Slashdot Mirror


Survey Finds Nearly 50% In US Believe In Medical Conspiracy Theories

cold fjord writes in with some bad news for the people using water fluoridation to pacify the public and install a new world government. "About half of American adults believe in at least one medical conspiracy theory, according to new survey results. (paywalled, first page viewable) Some conspiracy theories have much more traction than others ... three times as many people believe U.S. regulators prevent people from getting natural cures as believe that a U.S. spy agency infected a large number of African Americans with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). J. Eric Oliver, the study's lead author from University of Chicago, said people may believe in conspiracy theories because they're easier to understand than complex medical information. ... Some 49 percent of the survey participants agreed with at least one of the conspiracies. In fact, in addition to the 37 percent of respondents who fully agreed that U.S. regulators are suppressing access to natural cures, less than a third were willing to say they actively disagreed with the theory. — One of the conspiracy theories, that the U.S. created HIV, was created for an active disinformation campaign by the Soviet Union against the U.S. as a form of political warfare during the Cold War, and still gets repeated."

51 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Jenny McCarthy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    That says it all.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Jenny McCarthy by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stupidity is on the rise.

      Seems there was a Far Side cartoon about imbeciles marching with an upside-down banner or such. It's pretty much what I expect to see some times "we r teh stoopids - and we voat"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Jenny McCarthy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I learned recently that the wife of the quarterback of my beloved Chicago Bears is one of these anti-vaccine people, based on the notion that vaccines have "chemicals" in them. So they don't get their kids vaccinated, endangering the lives of others.

      Here, if you really want to be scared, is an interview with noted genius Kristin Cavallari, explaining that the reason she doesn't get her kids vaccinated is because she's "read too many books".

      No kidding, you've got to see this:

      http://youtu.be/7WzE0qO7tzY?t=...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Jenny McCarthy by oscrivellodds · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The feds have been suppressing weed for a long time. It's a natural cure, and as they say, it's da healin' of da nation!

    4. Re:Jenny McCarthy by dnavid · · Score: 2

      Or cynicism. Just because a lot of crackpots believe something, that is no guarantee that it is not true. There was a conspiracy theory, dismissed by most rational people, that the government was monitoring our email and phone calls. Then it turned out to be true.

      Since there's a million conspiracy theories, some will end up being at least partially true by random chance. Even here its hard to give credit to the conspiracy nuts, because very few of them believed the government monitoring was specifically of the character revealed by the Snowden leaks.

      I'm pretty sure if you try hard enough, you can find a Nostradamus quatrain that predicts the NSA monitoring. That doesn't add credibility to Nostradamus, it just means when that many monkeys bang on keyboards, eventually some of it will start to rhyme.

      No amount of conspiracy nuts believing in something makes it true, and no amount makes it false. If they were always exactly wrong, we could use them as bizarro truth meters. What they are is nuts, and contain as much useful information as atmospheric noise.

    5. Re:Jenny McCarthy by hermitdev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love her (I've also a Bear's fan) argument that "We didn't used to have this problem". Yeah, we also used to die by 40. We also didn't even know what the hell cancer is. We also didn't smoke. We also didn't use to drive. We also didn't use to send our kids to school. We also didn't use to mandate our kids go to school. We also didn't use to send people to the moon. We also didn't use to stick our head up our ass because it makes us feel all warm and fuzzy.

    6. Re:Jenny McCarthy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, that's very likely to be false. If they are "natural cures", everyone could get them

      They can get them only if they can afford them. Under Obamacare, not every natural/alternative treatment is covered. In addition the government funds medical research that suppresses "natural cures" by exposing them as ineffective frauds. I really don't see why this is considered a "conspiracy theory", since it is something that the government is clearly doing, and doing in an open and transparent process.

    7. Re:Jenny McCarthy by hermitdev · · Score: 2

      Sure, you have the right to tell people to not get vaccinations. I don't get all vaccinations my doctor prescribes, because as a healthy adult, some are stupid. I get my tetanus, rabies, measles (one time shot), that sort. I don't get a flu vaccine, not because I'm afraid of autism, but because they get it wrong most of the time. And the flu "vaccine" is just as likely to make you sick as it is to prevent it in the first place. Granted, the "vaccine" generally doesn't affect you "as bad", but you still get sick.

      That said, Jenny McCarthy is fucking nuts in regards to things like Polio & MMR

      Hell, we could be done with Polio vaccines if it wasn't for backwaters countries like Pakistan.

      We eliminated smallpox worldwide via vaccines. If she think's they're a bad idea, maybe she'd be willing to volunteer to be exposed?

    8. Re:Jenny McCarthy by plover · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Q: You know what they call a "natural cure" that has been tested and found to work?

      A: Medicine.

      --
      John
    9. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Strange, I working in a University in a microbiology department no less and the department pays for the staff to have flu vaccines. I would suspect the staff know a damn sight more about vaccines that you do and I can guarantee they are probably a lot smarter than you too.

    10. Re:Jenny McCarthy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Now who said anything about children "dying in droves due to not being vaccinated"? But there are some very troubling statistics. Like the outbreak in measles in NY, and polio being on the rise. Kids dying of whooping cough which hasn't happened for decades.

      I don't know if you're old enough to remember polio. It was a disease that crippled thousands of young kids and because of vaccination was wiped out until these knuckleheads decided they didn't want to vaccinate their kids.

      Here's an assignment. Look up "herd immunity". Read about it and come back here and tell us what you've learned. I know you want to be well-informed on this subject, and herd mentality is why refusing to vaccinate your kids is a hostile act toward the rest of us.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it is true that the reason why it is such a small chance is because of vaccinations

      The problem with this is that the anti-vaccination folks are essentially relying on herd immunity to stay healthy. Previously, when it was just kids who were too young to be vaccinated or people with medical reasons (allergies, immune system issues, etc), herd immunity had no trouble keeping them safe. Measles was all but wiped out in the US. A few people started skipping the vaccines due to one scare or another (e.g. Wakefield's "MMR causes autism" which despite being debunked repeatedly still gets quoted), but they were fine because herd immunity protected them as well. However, when too many people jump on the anti-vax bandwagon and skip vaccinations, herd immunity breaks down and you begin to get outbreaks. This is where we are now. Outbreaks of disease preventable illnesses popping up because some people listen to Jenny McCarthy railing about toxins (just before she gets botox injected into her), listening to some other celebrity, or listening to "some stuff I read on a natural cures website" instead of listening to someone with actual medical experience.

      And when these diseases break out again, people will die. (Despite some anti-vaxxers - who obviously have never seen the diseases - claiming that whooping cough and measles not killing anyone.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    12. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I completely agree but would only add that herd immunity also covers people with actual valid reasons for not vaccinating. These include medical issues like allergies or immune system problems or age (too young to get the vaccine). A six week old baby shouldn't die of Whooping Cough because some idiot thinks it's their "personal right" to be a disease carrier.

      If not vaccinating meant that only you or your children would get sick, I'd say "it's your choice" (though I'd still argue for vaccinating being the better choice). However, when someone tries to claim that their actions (not vaccinating) that affect other people is their choice, I highly disagree. (I keep waiting for them to claim that it's their right to choose to drive drunk - railing against police enforcing driver sobriety and completely ignoring how many people are killed by drunk drivers.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    13. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Anguirel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do we need deaths for a completely preventable outbreak of a disease due to lack of vaccination to count as counter to the "ridiculous claim" that you should get vaccinated? Herd immunity breaks down pretty quickly. We're apparently just barely over the line on it. Every "very, very smart" person making that choice is putting us closer to the loss of that herd immunity, and also one step closer to allowing their child (and every child unable to be vaccinated due to complicating factors that have no other option) to suffer unnecessarily from a potentially devastating disease. Opting not to vaccinate when none of those complicating factors exist is not an "intelligent choice" in any way, shape, or form.

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
    14. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As the parent of a child with autism (and someone who is likely on the spectrum as well - albeit undiagnosed), I'm insulted when people imply they'd rather their child get a deadly disease than get autism. Like Penn and Teller said, even if vaccines caused autism - WHICH THEY DON'T - it would be better to get your child vaccinated and risk autism than go unvaccinated.

