker of Bitcoin, I'd want privacy too. I am sure interested parties (Read: NSA/CIA/FBI/DEA/etc.) would love to question (Read: Guantanamo Bay) the makers of this almost anonymous currency.

    In all seriousness, what questions would you want to ask? If somebody thinks that he's still sitting on a huge pile of bitcoins, they'd probably want those transferred to a new owner; but there aren't a lot of other secrets to be had, aside from tedious and largely pointless questions about 'So, what inspired you to create a cryptocurrency?' How it works is a matter of public knowledge, and if there are any undocumented lemmae your best bet is probably to ask your own in-house team of world class cryptographers to read the paper and drink some coffee while thinking about it.

    Maybe some enraged central bank chairman wants to take a rasp to his teeth just for spite; but there isn't much interrogative value.

  10. Re:I don't blame him by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    I recall correctly, the original creator invested a large number of bitcoins in the SilkRoad

    Umm...no. The ~1 million bitcoins that are believed to have been mined by the Bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto have not been involved in any transactions since Satoshi disappeared in early 2011.

  11. Re:The original article by chatteringmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Original article states:

    "Tacitly acknowledging his role in the Bitcoin project, he looks down, staring at the pavement and categorically refuses to answer questions.

    "I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it," he says, dismissing all further queries with a swat of his left hand. "It's been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longer have any connection."

    Curiously ambiguous, if truly a direct quote. Is he no longer involved in Bitcoin, or no longer involved in talking to reporters who contact him because his name happens to be Satoshi Nakamoto? The "turned over to other people" could refer to his attorneys. But "no longer have any connection" imples that at one time, he did have a connection. Hmmm.

  12. I'm not the creator of bitcoin either by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    And nor is my wife.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  13. The real story... by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

    Newsweek should find out who invented bitcom!

  14. Re:The original article by crashumbc · · Score: 2

    Just to play devils advocate...

    Given his age, medical condition and his work history in government security fields.

    He probably had no idea what the fuck a "bitcoin" was and thought it was something from his security past that he shouldn't be talking about...

  15. OH GOSH & BEGORRA! ALWAYS AFTER MY LUCKY CHARM by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Catch the leprechaun and he'll give you a pot of gold!
    Of course, the tradition has it he'll trick you and the gold will turn to worthless bitcoins after you've let him go.
    sneaky Japanese leprechauns!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. Quran desecration incident by Jmstuckman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In 2005, Newsweek published a false report that American soldiers had desecrated copies of the Quran at the Guantanamo Bay prison. The report was proven false, and Newsweek retracted it, but it was too late -- the report had already sparked riots which injured over 100 people.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q...

    Was the Bitcoin report written with the "same high editorial standards" that Newsweek had followed in the past? It looks like it.

  17. Re:wait, what? by Dahan · · Score: 2

    When did his name change from Satoshi to Dorian? Did I miss something? The last article said they found him because his name literally was Satoshi.

    1973. From the original Newsweek article, "At the age of 23, after graduating from California State Polytechnic University, he changed his name to "Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto," according to records filed with the U.S. District Court of Los Angeles in 1973."