Slashdot Mirror
SpaceX Files Suit Against US Air Force
Today Elon Musk announced that SpaceX has decided to challenge the U.S. Air Force's restrictions on rocket launches related to national security. Such launches are done with a Russian rocket right now, and that contract is not up for competition with other rocket makers, like SpaceX. Musk says the company has exhausted other options to become part of the bidding process. "We're just protesting and saying these launches should be competed. And if we compete and lose, that's fine, but why were they not even competed?" He also said it's the "wrong time to send hundreds of millions of dollars to the Kremlin," referencing events in the Ukraine.
At the same press conference, Musk announced that SpaceX's recent attempt to soft-land a rocket booster stage was successful. It landed and was in "healthy condition" immediately afterward. Unfortunately, they weren't able to recover it because it landed in the middle of a rough storm, which eventually destroyed the stage. The storm was rough enough that the Coast Guard wouldn't even send a boat out to help recover it. Musk said, "We'll get much bigger boats next time." SpaceX also plans on landing the stage on shore at some point, which makes recovery easier. Musk made this prediction: "I expect we will be able to land a stage back at Cape Canaveral by the end of the year."
At the same press conference, Musk announced that SpaceX's recent attempt to soft-land a rocket booster stage was successful. It landed and was in "healthy condition" immediately afterward. Unfortunately, they weren't able to recover it because it landed in the middle of a rough storm, which eventually destroyed the stage. The storm was rough enough that the Coast Guard wouldn't even send a boat out to help recover it. Musk said, "We'll get much bigger boats next time." SpaceX also plans on landing the stage on shore at some point, which makes recovery easier. Musk made this prediction: "I expect we will be able to land a stage back at Cape Canaveral by the end of the year."
"Such launches are done with a Russian rocket right now"
more correctly, the launches are done with an American rocket, using a Russian engine (RD-180).
see: http://www.forbes.com/sites/lo...
http://www.parabolicarc.com/20...
(the article has it right; the summary is inaccurate).
http://www.geoffreylandis.com
Elon Musk is swimming in the waters of international politics. Big "no no" with this administration currently in office. He's about to get bitch slapped down and possibly lose it all. With Obama, he can be vindictive!
Life is not for the lazy.
Translation: some Air Force brass are getting board seats in some corporation X after retirement, so of course they don't want to open the bidding and allow SpaceX to take the contract.
Government (military) contracts are where all the real money is.
it takes 60 days for a seller to collect their funds on ebay/paypal
by then, the seller is usually on the streets and homeless
but elon musk has a spaceship!
And everyone at slashdot swooned, breathing deep his ethereal digestion byproduct.
But, what if Elon farted in the woods? Would Beta be there to smell it?
I'd say any teams and hopes we had with Russia should be maintained for the idea of brotherly love.
Taking Russia out of the loop in the ISS for now could appear like we're being jerks in times of international crisis.
We need goodwill now. Money is of no concern when you're thinking of the results of what could happen if Russia and USA blood goes bad.
God spoke to me
Funny how successful it is ... but it couldn't be recovered.
I'm not sure what world he lives in, but unless he's reusing his reusable rocket, he failed. Doesn't matter that the Coast Guard wouldn't go after it, that in fact is more telling than anything he said, storms that large and powerful don't blow up in 20 minutes, so there is definitely bad planning on SpaceX's part ... another reason why they just aren't qualified to do what they claim they are doing.
While the engineers at Tesla and SpaceX are damn good at their jobs, Musk needs to be silenced. PayPal was nothing more than right place, right time, and truth be told is an absolutely shitty company in every way except for lining his pockets.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
I suspect the current arrangement with the Russians providing lift tickets to the ISS performs a similar function to the intelligence treaties we signed in the 90s allowing the U.S. and Russia to perform overflights of each others' countries to verify ICBM numbers and troop movements, plus the CIAs fanatical attention to assist the Russians in tracking and controlling any and all nuclear materials to keep it from wandering off in the hands of men like Viktor Bout, "Lord of War" arms dealer.
By subsidising the Russian space program with this sweetheart no-bid contract, we, the U.S., help ensure that dozens of very highly skilled engineers and scientists with the ability to lead a team interested in designing and building short, medium, or long-range rockets - for whatever purpose - are kept "on payroll" and reasonably content safely and securely inside Russia. Exactly where we want them. Instead of helping a potential aggressor nation like Iran, North Korea, or theocratic / military dictatorship Du Jour develop accurate, long range weapons for suitcases full of cash, women, mansions and national hero-worship.
The current deal also forces a certain level of cooperation between the space agencies, governments, and builds political good will on both sides. Good Will that Putin is destroying at the moment, but will return providing he doesn't go all Poland '39 on the remainder of Ukraine.
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
This has nothing to do with the ISS. This is for spy satellites.
Heh, I thought I read this was launches to the ISS. Please ignore that. My point stands that we shouldn't be treating Russia like some rogue country, but still try and be cool with them. The guys point that we shouldn't be sending money to the Kremlin sends the wrong message to me. I think we should try and be peaceable and stay out of other country's affairs the best we can. I'd love to say,"Let the professionals deal in international affairs." but when you look at our elected officials just being corporate puppets, it makes me hang my head.
God spoke to me
"I'm not sure what world he lives in, but unless he's reusing his reusable rocket, he failed."
Uh, you do, you know, realize that there was never, you know, any plan to, you know, reuse the first stage even if it was recovered? And that, you know, the actual, like, goal of launching the rocket was not to recover the first stage, but, you know, to launch the payload into space to, like the space station?
Back in the real world, rather than whatever wacky alternate reality you live in, the goal of the recovery test was to perform a fake 'soft landing' over the sea to prove that such a thing was possible, and ensure that, if they screwed up, no-one would get hurt. That goal was successful. They only wanted to recover the stage so they could take it apart and see what had happened to the hardware in the process.
The problem with this plan is that Russia and its leader don't want goodwill from the United States. They want a monster that can be slain with saber-rattling like in the old Cold War days - even if they have to manufacture one out of an ally. Putin isn't interested in who dies in the process in his quest to cement his legacy as the greatest leader of the NEW Soviet Union that ever was - we (not just the United States, but the International community at large) can't be so foolish as to just ignore it. The only way he can get what he wants to have us in a position of weakness - and giving his nation the only means to get to and return from the International Space Station is about the best leverage that we can give him.
Its not a matter of *if* the relationship between the United States and Russia goes bad, its *when* it goes bad if Putin remains in power.
Musk said, "We'll get much bigger boats next time."
Is he retrieving a booster or a shark?
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Not many countries want goodwill from the United States. That kind of "goodwill" is used to topple democraticly elected governments in other countries and take their oil and other resources.
Don't worry, as soon as he has the Falcon heavy ready, he can launch his orbital solar deathray, and then he doesn't need to worry about Obummer (or Putin) interfering in this plans.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
It is about time that the FTC steps in and allows SpaceX to sell their rockets directly to the Air Force. Blame the rich local rocket dealerships, we corrupted their local politicians to create laws that are only designed to maintain their business model of selling old fashioned rockets. What people in the street want is to buy a next generation rocket, directly from the Internet, without having to talk to one of those sleazy rocket salesman. I am getting confused, you were saying Elon?
karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
Musk is a con man, who is amoral and has no qualms about
screwing over as many people as he needs to screw in order
to fulfill his fantasy of being the creator of something worthwhile.
And so far, it remains a fantasy.
We need goodwill now.
"If I be real nice to him maybe he won't hit me again! It's all my fault!"
Is such thinking any less heartbreaking on an international scale? No.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Remember Alexander Litvinenko. Diss putin can get you killed.
As a taxpayer, I wouldn't usually care about these corporate tiffs, but SpaceX can probably save the government hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars which could be used towards additional capabilities in space... so using SpaceX for launches could allow the Air Force to double its launch capacity at the same cost. Forget about sending money to Russia using ULA rockets, using SpaceX could double or more than double US space capabilities which translates to more communications satellites, more surveillance satellites and more R&D payloads.
It is boggles the mind that the procurement folks at the air force would sign long term contracts with ULA just a few months before SpaceX has finished jumping through all the Air Force hoops for certification. Seems like a pretty blatant multi billion dollar gift (going out of business gift?) to the United Launch Alliance and is a bad deal for the Pentagon.
Given the likelihood of certification for SpaceX, at the very least the Air Force procurers should have limited the contract to nearer term launches and not so many.
...I stopped reading this shitty post after the third 'you know'. DIAF.
But, you know, what he said was right (you know).
Musk said, "We'll get much bigger boats next time."
Knowing Musk, that means he's going to build a flotilla of fully autonomous fusion powered Nimitz class aircraft carriers constructed entirely from carbon fiber. They'll probably haul the booster up with carbon nanotube wires and preserve it in amber, then transform into robots and fly back to fucking Cybertron.
-- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
We need goodwill now. Money is of no concern when you're thinking of the results of what could happen if Russia and USA blood goes bad.
So we're supposed to just throw all our money down the shitter to keep Russia from getting sad/angry? What are they going to do? Their economy is already collapsing and they've proven once before that you can't pose a real, sustainable military threat to much of anyone if you don't have the economy to keep it going. If we isolate Russia, their economy will take a dive and Putin will end up on the wrong side of pissed off Russians. They'll have a hard winter, then they'll come asking for money telling everyone they've changed their ways.
We're pretty dumb, so we'll give them some money and the cycle will restart. We don't need to buy their stupid rocket engine in no-bid contracts. Let the best solution win.
-- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
sssssshhhhhhhh.... you're not supposed to reveal to the supporting characters that they're cannon fodder in a James Bond novel.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
It butt-landed in 1991. What's the big deal?
time to call in those favors Musk paid for in getting the President elected. Unless he's used them all up getting EV credits and immunity from Union hassles for TESLA.
Why is it that all cars are required to have front plates in CA, even if they did not come with them originally, but the Model S has no front plate or frame? Not a single one here in San Jose has a legal front plate that is required by law for everyone else.
Maybe Musk needs to save some favors for his other projects, or wait till after helping buy the next election.
In what way is one company getting the work like a job being split up among many companies? According to the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), over 20,000 different companies and universities worked on the Apollo program.
In short, the answer to your question is no.
https://www.asme.org/engineeri...
McDonnell Douglas handed the DC-X over to NASA who promptly dropped it and set it on fire.
Man, you make me sad. I remember how COOL that was at the time, it was the FUTURE, landing on a pillar of fire like a proper spaceship. Then we pissed away another 20 years doing nothing with it. May Space X have better luck.
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Knowing Musk, that means he's going to build a flotilla of fully autonomous fusion powered Nimitz class aircraft carriers constructed entirely from carbon fiber. They'll probably haul the booster up with carbon nanotube wires and preserve it in amber, then transform into robots and fly back to fucking Cybertron.
Actually I COULD see Musk building a carbon fiber hulled, wind driven,Knowing Musk, that means he's going to build a flotilla of fully autonomous fusion powered Nimitz class aircraft carriers constructed entirely from carbon fiber. They'll probably haul the booster up with carbon nanotube wires and preserve it in amber, then transform into robots and fly back to fucking Cy
Actually I COULD see Musk building a carbon fiber hulled, wind driven, solar powered, cargo ship.
I doubt he'd bother doing such a vessel as a recovery ship for this project, though, since he's just planning to land a couple to test that the control systems are working adequately before he starts bringing them in on land. Even if it made sense to build one to use it twice, by the time it was done its mission would have already been completed.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
ROFL!
Wish I had mod points just now.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
What exactly have you done lately that's so innovative and amazing? Exactly, nothing. Banker or not, this guy has a strong vision and has worked hard to make those visions reality.
Seriously, SpaceX should sue the republicans for being the traitors that they are. If trash like shelby, wolf, Hatch, Coffman, etc were sued PERSONALLY, it would no doubt go through multiple courts, BUT, with information brought out, it would cause citizens to re-evaluate what is happening.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Smart guy.
He know's his main competition is OSC. And for nearly all small Airforce launches goto OSC. And OSC is using russian engines as well for their NASA bids.
OSC is their main competition. OSC does built their own stuff, but at a different approach (older tech but still develops). He needs to stay ahead considering the competition's solution is much different but hitting the same price point.
...
We need goodwill now. Money is of no concern when you're thinking of the results of what could happen if Russia and USA blood goes bad.
And here I thought merely electing Obama would give us that....
Who just happen to be by far the biggest military aerospace contractors, doing just about some of everything.
The RD-180 business is minor.
Just because you love your crazy axe murdering brother doesn't mean you should buy him an axe.
The problem is, it will go bad unless Putin gets what he wants, and what he apparently wants is to take over the neighbouring countries and rebuild Soviet Union. Which, of course, will bring him into a conflict with the EU, which in turn could lead to anything from World War III to EU dissolving from the stress to EU becoming a real federation to effectively counter the threat. To avoid such a chaotic situation with potentially catastrophic consequences Russia needs to be contained, and the most "goodwill" way of doing so is economic isolation.
Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.
For starters, DC-X cost about $60,000,000. That was in the 90s, but that's barely noticeable on any government budget, and significantly less than NASA spent to put a fake upper state on top of a shuttle SRB and fire it into the ocean. The low cost was one of the reasons it scared the established players so much.
Secondly, if I remember correctly, the leg failed to extend because someone had disconnected a hydraulic line. And that was after NASA had taken over the program.
The idea of brotherly love is supposed to be two-way. And right now, US is seen as enemy #1 not only by the Russian government, but by the majority of the Russian society (which is being fed propaganda about how US is behind everything bad that's happening in Ukraine from their TVs).
You would rather than the country you live in be on the shit list of the U.S. government as opposed to being on a list of supporters?
... that agrees with you. And that list is what I know personally to be true ... which is probably less than 1% of the total list.
My team lost a contract to a competitor because of price, not actual technical feasibility. We had a working prototype that was proven technology (only needed 6 month to make it operational), but the government gave the competition (who only had a design on paper) because they heavily (and purposely) underbid the proposal. Five years later, the product delivered is not even 10% of what was bid, and what was delivered has cost 3X the bidding cost in post delivery repairs.
So that "cheap" designed ended up costing over twice the amount that we bid.
... that still has a 70% failure rate instead of going with technology that is PROVEN and RELIABLE ??
Sorry, but contrary to what the SpaceX PR machine claims, to this day SpaceX hasn't managed to launch a single rocket without it having some mayor failure. From catastrophic flights (first 8 flights were total lost) to failing to reach target orbit and frozen thruster nozzles, SpaceX hasn't managed a single flight with an acceptable level of reliability.
Yes, they have managed to PARTIALLY complete a mission, but have never actually fully completed one.
SpaceX has launched every payload it was paid to launch on Falcon 9, and the only failure to reach the desired orbit was due to NASA telling them they couldn't relight the engine in case it hit ISS.
If that's not 'an acceptable level of reliability', I don't know what you think is.
Well the thing is we told Ukraine that if they gave up their nuclear weapons, we'd help protect them from foreign aggressors; they did and then got invaded by Russia. Unless we do something effective pretty soon, it's going to be a hard sell to get anybody else to give up their nucs.
Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
I think you're right: jealously. Musk has runs on the board - multiple runs in multiple arenas. He should be every geek's action hero, but instead people are calling him a con-man, a fake, a wannabe. It's absurd in light of the observable facts, and the only explanation that fits is that a collection of true wannabe's are sitting at home chucking sour grapes.
Not what the treaty says at all. The US made no such promise.
It's bad for business to sue your customers.
You would rather than the country you live in be on the shit list of the U.S. government as opposed to being on a list of supporters?
This argument is often raised, but Haiti and Cuba are countries that make you stop and think about it. Haiti received government support from the U.S. and it not doing well by any measure. Cuba has had an embargo with the U.S., Bay of Pigs, etc. and is doing relatively okay for it in comparison.
Now I like the U.S. and respect it for holding to its principles as a country, but there are a couple of supporting countries that have had their countries pretty well screwed over.
...continue to pioneer all those things only the rich can afford! I'm sure changing the world for that 1% is going to make a massive difference.
So let's see if I understand the situation -- I don't live in your country, so this is damned confusing.
Not so long ago, you had a huge military enemy. They were bigger than you. They were scary. Many lives were lost on both sides. Then there were decades of espionage. Movies, history books, and even comic book super-villians were written about your relationship.
Then, you finally became allies, working together against many things. Once again, movies, history books, and even comic book super-heroes were written about your relationship.
As a direct result, and probably actually the primary cause, you share technology for space exploration -- a laudible partnership and persuit.
And now your own civilians are upset with your friendly relationship? So much so that they are suing you (i.e. themselves) in an attempt to actually harm or hinder that friendship?
And, one of the excuses is that your friend is powerful? Poke the bear?
There's a comedian with a great joke about your country -- "the U.S. goes to all the wars, they love war. they had a civil war! no one left to fight? screw it:, two teams...".
Damn, you guys really do look for fights.
being fed propaganda about how US is behind everything
You're right, they're not behind everything but they are behind the operations that we *know* the CIA is directing/informing. Does somebody want to guess at a percentage now, last month, and next month?
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
It's not a treaty, no signer has ratified it. The "memorandum of understanding" states only that the US (and UK and Russia, and in a separate agreement, France) agrees not to use or threaten to use nukes on the Ukraine (which it hasn't), not to challenge the territorial integrity of Ukraine (which it hasn't), to respect the then existing borders of Ukraine (which it does), and to raise any attack by another party against the Ukraine in the Security Council (which the UK did, with US support.) There's no requirement to defend the Ukraine against another signatory or non-signatory attacking them. A mutual defence treaty is a whole different kettle of fish.
The US (and UK and France) have upheld their ends of the agreement (again, not treaty), only Russia has violated the agreement.
Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
Cuba isn't really doing all that well either, although I think their PR efforts are better than what Haiti does. It really isn't a fair comparison and Cuba has definitely been hurt with the various blockades and embargoes done against it. Don't forget, Cuba is still being ruled by a communist dictator that has even more control and authority over that country than Adolph Hitler had over Nazi Germany. About the only thing I can really say that is positive is that Cuba seems to be doing better than North Korea, but then again Cuba isn't investing in a nuclear weapons program either. Cuba wouldn't have survived at all if it wasn't for the generous patronage and support given by the Soviet Union, who gave that support primarily because keeping Cuba prosperous also was excellent PR.
Don't even get started with the Bay of Pigs invasion. There is no possible way that Cuba could have held out against the actual U.S. military, and why Kennedy let that abomination of a military action happen in the first place still is something to this day makes me say "Huh?"
In other words, comparing one former French colony that nobody cares about to a former American colony that is a deliberate thorn in the side of every occupant of the White House is not even a realistic comparison at all. Perhaps the worst part about American administration of Cuba was the singular failure to dismantle some of the even earlier Spanish institutions that should have been removed but weren't until Castro came to power.
The other thing is, even if CIA is truly behind every single thing happening in Ukraine, Russian populace at large believes that all those events have the singular purpose of getting at them. Basically, the "patriotic" picture of the world in Russia is that the country itself is sort of the center of all that is good and holy in the world (some people link it to Eastern Orthodoxy / Third Rome, some to Soviet legacy, many even combine the two), and the Western world (led by US) as a force of evil that would want to rule the world, and needs to destroy Russia utterly because it stands in the way of that. Therefore, every foreign activity of Western countries, real or imagined, is deemed to be aimed in Russia directly or indirectly.
Surely, you did not read/watched U.S news/TVs, right?
Don't act like somethings good/bad, black/white!
Oh! Look, how bad Russian mobs are:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/25/1294569/-NY-Times-photos-prove-masked-men-work-for-Putin-made-those-anti-semitic-fliers-Uh-no
I missed what happened to it after the report of a successful soft landing.
"Unfortunately, they weren't able to recover it because it landed in the middle of a rough storm, which eventually destroyed the stage."
Well, if it's so damned smart and clever and capable and all, why didn't they tell it to land somewhere else?
Land at sea in the middle of a bloody storm, you get what you deserve!
We need goodwill now. Money is of no concern when you're thinking of the results of what could happen if Russia and USA blood goes bad.
So, this is danegeld.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
I didn't say anything about how the perception in US might be skewed, only how it's skewed in Russia. There's nothing black/white about it.
And yes, I do actually know what I'm talking about - I'm a Russian citizen, I watch the state media as well as private blogs in Runet, and have plenty of friends there who fall on all sides of the spectrum.
The idea of brotherly love is supposed to be two-way
May be, it's not your intention. But the way you expressed is the way I understood.
Your previous comment is likely Russia painted U.S as bad guy, but U.S did not.
Meanwhile, actually, Russia is not the guy stopped corporate with NASA, nor non-politic projects, e.g. RD-180 engine, etc...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/clayton-anderson/iss-calling-russia-friend-or-foe_b_4912989.html
Russia is the guy who occupied a part of another country, and is sponsoring hostage-taking terrorism in another part of that country to prepare for one more takeover. What did you expect the rest of the world to do? Send Putin roses?
Yeah, that's show your actual intention. I like this straight, not disinformation.
Yeah, Russia must be punished! :) ;)
But...
* Not science, non-politic, 'for mankind' project
* Not the rest of the world, it's the Western world, decide to 'do something'. But, what will punish the 'rulers' for doing something even worse. E.g. Kosovo, no referendum, bombing innocent people, whitewash war crimes like:
Kosovo Prime Minister Agim Ceku is no longer considered a War Criminal
http://www.globalresearch.ca/kosovo-prime-minister-agim-ceku-is-no-longer-considered-a-war-criminal/2165
Kosovo's PM Hashim Thaçi was 'mafia boss who stole human organs from Serbs'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1338766/Kosovos-PM-Hashim-Tha-mafia-boss-stole-human-organs-Serbs.html
Russia is the guy who occupied a part of another country
I don't agree with everything Russia do, but at least, almost of Crimean against to be part of Ukraina, since the end of Soviet. You, be a Russian must knew that!?
What if Catalan don't want to be part of Spain, or more than 80% of Venetian want to be independent. How democracy the West promoted.
is sponsoring hostage-taking terrorism in another part of that country to prepare for one more takeover.
That is, you've proved that your one-way information.
That is, all you've claimed has never be proved, even Kerry, or Psaki... And how the non-information made you believed this?
Meanwhile, there more than one proof of financial support of Western for the 'Maidan' oligarchs.
Secondly, I don't see the difference between the Molotov-throwing protesters who overthrown Yanukovitch with who - you called terrorists - in the Eastern Ukraine.
Either the way they do, or their intention.
What I read and what my compatriots who have lived there, I can tell that all people who *directly* participate in the up-rising in both West and East of Ukraine are all want to have better life. One against the 'Russia-backed' oligarchs, others against 'Western-backed' oligarchs.
P/S: At least, Yanukovitch did NOT use military against his people!
I'm not of a particularly high opinion of how the West handled Kosovo, both back in 1999 and after its de facto independence. But, at the same time, it took an actual genocide (as in, people being dragged out of the houses and shot, or forced to relocate at a gunpoint, solely on the grounds of their ethnic identity), and over a year of negotiations and threats, before military force was used in Kosovo...
I don't agree with everything Russia do, but at least, almost of Crimean against to be part of Ukraina, since the end of Soviet. You, be a Russian must knew that!?
Sure, I don't have any doubts about the outcome of a fair referendum. But these things should be done right and proper, which is to say, a referendum carefully arranged, with plenty of observers present, and with everyone agreeing on how to handle the outcome. Not a hastily run affair under gunpoint with threats to those who disagree. And certainly not when, shortly after the referendum, people get beaten up for speaking the wrong language in public...
That is, you've proved that your one-way information.
That is, all you've claimed has never be proved, even Kerry, or Psaki... And how the non-information made you believed this?
Meanwhile, there more than one proof of financial support of Western for the 'Maidan' oligarchs.
My sources of information on this are the separatists themselves. You know that they give interviews and such, and they have websites and blogs of their own? They pretty much openly boasted of taking hostages, later explaining that it is to "exchange for our guys they captured". I have no idea what Kerry said on that subject - didn't even know he did - and I don't really care.
In general, 95% of my information sources on the situation in Ukraine is Russian and Ukrainian press, and blogs of people who live there. I only read Western press to know what the public opinion on the matter is.
Secondly, I don't see the difference between the Molotov-throwing protesters who overthrown Yanukovitch with who - you called terrorists - in the Eastern Ukraine. Either the way they do, or their intention.
There was no difference when people in Eastern Ukraine started to organize for federalization or more rights (language etc). The difference appeared when they took up arms before any violence being directed at them (on Maidan, the molotovs appeared only after the first brutal beatings, and guns appeared only in the last two days of the conflict when Berkut started shooting at protesters with real bullets), and when they started taking hostages and throwing journalists of "hostile" media into jail. The other difference is that those people not only carry guns, they carry military guns (full auto AKs, RPGs), and are generally very well outfitted for a grassroots militia movement - but then it all starts to make sense when those guys are asked where they're from, and a good half came there from Crimea, and a bunch more from Russia proper.
P/S: At least, Yanukovitch did NOT use military against his people!
Sure, he used his intensely loyalist personal guard instead, just like Saddam used his fedayeen - because the army might not be willing to shoot at unarmed people (heck, they aren't even willing to shoot at armed people, as the new government has found out!). Either way, he told them to use real bullets, and now we have 100+ bodies coming from Maidan. How many bodies are there in Slavyansk and Kramatorsk?
It's a dumb law suite. Why, Musk can't win because he isn't a US Citizen and none of his companies are US companies; all about taxes.
It's a smart law suite. Why, Musk is what President Obozo (Barak Butthole Obama) can never be, a real 100% African ! Obozo ? The ass wipe is not even an African-American ! Why ? Obozo is just a half breed, American Kenyan Dingo.
This law suite will keep Obozo haunkered down in the 'Situation Room' sucking his bong and masturbating to Putin videos until the half breed dingo walks on January 20 2017.
Ha ha.
Here dingo here dingo.
Weeeeeeeeee !
You know what, what you believe in Kosovo is what history has been re-written after NATO intervention. KLA WAS a terrorist group, and innocent Yougoslavia was bombed (I don't say Serbia was right, but all criminals must be treated as they are). And now, the KLA have done and doing the same with 'minority' group of Serbians. Ironic!
It's not that West did that so Russia can do this, but I showed you that when you strongly believed in 'the rest of the world...' you must be in fantasy world. I sicked of this hypocrisy (not about you, but about what the side you believe in).
Remember Arab Saudi, Jordan sent troops to Bahrain to suppress protesters. What are your 'the rest of the world...' when they are friends.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/15/world/middleeast/15bahrain.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0&gwh=626185009C8613BB1B9F513418DB146B&gwt=regi
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13921113000706
Not a hastily run affair under gunpoint with threats to those who disagree. And certainly not when, shortly after the referendum, people get beaten up for speaking the wrong language in public...
I guessed, from the 'free' medias. I would say this **may** be happened, but did you remember the news about one Ukrainian soldier died in Crimea, no news media told that there also a self-defense member died, and BOTH were shot by unknown snipers. This was **covered** until the:
Ukraine's unlikeliest funeral. the only two foes to die in Russia's Crimea takeover are mourned together - Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10716412/Ukraines-unlikeliest-funeral-the-only-two-foes-to-die-in-Russias-Crimea-takeover-are-mourned-together.html
And, any media you read told that Region party members were beaten and forced to resign. Do you think this leads to free election in Ukraine!?
My sources of information on this are the separatists themselves. You know that they give interviews and such, and they have websites and blogs of their own? They pretty much openly boasted of taking hostages, later explaining that it is to "exchange for our guys they captured". I have no idea what Kerry said on that subject - didn't even know he did - and I don't really care.
I'm not talking about the hostage yet. I talking about [Russia] 'is sponsoring' this separatists, that is Kerry and Psaki claimed that there FSBs [was captured], 'pictures of Russian soldiers in self-defense force'. They couldn't prove this:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/25/1294569/-NY-Times-photos-prove-masked-men-work-for-Putin-made-those-anti-semitic-fliers-Uh-no
There was no difference when people in Eastern Ukraine started to organize for federalization or more rights (language etc). The difference appeared when they took up arms before any violence being directed at them (on Maidan, the molotovs appeared only after the first brutal beatings, and guns appeared only in the last two days of the conflict when Berkut started shooting at protesters with real bullets), and when they started taking hostages and throwing journalists of "hostile" media into jail. The other difference is that those people not only carry guns, they carry military guns (full auto AKs, RPGs), and are generally very well outfitted for a grassroots militia movement - but then it all starts to make sense when those guys are asked where they're from, and a good half came there from Crimea, and a bunch more from Russia proper.
Sure, he used his intensely loyalist personal guard instead, just like Saddam used his fedayeen - because the army might not be willing to shoot at unarmed people (heck, they aren't even willing to shoot at armed people, as the new government has found out!). Either way, he told them to use real bullets, and now we have 100+ bodies coming from Maidan. How many bodies are there in Slavyansk and Kramatorsk?
Real bullets...! Did you believed in video captured Berkut kn
Air Force Officials as making the rounds calling Musk and 'Apartheidist' . An Air Force Public Relations Officer made the connection when he read that Musk is an African, as in South African. Now with Kerry calling Israel an Apartheid country, the Air Force is pushing that Musk's SpaceX is an Apartheid company, and un-American to boot.
Ha ha