DARPA Unveils Hack-Resistant Drone
savuporo (658486) writes with news based on the work of a DARPA project known as High Assurance Cyber Military Systems: "'The Pentagon's research arm unveiled a new drone built with secure software that "prevents the control and navigation of the aircraft from being hacked. ... The software is designed to make sure a hacker cannot take over control of a UAS. The software is mathematically proven to be invulnerable to large classes of attack,' [HACMS program manager Kathleen] Fisher said." This is currently being demoed on a quad-copter platform. It would be interesting to know the CPU architecture, chipset, programming language and the suite of communication protol this thing uses ."
before someone takes over one of these babies ? I mean - for a challenge, this is about the same thing as waving a kilogram of prime steak in front of a pride of lions...
Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
No kidding. I wouldn't even say "he hasn't missed a field goal in 43 attempts, this is a chip shot" because you'll put a rook on it and fail somehow. Heck, the US Government can't even put up a fricking (healthcare) website so how can they expect to succeed at making a "hacker proof drone"? 'Mathematically-proven" is like using the word "clinical" in front of a toothpaste...means nothing other than to hype a product...
Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it -- Donald Knuth
That's a misquote, like "Play it again, Sam."
"Note that I have not tested this code, I have merely proven it correct."
--Donald Knuth
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Yep, I especially loved this gem from the summary:
Anyone who knows anything about software and crypto knows you cannot make the software "invulnerable" to attacks. You can greatly decrease the number of bugs and known attack vectors. You can make it infeasible to brute-force your system using a realistic amount of computing power. But you do not know what you do now know, and the system cannot be 100% secure.
I would love to see how they "mathematically proved" it is 100% secure (invulnerable, remember).
24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!