Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Hungry Students, How Common?

Gud (78635) points to this story in the Washington Post about students having trouble with paying for both food and school. "I recall a number of these experiences from my time as grad student. I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc. Me and my fellow students still refer to ourselves as the 'starving grad students.' Today we laugh about these experiences because we all got good jobs that lifted us out of poverty, but not everyone is that fortunate. I wonder how many students are having hard time concentrating on their studies due to worrying where the next meal comes from. In the article I found the attitude of collage admins to the idea of meal plan point sharing, telling as how little they care about anything else but soak students & parents for fees and pester them later on with requests for donations. Last year I did the college tour for my first child, after reading the article, some of the comments I heard on that tour started making more sense. Like 'During exams you go to the dining hall in the morning, eat and study all day for one swipe' or 'One student is doing study on what happens when you live only on Ramen noodles!'

How common is 'food insecurity in college or high school'? What tricks can you share with current students?"

65 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. first post :P by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2, Funny

    Feed me!

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:first post :P by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Feed me!

      College Diet:

      1.Ramen noodles

      2.Natty Light

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:first post :P by knightghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Potatoes are 10 cents a pound here.

      "Learning to live poor" is the most education that people get in college. They have money... they just don't know how to manage it properly. I've been there. Many years, the $1 burger king friday special burger was my treat for the entire week.

      Looking back, I could have done far better. Why? Because I've learned. Why did I learn? Because things got tight so I got motivated. People are capable of far more than they'd like to be.

  2. You don't hear about the failures by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...because no one wants to tell you about those, of course not - who wants to admit they didn't make it after all of those hardships?

    I took an education in Animation, very VERY expensive, cost me a HUGE fortune (which I took up a loan for, and worked in a computer store to pay off), did I end up working for Disney? No. Despite winning TWO FILM AWARDS - I still didn't get a job with Pixar or the likes, why? Did I suck? No - I just didn't have the right connections, and I didn't even understand how important it is to have the right connections, and NOT to piss off the wrong people.

    I spent the next 10 years paying of my study debts, I'm finally free. But I don't regret anything, if I didn't do it - I'd spend the rest of my life wondering how things would have turned out if I did it, if I really just took the plunge and went for it. Well - I did...and it didn't turn out as I expect it.

    But you know what? Everything you learn in life - you'll eventually get some use out of, I use my former education to work in advertising, using my animation skills in a technical sense, earning my living that way. Nothing is ever 100% black & white.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:You don't hear about the failures by bielcosmo · · Score: 2

      Here is the problem. 30 years ago, you just needed a degree. English degree? You were still able to find a well paying degree. In fact, it mattered more what one did after graduating than the major. Then majors became important after the dot.com crash. Want a computer job, where is the CS degree? Now, a degree in the field is relevant only because without it, your resume doesn't pass the first round of filters. There used to be an unspoken deal. A student paid the insane fees and dealt with pleasing the professors for the degree, and because of that, they would get hired. Now, that deal was welched on, and not by the students who played by the rules.

    2. Re:You don't hear about the failures by websitebroke · · Score: 2

      An animator is one skill, an entrepreneur is another. Quite frequently, people only have one of them.

    3. Re:You don't hear about the failures by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Everything you learn that you are interested in that is. That is one of the main reason to advise people to learn something they have a passion for. The ones doing things for the money will not get a lot of mileage out of their "learning" as it will not become part of who they are and hence they will never be good at it will not stay long with them. That is also a reason why everybody that finds they cannot find passion for a subject to change the subject.

      Sure, at the end of the day you have to find some way to make enough money from what you learned to live off it. But you can either live in hell, doing a job you hate and no amount of money will ever compensate for that (although many people think it does). Or you can do something that you at lest love parts of and that you are good at. That usually does not make you rich, but unless you are really unlucky, it should be enough to live decently off it. Just remember that working is what takes most of your awake-time. Making that time more agreeable is very much worthwhile.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by runeghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure, the 'best' schools are there, but who cares if you're walking the edge of malnutrition in order to pay for class, gas, and books? Emigrate to an actual civilized country instead of a pretend one.

    1. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Noughmad · · Score: 2

      Yes, things are expensive in Europe, but a large majority of students here can afford to own a car. You know, not having to pay for college does wonders.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    2. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most universities in Germany include an unlimited public transport pass in the low semester fee (ca. $300 per semester, the biggest part of that actually is the public transport pass. There is no tuition.) Public transport includes railways, not just buses. You don't need a car. Cycling is common in Germany. Get a bike. It is often the fastest way to get around.

      Students typically choose from several canteens offering a variety of subsidized meals (a full meal for $3.50, for example). You don't need to learn how to cook (but cooking is a great opportunity for socializing, so do it anyway).

      Most required reading is available at the libraries or you can buy hand-me-downs cheaply. Course based learning materials are also made available online.

      By far the biggest cost of studying in Europe is a place to stay. There's at-cost rooming (with high speed internet and other amenities), but due to the high demand there's usually a waiting list for that.

    3. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

      Food is not that expensive in Europe, if you buy in-season vegetables and cook them yourself. Driving a car is expensive, but in many countries you can get by without a car. Typically people get their first car when they get their first full-time job. If you're studying in Europe, drive a car and don't have enough money to eat properly, I'd say you made the wrong budget choices.

      When I was a student (in the Netherlands in the late 90's), housing was the largest expense. Second was the tuition costs. Food was third, but a lot below housing and tuition. Books were expensive a piece, but fortunately our university didn't require a lot of books to be bought: they tried to use books efficiently (only require a book if a lot of chapters were used; use the same book for multiple courses if possible) and offered a lot of their own material at duplication price (about 1/5th to 1/10th the price of an academic book). Looking at my bookshelf I count 14 books from my studies and I think I sold one, so 15 books for a master's degree.

    4. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      For everything except your education. And your job prospects...

      Yeah, no one ever hires people from shitty European schools like Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College London, the Sorbonne, Gottingen, ETH Zurich, ...

    5. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Stop bailing out banks, stop "saving" Greece so they keep buying your submarines and there's suddenly a whole lot of money for education without bleeding the middle class dry.