      The real reason for the "rise" in autism is better detection. When I was a kid, I was pegged as "shy", "weird", and my parents were told (while I was in elementary school, mind you) "he won't feel comfortable socially until he is in college." There was no diagnosis as to what was going on with me and definitely no help. I was just not like the other kids and that was it. With my son, we had a doctor spend six hours observing him (3 hours in class and 3 hours one-on-one observation) before getting the Asperger's Syndrome diagnosis. Once we had that, there were a lot of resources for us to draw upon to help him out. (Adults can get diagnosed too, but in my case money is tight and a diagnosis wouldn't help me or my son.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    15. Re:Jenny McCarthy by FirephoxRising · · Score: 2

      Many people are stupid, but it wasn't that long ago that doctors did pretend to treat black people so that they could observe how untreated syphilis develops.....

    16. Re:Jenny McCarthy by HatofPig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now if you argue that an unvaccinated child puts your vaccinated child at risk, aren't you whining that you don't believe the vaccine conferred immunity to your child?

      It's not about PopeRatzo's hypothetically vaccinated child. It's about anyone who had a legitimate medical reason to not be vaccinated whose only protection is through herd immunity. Maybe PopeRatzo confers his blessings onto other people's kids too.

      --
      Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    17. Re:Jenny McCarthy by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Universities are known for groupthink bandwagoneering. People who routinely fall for those dynamics are not as bright as you may think. In fact, they do usually get the flu strain wrong, making it pointless and possibly detrimental to your health if your immune system reacts like you're actually infected with live virus.

    18. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      But it takes only a small amount of smarts to realize it's not about a child living or dying necessarily, but that vaccinations STOP DISEASE from spreading. So yes, it is not about ONE CHILD's life but the health of the community and whether or not other children get sick. We not have diseases recurring in America that were nearly wiped out because so many people are refusing to get vaccinated for no reason other than lies that were told Yes, these were LIES told by one doctor in order to try to push his own vaccination scheme, and it was later entirely recanted but the lie keeps perpetuating itself.

      Next up, someone hints that water is not safe for children according to some preliminary study results so just to be on the safe side parents should stop allowing their children to drink water or products that include water. And then suddenly people are filled with self doubt about all this, not really sure, but they've read a lot of books and decided that this is best for their children.

    19. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Sounds like only one adjustment was needed... don't deal with the friend's chiropractic girlfriend. I'm guessing not dealing with her has made you happier which should improve your general health.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    20. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Antonovich · · Score: 2

      Maybe someone can explain to me why we don't just change the law. You don't *have* to get your kids vaccinated but if you don't, and your kid gets it, then you are responsible. They get sick and survive you can be charged with grievous bodily harm/serious neglect, and no doubt lose custody. They get sick and die, you get charged with neglect resulting in death (which is probably close to murder in many places). I haven't thought it through completely, but it would seem like a fairly good motivator... If your kid gets it in spite of being vaccinated, you have done everything you could, so it's just unfortunate.

    21. Re:Jenny McCarthy by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't prove anything, I just stated a fact: There is no connection between autism and vaccines.

      That's it, and that is the absolute truth. All of the "supposed" connections have turned out to be false. Not only that, but the numbers are actually in for those who don't vaccinate, and guess what? They have autism at the same rates.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    22. Re: Jenny McCarthy by Wootery · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. You were factually wrong, and AC corrected you. You clearly do not understand herd immunity. Your immune system does not exist in a vacuum.

      These two comments make the same correction, and quite rightly.

      If John Doe decides not to get vaccinated and you get vaccinated, how are you at risk? John gets polio and you do not, there is no issue.

      This is wrong. You absolutely are affected by an increased number of potential carriers. I don't care to be the fourth person to try to explain herd immunity, though - please, just go and read the Wikipedia article.

      If you wish to argue that it is a real dilemma lets see your arguments. If you can't, then I am correct.

      Now that's just beautiful.

    23. Re:Jenny McCarthy by Agent0013 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Weed was not supressed because it's a natural cure. Thus it's irrelevant in this case. Weed has been supressed for completely different reasons.

