Slashdot Mirror
Amazon Launches Android-Powered 'Fire TV' For Streaming and Gaming
Today Amazon launched 'Fire TV,' a new video streaming box designed to compete with devices like the Roku and Apple TV. The Fire TV runs Android on a quad-core Qualcomm 1.7 GHz processor with 8GB of internal storage and 2GB of RAM. It supports 1080p video output at 60fps and measures 4.5" x 4.5" x 0.7". The Fire TV is also explicitly designed to support gaming, and Amazon has concurrently launched their own game controller. The Fire TV's remote control includes a microphone and a button that lets you search TV show and movies by voice.
Or user-subjugating software?
My Roku 3 will let me side-load channels. If this won't, not interested. No pron, no go!
SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
These TV devices seems likes a fairly odd market.
We have game consoles with Apps that do all these things. or you can hook up an old PC that you have around.
On the other end you got the Chromecast which is very cheap for your streaming from your PC.
This middle ground I don't think really fits a lot of peoples needs, Either Pay more and get more out of your purchase, such as gaming, and perhaps a Blu-Ray player. Or pay a lot less and get something good enough.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
1. The scroll wheel beats both Chromecast's software slider and Roku's remote, but it's still no substitute for proper chapter stop buttons.
2. No H.265 support means this model of FireTV will become obsolete later this year.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
Apart from Netflix, which is already available on a lot of devices, is there any point in buying a Fire TV in other countries? Even Canada doesn't get things like Hulu or Amazon Streaming.
I don't think the Fire TV will sell at all outside of the USA.
Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
Kindle Fire is a tablet that extends the Kindle e-reader line and runs Fire OS, Amazon's fork of Android OS. Fire TV is a set-top box for watching TV that runs Fire OS. I don't see how it's that bad of a name.
I'd rather replace/upgrade a $49 widget than a $500 TV.
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
I won't pretend to give you a generalized answer, but rather answer it for myself and my household:
(Context: I work at Netflix, which may make a difference so it's worth noting. That said, I'm back-end cloud systems, with nothing to do with consumer devices).
I consume my media from several sources, including iTunes, Hulu, Netflix, HBO Go.
I could get a SmartTV that lets me access them, but IME, smart TV manufacturers move pretty slowly; I also think of my TV as just a large display, and imbuing it with more smarts makes it more painful and expensive to upgrade to something else. By focusing on modularity -- this TV is just a bunch of HDMI ports with a big screen -- it lets me optimize the TV for display, and use another device for content access.
Which is why I prefer the AppleTV rather than a SmartTV.
(We could have another conversation about AppleTV vs Roku or the Fire TV, but that's outside the scope of this particular comment thread).
I guess this solves the mystery as to why Amazon never batted any eyelashes towards Chromecast.
turning tvs into smart tv's might make sense but eventually...everyone will just have a smart tv.
That might work on the low end, but if you buy a $1000+ TV, you probably don't want to have to buy another one to replace it in a few years when the company stops updating the firmware or the SoC can't handle the latest video codec or whatever. Much better to use the expensive TV as a video monitor alone, and keep the fast-obsoleting stuff on a cheap external box.
Apple doesn't let anyone else stream? That must explain why I can stream from Apple, Netflix, Crackle, Crunchyroll, Vimeo, Youtube, etc.
Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins