Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Peoria Mayor Sends Police To Track Down Twitter Parodist

Posted by timothy on from the how-is-this-playing-in-peoria? dept.

New submitter rotorbudd (1242864) writes with an article at Reason about Jim Ardis, mayor of Peoria, Illinois, who ordered police to track down whoever was responsible for a parody Twitter account mocking him."Guess the good Mayor has never heard of the Streisand Effect. 'The original Twitter account had a total of 50 followers. The new account has over 200.'"

7 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't parody protected in the US? by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Canada you can parody anyone. For example Justin Turdeau instead of Justin Trudeau (leader Liberal party Canada). It's funny and you can't get sued never mind have the police come after you. It's called freedom of speech.

    1. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 4, Informative

      apparently you can't parody in US... the the original account in question, @peoriamayor has been suspended. but a thousand flowers are blooming, including this guy, who's profile reads "Welcome to Peoria, bitches! My house, my rules. Check those civil liberties at the door and bow down to your leader. Humor and Parodies punishable by death."

    2. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      No we dont, free speech is only allowed in free speech zones. Doing it outside a designated zone means you get tazed in the junk by police.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? by edibobb · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to break it to you, but there was much more police and political abuse in the U.S. 40 years ago. There was just no efficient internet or cell phone communications that we have today. Most misdeeds in the 1960's and 1970's were largely unknown beyond a few dozen people. Things have improved immensely. Most police and even a few politicians are honest today.

    4. Re:Isn't parody protected in the US? by BiIl_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      What part of the constitution is the right attacking?

      Both parties are attacking the constitution. Look at all the scumbags who voted for the Patriot Act (especially the first time around): Many from both parties, and most people the first time around. Who's trying to get rid of the TSA? A select few from both parties. Bush used free speech zones, too. Furthermore, we have DUI checkpoints, the TSA, constitution-free zones, unrestricted border searches, the NSA surveillance, etc., and none of those things were started solely by one party; it's a bipartisan effort to infringe upon our rights, and both parties are filled with evil scumbags.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  2. Re:Why won't the vote this nut out? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before we get all silly, please remember that the police had a WARRANT to search the guys house. So any discussion of the "rule of law" needs to remember that the legeslative and judicial branches are also full of shit.

    No just bitching about the executive abuse of power.

    --
    THL phish sticks
  3. Re:freedom of speech by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes it does. Otherwise it's "freedom of talking". Freedom of speech means that no government entity can go after you for the content of your communications, whether broadcast or otherwise. Where exactly that crosses with Secret classifications, I don't know, but freedom of speech necessarily implies freedom from persecution (from government) for speech.