      I'm not sure if you actually know what the real reasons for the suppression of weed is. The paper did not want the compitition from a much faster growing and better producing plant to take away their business. Hemp makes the best paper from what I have read, and can be used for clothing also so I bet the cotton growers were worried also. It was also very easy to vilify as it was smoked at the time by those "dirty Mexicans". The public service propaganda at the time was about how taking a single puff on a joint would cause teens to go insane and run around shooting people or jumping off bridges to their death. I don't think you can get much more ridiculous.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    24. Re:Jenny McCarthy by stdarg · · Score: 2

      Your rationale for absolving parents of vaccinated kids is that "you have done everything you could, so it's just unfortunate" -- but that makes no sense because vaccination is not "everything you could" do to prevent illness. Just as a small example, say you give your child the flu vaccine, but he still catches the flu at daycare. You're not absolved. You could have quit your job and kept your child at home instead of sending him to daycare (which is a known risk factor for illness). So you should still be held criminally negligent according to the spirit of your law.

      Perhaps that points to why laws like yours are not acceptable. You are criminalizing things which many people still believe fall within their freedoms to take care of themselves and their families as they see fit. I'm curious what you think about the myriad other activities that may (or may not) harm children. I'm guessing you would be pro-criminalization for things like your child twisting his ankle while playing basketball, since you could have easily prevented it by not letting him play basketball. Maybe that's not harmful enough for you to take notice. I'm sure you would agree that the parents of children who are shot in school shootings should be sent to jail for not protecting their kids. "You don't *have* to homeschool your kids, but if you don't and they get shot at school, then you are responsible for their murder." Something like that?

      The main thing I'm curious about is why you wrote your hypothetical law the way you did. You clearly want to encourage vaccination. So why not make the law "You have to get your kids vaccinated" rather than the circuitous route you took?

  2. Statistical Lies by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Statistically speaking some conspiracies are true.

  3. Took me a bit to find this by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Operation Whitecoat it was called. If you were a Conscientious Objector you did this instead of shooting people.

    There's lots and lots of conspiracies out there. All a conspiracy means is that two or more people get together to do something. Banking is rife with them. So is the software industry (and the hardware, anyone remember when flat panels suddenly got cheap? Conspiracy among vendors to keep prices high...).

    Yes, there are crack pots out there. But that doesn't mean organized groups of people aren't doing bad things...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Took me a bit to find this by wisnoskij · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even just restricting that to full blown government conspiracies. It is amazing the absolutely crazy things the government has been forced to admit to 40+ years after the fact. Stuff every bit as crazy as any of those conspiracy nuts come up with. And that is just the stuff that leaks out. If the government can keep huge completely illegal and immoral projects a secret for 40+ years, by then half the people involved at already dead, then who knows what never comes to light, or what is kept so off the official record that there could never be any proof.

      Unfortunately, we know that the government is not completely unwilling to perform secret medical tests on their own unwitting and unconsenting civilians.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    2. Re:Took me a bit to find this by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

      They weren't deliberately infected, they weren't soldiers, (they were sharecroppers, and they were provided with free medical cares, meals and burial insurance as compensation), and for the first decade of the study, there was no verified cure for syphilis (the efficacy of penicillin wasn't verified until the 1940s; the study began in 1932). It's hard to blame the architects of the study for studying an incurable disease to chart its progress, though obviously their successors lacked any moral compass.

      The facts of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment were bad enough, but you're making it seem even worse. This is the part of the problem. Actual malfeasance gets exaggerated even further; it changes from failure to take action (treat patients like they should have) to deliberate malevolence (intentionally infecting patients). If you reinterpret the world as one in which everything is explained by deliberate malice, of course you'll believe in conspiracy theories.

      Sadly, in this particular case, despite being completely off base about Tuskegee, there were in fact acts of active evil perpetrated in Guatemala. Unlike Tuskegee, the experiments weren't on U.S. citizens, only lasted three years, not forty, and the subjects were treated for the conditions they were infected with (though some still died). Doesn't excuse it, but again, it's not a good basis for proving the existence of long term, actively malevolent policies.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    3. Re:Took me a bit to find this by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hundreds of Black soldiers at Tuskegee during WWII were deliberately infected with Syphilis

      No they weren't. What acutally happened is bad enough. You don't have to embellish it with made up nonsense. No one was deliberately infected. They were just left untreated. They were mostly sharecroppers (farmers). They were not soldiers. The study began in 1932, nearly a decade before WWII. At the time, penicillin was still experimental, and not used to treat syphilis. There was no effective treatment before antibiotics became available after 1943, so at least when the study was conceived, it was not quite as unethical as it appears in hindsight, since there weren't a lot of good treatment options at the time anyway. Leaving the subjects untreated until 1972 was, of course, appallingly unethical.