      As long as you keep voting in that helmet hairdo she-male, you should not expect any pity from me!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

      The British are not really part of Europe...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

      When I lived in France, I would get in my car for two reasons: go to the Cora (big supermarket) once a week, and go on weekend trips around Alsace. During the week, it was public transportation all the way. I didn't know many people who commuted in their cars... the two that did commute did it on gas-sipping motorcycles.

      Today I live in California, and drive 34 miles per day to get to work, my wife drives a bit less, in a different direction. Our commutes are shorter than most of the people we know. Comparing California to Alsace, the driving cultures are completely different. My daily commuter is a 24 year old 270hp Toyota Supra, the car I take to see customers a 460hp Volvo (I'm in IT, but I work for an aftermarket auto-manufacturer)

      With cars like this, I would be regarded like a wasteful pig by most people I knew in Europe. Amongst the people I know in the US, my cars get good MPG.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    8. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I went to university in Europe, England to be precise.

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      Food? Not too expensive. More so than the cheapest places in the US, but the canteen was subsidised and decent enough. You could cook cheaper for yourself if you tried however.

      Books? What books? The whole have-to-buy-the-lecturer's-book thing is a uniquely US invention. Actually, I was always planning on being an engineer for life, so I bought quite a few of the books and still use them. Many of my fellow students survived just fine on the lecture notes and libraries (and still got first class degrees).

      And gas? What are you some posh rich kid or something? And how did you wangle a parking space at uni anyway? Sleep with the senior administrative staff? Bicycles remain extremely popular in universities. This is doubly so in many of the older universities since their town centres predate automobiles and can't cope with volumes of motorised traffic.

      If you need a break and want to get away, we have these things called "trains". They go all over the place. If you're a argain hunter you can even get cheap beds on the sleeper ones.

      You seem to be deeply convinced that America is the best country in the world and that all others are like America but worse. I happen to be a big fan of the place (well certain parts) and would probably emigrate there if I could, but man, you need to pull your head out of your arse.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a British student.

      Get a bike, you lazy git.

      Oh and if you think the public transport is bad in the UK, please bear in mind that the GP is American. On that scale, we have excellent public transport.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  4. Well considering that.. by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... 80% of you in the US are competing over 5% of the money in the economy, you guys have no idea how unequal your society has become and you keep voting for more of getting screwed.

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    1. Re:Well considering that.. by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a difference between income and wealth. The IRS tax stats are freely available for anyone to view. The bottom 80% of Americans (that's a roughly $80k/year income cut-off) account for about 40% of the income, closer to 45% after taxes.

      Wealth is the integral of income (minus expenses). It's just how much of that income you're able to save or spend on durable or appreciating assets. A large percentage of lower- and middle-class income is spent on consumable necessities (food, clothing, gas, etc). But a lot (if not most) of it is also spent on things with no long-term value and depreciating assets with negative ROI (movie/concert tickets, iPhones, HDTVs, eating out, interest on credit card debt, the latest and greatest [anything], etc).

      Given that income distribution is still pretty healthy, you can still amass a large amount of wealth if you simply live within your means and spend/invest your money wisely. I've met a little old lady who worked in a library all her life who has a half million dollar fortune, a carpenter who works out of a pickup truck who owns three houses. In my younger days I made about $40k/yr, yet over 5.5 years managed to save up over $100k for a down payment on a house. I had to live like a hermit, but it's doable. It's all about how you spend your money. If you're blowing it on things which will be worthless in a few years (or tomorrow) while blaming the 20% of people who own 95% of the wealth for all your woes, you've already lost. Yes the system can be improved, but "the man" holding you down is usually yourself.

    2. Re:Well considering that.. by khallow · · Score: 2

      80% of you in the US are competing over 5% of the money in the economy

      Looking at the chart, they say 11%.

      The problem with this statement is twofold. First, it still ignores significant parts of the economy, such as future income. For example, if you have an income (not net income) of 17,300 (like the mean of the bottom 40%), then you probably have a few tens of thousands of potential net income over your lifetime. That isn't reflected in the net worth figure.

      Second, it ignores that most US residents don't compete for wealth. For example, more than a third don't save at all for retirement (36%). So of the 44% who aren't in the 20% wealthiest and happen to save even a little and thus, compete in even the slightest way for wealth, they have 11% of the wealth of the US. That doesn't sound bad to me at all.

    3. Re:Well considering that.. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

      We're far from that. Let's take a look at the Income equality by country.

      Let's just take the richest/poorest 10% comparison. The US has a factor of 15.9. Meaning that the richest 10% make about 16 times what the poorest 10% make. With this, they're in the great company of splendid equality paradises like Uganda, Georgia (the country, not the state...) and Iran.

      There is not a SINGLE European country with a worse ratio than the US. Granted, the aforementioned Georgia along with Portugal and the UK are coming close to it, but none of them is actually WORSE. Most central European (and let's also lump in the Scandinavian) countries revolve around a disparity factor of about 5-8.

      That means that we're looking at about three times more equality in Europe than the US.

      Btw, the 20% rich/poor ratio doesn't get much better for the US. It goes down to a "mere" 8.9 times more money in the 20% rich than the 20% poor, but it's still more than twice the ratio of Finland and Sweden.

      A look at the Gini map also tells a lot (ok, if you know what the Gini coefficient is), with Europe lighting up in green and the US being in a group with such equal rights beacons like China, Argentina or Iran.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Well considering that.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about amassing wealth, it's about quality of life. Reaching 70 with a half million dollar fortune just means you missed out on those enjoyable things in life that depreciate or have negative ROI, like movies and concerts or eating out or holidays. Exchanging enjoyment and variety in life for a pile of money when you are probably too old to really enjoy it anyway doesn't seem like a good way to live.

      Anyway, what happened to the concept of being rewarded for working hard? I thought that was the American Dream, not "do the same low paid job for 40 years and forego all of life's little pleasures". Also, why would a carpenter with three houses work out of a pick-up truck when he can clearly afford some kind of basic workshop that would allow him to grow his business?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Well considering that.. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      It's not about amassing wealth, it's about quality of life. Reaching 70 with a half million dollar fortune

      A half million dollars is hardly a "fortune" these days for retirement. Having about 20 times your annual living expenses in the bank to retire at age 60-65 is a pretty reasonable goal. $500,000 / 20 = $25,000. While many people tend to spend less in retirement, $25,000/year is not exactly extravagant living. Many people don't manage to save that much, but anyone who is middle-class or above should probably be targeting something like that or more... unless you're one of the rare people these days with a guaranteed pension or something.

      just means you missed out on those enjoyable things in life that depreciate or have negative ROI, like movies and concerts or eating out or holidays. Exchanging enjoyment and variety in life for a pile of money when you are probably too old to really enjoy it anyway doesn't seem like a good way to live.

