Slashdot Mirror


Mental Illness Reduces Lifespan As Much as Smoking

That smoking is bad for your health is a commonplace; cancer, lung disease, and other possible consequences can all shorten smokers' lifespans. A new meta study from researchers at Oxford concludes that mental illness is just as big a factor in shortening lives, and not only because depression is a contributing factor to suicide. From the story at NPR: "We know that smoking boosts the risk of cancer and heart disease, says Dr. Seena Fazel, a psychiatrist at Oxford University who led the study. But aside from the obvious fact that people with mental illnesses are more likely to commit suicide, it's not clear how mental disorders could be causing early deaths. The researchers looked at data on 1.7 million patients, drawing from 20 recent scientific reviews and studies from mostly wealthy countries. Comparing the effects of mental illness and smoking helps put the stats in context, Fazel tells Shots. 'It was useful to benchmark against something that has a very high mortality rate.'" [Press release from Oxford.]

192 comments

  1. An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps the reduced life expectancy is comparable to that caused by high-stress lifestyles. If I was paranoid or socially ostracised, as the mentally ill commonly are, I'd be stressed too.

    1. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps the reduced life expectancy is comparable to that caused by high-stress lifestyles. If I was paranoid or socially ostracised, as the mentally ill commonly are, I'd be stressed too.

      I would also add that mental illness & stress also reduce the ability of those afflicted to care for themselves, resulting in unhealthy lifestyle choices, and drives away those who might want to help as well.

    2. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was paranoid or socially ostracised, as the mentally ill commonly are, I'd be stressed too.

      If? Come on, this is Slashdot.

    3. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone with untreated clinical depression and a sleep disorder (or just with one and the other as a symptom) I agree with the parent and his smart grandparent. "Mental illness" can be extremely stressful. I see too many choices and it takes a long time to come up with the best choice. Deciding takes too long which eats up my already shortened time. As my time disappears more and more tasks start piling up Too many tasks makes me feel overwhelmed and I break down and use escapism to avoid my seemingly impossible things to do (each task for you would take 10-30 minutes to complete). I was at least able to stop playing video games, but now I'm watching way too much TV (currently on Red Dawn and slowly moving backwards through highly rated scf-fi TV shows after finishing all the well known shows).

      I get very little accomplished with all that procrastinating, which makes me feel even more depressed. I do try and get out with people, but after a night of dance club I cry myself to sleep from the stress of dealing with people and all the mistakes I made screwing up dance moves I should have known, knowing I'm a loser because I was standing on the side lines waiting for someone to ask me to dance instead of having the confidence to ask them, or people telling me I should smile more. Really please stop that. The last thing I need you to tell me is that I'm making everyone around me feel bad because I don't look happy enough. That reduces my confidence even further because then I believe everyone is bothered by me and doesn't want me around. True or not, it increases escapism and reduces healthier activities.

      How would you like to walk barefoot through a large area converted with poisonous snakes? That's what it's like all the time with crippling social anxiety. Anything you do and your inactions must be perfect or you'll be destroyed by those around you. Since just being in such a situation is extremely stressful in and of itself, you'll make mistakes.

    4. Re:An opinion from a layman by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      One obvious additional factor is needing to take medications. Medications are a form of drug, and they do alter body chemistry etc from someone that doesn't need it. Not for a minute am I saying that people who have mental illness should be off their meds, but it is the lesser of two evils when compared to a healthy person.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:An opinion from a layman by Lotana · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is very hard. I am convinced that changing the way a person thinks is one of the most challenging things in life.

      What is helping me improve my social anxiety and depression is seeing a psychologist. Combination of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and medication gives me a small edge to help me cope.

      I sympathize with your struggles. I hope you will find what works for you to avoid sinking deeper into that abyss.

    6. Re: An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admire the courage that went into posting that, even if it is AC.

      I know I have a tendency to endanger myself, particularly when I'm overwhelmed by anxiety.