    4. Re:Took me a bit to find this by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

      They weren't deliberately infected, they weren't soldiers,

      Everyone knows the Tuskegee Blacks were in the military. They were airmen.

      You're confusing the Tuskegee airmen with the Tuskegee syphilis experiments. They have nothing in common besides being trained (the airmen) and conducted (the experiments) in proximity to Tuskegee, AL. Tuskegee is an almost exclusively Black/African American city, so most things that are associated with Tuskegee are also associated with black people.

      (they were sharecroppers, and they were provided with free medical cares,

      What good is "medical care" when there's a deliberate lie about the care?

      If you read another sentence or two, you'd note that there was no verified treatment for syphilis for the first decade of the experiments. Providing palliative care to those with incurable diseases is a net good; there are legitimate philosophical arguments over how much information a doctor should provide when the information cannot be understood or acted upon in a meaningful way.

      Clearly this was unethical, but recall, this was Jim Crow era. A lot of people considered black people sub-human. Sure, the doctors didn't tell them they had syphilis. But the South made it nigh impossible for them to vote, hold elected office, get a meaningful education, buy property, use public services, receive a fair trial, etc. We were kind of awful in general; the Tuskegee experiments weren't that much more awful when compared to everything else we did.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
  4. Conspiracy or act of legislature? by GodInHell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In fact, in addition to the 37 percent of respondents who fully agreed that U.S. regulators are suppressing access to natural cures, less than a third were willing to say they actively disagreed with the theory.

    Marijuana is still illegal, right? I mean, it's it a conspiracy theory if I can point to the status and rules at issue?

  5. my thoughts on conspiracy's by the+simurgh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Lesson number one: trust no one. The minute God crapped out the third caveman, a conspiracy was hatched against one of them. Welcome to earth, watch your back no one else will.

    1. Re:my thoughts on conspiracy's by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

      my thoughts on conspiracy's

      I'm still trying to figure out what the Trilateral Commission, the Rothschilds, the Masons, and George Soros hope to gain by tricking people into being so actively bad at understanding the difference between the plural and possessive uses of the apostrophe. There must be some money in it, somewhere.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:my thoughts on conspiracy's by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think they stuff coal up the butts of grammar pedants and come back later harvesting diamonds.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Other 50% are uninformed by iamacat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Red rice yeast is as effective as statins at lowering cholesterol, without liver side effects statin pills. Yet FDA bans sale of supplements calibrated to have enough active components.

    Pot has helped millions to get measurable relieve from debilitating conditions. Yet federal government still considers it to be highly addictive and without medical value.

    Countless food additives have been banned in most of the world outside US and most countries require clear labeling of genetically modified foods? Are our government scientists that much smarter?

    FDA review process denies potentially life saving treatments for many years, even to people who are about to die without them anyway.

    With this kind of track record, it's no wonder people are suspicious about other things. If a vaccine killed 10% of people compared to statistically saved lives, would YOU trust our government to admit to that?

    1. Re:Other 50% are uninformed by hedgemage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cite sources please. Reputable journals only.

      Problem is that the US has made it nearly impossible to research the effects of marijuana/THC so there is a real lack of good data. Facing this lack of evidence, too many people are stating outrageous claims that pot will do everything from cure the common cold to cancer and everything in between.

    2. Re:Other 50% are uninformed by JimSadler · · Score: 2

      And in an unregulated industry how do you determine if your red rice yeast is authentic or the right strain? We can't even get real olive oil in grocery stores as most brands contain almost zero olive oil. So far the health food industry is a total scam with no assurance at all of any element of fairness or honesty.

