Slashdot Mirror


Gunshot Victims To Be Part of "Suspended Animation" Trials

New submitter Budgreen writes: "Knife-wound or gunshot victims will be cooled down and placed in suspended animation later this month. The technique involves replacing all of a patient's blood with a cold saline solution, which rapidly cools the body and stops almost all cellular activity. 'If a patient comes to us two hours after dying you can't bring them back to life. But if they're dying and you suspend them, you have a chance to bring them back after their structural problems have been fixed,' says surgeon Peter Rheeat from the University of Arizona in Tucson, who helped develop the technique. 10 gunshot and stabbing victims will take part in the trials."

35 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Space travel by geogob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sounds more like science fiction than anything else to me. But if it works and the technique becomes viable to handle patient with heavy injurie - and assuming the patients can be kept suspended for long periods of time without creating further damages, I wonder if the technique could be adapted for space travel. It would solve a lot of problems related to long-duration interplanetary travel.

    The idea is not new. I just wonder if this could be the first step in this direction.

    1. Re:Space travel by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is very unlikely that we will ever be able to use this technology for deep space travel. First, the distance that grate that you need thousands of years to get there. Therefore, the suspended animation must last that long without chemical decay of cellular structure. Second, all the technology in the ship must last that long. We have no technology which is usable without maintenance for that long. Therefore, self-repair ability for everything including the ship itself must be part of the mission. This looks very much, like the man who wanted to travel around the world in a straight line from Peter Bichsel. Third, all that requires energy, which has to be brought with you.

      In the end it will also not matter, because when these people reach the distant location, there will be no compatible civilization on earth left. If any at all. 10000 years ago we were sitting in caves. Reading books from medieval time in their original writing is almost impossible to most people today and that is only 500-1000 years. There is no point in deep space travel as long as we are not able to go faster than light or at least close to light speed.

    2. Re:Space travel by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This sounds more like science fiction than anything else to me.

      I'm sure they said the same thing about organ transplants a hundred years ago.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Space travel by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      The first thing you see when the lid of your cryo-chamber whirrs open will be another human saying, "Hey, we made a warp drive engine while you were asleep!"

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Space travel by Raumkraut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the end it will also not matter, because when these people reach the distant location, there will be no compatible civilization on earth left.

      People don't generally think of multi-millennium cryo-sleeper journeys as a "there and back" deal, so the state of any civilization on Earth would be pretty much moot once they wake up at the destination.
      That is, unless Earth has advanced so much that FTL Earth ships arrived at the destination before the sleepers did. In which case; "welcome to the world of tomorrow!"

      There is no point in deep space travel as long as we are not able to go faster than light or at least close to light speed.

      Perhaps no point for those staying behind, no. But for the pioneers, however long the journey takes, they may well become the first humans to explore and colonise a new planet and star system. If you honestly think that such an amazing achievement is entirely pointless, then I think you might be on the wrong website.

    5. Re:Space travel by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      "And oh, that planet that you were headed for to colonize? Yeah, we terraformed it already, but thanks for the effort."

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Space travel by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or a hundred-man colonization team, for that matter.

      That would not be a successful long term colonization effort. But fifty men plus fifty women might be.

    7. Re:Space travel by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The first successful organ transplant was done in 1883: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Space travel by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even better, ten men and ninety women....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:Space travel by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, you don't think that maintenance people know how to screw?

      Or for that matter, if you're carrying a million people, you can wake 100 of them every year for maintenance duties, and then each of them will have spent three years awake for the voyage.

      Note that this assumes that 30K years is correct. At 0.1% of lightspeed, the trip would be closer to 4300 years than 30,000.

      Yes, we don't know how to get to 300 km/s now. We will before we consider going to alphacent. And if we decide to go to alphacent before we can do 300 km/s, well, we'll have 25000 years to figure out how to go 300 km/s and still get to alphacent first with a ship that's going 300 km/s.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    10. Re:Space travel by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would I bring along nine other men???

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    11. Re:Space travel by SalafranceUnderhill · · Score: 5, Funny

      And by the way, since we hacked the algorithmic and neurological underpinnings of intelligence, way back when, we've been so much smarter than you people that it's just not funny.