      As for social anxiety, desensitized yourself may help. Go somewhere with a best friend and simply do everything he/she suggests, blindly. This alleviates the stress of making decisions and allows you to project any guilt from mistakes made ontothe friend. Resolve yourself to explain away anything necessary to those around you by saying, "hey, that wasn't my idea, this bozo over here told me to do it. I just lost a bet."

      You may also want to look into EMDR and CBT.

    7. Re:An opinion from a layman by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Who says Slashdotters are mellow? I can tell by some of the quick down-mods I get.

    8. Re:An opinion from a layman by nbauman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One of the big problems is that anti-psychotic drugs have severe, and sometimes fatal, side effects. (Many of them cause severe weight gain, often enough to lead to diabetes.)

      It's actually difficult or impossible to find out whether a drug causes, say, fatal heart attacks, if they didn't show up with 1% frequency in 500 patients in 6 months in the original FDA approval trials.

      World Psychiatry is an open access journal, but that issue isn't on its web site yet. http://www.wpanet.org/detail.p... So I can't read the article and find out whether they deal with this.

      I had a friend who was schizophrenic. He had finished a couple of years at Columbia before the schizophrenia hit. Fortunately his parents were relatively wealthy, and they could put him up in an apartment with a relatively normal lifestyle. He had a girlfriend. They smoked a lot of marijuana.

      One day he died suddenly, for no apparent reason. I think the final diagnosis was a heart attack. His psychiatrist insisted that it wasn't the drugs that did it, but I later found out that his drugs were associated with some fatalities.

    9. Re:An opinion from a layman by nbauman · · Score: 1

      There's a pretty high level of suicides among schizophrenics. If the schizophrenia is severe, they can also engage in dangerous behavior, like walking into traffic or onto subway tracks.

    10. Re:An opinion from a layman by arth1 · · Score: 1

      There's a pretty high level of suicides among schizophrenics. If the schizophrenia is severe, they can also engage in dangerous behavior, like walking into traffic or onto subway tracks.

      I would think that people with mental illnesses are more likely to die from accidents, because they may not react as quickly or correctly to a dangerous situation. Not necessarily because of being slow or stupid (although those count too), but they may have other things on their mind. Or may be on medication that affects the ability to react correctly.

    11. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schizophrenia, depression, bipolar disorder. The all have a tendency to suicide.
      It is hard enough to fight stuff like cancer or autoimmune disorders where the body turns on itself. When your mind is the enemy? Where do you even start?
      There is a youtuber named Erin Lee that made an episode about her bipolar disorder. Its quite interesting to hear the perspective of people who have survived mental illness.

      "Like being trapped on an airplane and there is a crying baby right behind you and it's a four hour flight and you don't have anywhere to go and the baby just keeps crying. It's like that but 24 hours, 7 days a week, in your head."

      "...impulsive behavior combined with suicidal thoughts, and that is not a good combo."

      "When you have a voice in your head, not only screaming, but also very logically, very soundly, telling you over and over that you should commit suicide, because it's what you are destined to, it's very hard not to listen."

    12. Re:An opinion from a layman by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Why are you untreated? Anxiety and depression can be treated fairly effectively. It doesn't cure you but it does allow you to function better.

    13. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read about how anti-depressants can be bad for you and damage your brain before I read about the good they can do. They also treat the symptoms and not the reason those symptoms came to be. The same reason I don't take cold meds unless I have something really important I need to focus on; if I'm sick I want to know I'm sick so I can adjust and get better faster. If you mask the symptoms you don't know how sick you really are. There's enough things I can try to improve before taking pills, the problem is I do them for a day or two but can never keep them going. I've have a few first meetings with different psychologists, but something comes up and I have to cancel our second meeting and I never go back. A year or two later I go back and have another first meeting and the cycle repeats. Not being able to track all the food you eat for a week is frustrating. I don't want to go back and say I couldn't do something so simple.

      I also made it this far without them (graduated college), so in theory I can keep going without them. I've gotten a little better throughout the years. And finally, because I'm concerned on what they might do to me in the future. More people go on violent sprees after taking these types of meds, they cost a lot, and my options might be more limited in the future once I'm officially labeled as someone with a mental disorder (which I might be already). General fear of the unknown. Being depressed since a little kid means that's what you know and sort-of find comfortable compared to some other state of being. I didn't even realize I was depressed until my last year at school. I just thought I was lazy, extremely shy, worthless, and an extreme night owl.

