Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Court: Chinese Search Engine's Censorship Is 'Free Speech'

jfruh writes: "You will probably not be surprised to learn that Chinese search giant Baidu censors a wide range of content, particularly political material deemed to be pro-democracy — and does so for users everywhere, not just in China. A group of activists filed suit against Baidu in New York for violating free speech laws, but the judge in the case declared (PDF) that, as a private entity in the United States, Baidu has the right to provide whatever kind of search results it wants, even for political reasons."

5 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What. by operagost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because telling businesses what information they must provide to the public is the same as the old unconstitutional "fairness doctrine". Would you like to require that Rachel Maddow have Sean Hannity on her show every night to rebut her points? If a search engine is providing biased results, don't use it. Providing FALSE information could be a problem, as that would be libel.

    I don't understand why I have to explain this on a forum that's populated by teens and adults. You can't use your rights to infringe on others' rights.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Re:What. by schwit1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Freedom of speech doesn't mean I have to give you my microphone.

  3. Re:The Founding Fathers are crying.. by schneidafunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The whole point of freedom of speech is to allow people you disagree with to say (or write) what they want. If the westboro church can protest soldier funerals, this ruling should be a no brainer. The search engine is writing the search results in a biased way but the judge has ruled that is free speech. Fine with me... now back to searching on google.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  4. Re: 14th Amendment by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Should"? Says who, you? If I want to launch a web site with a map proclaiming that Nova Scotia is now Kevinland, you think I should be forcibly prevented from doing so?

  5. Re: 14th Amendment by AlecC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? The free market applies. If you don't like the goods one merchant supplies, find another. It is not as if search engines are state licensed or limited. It seems to me that by your logic, you can sue any publisher who decides not to publish your crappy book on the ground of inhibiting your free speech.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.