      You're presenting a false dichotomy. It's not like you have to choose between living on rice and beans every day to maximize the pile of coins in your "moneybin" OR you get to go out to movies and eat out every night and enjoy life. There's a lot between those extremes.

      The prudent thing is always to be prepared for emergencies. So, personally, I'd put a pretty big priority on making sure I have adequate insurance (including disability, etc.) and an emergency fund with about a year's living expenses that I can draw on if I lose a job or something. I'm not saying you need forego all eating out or movies or whatever, but many people would be surprised how fast you can save money if you just stop buying lattes every day or every other day, or if you only ate out for lunch once per week instead of most days.

      If you're not prepared for emergency situations, you're just not living rationally. Most people will have some sort of crisis happen at some point in their lives, and having at least a small "cushion" in the bank is just a necessary thing... like having a few cans of soup in your pantry in the winter in case a snowstorm comes and you need to stay home for a day.

      As for saving for retirement and so forth, I think you're also missing out on one important element: the more you save, the quicker you become financially independent. That means you have more choices and can decide to do enjoyable things when you want, rather than just when you get your tax refund or are lucky enough to get a bonus.

      Some extreme people save enough of their income and live so frugally that they can retire by age 40 or 45, so they get to spend the rest of their lives -- including most of middle age -- doing what they want.

      An intermediate course is to put some money away, but continue to enjoy some of the things you mention. That way you trade a little flexibility now for a lot more flexibility later on.

      Anyway, what happened to the concept of being rewarded for working hard?

      Both of my sets of grandparents came from lower class backgrounds (three of their families had been immigrants). They lived life well, had most of the nice things that "middle-class" people have, and for one set of them actually had significantly more nice things than most middle-class people, even on blue-collar salaries. They had fewer things, but the things they had were top quality.

      But they also saved -- to my knowledge they always bought cars in cash, they might have taken a mortgage for a while, but otherwise never had a loan in their lives (definitely never any credit card debt). They had plenty of money in the bank to retire, and when they died, they passed on a decent sum to the kids and grandkids.

      So, it is possible to be "rewarded for working hard" and also save money, assuming you have a decent middle-class job. People are just stupid and think you have to live within your "income group." If you make $200k per year, but live li

  5. not poor by BradMajors · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someone still owns a car and has a place to live they are not poor. I have know students so poor that they are homeless.

    1. Re:not poor by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      I could not afford a car until I had been working for a year after grad school. While in school I had a 3rd floor walk-up and a 10-speed bike. My Hungarian landlady taught me how to make Chicken Paprikash. Buying whole chickens, fresh vegetables, rice and flour in bulk is cheaper than prepared foods (except I still bought macaroni and cheese, of course). I worked as a dishwasher, graded exams, repaired equipment in the EE lab, ran statisical analysis for researchers, whatever I could get. It's not hard to get by if you can live simply and are willing to work. The city where I went to school, Pittsburgh, has great parks and museums and the best football team in the world.

  6. Grad school is voluntary... by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if you don't have the means and/or resources necessary to live comfortably during that period AND you're not willing to make the sacrifices necessary otherwise - then don't go.

    Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?

    --
    Loading...
  7. I'm not sure how common it is... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it sounds like an absurd example of a false economy: Even at relatively cheap schools, the cost of running a student through is nontrivial. It seems like complete insanity to waste expensive instructional time on somebody who can't concentrate properly for want of a few dollars worth of calories. Nobody's interests are well served by that.

  8. Cars are a luxury by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc.

    A starving student with a car?! I think we've isolated the problem.

    1. Re:Cars are a luxury by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc.

      A starving student with a car?! I think we've isolated the problem.

      I thought the same thing. I could never have afforded a car as a student.

  9. Never forget where you came from by jmcbain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I finished my CS PhD about 10 years ago at a top-20 US university. My first year I was not paid, but after I hooked onto an advisor later, I received an RA or TA position for $23k/year, and in my last few years, I received a fellowship for about $40k/year.

    That first year was horrible. I recall eating spaghetti and ketchup, and I distinctly remember having to ask one of my rich friends for a $500 loan just to pay my rent one month. That was one of the most humiliating experiences of my life, and it really shaped my financial planning. Now, 10 years later, although I'm making well over $150k/year, I keep my expenses very low like I'm still a grad student, and I always have at least 6 months' expenses in short-term accounts.

    1. Re:Never forget where you came from by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah spaghetti and ketchup. Nice combo.

      Some of my favorites from my college days were:

      - A boiled potato with a slice of American cheese
      - A cup of white rice with a handful of peanuts

      I was hungry much of the time the last couple of years in college, but mostly that was from stupidity (losing money for dumb reasons) and hubris (refusing to accept any assistance from my parents).

      In Pittsburgh (I went to CMU) there used to be a grocery store that would sell expired food ("Groceries Plus More II" was its name). That was a godsend. You'd never know what you'd get each time you went since their stock was determined by whatever expired goods they could procure that week, but whatever you ended up with was usually for pennies on the dollar. Who cares if a can of spaghetti sauce expired two weeks ago, if it is only a quarter, I'll take it.

      Nobody actually starves in college or grad school, and going hungry and living on the cheap is one of the charms of that time of life. So enjoy it.

  10. Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by aheath · · Score: 2
  11. And it's also unnecessary by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know about other states, but in Virginia you can go to community college and then get a guaranteed transfer to a 4 year state university if you have at least a 3.0 upon graduation. If you live near Virginia and your state schools are subpar, then all you have to do is move to the town where you want to start, declare residency and apply after one year to the community college to get in state tuition. Want to go out of state and find it a burden to pay $25k/year instead of deferred gratification of one year for less than $5k-$7k/year? Only got yourself to blame. It's not fair, but I doubt most of the world's poor would cry a single tear for you due to your inability to wait one year to save $15-$20k/year.

  12. Get creative by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I subsisted on Ramen and chicken pot pies because they were cheap (4/1$ for Ramen, 2/1$ for chicken pot pies). Even the cheapest dollar meal at the local fast food didn't have as many calories. But, no, I didn't worry about food all that much.

    First thing is to learn to cook. It's generally cheaper to buy family portions and make your own than to buy individual meals. For example, a bag of rice is $10, but can act as bulk in many meals such as fried rice, chicken & rice, steamed rice with butter & onions.. Yeah, doesn't sound too appetizing, but it can be. Fried rice, for example, is easy to make. For about 20$ worth of ingredients, you can have 10 meals. Just need rice, an egg or two, onions, salami/pepperoni, etc.. You can buy a pack of miso for around $4. Add firm tofu ($3) or chicken chunks ($4) and dried seaweed ($3) and you can make soup for 10 people. Buying a bulk pack of 50 tacos will set you back around $10; add a couple pounds of beef (10$), lettuce (2$), cheese ($5), etc., and you can feed 10 people for $50 or so.

    Next, use coupons and shop of two-for-one days. You can easily save 50% of your bill just by using coupons and shopping on the right days. Avoid individual meal items such as can soda and even White Castle burgers.

    You can also show up at friends/relatives around dinner time but use that only as a last resort unless you're really tight with them. Make friends with someone who works at a pizza shop. I knew a guy in college who would take leftovers from the restaurant. At a Denny's, for example, he'd order a coffee. When people were about to leave he'd run up and ask if he could have their leftovers. Bizarre, but he saved a few bucks. He's also gotten pretty wealthy since those days so I guess it paid off. I figure that one day he'll find a way to end up in jail just so he could get a free meal and bunk. :/

    Oh, and forget about corned beef. Back in my day it was cheap, around $1.50 a can. Now it's close to $6 a can. I remember many days eating corned beef and cabbage, corned beef and scrambled eggs, steamed corned beef, corned beef sandwiches. No more.

    1. Re:Get creative by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoah you're a monster.....

      Corned beef AND cabbage? I take it your gas costs during the winter were low at least but your whole dorm would've smelt like a warcrime. Bravo on the flawless fart recipe for college students.

    2. Re:Get creative by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I will add this:

      Beans and frozen vegetables are your friends. Get a crock pot. Make a crock of beans, divide them into servings and freeze them to use as needed. Beans are good nutrition. Meat and bean dishes go much further than just meat. A crock pot is also great for turning less expensive cuts of meat into a feast.

      I find that frozen vegetables are much handier than canned, they keep nicely, and don't have all the added salt or other ingredients. Having them in the freezer makes adding vegetables to a dish, or making a side dish, very easy. You can easily have several different types or mixes to use as desired. Spinach in the omelet, mixed veggies in the stew, and so on. Getting those vegetables into your diet is better than just going for a burger and fries all the time.

      Eggs are a great source of cheap protein, and sometimes they even go on sale. You can hard boil them to keep them longer.

      Keep an eye out for sales on various fruits and vegetables, such as apples, sweet potatoes, or potatoes, and buy a bunch.

      Frozen bread dough can be quite a bit cheaper than already baked loaves. Having some in the freezer during bad weather means you can have bread in case there is a run on the store (as sometimes happens) and the shelves are bare.

      Raman can be tasty, filing, and tempting, but you might want to leave it as an occasional treat with all the fat and salt in the standard cheap stuff. Nutritionally you're probably better off with a potato.

      You'll know you're developing the right mindset if you look at the price of a standard fast food "meal deal" and think to yourself: "I could buy a pound/half kilo of hamburger, a loaf of bread, and add a few pennies of potatoes and eat for 3-4 days for that! If I made a meat and bean stew it would be all week!"

      Plan ahead. If you are going out, bring a container of water and a snack, such as an apple. That way you can avoid the temptation of soda and a candy bar. It's cheaper and better for you.

      If you do it right, eating fairly cheaply can be healthy too.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Get creative by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      And grains, don't forget whole grains. Oats, barley, wheat, etc. Filling and nutritious.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  13. Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by BKX · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's like Dave Ramsey says: if you're broke, then eat "beans and rice, rice and beans." It's easy and cheap, even in a dorm.

    1. Rice cookers are like $10-20. Get one with a steamer tray. It doesn't have a burner and can't start a fire, so tell your RA to fuck off.
    2. Buy rice at the Asian store. It'll cost $1/lb for good Jasmine rice (brown rice only, you'll need the nutrients). (You don't have an Asian store? My ass. Or try the Mexican store. You don't have a Mexican store, either? Shut the fuck up and stop lying. Open your eyebulbs; they're everywhere.)
    3. Buy bullion cubes and/or soup base (it comes in a jar) for flavor. You can get that stuff cheap at the Asian store.
    4. Buy beans in a can from Save-a-Lot/Aldi/cheapo-store. I like navy beans and fava beans. There're a few dozen other kinds. Get what's cheap. One can a day, minimum.
    5. Put the rice, soup base/bullion/soup mix and water in the rice cooker and press the button. Add the beans when it's done. Enjoy.
    6. If you're feeling rich, chicken or sausage or burger patties go in the steamer tray.
    7. The Asian store will also have cheap noodles that the rice cooker will cook just fine. Cheaper than ramen. (You still need the beans, or you'll eventually get something nasty like beri-beri.)
    8. Oatmeal and raisins make a good, fast breakfast. (Add sugar packets and creamers from wherever other people get coffee.)
    9. You'll also need to add some vitamin C every once in while to prevent scurvy. Any fruit or fruit juice will do. Tea made from fresh pine needles (actual pine trees only) will do in a pinch. I like raisins, apples, bananas, and oranges, which are all usually cheap enough.

    You can actually live on that stuff for months at a time without dying. The soup base/bullion and occasional noodles and meat will keep you from committing suicide.

    1. Re:Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      My school banned rice cookers too, no arguing they are simply confiscated and you are fined. Nearest food store was also a 20 minute drive. Couldn't have guessed when I was applying to college that it might have food supply logistics similar to a derelict bus in Alaskan bush country.

