Slashdot Mirror


NSA Can Retrieve, Replay All Phone Calls From a Country From the Past 30 Days

An anonymous reader sends this news from the Washington Post: "The National Security Agency has built a surveillance system capable of recording '100 percent' of a foreign country's telephone calls, enabling the agency to rewind and review conversations as long as a month after they take place, according to people with direct knowledge of the effort and documents supplied by former contractor Edward Snowden. ... The voice interception program, called MYSTIC, began in 2009. Its RETRO tool, short for “retrospective retrieval,” and related projects reached full capacity against the first target nation in 2011. Planning documents two years later anticipated similar operations elsewhere."

29 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. How? by Bradmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So do they have the cooperation of the target country? Or have the infiltrated the entire communications infrastructure of the world? This is really creepy.

    1. Re:How? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Co-operation? I highly, highly doubt that.

      I can see only two possibilities for how the NSA could collect every single phone call of an entire country, such that the Washington Post would agree not to publish the name of the country. One is that it's something like North Korea where the infrastructure is really weak and there might conceivably be only a handful of points where all telephone calls pass through. If a covert team on the ground were able to splice those fibres, or hack the telephone equipment remotely, and somehow duplicate the internal traffic onto fibres heading out of the country , I can see they could be intercepted at that point.

      The other possibility is that it's a small country that's supposed to be "allied" (Washington does not really have allies), like Belgium, seat of the EU. We know that GCHQ hacked Belgacom pretty badly. Undoubtably the NSA has done the same with other telcos. In this case, the WashPo agrees not to disclose it to avoid causing even more severe diplomatic fallout (though this was apparently not a concern so far). For a small but modern country it's quite feasible to imagine hacked telephone equipment simply sending all phone call data out over the internet or a fibre that's meant to be dark without anyone actually noticing, as phone calls are relatively low bandwidth.

      Regardless, this is pretty amazing. Every time I think these fuckers can't get any creepier, they do. First OPTIC NERVE and now this.

      These stories always leave me depressed. It's clear nothing is going to happen, the politicians all seem to be creaming themselves over these powers and can't wait to legalise it all ... then they can conveniently go after anyone who is breaking their collection with crypto.

    2. Re:How? by amorsen · · Score: 3, Informative

      the infrastructure is really weak and there might conceivably be only a handful of points where all telephone calls pass through.

      The opposite is happening. Denmark had PSTN switches in hundreds or thousands of locations for PSTN. The switches for the cell phone network that handles most of the calls on the other hand are in just a few locations per operator. Today it is easy to do the call handling of hundreds of thousands of simultaneous calls in a single location.

      You can still route the voice data directly from cell tower to cell tower, at least with some technologies, but the benefits of doing so are not great anymore.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:How? by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are not depressed enough. ;)

      What is far more scary is the trajectory of all of this - they are light years ahead of where we thought they were in the inevitable decent into a police state.
      If you had made such claims about the NSA a few years ago on slashdot you would have been ridiculed and marked a troll. It would have been unbelievable to most.
      (NB: I am NOT saying this justifies making unsubstantiated claims about the future though)

      But where will they be in 5-10 years when they are better at hiding their activities? I am not saying I know and I am not a conspiracy theorist but to be honest whatever it is it looks pretty grim.

      We now also know that one of the NSA's primary functions is squashing political dissent and corporate espionage so this is not limited to terrorists etc.

      We already knew that the US engaged in this (assuredly with the help of the NSA) and more:
        - Manipulations in places such as South America resulting in countless deaths.
        - Presidential writs for assassination
        - Lying about WMD in Iraq
        - Drone attacks on civilians
        - State authorised torture
        - Mass surveillance
        - etc etc
      And this is just what we know to be true...

      So what is even scarier still is that this is paralleled by the advance of drones and robotics. They just took the governors off R&D on weaponised robots. This includes law enforcement application such as for riots.

      Looking at all this and the complete lack of traction in undoing or slowing down any of it where do you think this is all going? No place good.

      NB: This looks like I am very anti american. I am not. I am anti-super power. I have no delusions that China or Russia are any better for mostly the same reasons.