    3. Re:Other 50% are uninformed by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And though they're not a medical conspiracies, quite a few 'conspiracy theories' have turned out to be true in the past few decades. We've found out in recent years that our government *does* have secret prisons where they torture people. The NSA *does* read your email and tap your phone. People within the finance industry *do* apparently help to torpedo the economy so that they can make money from the collapse. Private prisons *do* raise money for candidates who support excessive prison terms and mandatory sentencing. The Republican party *does* have meetings where rich funders talk to the presidential nominee about how poor people are parasites and rich people deserve more money. Wasn't there something about the CIA selling crack?

      All of these conspiracy theories have turned out to be more or less real. It doesn't seem to crazy to think that the pharmaceutical industry has engaged in some kinds of similarly insane shenanigans.

    4. Re:Other 50% are uninformed by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Aspirin a man made synthetic compound mimicking the pain relieving properties of willow bark? I believe that every anti-biotic we use today is also a mimicker of natural remedies. Numerous plants have known medicinal properties, such as coagulants, anti-coagulants, antiseptics, anti-fungus, anti-bacterial, numbing, etc.. etc..

      If you drink Milk purchased in a store you get Milk fortified with Vitamin A and Vitamin D. We are trying to fortify Rice with Vitamin A for mass consumption. Pregnant women are given massive amounts of prescription vitamins, and we know that certain deficiencies cause health problems like gout, rickets, scurvy, immune deficiency, and more. If you believe a recent report regarding vitamins this is obviously a waste of time because artificial sources of vitamins are all useless (This was all over the TV news a few months back).

      So while I believe you have a point regarding false claims, but take issue with you doing so in only one direction. I also take issue with you requesting "reputable journals" when you know none exist. You state right after you make that request that there is no evidence in any journals and even provide a reason why the data is lacking.

      Perhaps I'm twisting your point a bit, if I am my apologies. I'm astounded at how many people simply don't get that the US position on drugs and medications purely backs money making operations. Often times their own work gets contradicted by themselves to further a different portion of their funding (see the vitamin example above). People for the most part completely miss that part, don't do any research to find contradictions or problems, and both ends of the spectrum end up providing false information.

      People claiming there are no natural remedies are not telling the truth, intentionally or otherwise. There are a great many natural remedies, but they are not as profitable to make, and not as easy to provide to the masses. Looking at the abuses to antibiotics and various pain relievers over the last 30 years, the mass distribution and low cost has not necessarily a good thing.

      Finally, I agree that people make false claims regarding natural remedies, making them more than what they are. At the same time you can't honestly deny that Companies/Corporations make false claims regarding their products. Countless class action lawsuits back the latter fact. People don't know who to trust, and quite frankly you can't blame them. The FDA stopped being an agency looking out for the best interest of our citizens long ago.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  7. "conspiracy theory" is loaded language by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Researchers messed up from the start using the "conspiracy theory" contextualization.

    Operation Northwoods would certainly **sound** like a conspiracy theory, a US gov't plan investigating the use of false-flag actions on US population to manufacture consent, but follow the link to the official documents, declassified, proving the plan existed

    Or how about The Gulf of Tonkin Incident which was a **all fake** and used to justify Vietnam intervention. Again...follow the link...the documents are declassified and it's true.

    Today's conspiracy "theory" is tomorrows class action settlement!

    By using the "conspiracy theory" contextualization, the researchers then biased **what theories they chose** and to go deeper **which variation of the theory to use**

    ex: Flouride. Some say flouride in the water table is for dumping toxic chemicals to cause their Pineal Gland to calcify...others don't think it's so devious...just a way to make money off of industrial waste (selling something uneccesary on decades-long contracts w/ governments) not actually ***hurt people***

    from TFA, here's the **versions** of various theories they chose:

    They include the theory that the government knows cell phones cause cancer but does nothing about it, that genetically modified organisms are being used to shrink the world's population, that routine vaccinations cause autism and that water fluoridation is a way for companies to dump dangerous chemicals into the environment.

    Notice that ****corporate conspiracies**** are not mentioned!!!

    The health care industry profits from **artificial scarcity**...and lobbying to get unsafe, easily abusable drugs approved by the FDA over objections (see: Rudy Guilianni's early career as an attorney ;)

    Artificial Scarcity & corporate cronyism is not a "conspiracy theory"...in fact, if you toss out the craziness, just about all "conspiracy theories" can be explained by unscrupulous people doing criminal behavior on a large scale.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  8. Re:What does it cure? by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    does current treatment for AIDS cure, or just alleviate? does current treatment for genital herpes cure, or just alleviate?

