Slashdot Mirror


Double Take: Condoleezza Rice As Dropbox's Newest Board Member

Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State under George W. Bush, and defender of Bush-era (and onward) policies about surveillance by wiretapping and other means, has landed at an interesting place: she's just become a part of the small board at Dropbox. TechDirt calls the appointment "tone deaf," and writes "At a time when people around the globe are increasingly worried about American tech firms having too close a connection to the intelligence community, a move like this seems like a huge public relations disaster. While Rice may be perfectly qualified to hold the role and to help Dropbox with the issues it needs help with, it's hard not to believe that there would be others with less baggage who could handle the job just as well." Some people are doing more than looking for an alternative for themselves, too, as a result.

12 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Good choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She's pretty sharp, well connected, and understands how the government sees these types of date & service providers.

    At a she's an awesome catch for any cloud company. Throw in her political awareness and it's even better.

    1. Re:Good choice by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She's pretty sharp

      Anyone that thought the Iraq War was a good idea, should not be described as "pretty sharp". There is a saying that 'Whatever women do they must do twice as well as men to be thought half as good.' Condoleezza Rice is proof that we have moved past that. She is female (and black), and promoted to the highest levels, despite the failure of nearly all her policies. She is proof that you no longer have to be male to be both successful and incompetent.

    2. Re:Good choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Iraq war was good for all the companies involved, just like the other wars. Plus, it took down the criminal who dared to trade oil in euros, not dollars, so it was good for the State as well.

    3. Re:Good choice by khasim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anyone that thought the Iraq War was a good idea, should not be described as "pretty sharp".

      That depends upon whether you mean "good idea ... for the USofA" or "good idea ... for me and my friends".

      A lot of companies made a lot of money off of that war.

      She is female (and black), and promoted to the highest levels, despite the failure of nearly all her policies. She is proof that you no longer have to be male to be both successful and incompetent.

      I don't agree with that. I think that anyone, regardless of race, creed, religion, etc, will always have a job publicly supporting the existing power structure.

      She wasn't elected. She was appointed by the people who were elected. And those were white men.

      Which is why I think that she's now at DropBox. She still has those political connections. And DropBox wants to pay her for access to them.

  2. Force her out! by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quick, let's boycott Dropbox so we can force her out of the company. Then after we've succeeded we can have a another Slashdot story lamenting how intolerant we've all become and we can point fingers at everyone else.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  3. Baggage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know you all think Bush and Obama are the same, but there's no way Secretary Rice has "close connections to the intelligence community" under the Obama administration.

  4. meh by schneidafunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really don't care, this is a private company and they can hire who they want to. That being said, I assumed dropbox already was infiltrated by the NSA.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  5. Re:Wiretapping? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? National Security Advisor who supports wire tapping sitting on the board for a cloud based storage solution company. Could your post be code for stupid.

  6. The important stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did she donate to a Prop 8 organization?

  7. Re:Oh why not? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really?

    She was intimately involved in the decision to go to war with Iraq and spoke publicly in support of it.

    She was an integral part of the Bush administration's campaign of lies surrounding the war, working to further public support of the war by lying about Iraq's non-existent weapons of mass destruction.

    Rice played a central role in affirming the "legality" of the Bush administration's torture program.

    Rice not only spoke in favor of the Bush administration's warrantless wiretap program and expansive domestic surveillance program, she authorized the warrantless wiretap of UN Security Council members.

    But you keep thinking that a extremely brilliant and accomplished individual, having obtained her Masters degree at age 20, isn't smart enough to ask the right questions or able to go toe to toe with Cheney or Rumsfeld....

  8. Uh oh! by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently they never checked her stance on Gay marriage:

    “I don’t ever want anybody to be denied rights within our country. I happen to think marriage is between a man and a woman. That’s tradition, and I believe that that’s the right answer. But perhaps we will decide that there needs to be some way for people to express their desire to live together through civil union.”

    Condoleezza Rice — Dec. 20, 2010

    I guess websites will have to protest and such and then she'll resign after 2 weeks right?

  9. Re:Oh why not? by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But you keep thinking that a extremely brilliant and accomplished individual, having obtained her Masters degree at age 20, isn't smart enough to ask the right questions or able to go toe to toe with Cheney or Rumsfeld....

    The problem is that, while she is smart, she is also ideological.

    If her ideology conflicts with the facts, the ideology wins.

    Not only was she NOT willing to ask question, she WAS willing to give press interviews with WRONG information. Because that WRONG information suited her ideology. Even though it would cost lives.

    NOT the kind of person YOU want on the Board of Directors of a company tasked with providing access to YOUR data.

    She didn't care enough about the lives that would be lost to ask any questions. And she cared so little for those lives that she provided wrong information to support the drive to war. Do you think that your DATA will mean more to her than that?