      But...

      We think you're *so* adorably kawaii!

      Who's a good boy! Whooo's a gooood boy!

      Mummy loves her little guy, yes she does!

    12. Re:Space travel by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Richard Branson, is that you?

      No, surely it's Dr Strangelove: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

    13. Re:Space travel by Riceballsan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *we've already terraformed it, developed a society, met other life forms, declared war, and the new planet is now uninhabitable due to the weaponry used in that war.

    14. Re:Space travel by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends upon your definition of "qualified"

      There would be millions of volunteers. If you need a thousand, you could pick the top 0.1%. I would definitely want to go. If you look at history, there has never been a problem getting people to volunteer for dangerous, one-way missions. In the 1500's, there was no shortage of colonists heading out of Europe. The Polynesians colonized every speck of land in he Pacific. The Japanese Kamikaze attacks stopped because they ran out of planes, not pilots. In the aftermath of the Challenger explosion, of the dozens of astronaut candidates, ONE dropped out.

      You have a very dim view of humanity if you think there would be a problem staffing a starship.

    15. Re:Space travel by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would I bring along nine other men???

      To preserve your sanity.

    16. Re:Space travel by Glothar · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's a VCR?

      ...and why doesn't it support NTP?

    17. Re:Space travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've had sheep, and I've had your wife. I'm sticking with sheep.

    18. Re:Space travel by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, why didn't you pick me up on the way, you bastard!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. "Victims" by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    "10 gunshot and stabbing victims will take part in the trials"

    Jesus, I can already picture a scientist charging around a shopping mall with a revolver and a switch-blade yelling "For science!"

    1. Re:"Victims" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try carrying a kitchen knife in your pocket sometime and pulling it out in such a way that results in your doing more damage to someone else than to yourself. The reason kitchen knives are one of the most common murder weapons is that most murders are crimes of passion in the home and a kitchen knife is readily available in a convenient knife block or draw (corollary: don't insult the cook!). They're a lot less common in situations involving premeditation.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:"Victims" by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mohammed K. (2001). On The Effects Of Passenger Aircraft On Steel Frame Buildings. Proceedings on International Terrorism: 223-225. New York.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    3. Re:"Victims" by bdeclerc · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do realise that "Muslim" is not a race, right?

    4. Re:"Victims" by stoploss · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try carrying a kitchen knife in your pocket sometime and pulling it out in such a way that results in your doing more damage to someone else than to yourself.

      ...if only someone could invent some sort of "wrapper" for the blade that would allow a fixed blade to be carried safely and drawn out when desired without inflicting injury on the user. Maybe they could call it a "knife condom", or maybe a "knife carrier", or maybe they would invent a completely new word for it like "sheath".

      They could even make universal sheaths that support different types of knives, so that the sheath could be used for a knife that wasn't specifically designed for it.

      Oh well.

      You may be correct that kitchen knives are used mostly in crimes of passion, but don't underestimate the violence inherent in criminals. For example, once the UK finished effectively banning firearms, they were saddened to find that criminals switched to knives instead. What was their reaction? Knife control laws. Obviously, once those laws were in place, it made kitchen knives more popular for use in crime, so their natural reaction was to start calling for a ban on kitchen knives.

      Since they are attempting to treat the symptom rather than the cause, I look forward to a future where the UK calls for a succession of such laws: kitchen knife control, steel pipe control, brick control, rock control, and, ultimately, stick control.

    5. Re:"Victims" by Kielistic · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's no hard definition of species either but I assure you that I am not a cabbage. In the world of biological sciences: "close enough to be useful" is sometimes the best you're going to get.

  3. Re:Old idea. What makes it possible now? by geogob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes its small details that make a huge difference and allow old ideas to become reality.

    Just think about blood tranfusions. The first attemps to store blood to transfuse it at a later point all failed. A simple stabilisation agent made the procedure possible. I wouldn't expect the New Scientist to produce such details in their publications though.

    It would be interesting to see a paper from a medical journal on this topic.

  4. Re:Old idea. What makes it possible now? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This idea is very old, so I suppose there was a technical hurdle to overcome.

    Probably the replacing-all-their-blood-with-saline-without-them-dying part.

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Too bad they won't use glycoproteins by wisebabo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The real(?) key to long-term suspended animation (months, years) would probably involve cooling the body to sub-freezing temperatures.

    At that point, you need something to keep the ice-crystals from rupturing cells. In certain antarctic fish they have glycoproteins that do this (I think other hibernating animals use glycol or glycogen).

    Until we get nuclear fusion(?) it's clear that spaceflight even just within our solar system is going to require some pretty lengthy journeys. On the other hand, if safe long-term suspended animation is attained, there might be a whole bunch of "future" travelers who might decide to jump (one way of course) years, decades, centuries into the future.

    I think there was a science fiction book which talked about the (disastrous) effects such a technology had on society.

    1. Re:Too bad they won't use glycoproteins by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Radically better thrust/weight ratios than chemical fuels? Potentially better behaved than 'Project Orion' style nuclear propulsion?

      Be that as it may, I'm pretty sure that no sane IRB would sign off on using cryonics and experimental nonhuman proteins on gunshot victims just because Space is Awesome, man! The scope of the study is techniques to provide team trauma surgeon more time to stitch them back up before they bleed out, a short timeframe, and likely one where working on frozen tissue would not make matters easier.

  6. Re:UPMC Presbyterian Hospital in Pittsburgh by heypete · · Score: 5, Informative

    My question is this voluntary? How is exactly does one opt out if they prefer traditional care? Doesn't seem to be like a recent victim of gross trauma, can exactly make an informed decision.

    According to the article at New Scientist:

    Getting this technique into hospitals hasn't been easy. Because the trial will happen during a medical emergency, neither the patient nor their family can give consent. The trial can only go ahead because the US Food and Drug Administration considers it to be exempt from informed consent. That's because it will involve people whose injuries are likely to be fatal and there is no alternative treatment. The team had to have discussions with groups in the community and place adverts in newspapers describing the trial. People can opt out online. So far, nobody has.

  7. Re:Pretty simple in theory by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's a bit trickier to replace every milliliter of blood in your body with cold salty water than to lower someone's body temperature.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  8. Sounds like a horror film plot by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I seem to recall some horror film plots something like that. Usually it's something along the lines of zombies, but I also seem to recall something along the lines of preserving the lives of those who are supposed to be dead and something bad happening as a result. Combine the two? Uh boy... they are supposed to be dead and when "brought back" are actually spirited by demons or something like that.

    I am extremely wary yet curious about the technique. To take a body and remove the blood and store it? I'm okay with doing that to a person officially declared dead especially if it's (1) approved by the living person in advance (2) someone extremely recently dead.

    What is it about blood which causes problems which are solved by removing it? What's more, with all that capilary action, how can they be sure they removed it all?

  9. Re:UPMC Presbyterian Hospital in Pittsburgh by deadweight · · Score: 5, Funny

    I may get an informed consent form tattooed on my chest. "Dear Mr/Mrs Doctor Person, If I am pretty much dead, feel free to try your experimental zombie procedures. Signed Iwill EatYourBrain

  10. I had something similar done about 10 years ago by joseph90 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had something similar done about 10 years ago. It was a bit experimental at the time and they told me I was very probably going to die during surgery and if I did not die I would prob. have brain damage and/or organ failure but without the surgery I would be dead in hours. They cooled down my body and then removed all my blood, there was no saline replacement. I was dead for about 10 minutes and apart from some problems reanimating me it worked out OK (there were some problems,I spent a month afterwards in a medically induced coma and had to have further work done repairing some damage caused during surgery). It was considered a major success at the time.

    A bit scary to be told that you have about 30 minutes to live. Last thing I remember is the anesthetist putting a line in and thinking that once he injected the anesthetic I was going to die.

  11. SAW XII: They Can Torture You Forever by fygment · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In which the victim's are cut and hacked until almost dead ... then suspended ... repaired ... and the fun begins again.

    Combine this with the seriously chilling 'time dilation' drug and the future just seems a little darker.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.