Slashdot Mirror
Pentagon Document Lays Out Battle Plan Against Zombies
mpicpp sends this news from CNN: "Never fear the night of the living dead — the Pentagon has got you covered. From responses to natural disasters to a catastrophic attack on the homeland, the U.S. military has a plan of action ready to go if either incident occurs. It has also devised an elaborate plan should a zombie apocalypse befall the country, according to a Defense Department document obtained by CNN. In an unclassified document titled 'CONOP 8888,' officials from U.S. Strategic Command used the specter of a planet-wide attack by the walking dead as a training template for how to plan for real-life, large-scale operations, emergencies and catastrophes."
I'm glad to see tax money put to such wasteful use... For a brief time I thought they would actually do something worthwhile with taxes.....
Do you get the angry sarcasm in that statement? It is sarcasm!
Pentagon couldn't vey well openly plan to fight a war against the unhappy general US population, opposing it's military dictatorship, so they had to invent "Zombies." The real target here is US citizens who don't like their fascist government.
From the document, it says for this training excersize, "we elected to use a completely impossible scenarios that could never be mistaken as a 'real plan'.
"The document is identified as a training tool used in an in-house training exercise where students learn about the basic concepts of military plans and order development through a fictional training scenario,"
In the mid 1800's artificial satellites were only science fiction too. As was robotics in the mid 1900's. Now all the global telecommunication depends on satellites and robots are faster and stronger than humans, even if they do not have cognitive capabilities comparable to ours yet.To have a plan is the simplest form of preparation. It's not like they have extra infrastructure or personal around the clock to stop something like a zombie infestation from happening, but they have a plan. And they will spend their time and resources with exercises anyway. Might as well go bat shit crazy.
But anyway, it's not like my country's army has money to buy ammo for live ammo exercises.
I think I speak for all non-Americans when I say: Let the US Army burn money with harmless thoughts instead of black R&D, torture camps, wars on other countries and so on.
This combination doesn`t exist: ETIs that know about humanity and want to see us dead. Otherwise we wouldn't exist.
Ebola is as good as a zombie outbreak and there is one in a modern city in West Africa
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/o...
How much of this plan could apply to a mass rebellion against a state or the federal government, if people get tired of the corporatism?
What, round everybody up into refugee camps? Pass.
Because training.
Ebola is as good as a zombie outbreak and there is one in a modern city in West Africa http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/o...
that really sucks, the local warlord had PLANS for those people!
Zombies are a metaphor for poor people. You can't make a battle plan for what to do when the proletariat rises, because the optics are bad, but you can plan for zombies. Yet another reason to do something about income inequality before it comes to that.
So that's where that last 375 million went! Maybe I should just give the gubmint 100% of my earned income as tax. Wizards of frugality. Because puppies.
Emergency services have been using things like "zombie attacks" for decades. There's a lot of reasons why. One is if a civilian stumbles onto your training exercise, they're more likely to think it's some sort of movie then to get scared. Another is it's a bit lighthearted for a serious subject and may make it more enjoyable for people involved. And, any skills or experienced from the fantasy directly carries over to real life situations.
Unsuspecting Citizens. A way to cull the masses when unemployment rates go too high.
Now all the global telecommunication depends on satellites
Actually it doesn't. Maybe it did in the 70's, 80's, and 90's, but at about the turn of the millennium satellite communication is increasingly unimportant for global communications. In fact it has the disadvantages of much higher latency, lower bandwidth, and much higher cost.
WTF is all this "zombie attack" crap? Come on - the shit's not REAL, so WTF is the government or anyone else "going off" on this CRAP for anyhow??
* Seriously - DO THEY KNOW SOMETHING I/WE DON'T?
(I mean, come on - please already! That's crap's the provonice of Science Ficiion or Horror films/books - nothing more, so WHY WASTE TIME ON IT - especially with taxpayer monies?)
APK
P.S.=> I mean it...
... apk
It's a place holder. The CDC has used it as well to simulate the rapid spread of a disease across the country. You see, in any large scale disaster/emergency/attack/whatever, there are quite a few constants: quarantining or blocking off certain areas, logistics, crowd control, evacuations. A "zombie attack" is essentially a placeholder that allows for plans to be drawn up that can be adapted to a wide range of cases. It also keeps those involved entertained and therefore engaged in the exercise because it is so outlandish and impossible (and also something they've likely seen in movies).
The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
zombies.malebolge.hl 127.0.0.1
What the hell do you think is in the flu shots they want you to get so badly? ZOMBIE VIRUS :) have a nice day
Awhile back the CDC led a zombie awareness campaign involving the public. The objective was not to prepare for actual zombies, but instead to teach basic principles disaster preparedness in a format that would actually get attention.
Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
THAT actually makes SOME sense here (considering zombies are nonsensical fantasy & nothing more). believe it or not. Wouldn't surprise me @ all!
APK
P.S.=> What you said actually IS scary, i.e. - substituting "zombies" as a word for a revolt of the working class masses (who've been ROYALLY FUCKED OVER by the TRUE controllers of our now VERY fascist government bought off & PAID for by BRIBERY (lobbyists))
I suppose you can say that "We have the BEST GOVERNMENT that money TRULY CAN buy" or rather, buy off... apk
Not only that but zombies combine multiple situations. You need physical defense, infection monitoring, unknown medical care, rioting, panic, etc
You can combine all your forces. Police ambulance fire military into a single exercise easily.
And it is easier for the actor to play their roles.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
Seems like the only purpose of this article on CNN was to generate page views by people who were fooled by the headline and summary into believing that it actually was meant to be in preparation for a zombie attack. It seems to have worked really well. The purpose of it on /. I don't understand.
Just wondering!
First off: training, as others have said. Ridiculous scenarios have the advantage of being more entertaining and less likely to freak out the populace.
And secondly, if you'll allow me to put on my tinfoil hat for a moment, I imagine the response to a worldwide zombie attack would bear many similarities to the response to mass civilian uprisings - a scenario any power-loving government is afraid of. And can you imagine the reactions if it got out that they had a plan titled "Military response to attempted popular revolution"?
Not to mention that you don't want to encourage the god-and-country loving rank and file to think about how they would react to being ordered to fire on their neighbors - in a crisis situation you can put a lot of psychological pressure on the troops and possibly get at least a few days or weeks of unhappy obedience before you have to start worrying about mass defections, which used intelligently may be enough to get the population back in line. Put them through a training exercise where they have to confront the possibility of being used for civilian oppression beforehand though, and you may find that a lot of them have already decided they'll have no part in it if the scenario becomes reality.
And it has the added benefit that anyone claiming that "zombie apocalypse" is a stand-in for "civilian uprising" will sound like they're off their rocker. And so if you'll excuse me I'm going to remove my tinfoil hat and get on with enjying this beautiful Saturday morning.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
...because the optics are bad...
Thanks, now I now never to read anything else you post, ever.
Are you also one of those assholes sitting around in meetings saying, "well, the ASK is reasonable, and I don't think the LIFT is to big".
Asshole.
Shh! Don't say things like that. Stupid people might believe you.
After all, people still believe what Jenny McCarthy says. And the pope. And the NRA. And Fox News.
Perception is reality. Zombies are popular. So... this is an excellent teaching tool because it engages the interest of students (not to mention good PR for a public that prefers lies over reality).
Zombie attack is used as great training because it combines many different types of scenarios into one. It's an infectious disease, so you're training mass prophylaxis etc, people get injured, so it covers mass casualties like a plane crash or big explosion, the zombies come after people in mass like a riot or invasion. The water is assumed to be infected with the zombie virus, so it trains infrastructure disaster, etc. Nearly everybody involved with emergency response has to do their job for a zombie scenario, so it's great for a large, coordinated training exercise.
The last time we ran zombies, here in College Station, I don't know that the computer emergency response people were included. That's the only group not trained by zombie that I can think of. Maybe next time we'lldo zombie hackers. :)
I work at TEEX in College Station, where we train all sorts of peoplefor every disaster imaginable - we have wrecked trains, buildings that collapse on demand, etc. Most of the classes we offer can probably be included in a zombie scenario .
* Seriously - DO THEY KNOW SOMETHING I/WE DON'T?
I think that given how little you know, everyone knows something you don't. ;-)
Emergency services have been using things like "zombie attacks" for decades. There's a lot of reasons why. One is if a civilian stumbles onto your training exercise, they're more likely to think it's some sort of movie then to get scared. Another is it's a bit lighthearted for a serious subject and may make it more enjoyable for people involved. And, any skills or experienced from the fantasy directly carries over to real life situations.
"Woah, no way! A tin-foil hat! I've always heard about them, I wonder how it fits..."
Fantasy has already become reality, and that is the main reason we are seeing official government documents coming out now is because the t-virus is more fact than fiction. By releasing these documents, the government is helping train citizens for the zombie outbreak they plan on creating in a few years as a method of population control. Of course, individuals and groups will be targeted for infection to help restore the balance of power.
(removes hat)
"Man, I don't see how people wear these things."
I hang around in survivalists circles a little bit and there's a little bit of a saying there "If you can survive a zombie apocalypse you can survive almost anything" The idea of walking undead creatures with a taste for human flesh is very unlikely (not impossible, but unlikely), but the skills & tools for surviving one will prepare you for a variety of situations (natural disaster, civil unrest, economic collapse, etc). The idea of the military preparing for mass numbers of "zombies" (civilians) rising up and assaulting them is not very settling. There are not many situations in which this kind of training would be necessary except for a civilian uprising, save for some of the aspects of dealing with an defending from assault with limited resources, a breakdown of communications & no backup.
Boring The American Doctrine of never using a single bullet when 30 can be used wont work on Zombies.
Zombies for the win - still no military wins * for the merkins in my life time (* you win the battle but lose the war).
that plan actually covers the uprising of large parts of the population against the government.
To have any chance, all dead who haven't completely disintegrated would have to zerg rush military bases. That's the only possible way.
It's like Risk, Japan has to take Hawaii, or not, but it's decided early on.
An alternate strategy, attack and convert the populace early, would just suffer the same fate even if successful.
Now, take out ammo plants, that might work if your zergs can out-attrit bullet stores in bases.
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
If you read the second link to the actual document. The very beginning is a disclaimer that basically states they used this scenario specifically to add interest to an otherwise dry subject.
It doesn't change the subject, nor the training. It merely adds a little 'fun' to the course.
As other posters noted. The survival techniques are still valid. The Zombie angle just to make it interesting. And most people will retain more from an interesting class than a dull one.
The headline is clickbait.
If they were saying "OMG there might really be a zombie apocalypse then yeah, what B.S.
But that isn't the point at all.
Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
We call the computers of private citizens infected by botnet logic Zombies. So perhaps we can just have a virus that also is digital to include the CERT team as well.
They know what's coming.
MIT has calculated 40 years ago that our civilization will collapse, having reached it's limit for growth, somewhere around the years 2030.
These calculations, statistical analysis and mathematical modeling have been confirmed many times with new data available since the '70s.
What they are preparing for, is the hordes of zombie like famished people roaming cities and countryside looking for something to eat and no choice other than doing anything for it.
See here the latest confirmation of the MIT's calculations:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/looking-back-on-the-limits-of-growth-125269840/?no-ist=
Some viral contagions could be so bad that you have to kill at a distance, and stay the f away from the body without super spaceship equipment.
.
A contagion that runs a high fever and huge agitation could turn a block of your neighborhood into a zombie movie scene.
.
Believe it.
.
(PS. They are training to get the soldiers use to the idea of killing their own family when they are going through your city block rounding up 'bad people,' like you are likely.)
.
Can't even tell if you're trolling. /. has gotten that bad these days.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
I went to read the plan from the link in TFS. It sent me to a document hosted on scribd.com, which required a facebook login to download. So this means that in order to defend ourselves against a zombie attack, we will have to be assimilated so we can even read the plan.
Have gnu, will travel.
Zombies are a metaphor for poor people.
Poverty can be transmitted by bite?! Thanks for telling me! Now all I have to do is make sure I never get bitten, and I'll never need to worry about being poor again.
Brainless Walking Dead, that describes most of the politicians running/ruining the country right now.
Zombies are a metaphor for poor people.
Ha! Nice one.
The problem is the army is mostly composed of poor people.
Happy people make bad consumers.
When I was house shopping, my fiance asked me what me criteria were for choosing a house I told her "Location, Size, Price, Layout, Number of Bedrooms and Defensibility in the event of a Zombie Apocalypse."
Zombie outbreaks are a metaphor for civil unrest. Basically, anything that disrupts food delivery or utilities for a week will be the equivalent of a zombie apocalypse.
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Even if there was a secret islamophobic agenda, this would be incredibly ineffective training because Zombie scenarios assume very limited infiltration and stealth - only people who know they've been bitten and just want a few more hours of life. If Muslims all of a sudden coordinated an attack, most of them would just say they were Christian and attack covertly. Barricades and heavy weapons would be useless.
Simple. There will never be a zombie attack.
On the other hand, being able to train for extreme situations without making the obvious mistake of assigning a real world group as the 'bad guys' because everybody knows zombies don't exist.
If they had used a real world opponent, there would be two problems.
The first, is the diplomatic problems that would arise from them planning conflicts with that group. How do you think China, or The United Kingdom, or any other country would respond to something like that.
Second, there's the whole problem with mindset. You get everybody training to fight someone in the real world, and that's the opponent they think about fighting. If that actually ends up being your real foe, see the first issue, then that's not so bad, but if it ends up being someone else, then you have the problem of people using the wrong strategies since they are mentally locked on the one they trained for. If you always know your opponent is non-existent, and not just a renamed nazi/soviet/scientologists/whatever, then you concentrate more on the fundamentals rather than your training analogs.
It's a good idea to train against a completely fictional opponent that will never be mistaken for anyone in the real world for various reasons. Too bad you don't understand that.
I saw the ***exact same thing***
fsking CIA criminals & their aristocrat/illuminati overlords
Jeb Bush 2016!
Thank you Dave Raggett
Even if there was a secret islamophobic agenda,
What Secret?
UK Islamist Leader: Islam Will Dominate America
Muslim daubs war memorial with 'Islam will dominate the world' - but walks free after CPS says he was NOT racially motivated
Friday Prayers in Brazil: Islam Will Dominate the World
I want to see flag of Allah flying over Downing St
Yes. That is the real reason why you should avoid the ghetto girls in 3rd world countries!
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
Whiner. :)
I wish I were. I don't know that that's actually what's motivating this, and I certainly hope it's not. But the idea of zombies as an unsubtle metaphor for the proletariat is well trodden and more plausible than I would prefer. Of course, they also make for really good fiction. I recommend Mira Grant's Newsflesh series, and Carrie Ryan's The Forest Of Hands And Teeth, both of which have some genuinely hair-raisingly scary bits that made my hands sweat.
That's probably more of a saving grace than a problem. It's prevented a lot of evil deeds in the past; would be nice to think it could prevent some more in the future.
It's a metaphor, son. A metaphor.
Actually, it's probably the reverse. The transformation of the Roman army from a drafted landholding class to paid professional soldiers was one of the factors in the collapse of the Roman Republic. People who don't feel a strong connection to established society won't balk at overthrowing it.
An enemy that may look like normal people, but want to kill or convert all others ...
You are behind, that is definitely about the Commies, the Cold War stuff is back. Islamophobia was last decade.
Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
1) Conservatives vote brainlessly on dead social issues where the public was only on their site when they were alive.
2) They screw themselves by supporting people and policies against their own interests-- that is just brainless!
3) They are after the brains of others; just like killing the golden goose they attack the sources of the great stuff they wish to have. Anti-science but their whole life is loaded with the results of it, if not having science give them their life and keep it in the 1st place!
Mostly it's #1 and #2 is only similar in that they are incredibly stupid.
Especially the double-tap to the head. Gotta make sure.
Money buys government. Our votes are symbolic; ignoring the cheating games keeping people distracted, it's a choice between a flavor of corruption.
One is faster than the other but it depends on the flavor in what way. Some issues 1 side can do faster on the guise of compromise and something extremely unpopular just causes a switch out later and a different set of things can be done until revisiting it again--- after voters forget... they only have about a 1 year memory and on big issues you only need to wait about 8 years; on bigger things it only takes a generation to change.
Why buy votes? The system is easy to rig because the weak point is controlling the available options.
Regulatory capture. You don't even need the common situation (like FCC today) you can do it by offering great jobs AFTER, nobody can stop that short of laws limiting their employment later (and that of their spouse and kids.)
Use the pawns you own in gov and other powers to force politicians or better yet, to manipulate them. Such as showing them those nutty threat assessments (which were designed for experts to filter and summarize not for politicians to read because the things are nearly as ridiculous as alien or zombie threats.) The power of the staffers is incredible! Load those up and you can push politicians around without them knowing it.
Power and influence too great undermines any system you can devise. The ONLY solution is to limit power and it's influence over governance. Branches of government help, term limits kind of (but not really, plenty of corrupt people waiting and effective honest people are RARE,) and the taboo thing in the USA, limiting private influence... which ultimately means income caps.
Then you have the professional Roman Army that helped collapse that empire... A drafted one makes it harder for the powerful to be immune.
Democracy Now! - uncensored, anti-establishment news
That's certainly a problem with military dynasties. How it would play out in practice, I'd prefer not to find out.
Zombies have always been a metaphor for the less-intelligent and technologically underequipped races.
In any sort of US collapse scenario the military will need to exterminate any rioters that threaten the 1% who have been chosen to survive. The military will better armed, more mobile. They will only lack numbers. Should they be surrounded by a pack of "zombies" and their supplies run dry, they face certain doom.
These scenarios are just a way of training for mass scale slaughter of Americans.
Because a training document based on an invasion by China would be politically embarrasing, and one based on an invasion by North Korea would be legitimizing a megalomaniac. So "zombie" is code for "asian" without having anything embarrassing happen if the game plan is leaked.
Learn to love Alaska
It's training on reality. Something will happen sometime. Zombie is a placeholder for "unknown future issue" (or, as I said elsewhere "asian" without political complications).
Learn to love Alaska
If satellite is so bad, why is it used as the first choice for almost all video operators?
Learn to love Alaska
The US military takes an oath that holds the Constitution above the president. And they understand what that means, Plus every totalitarian state for the past century has been left-wing, while the military is mostly right-wing, so I don't see them supporting any dictator wannabe in any case.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
RTFA
"The document is identified as a training tool used in an in-house training exercise where students learn about the basic concepts of military plans and order development through a fictional training scenario,"
Fictional? Maybe that's just what the government wants you to think.
Simply because its wireless. It works great for relaying video, where the latency doesnt matter.
99%(+?) of telecommunications are IPv4/IPv6 and pass over fiber at some point.
Pinochet was left-wing? The Shah of Iran was left-wing? Saudi Arabia is left-wing? Putin is left-wing? Anyway, "left-wing" is a really stupid concept to mix with "totalitarian," because most of the supposedly left-wing states you refer to were left-wing in name only. Like, I bet you think Stalin's USSR was left-wing, and that China is left-wing, and North Korea is left-wing. But of course they are not.
It's a way to model attacks by [current favorite threat] or [some other threat] without the risk that you'll get caught yet again using training material that's racist or religiously prejudiced or stupidly outdated, avoids the political problems of using training material where the "enemy" is now one of our allies (like the Germans or Russians or in some decades, Iraqis), and eliminates the problem that the training-material enemy is some national or ethnic group that some of your soldiers happen to belong to. And it means you don't have to do sensitivity training for the people who write your training material.
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
*sigh* The military is not preparing for any such thing, the tinfoil worn by many survivalists has worn off on you. The military is conducting a _training exercise_, in which commanders and their staff practice taking high level planning/guidance (CONOP 8888 in this case) and transforming it into plans, taskings, and orders.
You're reading way too much into this. This is a paper exercise for a staff training course. Exercise writers get bored too, and they come up with all kinds of outrageous/silly things.
It's specifically because it's not a threat, which you would understand if you actually read the article for the purpose of comprehending it. The reasoning is clearly stated in the first section.
Well, you make a good point, I was thinking "dictators of the western world" where the concepts of left and right are familiar. But yeah, Stalin and Hitler (and Mao) were clearly communist and socialist (and communist), respectively. People like to claim "in name only" but really, the core left ideals only work through ever-increasing government coercion, so totalitarianism is an inevitable part of the package (and these guys achieved many of the stated goals of their political philosophies, especially Hitler - if only he had been hit by a bus in 1937!).
As much as Orwell (an ardent socialist) warned about this danger, he never did come up with a good way to protect against the government taking that path, or rather being hijacked by dictator-wannabes who saw the perfect fit between the politics of he left and their rise to power.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Seriously? Hitler was a socialist? No, the term "socialism" was co-opted by the Nazis to create a right-wing alternative to actual socialism, which was ascendant at the time. There is nothing remotely socialist about Nazism. E.g., Nazism was very much pro-private-property, and anti-equality.
No, really, don't let the revisionists fool you. Hitler was a socialist, and a progressive. He enacted most of the progressive agenda at the time, and was the first in Europe to do a lot of things. Minimum wage, universal health care, social security, high corporate tax rates, the list goes on quite a bit more. And again most of his reforms were "first time in the Western World" stuff - much of the genuine progress of the 20th century happened first in Germany in the 30s (along with many of the mistakes like eugenics that were very popular with socialist writers of the time, but that the modern left tries to forget about). Had he been hit by a bus before he got militarily aggressive, he would have gone down in history as a great statesman: most of the bad stuff happened after he ran out of other people's money.. Before the wars started, he was unambiguously described as a socialist by writers of the time.
This idea that "Nazis were right wing" is entirely modern. To so many, many people today "right wing == bad". The Nazis were bad, therefore they were right wing: that is the entire modern argument. Don't fall for that rationalization.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
Several years ago, at the Emergency Management Institute in Emmitsburg MD, I ran across the exercise scenario Operation First Contact. The government was planning for the first contact with aliens. King's absolutely correct. It's easier to get people's attention if they're having a little fun. And planning is planning.
"....send more copssss..."
This isn't sarcasm. My comment is genuine. I'm disturbed by what you've chosen to do, but relieved that you've tried to block others from accessing your supplies.
It was cheaper.
Er, no, universal health care was put into place by Bismarck as a means for controlling disease, not out of a desire to promote socialism. Hitler tried to abolish it, but this was so strongly opposed that he gave up. I think you have been reading to much anti-obamacare propaganda—apparently the idea that Hitler is the father of socialized medicine has been floated in a desperate attempt to make Obamacare look bad. But it's completely ahistorical. As are the other points you mentioned—all of those things were put in place in Bismarck's time, not Hitler's time.
Sure, sure, keep telling yourself that Hitler wasn't a socialist, it's always perfectly safe to keep giving the central government more power because corporation koch brother global warming. And hey, if more central power didn't solve the problem, clearly you didn't go far enough. I can see no flaws in this plan.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
+1 off your meds
Cheap storage VM.
DFL primaries seem to function but the GOP ones are largely rigged. I have also observed primary cheating (and it's legal.)
Say you get your honest candidate in or your 3rd party person gets into 1 of the two parties. If your person gets to run, then you have not only the other side and likely the press against them (because the press defends the established parties) but you have some of their own party working against them; especially the corrupt elements of their own party.
Ultimately, you can and I often do blame the public, which is an argument that applies to everybody in every form of tyranny. It's one thing to rise up against a dictator and quite another to wake up against The Brave New World. Modern mass-control methods (when you start learning about them) makes one wonder if democracy is even possible in the future... you don't need to fool everybody all the time, just a majority... and getting people to NOT vote and give up is just 1 technique out of a continually growing list of techniques.
The voting process itself has a massively huge impact; the only hope is to get good voting systems in place. We have nothing of the kind. It would be a miracle to use the broken system against the entrenched powers to repair itself long enough for it to begin to function again.
All that said, all democracies fall into despotism-- that is just the natural life cycle. Sadly, we live during the end of our short-lived one. It's the people who are responsible for that as well; which is why fixes don't really work - once the disease spreads you are only buying time. Sorry to be realistic.
Democracy Now! - uncensored, anti-establishment news
That, or there are some very top secret biological weapons at some secret lab in Area 51 or somewhere. And since the higher-ups in government know about this weapon, and what would happen if it were to escape, they practice for such an eventuality.
-- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.