    4. Re:How? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope, sorry. The NSA projects are not open source.

    5. Re:How? by towermac · · Score: 2

      You had me up until "NSA's primary functions is squashing political dissent and corporate espionage". I mean, that's not really their primary function; stick to facts man. But they have done those things, so let's look at your examples:

          - Manipulations in places such as South America resulting in countless deaths.
      No, you can't blame them for the countless deaths. You assume they are the dominant players in sleazy corrupt South American politics. That's just silly. I will say I'm skeptical about our national interests being served in any way by getting ourselves dirty down there, if that helps.

          - Presidential writs for assassination
      You mean like Bin-Laden? I guess you can disagree with the last 2 Presidents, and a lot of people on that. *IF* we do have to go out and kill somebody like that, then I definitely want the President to have to sign off on it, and not the Undersecretary of Defense or some such. But regardless, everybody knew about it; nothing to do with this NSA issue. And I think he was an international criminal, wanted in lots of places.

          - Lying about WMD in Iraq
      Saddam lied about WMD in Iraq, and tricked George Bush. Saddam wanted the same deal North Korea got. North Korea started messing around with centrifuges and yellowcake and WMDs; and Clinton gave them a reactor, and I think some gas and food too, so they would stop. (And they did for a minute.) Saddam moves around some aluminum tubes so our satellites see it, and plants some guy in Niger trying to buy uranium; but he didn't count on: George Bush was just ignorant enough to fall for it, resentful for his daddy enough to never want to make a deal, and cowboy enough to go and get him.

      I feel like that just happened, have people forgotten already? And yes, they found somebody way after the fact, in all those hearings, that lied about something. We're all shocked.

          - Drone attacks on civilians
      We're all against that. They say they thought the guy was there, but it was a wedding. Oops. You can believe that shit or not, idk.

      But Obama pulls that trigger, not the NSA. And he's supposedly killing Al-Qaeda. I do agree we should stop pulling that trigger. ButI think we're about to bring them all home though.

          - State authorised torture
      You talking about the 3 guys that got waterboarded at Guantanamo? How long ago was that? The press covered that pretty good though, don't you think? Not really all that scary.

          - Mass surveillance
      Yes, that's the thing, and why we're all here talking, and why I want to build a statue of Edward Snowden in my backyard.

          - etc etc
      Which etc? Jumping on board early with Ukraine? Easy going, pretty much hands off with Egypt, but slightly protecting them from others as they go through their shit? We still do some good things. The US is not all evil just yet.

      If I may refocus us: It's not so much the NSA knowing these things. They knew these things before, and we didn't care.

      What changed was George Bush and the Congress that passed the Patriot Act. Those firewalls and barriers between agencies were there for a reason. I get that we want to break those barriers for something like 9/11. We went way too far.

      And it's slowing down. This issue will be hot in the next election. I almost want to predict the Patriot Act will be repealed, but they will probably trick me on that one, and water it down a bit.

      And we need more super-powers, not less.

    6. Re:How? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      and plants some guy in Niger trying to buy uranium

      The "freedom fries" pin it on the French silly shit again? Saddam didn't need to buy uranium because there was a big stockpile of unused yellowcake in Iraq already known about when Rumsfeld was shaking Saddam's hand. Unused because Saddam killed off a few nuclear scientists for being too slow and ran out of them.
      Remember that the attempted coverup of the Niger lie nearly landed Libby in jail and he needed a Presidential pardon to avoid it? Why are you bringing it up as if it wasn't debunked on nearly half the newspaper front pages on earth?

  2. Still think Big Data is great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think again.

  3. Its ok. by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well this is a truly shocking revelation noone saw coming.

    NSA will probably claim they only use their power to create rainbows and heal sick puppies.

  4. Re: How about... Malaysia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are we really supposed to believe that 13 years after 9/11 that the US doesn't know the location of every airborne plane in the world? Would it really be that hard compared to some of the supposed capabilities of the NSA we've been hearing about lately. The plane crashed, everyone is dead, the NSA has no incentive to help locate the wreckage as that will simply give away the secret capability. Lose a plane in the Atlantic Ocean bound for the United States and watch how fast it turns up.

