Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Launches Android-Powered 'Fire TV' For Streaming and Gaming

Today Amazon launched 'Fire TV,' a new video streaming box designed to compete with devices like the Roku and Apple TV. The Fire TV runs Android on a quad-core Qualcomm 1.7 GHz processor with 8GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM. It supports 1080p video output at 60fps and measures 4.5" x 4.5" x 0.7". The Fire TV is also explicitly designed to support gaming, and Amazon has concurrently launched their own game controller. The Fire TV's remote control includes a microphone and a button that lets you search TV show and movies by voice.

7 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Is it free software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or user-subjugating software?

    1. Re:Is it free software? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I already have a device which records my discussions with my wife.

      I'm presuming the device your talking about is your wife? Marriage. Ain't it wonderful?

  2. International? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apart from Netflix, which is already available on a lot of devices, is there any point in buying a Fire TV in other countries? Even Canada doesn't get things like Hulu or Amazon Streaming.

    I don't think the Fire TV will sell at all outside of the USA.

  3. The name is logical at least by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kindle Fire is a tablet that extends the Kindle e-reader line and runs Fire OS, Amazon's fork of Android OS. Fire TV is a set-top box for watching TV that runs Fire OS. I don't see how it's that bad of a name.

  4. Re:Just get a Smart TV by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd rather replace/upgrade a $49 widget than a $500 TV.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  5. Re:Just get a Smart TV by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I won't pretend to give you a generalized answer, but rather answer it for myself and my household:

    (Context: I work at Netflix, which may make a difference so it's worth noting. That said, I'm back-end cloud systems, with nothing to do with consumer devices).

    I consume my media from several sources, including iTunes, Hulu, Netflix, HBO Go.

    I could get a SmartTV that lets me access them, but IME, smart TV manufacturers move pretty slowly; I also think of my TV as just a large display, and imbuing it with more smarts makes it more painful and expensive to upgrade to something else. By focusing on modularity -- this TV is just a bunch of HDMI ports with a big screen -- it lets me optimize the TV for display, and use another device for content access.

    Which is why I prefer the AppleTV rather than a SmartTV.

    (We could have another conversation about AppleTV vs Roku or the Fire TV, but that's outside the scope of this particular comment thread).

  6. Re:Just get a Smart TV by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    turning tvs into smart tv's might make sense but eventually...everyone will just have a smart tv.

    That might work on the low end, but if you buy a $1000+ TV, you probably don't want to have to buy another one to replace it in a few years when the company stops updating the firmware or the SoC can't handle the latest video codec or whatever. Much better to use the expensive TV as a video monitor alone, and keep the fast-obsoleting stuff on a cheap external box.