  9. conspiracy is irrelevant... by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 2

    but there are a lot of cheaper, better therapies that are ignored or attacked by pharmaceutical, medical interests, whether natural substances or generic drugs used off label. The FDA essentially promotes expensive, less effective, often dangerous therapies that are officially blessed. I've saved $40,000+ a month recognizing this situation the last several years, with better research and results in my family when the doctors themselves said no real hope several years ago.

  10. Vocabulary Tar-pit by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Conspiracy" is a vague word. In an industry as large and complex as medical care, I can almost guarantee that underhanded manipulation is going on, and have heard about such directly from acquaintances who worked or are working in it.

    Whether one can label underhanded manipulation a "conspiracy" is tricky one. Multiple people of power work together to manipulate for selfish reasons. But often they use "gray lies" so that they have a fall-back argument such as "It's a matter of interpretation".

    I'd generally call such "coordinated bullshit" and reserve "conspiracy" for outright coordinated lies or clear-cut criminal acts.

    The largest volume of BS in the world is done at the grey borders of "truth", not so much dead people in car trunks or planted microscope slides. If you want to clean up corruption and BS, then going after manipulation of grey areas is probably the biggest bang for the buck.

    The word "conspiracy" has kind of been diluted similar to how we use "robbed" to mean "burglarized". "Robbed" technically usually means you were approached and threatened in person by the thief. Taking your TV while you are on vacation doesn't count. That's "burglarized", not "robbed". But humans like to add drama to their speech such that the embellishment causes a kind of "severity deflation" of meaning over time. Thus "robbed" grew weaker in perceived meaning.

  11. Re:The Cure? Good Luck by flyneye · · Score: 2

    Can you imagine how many researchers could go on to OTHER pressing problems instead of succumbing to the usual dimwitted cliche , you just dropped?
    Deep intense regulation of Medical companies, complete with special taxes and loss of IP protection for leaving the country or for having foreign facilities which could escape regulation, would be a nice start to setting this whole mess and others straight.
    No offence to other countries, but if we cant make them do the right thing, theres no point in calling them anyones asset. Medicine wouldnt be held back by doing this. Medicine IS held back, as you pointed out by the current gard.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  12. Re:The Cure? Good Luck by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2

    Can you imagine what it would take for the medical bureaucracy that can't seem to find its own ass with two hands, a stethoscope and a flashlight to pull off suppressing a working cure? My main argument against 'Conspiracy Theories' is that most large organizations are so incompetent at doing there actual jobs, they in no way have the level of skill, organization and attention to detail required to make any decent conspiracy work for any length of time that can be measured without resorting to planck units.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  13. Pharma Lobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the wealthiest lobbying groups in the world could in no way have any influence on government policy, now could they?

    Not all conspiracies are equal.

  14. Re:What does it cure? by meglon · · Score: 2
    Yes, like Laetrile. That wonder drug saved so many lives and cured cancer and made hair grow back and... wait... what? Cyanide kills people? No shit. Well, at least it made some con artists a bunch of money while it was killing people because they took it instead of medicine that might actually have helped.

    Plover said it perfectly in a post above:

    Q: You know what they call a "natural cure" that has been tested and found to work?

    A: Medicine.

    More on point, all this study says is that, once again, we have a bunch of stupid fucking ignorant people in the US who don't even have a passing acquaintance with reality.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  15. the problem for the medical community is. by strstr · · Score: 2

    The conspiracy theories are always partially truth and the medical model does not have any method for scientifically proving the public wrong. They rather use discredidation tactics and speculation like calling it all a conspircy theory even though they do not really know if something is true or not. They generally overlook government abuse and classification of information that might prove the public right on things like the government or corporations withholding information about natural cures and functional treatments, or the allowance of public genocide and medical based injuries. The real conpiracy is exposed because doctors have an aligned interest with pharmacutical industry to push drugs and treatment for condition that either should not be treated or do not get better with medications, get worse, or have little to no effect, like many drug based cancer treatments and psychiatric treatments. The industry also effectively lies about all the harmful effects of drugs and covers up their ineffectiveness. Often times medical professionals even have ties to military, CIA and other government operations, using the public for genocide and weapons experimentation like they did in MKULTRA. For evidence of the psychitric drug abuse/cover up, look up the psychiatric affidavits of Robert Whitaker and Dr. Grace E. Jackson on this page for example: http://www.oregonstatehospital...