  5. If time machines exist, what should warrants mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem with all of this is that warrants used to mean that if you had reasonable suspicion, you could ask nicely, and if you found something that gave you probable cause, you could get a search warrant.

    The unstated assumption is that only the things you find after you get the search warrant are admissible. The assumption was unstated because time machines didn't exist.

    If you bury the body and bleach the walls, the prosecution finds no blood. (The cops can find a dozen empty containers of bleach, and ask you why all your wallpaper is sparkling white, and that's still a pretty good foundation on which to build a case. Reasonable people don't bleach their ceilings with a mop.) You can wiretap the guy, but if he's already made the incriminating phone call to his very good friend with the pig farm, it's not going to help the prosecution very much unless the suspect is dumb enough to do it again. Hey, guess what? Law enforcement isn't supposed to be easy.

    We now have the ability to quite literally go back in time and look at everything someone ever said, preceding the time at which the warrant was issued.

    Legally, there's no time machine, you're just looking at the (nonpublic) permanent record of everything everybody ever said to anybody ever. But qualitatively, being able to go into the past and drag things up, even from private communications where both speakers had a reasonable expectation of privacy, appears to fundamentally change the definition of a warrant, of discovery, and so on.

    The whole concept of investigation has changed, and it makes the question "Are you now, or have you ever been, a [politically-undesirable / criminal]?" just got a whole lot murkier. I think that's the issue upon which the Supremes may ultimately have to rule.

    It's one thing to say "John Spartan, you have been fined one credit for violating the verbal morality statute." It's quite another to say "...for something you uttered on January 23, 1996."

  6. Re:Traitors by jovius · · Score: 2

    It's their job. That's actually the defense many use when they are blamed of taking part in atrocities. It was my duty, it was my job. One way to externalize oneself from what's happening, and from the moral and ethical dilemmas. The fact that ones duty is to maintain an undemocratic bureaucratic structure should be proof enough that the system is rotten from inside. The human interaction can be structured in multitude of ways.

  7. I imagine a lot more. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    If they are willing to spend the resources to store thirty days of phone calls, they probably are storing a lot more than thirty days of textual data - text takes up very little space. I imagine every SMS message, email and IM communication they can obtain is kept for a few years.

    This is a good chance to plug Retroshare. Go get it. Tell your friends to get it. Annoy the NSA with an IM program even they can't monitor on a large scale.

  8. In unrelated news... by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...all domestic telephone calls will be routed through Great Britain from now on.

    1. Re:In unrelated news... by Rich0 · · Score: 2

      ...all domestic telephone calls will be routed through Great Britain from now on.

      No need. While the NSA isn't allowed to spy on Americans, the GCHQ is allowed to do so. I'm sure the GCHQ is interested in what Brits are doing in the privacy of their homes, so the NSA just trades that data for whatever the GCHQ is collecting on Americans.

      Or maybe the NSA just outright spies on Americans. You never know which ones aren't actually Americans until you listen in...

  9. technically it could be done many ways by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    I can see only two possibilities for how the NSA could collect every single phone call of an entire country,

    my first reaction was "wow" but I was amazed that *the scope* not the technical ability

    from a network engineering perspective, those calls have to go through certain nodes and pathways...

    all are potential points of intercept...one concept you missed is **multiple collection methods**...they could do both of what you suggested combined with any of the following other possibilities:

    1. Submarines...every "phone call" (this excludes things like google talk to skype) has to go specific routing points on the coast...subs can but a signal analyzer on the seafloor cables

    2. Aircraft...esp blimps/drones...and satellites

    3. passive collectors...at major routing nodes...again these are on the coastline...you could put a passive, satellite-operated device that sends the data being recorded up to space in real time

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  10. **criminal elements of...** by globaljustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hear you...you're don't sound like a nutcase **to me**...you go a bit off on a few of your list there but that's not why i'm writing.

    It's wrong to say "the US government"

    Our government is the best system yet implemented.

    The problem is criminality. Even if it goes up to the President (and it surely has...many times...recently) that does not mean that **our system of governmance** is faulty.

    Our economic system (hardcore captialism) may surely encourage bribery...but in totalitarian communist countries you find examples of **more** bribery comparitively...or at least equal ammounts

    YES...the CIA "dealt crack" in the 80s, research brainwashing, etc etc...and maybe that whole organization has been rotten from the start but it doesn't define **what the good people are trying to do**

    According to its stated documents, the US of A could be the *best country in the world*....we have a *long way to go* but our problems arent because of our system...its b/c our **system is infected**

    Yes, the "infected system" line could be used for any country's problems...but precisely because the US has so many channels in place for **the people** to do the right thing...because we have the *power to change* means we are held to a higher standard than say, North Korea or Ukraine

    We can clean house...we can get rid of the criminals in our governemnt...the sun will still rise, and we will have ****NEW PROBLEMS****....that's progress!

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:**criminal elements of...** by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's wrong to say "the US government"

      Our government is the best system yet implemented.

      The problem is criminality. Even if it goes up to the President (and it surely has...many times...recently) that does not mean that **our system of governance** is faulty.

      A good system of governance should transparently expose, prevent, stop, and/or negate criminality.
      The fact that ours doesn't is a combination of weak oversight and poor internal culture.
      Having the "best" faulty government is not the same as having a good government.

      I'd also happily debate your claims that our government is the best system yet implemented.
      By itself, our dual party system (and the way they shut out 3rd parties) is cause for serious complaint.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:**criminal elements of...** by dryeo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Our government is the best system yet implemented

      You are joking aren't you? Or perhaps you really believe a system of government invented close to 250 years ago and barely tweeked since then is perfect and there has been no advances in government since then?
      There are serious problems with the American government leading to the current inverted totalitarian state, a state with 1% of its population in prison, a state that removes basic rights from those incarcerated people so they can never take part in regular society, a state with 2 parties that are basically 2 wings of one party, a party of the rich (how much money does it take to run for office and how do they acquire that money), a government that treats its constitution as toilet paper as it is too hard to change or follow, a government with the best propaganda machine ever seen, even though it has been out sourced to private industry, a government that strives to have a population who are not into politics, a government that can produce people like you who parrot talking points like "having the best government ever invented" without knowing anything about other forms of democracies and probably just internally comparing to various regular totalitarian states.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:**criminal elements of...** by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 2

      I have heard all these arguments before and I am sorry I just don't agree. Other replies have articulated why in ways acceptable to me so I will not go further.

      But in summary:
      1) In general I don't accept the false premise that because you are "the best" that this is good enough and therefore somehow prevents me from pointing out why it is terrible.
      E.g. Discussing the "kindest" mass murderer and have you argue that this person cannot be called nasty because he was the kindest.

      2) I don't accept that your government is the best system implemented yet
        - The wishes of the people are not carried out
        - There are only two parties and they are very very similar when compared globally
        - Most voters are very disillusioned with the system
        - Your media (a vital part of any democracy) is a joke.
        - Wealth distribution and wages for the middle class in the US are truly obscene - not just bad, TERRIBLE. Its like your country's economy is run by a super villain.
      There are MANY other countries that do it better than you.

      3) My list of US faults is not in anyway overboard. None of the items on that list is untrue. Most of them were released as part of the CIA historical documents and have been described in numerous places.

      4) I don't agree that you can "clean house". You are naively assuming that the people are still in control of their government.

      They are not.

    4. Re:**criminal elements of...** by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 5, Informative

      "a state with 2 parties that are basically 2 wings of one party, a party of the rich "

      So true.

      Noam Chomsky:
      "In the United States, the political system is a very marginal affair. There are two parties, so-called, but they're really factions of the same party, the Business Party. Both represent some range of business interests. In fact, they can change their positions 180 degrees, and nobody even notices. In the 1984 election, for example, there was actually an issue, which often there isn't. The issue was Keynesian growth versus fiscal conservatism. The Republicans were the party of Keynesian growth: big spending, deficits, and so on. The Democrats were the party of fiscal conservatism: watch the money supply, worry about the deficits, et cetera. Now, I didn't see a single comment pointing out that the two parties had completely reversed their traditional positions. Traditionally, the Democrats are the party of Keynesian growth, and the Republicans the party of fiscal conservatism. So doesn't it strike you that something must have happened? Well, actually, it makes sense. Both parties are essentially the same party. The only question is how coalitions of investors have shifted around on tactical issues now and then. As they do, the parties shift to opposite positions, within a narrow spectrum."

    5. Re:**criminal elements of...** by rsborg · · Score: 2

      a state with 2 parties that are basically 2 wings of one party, a party of the rich (how much money does it take to run for office and how do they acquire that money)

      To add to your point, a majority of the members of congress are millionaires [1]. Keep in mind that reporting rules don't require disclosure of amounts above $1M, just that they are "over $1M". So it's getting harder to track the wealth and it's corruptive effects.

      [1] http://www.opensecrets.org/new...

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    6. Re:**criminal elements of...** by log0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All of your yapping back and forth over semantics is distracting you from the fact that we are living in a fucking police state. Focus.

    7. Re:**criminal elements of...** by bob_super · · Score: 2

      Switzerland's direct democracy.
      France's THREE high courts, especially as they are empowered to deal preemptively with unconstitutional laws, before some is condemned and wastes everyone's time on appeals.
      Most of Europe's many-parties congresses, as long as they are not strictly proportional (see Israel for how true proportional representation encourage extreme behaviors) ...

    8. Re:**criminal elements of...** by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

      Switzerland's half-direct (!) democracy is prone to some of the very same failures the US republic is.

      If you get the media on board and if you manage to put the people in a state of fear (mostly by going "Won't somebody please think of the jobs!"), you get just about anything pushed through.

      We have equal rights clauses in our constitution... nobody gives a fuck. Married people pay more taxes than unmarried couples and they get a quarter less money once they retire, unless they get a divorce first.

      If you manage to buy a house or a condo, the money you could potentially make off of it by renting it out is directly calculated as income... even if you live in it yourself. This has the effect that a lot of people who retire simply don't earn enough to pay the vastly increased taxes their by now paid for property incurs.

      So no, please don't take Switzerland as a shining example. We have our fair share of problems as well.

  11. Re: How about... Malaysia? by Rossman · · Score: 2

    NORAD claims to monitor all flying objects around the entire earth, from ground level to 22,000 miles above the surface. They do not disclose however, how they are able to achieve that.

  12. Re:get real by able1234au · · Score: 2

    and then the text is searchable, which the audio is not. If someone uses certain keywords then up the priority and keep the raw audio for them.

    How much processing is required to do the speech->text? A fair bit i assume, and having heard many calls where i can't understand the other person then speech->text won't work.

  13. Re:Good by Cimexus · · Score: 2

    It's virtually impossible to make a cellphone call from a plane in flight. Firstly, for all but a very small portion of its likely path, MH370 was over the open ocean (no cell towers out there). Secondly, even over land, a plane is a hollow metal cylinder and a rather effective Faraday cage. Unless you're flying low'n'slow (e.g. 9/11), holding a call is very diffcult. I've tried it before and while I might occasionally get a few bars worth of signal, it's not useable in the real world.

  14. a or any ? by Tom · · Score: 2

    a country, or any country? That's important here. If they can do it to one country that only means that have one target thoroughly infiltrated. But if they can do it to any country of their choosing, then I'm seriously frightened.

    Here's why: Telecommunication is considered vital infrastructure in every country I know. I used to work in the industry. We had some of our phone switches in frigging nuclear-blast-proof bunkers. They and our primary storage system occupied the highest security data center available to us. There's nothing civilian above that.

    As a security guy, I can of course imagine a few ways to breach security or hack the switch, i.e. both electronically and physically. But it would require a considerably amount of resources. So if they have done that for everything everywhere, then... wow.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org