  14. Editors schmeditors already by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    collage admins

    If you can't make ends meet, I suppose you'll have to cut something, or you'll get stuck in debt.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. I'm not worried about poor students by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    right now. But wages have been in decline for 30 years. A little mis management is one thing (Mitt Rhomney was famously so broke at one point he had to sell the stocks his dad gave him to make ends meet :P ), but we're getting to the point where it's impossible to "work your way through college".

    For one thing, when we say "Wages Adjusted for Inflation" we mean inflation as a whole, but the cost of food and shelter (what college kids spend most of their money on, jokes about Ramen & Natty Lite aside) have gone up much faster than inflation. The sort of job you can hold while in College is gonna pay $8-$15 an hour depending on where you live. I know ppl at that income level working part time because the economy sucks and they made mistakes. They're not making it, and somehow I doubt the added expense/stress of school would help them, especially after they graduate with $150k in loans... If you're one of those super humans that doesn't need sleep and can go to class and the work 8 hours then spend 8 hours doing homework you might make it. Everyone else will just drop out. The consoles tell you this when you apply, and a lot of the big majors (Math, CS, MIS, Medical) won't take you if you're working full time.

    What sucks is we're so much more productive, you'd think we'd be working less. But why the hell would we give anything to anyone if they didn't "work" for it?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Getting to the point? We're there. We passed that threshold a while ago. We're already on our way of getting to the point where you cannot recover your college fees during the rest of your working years.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by gwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a teacher at a public university in Mexico. I know many of my students work (and, of course, many don't) to get enough income to live (maybe because their parents cannot support them, maybe even because they support their family).

      What I completely fail to understand is how on Earth can a 22-year-old graduate –as you say– with US$150K in loans. That is just insane. And sick.

      In my country, as in most of Latin America, and (as far as I understand) in Europe, all of the best universities are State-run, and tuition is either free or really low — Of course, there are private universities, with first-world scolarships. They have some selling points, but with very few exceptions, they are basically little but diploma mills, and next to no research at all is done in them (just teaching).

      Anyway, I cannot understand how the USA cannot have a decent public university system. I know there are *some*, as part of my family have graduated from them. But just the idea of being in such a deep debt as a freshly graduated student... Makes me sick.

    3. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by puto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a natural born US citizen of Colombian heritage. My first degree was a double major of Information Systems/General Business and a minor in Philosophy. I got it in the US, at Nicholls State University in Thibodaux, Louisiana in 1992. My tuition, meal ticket, apartment, insurance, and spending money was 4,000 us a semester. 1500 hundred was covered by grants, and the rest was me waiting tables and bartending. My second degree was in economics in Colombia at a private university. 2000 was the year and my tuition was about 1200 USD a semester. Just for tuition. I worked for the university in the computer science department and was a sub ESL teacher, and so my tuition was waived. I also had a wild hair and studied law for a bit a public university but al fin no me llamo la atencion. I have worked in Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Ecuador, and Mexico. The company I worked for specialized in letting computer science majors do their internships and then hired the best of the best. In the US students tend to work while in school. In Latin America some do, but the majority do not. It is almost a insult to suggest to a Latin American student that they have an after school job. Not too mention the 18-20 year old grown men not being able to cook, wash clothes, and basically take care of themselves without being under their mothers skirts. Sure some of the best unis in Latin America, are state run. In Colombia only the best of the best get into them. In the US many people can go to a community college, then to a public uni etc. But people like to get grants, loans, stay in school forever, live beyond their means, and accumulate debt. It is not the school systems fault but the individual students. You can go to an inexpensive school, work full or part time, or you can ride the government teat and run up huge loans. No one signs the papers but you.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    4. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      But you ignore financial aid (most people who have to borrow every cent will qualify for some at at least one school they apply to), term time employment, and summer jobs/internships.

      If you absolutely can't get any financial aid (i.e. wealthy parents who won't pay for you but whose income prevents you from aid eligibility), then you are simply an idiot for not getting a job shelving books in the library and pursuing paying positions in the summers.

      Term time employment is not hard to find (and in my experience, campus jobs tend to pay on the high side), and you can find something that is only 10-20 hours a week and won't interfere much with your studies. Also, half of the student jobs out there are the kind where you can study in your down time (the kids who check out books at the library or ring you up at the student coffee shop can spend half of their time doing their course reading). At $12 an hour (pretty common for student jobs, even without work-study), this can net you 6-7k each year. And of course you could always work more if you really needed to (and reduce living expenses below the "average" which includes the kids living off mom and dad).

      Then, you should absolutely be working during the off periods. Not too hard to nab a retail job during winter break leading up to christmas (although not a ton of earnings from that either). But you should be working full time all summer, every summer. Even if you don't need the money, you should do this since it always seems like the kids who don't are the ones who have the hardest time finding jobs after graduation (no experience). Even if you can't beat the $12 an hour you had before, this should get you another 6k for the year. And after the first year of school, you get access to better programs, and internships from higher paying employers. Lots of places pay interns the same as 1st year employees...even in the middle of the crisis in the summer of 2008, lots of kids were getting an easy 15-18 an hour plus overtime. With a bit of work, its not that hard to clear 10k in a summer. Yeah--you don't get to go take that unpaid internship that the rich kids can afford, but it's ok--they are just being exploited anyways. You'll come out with experience, money, and maybe even a post-graduation job offer.

      That pretty much covers all of your living expenses (and then some...considering you should probably be living a little sparser than the average student). Honestly, you could even still drop a grand in extra loan money on a cool spring break every year and it wouldn't really matter. You are still going to clock in at only mid 5-figure debt.

      The people complaining in the media about 150k debt for 4 years of school are either lying, actually had post-graduate education, or made extremely poor and lazy decisions (and I count going to a $$$ private university as a poor decision if you have zero financial aid). Its not even easy to get 150k in loans. You can't get that much from federal loans...and private lenders aren't so favorable to slacker kids who can't even bother to earn a single dollar all 4 years.

      --
      Bottles.
    5. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by gwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people complaining in the media about 150k debt for 4 years of school are either lying, actually had post-graduate education, or made extremely poor and lazy decisions (and I count going to a $$$ private university as a poor decision if you have zero financial aid). Its not even easy to get 150k in loans. You can't get that much from federal loans...and private lenders aren't so favorable to slacker kids who can't even bother to earn a single dollar all 4 years.

      That's also a very striking fact. Practically all of the people I know that work on postgraduate studies in the best universities in the country not only do it without paying tuition, but getting a scolarship (around US$1000-1500 a month, roughly the salary they would get as professionals). The logic is, postgraduate studies do require you to focus full-time on them, and not giving them that attention will lead to failure. The whole society will benefit from masters and doctors, so the whole society pays for them. Of course, academic requisites for permanence are high.

      If the society and government do not value having skilled professionals, sick schemes where graduate students have to spend their evenings serving at restaurants, and can devote much less to their studies. That's a losing recipe. And of course, that leads to longer terms because of failed subjects, which means increased debt.

    6. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting to the point? We're there. We passed that threshold a while ago.

      Correct. However, what many fail to realize is that in the 70's we didn't need to pay the educational extortion racket for permission to get work. The computing explosion was exploited to force the majority of the populace to seek degrees, but elementary school kids now have mastery of required technologies. The tools are more high-tech but the interface is even simpler than ever, certainly things that could be learned in on-the-job training.

      The folks bitching about not being able to afford degrees are fools just now feeling the effects of an education bubble about to burst. The tech that created the education bubble has brought ">advances that made degrees obsolete. You can always tell a bubble by the final pump and dump of ramped up attempts to cash in on overly optimistic valuation. You are now aware that degree mills exist...

      The requirement for college accreditation has always been a method for discrimination against the poor who would otherwise self-educate. More stringent degree requirements are a means by which corporations can drive down wages and get more government approved H1B visas and outsourcing. In reality, requiring employees to have a final exams is foolish since it doesn't actually prove they know anything at all -- That's why your boss is likely a moron. Entrance exams would instead suffice to prove applicants had the required knowledge and skills, without requiring they be saddled with debts by the educational gatekeepers of employment -- It doesn't matter how you learned what you know. Promoting to management from within makes cost cutting improvements in ability to predict and not make unrealistic expectations upon the workers, it also gives upward mobility to aging experienced workers instead of considering them dead at 40 (family raising age).

      We're already on our way of getting to the point where you cannot recover your college fees during the rest of your working years.

      Negative, debt levels have long since passed that point, and owing a debt to the careers you enter has always been unacceptable in the first place. College as anything more than elective learning college is just shifting around the Company Store by leveraging "intellectual property." We need college degrees less now that in the 70's. ::POP::

    7. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Anyway, I cannot understand how the USA cannot have a decent PUBLIC university system. I know there are *some*, as part of my family have graduated from them. But just the idea of being in such a deep debt as a freshly graduated student... Makes me sick.

      I've highlighted the reason in bold capitals. That's considered worse than most four-letter words in the vocabulary of many Americans (or at least, most of the one with enough power and/or money to actually put such a thing into practice.)

    8. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Two problems with this:
      1) By the time you learn to budget that well, you've probably already got the debt. People in their early 20s are notoriously bad for not having a decade's worth of working class life experience to give them the perspective needed to properly plan their debt load.

      2) I doubt "staying local" is really an option for most people (at least in their minds.) Between the stereotype of "get away from your parents and have fun" and the Hollywood-induced idea that Ivy League schools are the only ones worth attending, its pretty easy to see how young people with little world experience and only a vague sense of where they want to be in the future would jump at any opportunity to attend "the best schools" regardless of cost.

  16. And often not that useful/needed by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Grad school was historically and is supposed to be the sort of thing not everyone does. It is for people who are really interested in a field, who want to start doing some original research (under the umbrella of a professor's overall research) and so on. The sort of thing only for those that are truly interested in pursuing the subject more deeply and pushing the boundaries.

    Also most fields don't require graduate degrees. There are some that do (like lawyers), though usually they require a PhD or other advanced degree after it (like professors, medical doctors, etc). However for most an undergraduate degree is all they are after.

    However where I work, I see a ton of students that go in to grad school that are hoop jumpers. They see it as the next thing, that will get them a better job. They aren't that interested in the work, and don't have a particularly good understanding of it. They take comprehensive exams instead of doing a thesis, and so on. They try and use more time in school to make up for a lack of talent.

    So, if you are thinking of grad school, and it'll be any kind of financial hardship ask yourself: Why am I going? If it is because your field requires it, then ok no problem. Gotta do what you gotta do. If it is because you really love the field and you want to go to a higher level, that's good too, but just understand it'll be a pain financially. If it is "because I'll get a better job," then no, stop right there. That's not a reason to go to grad school, particularly if it is going to be a problem financially. It probably will NOT get you a better job, and will just give you more debt.

  17. C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "What sucks is we're so much more productive, you'd think we'd be working less. But why the hell would we give anything to anyone if they didn't 'work' for it?"

    If inheriting property is a legitimate idea, what about all of humanity inheriting our collective know how and so being entitled to some of the fruits of our global productivity?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
    "Douglas disagreed with classical economists who recognised only three factors of production: land, labour and capital. While Douglas did not deny the role of these factors in production, he saw the "cultural inheritance of society" as the primary factor. He defined cultural inheritance as the knowledge, technique and processes that have been handed down to us incrementally from the origins of civilization. ..."

    One way to implement that:
    http://www.basicincome.org/bie...

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      >Copyright and patent laws exist to specifically prohibit "all of humanity" from inheriting anything

      Quite the opposite actually, at least originally. Patents encouraged people to share their innovations with the world rather than keeping them secret (which was a major problem), in exchange for a decade or so of exclusive rights to profiting from them. Copyrights did similar - artists were encouraged to be more prolific by being granted control over the distribution of their creations for the first decade, giving them a better chance of being able to monetize their creations. And that addressed a very real concern - the for example it was quite common for the "media moguls" of Shakespeare's time to build their fortunes by producing performances of popular plays without paying the original playwright a dime - and thus many promising playwrights abandoned the profession in favor of something that would put food in their bellies. Or at least relegated their writing to an after-hours hobby.

      The problem came when folks started gaming the system and then purchasing more lucrative extensions to the law. 10 years gives the creator time to make some money off the initial wave of popularity (assuming they can generate such). 100 years ensures that their grand-children can still prevent the work from entering the social inheritance, quite possibly contributing to the creation being lost forever.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  18. Re:How's your Russian? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure Europeans are more worried about the US starting the next war.

    I'm pretty sure that Russia has fixed that problem for the Europeans able to make a reasoned judgment that might have actually believed that. The ones that still believe that tend more towards viewing the world with a constant filter applied and it will take an actual occupation or perhaps bombing to adjust it.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  19. Not expecting nor will get any sympathy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bet the only ones posting in here are going to champion how they made it, and how they, in fact, didn't starve, and how great they are.

    College was the worst years of my life. All the stress and starvation just made me a very angry person. I still see that I am right, that there is literally no remorse or accommodation for someone trying to focus on studying and learning instead of "get a job you worthless piece of garbage".

    These are the two options for those coming from very poor parents in a small town (and being white, ugly, male, and peasant clothing):
    1) work menial service job and waste away.
    2) work menial service job and go to college (and starve).

    I am not trying to troll. I can just see the writing on the wall with no sympathy:
    1) Why have __ when you should be eating food? You need to prioritize better. No sorry, need car to get to menial service job, remember?
    2) Some bullcrap story from the 1990's or earlier that somehow supposed to be equivalent to the last 16 years of economic hell.
    3) I made it by doing _ . You should follow this winning formula. Absent differences in city, luck, personality and circumstances.
    4) All that starvation was good for you.
    5) That you didn't make it was all your own fault.
    6) Spoiled children... blah blah blah.
    7) Some euro-centric view of the world that is only intended to bash the United States.

    That the smart people on here won't come up with actual solutions (technological or otherwise) is not going to be surprising. Yes I made it, yes I graduated, but then it was a year without a job in the field. And all the stress and bad eating wrecked my digestive system. Also took a thin person and made him fat, with an affinity for gobbling up any extra calories and anything free.

  20. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  21. Great advice; see also seasonal vegetables by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

    http://frugalliving.about.com/...
    http://www.drfuhrman.com/libra...

    Leafy greens especially are really important to preventing many diseases. Cabbage is a fairly cheap one. You can steam the cabbage while cooking the rice. Dandelions are a terrific source of healthy greens (if they have not been sprayed with weedkiller etc.). It's crazy that people have been taught to hate healthy Dandelions.

    Our stainless steel "Miracle" rice cooker with a steamer attachment was one of our best kitchen investments ($70) as it does not have Teflon as most rice cookers do, but we worked up to it from cheaper Teflon ones.

    Without good food, the mind and body can go into a downward spiral of low energy and depression -- thus a cycle of poverty. Hunter/gathers are more than 100 different types of food over the course of a year. Getting calories in not enough -- you need micronutrients too, and that means a diversity of foods -- but they don't have to be expensive foods.

    Of course, so many sick care schemes (Medicaid, Medicare, "health" insurance) will pay for expensive drugs and surgeries but won;t pay for good food to avoid drugs and surgeries. It doesn't help that stressed-out people tend to bulk up on calories as an ages old survival mechanism, not knowing where the next meal may be coming from. This is all made worse by US farm policy:
    http://economix.blogs.nytimes....
    "Thanks to lobbying, Congress chooses to subsidize foods that weâ(TM)re supposed to eat less of."

    Watch out for additives in bullion that might cause headaches and such. Lots of bad headaches could make it hard to keep a job or graduate from college.

    Beans are also cheaper to buy dried than canned -- except you need to know how to prepare them and have a place to cook them and the electricity or gas too cook them, which together may not be possible for many students.

    People need a healthy source of fat, too -- something lacking in what you outline. The brain is mostly fat, so it is no wonder on low fat (or poor fat) diets that people can get messed up mentally. Nuts can be one, but they tend to be expensive and they may be lacking in Omegas 3s. Eggs might be a good cheap choice of fat including some Omega-3s for many people; some other sources:
    http://www.self.com/blogs/flas...

    Eating vegetarian in general is healthier and cheaper. So is buying the right things in bulk, maybe splitting big purchases with others.

    We also got a lot of value from a $100 blender to do smoothies from frozen fruit -- but that is beyond very cheap (although still cheaper and much healthier than a carton of ice cream).

    Still, something like a "basic income" may be a needed as a general solution to poverty. The problem with a lot of frugal advice is that it forces people to take on various risks (like health risks of lack of vegetables, or safety risk of a cheap car, or assault risk in a bad neighborhood, and so on). Or it entails doing a lot of time consuming things that prevent more productive activities. Your advice though is very time-saving and practical, which is why I like it (except for quibbles on some of the above points as far as long-term living).

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  22. Re:How's your Russian? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    You don't really spend a lot of time working with EU military, do you?

    I had my share of work with various armies of this planet. Including Russian, various European countries and of course US. Without wanting to start a flame war, but if the average US soldier is about as motivated, trained and bright as the people I had to deal with, waiting for the US to bail the EU out is NOT really something that I'd consider a sound strategy...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    It's got nothing to do with "socialism". Quite far from it. What it has to do with is completely fucked up tax and tax money politics in Germany. There is a very easy fix for it: Stop bailing out banks, stop pumping money into bailout funds for high risk investment banks (actually, tax the fuckers 'til it's no longer profitable to leech the industry to death), stop destroying the middle class and instead tax capital gains more and you're set.

    Of course, nobody really wants that. Especially not "Mutti". And as long as you keep voting that ... thing in, no pity from this side of the border.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. Student Loans by Pricetx · · Score: 2

    Just to clarify, how do student loans work in the US?

    In the UK, they're provided by the government, and they don't work like conventional loans. They come directly out of your salary, and only once you start earning a certain amount. Even then, the amount scales depending on how much you earn, to the point where you may never even finish paying it (if you hit age 50 it just gets dropped completely).

    Whilst admittedly I still live at home, I can afford a car with literally thousands to spare, and have never met anyone personally who has financial issues relating to being a student.

    Based on all of the comments I'm reading here, my assumption is that in the US, student loans work more like conventional bank loans, where repayments are a fixed amount regardless of earnings?

  25. I'm in Grad School by stuporglue · · Score: 2

    I'm in grad school right now.