    It says that not only do people with schizophrenia recover at higher rates without medication but those who take medication never recover. Medication users also get heavy brain damage and 10% brain shrinkage, and die 25 years sooner as a result. Antidepressants also cause such permanent damage that people can never withdraw from them, cause mania and are not significantly more effective than placebo, whereas excersise is 80% effective by itself and doesn't require taking an ineffective pill.

    The industry has also been proven to lie about chemical imbalances causing mental illness, as no chemical imbalance has ever been shown except in people on medications.

    Finally, the medical model treats real issues and expected human responses as something to be drugged out of people, even when they in fact are not diseases. They might say a traumatized women who is afraid of losing her newest baby after multiple miscairages should be drugged and has mental illness rather than trauma, for example. A person legitimately attacked or set up by government operatives might also be labeled schizophrenic and paranoid despite it really being real, because medical professionals do little to validate government abuse or whether others are lying about the situation, leading to treatment with force of deadly brain damaging drugs.

  16. Maybe because there are real medical conspiracies? by rs79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Revealed: secret plan to push'happy' pills
    http://www.theguardian.com/soc...

    Big Pharma Could Win International Price Monopoly, Unlimited Profits in 'Free Trade' Deal
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    US patent moves are 'profoundly bad' in leaked TPP treaty
    http://www.theverge.com/2013/1...

    The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposed free trade agreement under negotiation between Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam. Leaked documents show the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) is pressuring TPP countries to expand pharmaceutical monopoly protections and trade away access to medicines.
    http://www.citizen.org/TPPA

    The medical industry the third-leading cause of death in the United States; after heart disease and cancer.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...

    Big Pharma Shamelessly Shills Dangerous Bone Drugs You Don't Need
    http://www.alternet.org/story/...

    The H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic: Manipulating the Data to Justify a Worldwide Public Health Emergency
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/t...

    "Somewhere in Rayong or Chon Buri on the coast of Thailand, a young woman may at this very moment be baring her arm for a shot of an experimental Aids vaccine that many of the leading scientists in the field say categorically has no hope at all of working.

    She will be one of 16,000 volunteers recruited for the second large-scale Aids vaccine trial, a $119m exercise many scientists believe is a farce."
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/scie...

    Fraud has become so endemic in this country that it's woven its way into America’s DNA. 2). Big Pharma Fraud.
    http://www.alternet.org/story/...

    Drug Makers New Targets for U.S. Fraud Inquiries, Report Says
    http://prescriptions.blogs.nyt...

    Merck drew up a "hit list" of doctors that needed to be "neutralized" because they criticized the now banned drug Vioxx.
    http://science.slashdot.org/st...

    Merck invents its own journal to publish bogus research findings to promote it's own products.
    http://blog.bioethics.net/2009...

    Why Aren't These Fraudulent Papers Retracted?
    http://truth-out.org/news/item...

    Doubts about Johns Hopkins research have gone unanswered, scientist says
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

    A National Survey of Physician–Industry Relationships
    http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/1...

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  17. was trying not to sound crazy by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    Does fluoride cause cause the calcification of the pineal gland?

    maybe!

    I don't think there's anything to it, but it's one of those "I wouldn't be surprised" kind of things. I'm a 9/11 truther, so that's some context for you.

    I live in Portland and we just rejected flouride recently. I used to be an activist & I noticed through social media that there was indeed such a thing as "big flouride" and they were not above hiring local agent provaceteaurs to disrupt hearings and put out disinformation.

    I saw "tradecraft" which doesn't mean it calcifies the Pineal Gland but it shows that there's money behind it.

    I'm much more apt to believe that part of marijuana prohibition was that it disrupts MKULTRA-style conditioning b/c of the short-term memory loss ;)

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett