Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Word Zero-Day Used In Targeted Attacks

wiredmikey (1824622) writes "Microsoft warned on Monday of a remote code execution vulnerability (CVE-2014-1761) in Microsoft Word 2010 that is being actively exploited in targeted attacks. If successfully exploited, an attacker could gain the same user rights as the current user, Microsoft said, noting that users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than accounts with administrative privileges. 'The vulnerability could allow remote code execution if a user opens a specially crafted RTF file using an affected version of Microsoft Word, or previews or opens a specially crafted RTF email message in Microsoft Outlook while using Microsoft Word as the email viewer,' Microsoft explained Microsoft did not share any details on the attacks that leveraged the vulnerability, but did credit Drew Hintz, Shane Huntley, and Matty Pellegrino of the Google Security Team for reporting it to Microsoft."

11 of 88 comments (clear)

  1. Wasn't RTF supposed to be minimalistic and simple? by skids · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Last time I looked RTF (decade or so ago) was a pretty bare-bones least-common-denominator document markup specification.

  2. Re:Wasn't RTF supposed to be minimalistic and simp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wasn't RTF supposed to be minimalistic and simple?

    RTF is. Word isn't.

    Word is bloated, cumbersome and buggy.

  3. this should never have happened by chromaexcursion · · Score: 4, Informative

    A simple protocol, no need for system access.
    Oh well, MS seems to have found a way to screw that up.

    Maybe Bill should pay to fix it ...

    1. Re:this should never have happened by marsu_k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I managed to right a dissertation on MacWrite back in 93 without ever once thinking it needed more functionality.

      I'm guessing it didn't include a spell checker?

    2. Re:this should never have happened by inasity_rules · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, his dissertation had obviously been overturned, and using MacWrite, he was able to right it. :D

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  4. Re: The question......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    RTFA

  5. Is LibreOffice vulnerable to the same exploit? by mmell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No? Okay, later.

    1. Re:Is LibreOffice vulnerable to the same exploit? by RoLi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Probably the MS-fans will think that's a problem, because LibreOffice is not "compatible".

      In fact the very fact that LibreOffice is an independent implementation of the file formats is a big advantage, because it is much more robust - When you reverse-engineer something you usually cover all possibilities (of a variable, etc.) - this is also the reason why you can often open corrupted .doc files with LibreOffice.

  6. Re:Zero Day emacs flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    A lisp virus is the same as a regular virus, except that you pronounce it Lithp Viruth.

  7. Re:Block all .RTF attachments by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure nobody would notice or care.

    The one trick (comparatively rare; but it happens at times) is that if you take an RTF document and give it a .doc suffix, Word will interact with it happily enough and I think even save it in the RTF format if you modify-and-save.

    This means that if you block by suffix, a remotely clueful attacker will just fix their suffix and carry on; but if you block by format a small and fairly unpredictable subset of '.doc' files will be weeded out for reasons users will be unlikely to grasp.

    This would hardly make it the most painful thing routinely inflicted on users in the name of security; but it isn't a plus.

  8. Re:Wasn't RTF supposed to be minimalistic and simp by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Plus OLE support. Quite a powerful capability; but one of those powerful capabilities best handled carefully, kept away from direct sunlight, protected from shocks, and otherwise treated as though it is just waiting to ruin your day.