    1) I know grad students who are struggling financially

    There are at least two people in my program (of about 100 total) who I know personally who are struggling to make ends meet. Their families aren't well off and our program doesn't have funding. They're getting along OK, but they have to live very very tightly, skipping any extra curricular activities, not buying text books, and budgeting both money and food.

    I assume that others may be struggling and I don't know it.

    2) More of us miss out on things so we don't have to starve

    A good number of us work full time or more to pay for things. I've had to not participate in school events both social and scholastic, including guest speakers and class outings. It is very difficult to see a teacher during office hours since I'm supposed to be at work.

    I'm not missing out on food, but if food were available I might be able to work less and be more involved.

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
  26. re: degrees by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Informative

    The funny thing is, I'm hearing the exact opposite complaint coming from some of the people with many years of actual work experience in their fields. They're saying that recently, the college grads with a B.S. or Masters in the field are getting hired over those with real experience.

    I don't know? Personally, I suspect the REAL issue is just a high unemployment rate overall. We're all stuck in a "buyer's market" when it comes to those doing the hiring, so expectations and requirements are very high, and opportunity to get hired is low. No matter where you're at on the education and/or skills ladder, it's difficult to get hired right now. So people begin tossing out accusations, trying to explain why they can't get jobs.

    I've worked in I.T. for over 25 years myself, and yet I don't have a degree. (I'm one of those people with "some college", meaning a few classes shy of an Associates' degree.) I've *definitely* encountered my share of jobs I was passed over for because someone really considered the degree of prime importance. Yet I don't think my track record for employment is really any worse than my counterparts who did have the 4 year degrees. Yeah, some of them earned $20K - $50K/yr. more than I did, especially during the dot-com boom era.... but in the long-haul? A lot of them lost those high-paying jobs when budget cuts or corporate mergers came around and they had to accept less to get back into the ranks of the employed. Others just got burnt out on I.T. completely and changed careers.

    Meanwhile, I don't have all the college debt they had to pay off, and since my salary has been relatively steady for the last decade or more, I didn't get so caught up in the thing of moving to a more expensive area, buying a large house, etc. -- only to have to give it all up when times got rough.

    There's a key difference though between the "old guys" like myself and people trying to get a start in I.T. today. I think most of us who lived and breathed computers in the 80's really got into it when it was still a hobbyist's world. Corporate America wasn't even really looking at home computers as more than a passing fad, or something to just "keep an eye on, in case it eventually became useful". When you bought a computer ,you got a 200-300 page manual you had to read, cover to cover, to learn how to make it work. You might have shared knowledge with a few friends you made who owned the same machine, or joined some computer club in town. But all in all, you had to be really motivated to learn it, hands-on. Otherwise, why even waste time with it? My college courses in anything resembling I.T. were largely a joke. Either I knew way more than the professors did, or the courses went in depth on something I didn't know much about because truthfully, it DIDN'T MATTER in the grand scheme of I.T.

    These days, I think colleges have figured out much more about what people actually need to know to be successful in I.T. -- and you actually *can* take classes and learn really useful material. At the same time, I see a lot of younger people who seem to be just as "into computers" as I was growing up, but they focus on much different things; social media, web sites, mobile device apps, and MMORPGs that can really suck up a LOT of one's time. It's all pretty cool and entertaining stuff -- but won't translate that well to a career doing network or systems administration, working as a PC support specialist, or systems analyst.

  27. Home economics by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    Potatoes are 10 cents a pound here.

    "Learning to live poor" is the most education that people get in college. They have money... they just don't know how to manage it properly.

    Yep, pretty much this. Students should learn to get by the same way adults do. Make a damn budget and stick to it (granted, this is getting rare among adults too). But do that math and get creative stretching your bucks.

    Found a handful of dependable roommates and rented rickety 100-year old houses with them, which were a lot cheaper than apartments and university housing. We took turns cooking for everyone. We ate well. We'd do a grocery run once a week and shop carefully... fresh or frozen meat that was under $3/lb., lots of pasta, rice, veggies, etc.. Drank tap water, mixed with that frozen juice from concentrate when we wanted something fancier. I pretty much stuck to ~$40 a week for groceries (in 2000 money), and maybe augmented that once or twice a week with trips to one of those heaping Chinese "any two or three" stir fry takeout places for $3-$5 per meal. Plus, I would volunteer to staff the ASME coffee shop in the morning while doing homework, which was good for a bagel or two per sitting. And of course stake out the extracurricular activities that had free pizza.

  28. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me, or are you bitching that an American going to Norway won't get free education in English, when a Norwegian going to US is not only going to have to pay exorbitant money for university tuition but also can completely forget receiving lectures in Norwegian at any US university, even despite the exorbitant cost? I mean, what did you think about European universities, that they have all been built for Anglophone people? "Isn't worth it"...typical. Well, I guess all those tales of the "monolingual pride" of Americans were true!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  29. Re: degrees by ultranova · · Score: 2

    Lazy HR by keyword sorting is the culprit.

    It's not necessarily laziness but another symptom of the oversupply of labour. When there's a 100+ applications for every position, it's impossible to evaluate them without resorting to data mining techniques. And at that point, if your application is not Search Engine Optimized, for example if you lack a diploma, sucks to be you.

    The underlaying problem is that our current economic model, and our model of employment as its subset, is based on the needs of the Industrial Era, which is ending. Capitalism is breaking down just like Feudalism before it, and whatever will replace it hasn't emerged into the mainstream yet. The question is: how long and painful will the transition be this time around?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  30. Re:Ahh by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Informative

    How many people in France know Finnish? Almost none?

    Hi there, I'm an American who studied in Finland for free, and the process of going there to study was pretty effortless. Even if I spoke no Finnish (or Russian, my field's lingua franca), my department was happy to let me concentrate on language learning for the first year or two before moving on to my real coursework. University of Helsinki is full of foreigners, some of which never really learn Finnish, so your claim that the language is a real barrier doesn't wash.

    As for having the money to study here, beyond there being no tuition fees, nearly all non-EU foreigners who come to study in Finland get funding (800€ a month, not luxury but sufficient) and housing for their first year as a matter of course. With a year's head start, one then has plenty of time to find some part-time employment or scholarship for the following years.