      Responding to someone else's post, when you're depressed and have social anxiety you don't have friends with whom you can go out and do things with. You see everyone as acquaintances. You've got no one to lean on. Who wants to be around someone who never looks happy or never laughs? People joke about it to me, "I'll make you laugh before the end of your internship" or "I've seen him smile once, I know he can do it", but they never stop to think about why I might not be laughing. Though I've gotten better at faking it.

    14. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are partially an idiot. If there is an imbalance, the meds will correct. Don't worry about loosing IQ points; they way you write and think, it should not affect it. In fact, many people with mental illness stop development because of it.

      You like how you live now - don't do anything about it, but at least shut-up. If you want to do something about it, do something. Take control of your life and stop being a looser. Do or die.

    15. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. A suicidal person would be driving on the freeway and think, 'i can hit that bridge pillar and the lights go out. it would be over instantly and i wouldn't hurt anyone else.' Then they think, becoming fixated on it - 'i would need to be going at least 100mph, i wonder if i can still hit it at that speed since there is a slight curve in the road.' Then they think, 'i bet i can compensate if I swerve that last second, but the car may go sideways and the air bags will go off.' and on, and on, and on. until its a plan, until they do it. suicide is not accidental. those are accidents. suicide in planned in one form or another. there are no attempts. do this, power goes off, no more pain. seems simple enough. but it is selfish, and a cowards way out.

    16. Re:An opinion from a layman by Megol · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Listen to me please: your writing indicates a typical depressed thought pattern, trust me, I've been there - I've been worse than that. I've talked with people with depression and noticed the same things/patterns.

      Guess what? Anti-depressants aren't intended to treat the _cause_ of depression. They aren't meant to be a "lucky pill" (a common meme) - they don't make one happy and aren't intended to. What they do is enabling the brain to work more as it is intended to and enable one to do other things to improve ones situation. However they need to be taken long term in order to do anything so taking them for a month and then quitting because "they don't do anything" that some people do isn't so smart.

      If one is very depressed and want a quicker acting help I'd recommend ECT - Electroconvulsive Therapy. I've had it in several rounds and talked with people that also had it periodically, some for many years (chronic depression). It is extremely quick acting compared to pills, some people claim to feel better already after waking up from the (for civilized nations) mandatory sedation.
      Is it risk free? No, _no_ treatment is risk free. People have died from complications when treating ingrown nails. ECT isn't good if one have very high blood pressure for instance as the pressures increase sharply, there are a number of other contraindications too. But ECT is the treatment with the most FUD around. It doesn't change one's personality, one doesn't suffer total memory loss, one doesn't get severe brain damages.
      Memory loss is a common side-effect though but it is mostly short term and is compensated by the practitioner adjusting placement of electrodes and the parameters for the next treatment. Another is muscle ache however that is compensated for using a mild muscle relaxant in conjunction with the sedation.

      About anti-depressants destroying the brain I'll not comment on directly however do you realize that depression _does_ destroy the brain? That is one reason for the faulty thought patterns and is easily verifiable by MRI on deeply depressed people. Anti-depressants and ECT have been shown to regrow lost brain matter.
      These are verified findings from 3rd party BTW so not some company PR.

      For your own sake I hope you do seek treatment, it can improve your quality of life drastically. I'm not talking about everything getting perfect over night, it will most likely take long time and well, is there anybody with a perfect life? ;) But it can be much better.

      PS if you have problem discussing your problems (AFAIK pretty common for depressed people) I recommend writing them down on a paper when seeking treatment and giving it to the psychologist. In this way he/she can then easier ask relevant questions.

    17. Re:An opinion from a layman by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      The medication thing is an interesting issue. I've personally encountered the following:
      I just want a pill that's going to solve everything
      Nothing I've taken has helped me, and the side effects can be hellish, and I'm tired of the not knowing and waiting to see if the next drug is going to work or not
      I'm scared of the side effects, and especially that they will affect my cognitive function or personality
      I don't want to be dependent on a pill for the rest of my life
      I'm feeling better, so I'm going to stop taking my meds

      I'm not in a camp critical of medication. I believe that it is one of man's best shots at improving himself. And the truth is, due to some combination of meds or therapy, I'm doing better than I was some years ago. However, I still have those feelings about meds from time to time. Let's call it a love-hate relationship.

      A good number of generic meds can be had for $15 copay if your insurance covers prescriptions. And if it doesn't, a number of generics are still probably pretty cheap (Lithium, Paxil). Forget about new name brand drugs. Also, You may be looking at $300 of lab work every 3-6 months, if you're on lithium or something else that needs to be monitored.

      Now the darker side of being undiagnosed and untreated is that you may have a depressive episode out of the blue and you wont have anything in place to help catch you. Not to mention, your life may currently be impacted negatively by lack of treatment and you are unaware of it or don't want to face it (reading into your last paragraph, not forming relationships with people, maybe? Which doesn't seem like such a big issue because who really wants to socialize, anyway? )

      Noone really has to know you have a mental illness, if you do get diagnosed. The biggest game becomes concealing your meds and your doctors appointments. The former isn't too bad, but the latter can be difficult if you work a mon-fri 9-5, because you'll have to get the okay to leave work when you normally wouldn't. My dad knows, my friends know, but I generally don't tell my employer or coworkers. Of course, if your employer knows, you may get some leniency for making those appointments...

    18. Re:An opinion from a layman by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      One of the big problems is that anti-psychotic drugs have severe, and sometimes fatal, side effects. (Many of them cause severe weight gain, often enough to lead to diabetes.)

      Sure, but the problem is that the illnesses themselves are dangerous.

      Suicide attempts are dangerous. Running off, doing and believing weird things is dangerous.

      It's not safe to just not treat these illnesses. It's the fallacy of the false alternative, to believe that we could choose to just not treat them and avoid the problem of side effects.

    19. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one do you think causes the other though? Is it the high stress that causes the mental illness or the other way around?

    20. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am betting that does not hold true in places they have treatment.

    21. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost stepped out in front of a car, not because I didn't see it, but because I didn't worry about it hitting me; Fortunately my survival instinct shouted at be as I was doing it and I stopped. This is on recovery (on going) of long term (30+ yrs) anxiety with help from Fluoxetine. I still think its worth it even with the danger, although I need to think to be careful around roads and in dangerous situations in general rather than just being careful.

    22. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last figures I'm aware of for the UK before these put it at a 20year difference.

    23. Re:An opinion from a layman by mpe · · Score: 1

      One of the big problems is that anti-psychotic drugs have severe, and sometimes fatal, side effects. (Many of them cause severe weight gain, often enough to lead to diabetes.)

      The idea that weight gain causes (T2) diabetes has two obvious flaws. The first is that there are plenty of obese non diabetics. The second is that at least 20% of people diagnosed T2 are "slim". This being a case of "correlation does not imply causation".
      Also diet is going to be a factor here. Someone frequently in hospital or just exposed to "medical professionals" might be more likely to eat the kind of low fat/high glucose diet pushed as "healthy" for the last 30 odd years.

      It's actually difficult or impossible to find out whether a drug causes, say, fatal heart attacks, if they didn't show up with 1% frequency in 500 patients in 6 months in the original FDA approval trials.

      It's unlikely that such trials would show any chornic side effects at all.

    24. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, a survey of health issues associated with drug addicts has shown a very strong link between marijuana use and cardiac problems:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/23/marijuana-heart-complications-cardiovascular_n_5194103.html

      The age range for people affected was between 20 and 34.

    25. Re:An opinion from a layman by nbauman · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that you shouldn't treat schizophrenia with drugs, but I am saying that there's a tradeoff.

      Sometimes when people with schizophrenia refuse to take drugs, it's because they decided that they'd rather suffer the symptoms than the side effects of the drugs. Sometimes that can be a reasonable choice. If I were faced with tardive dyskenesia, I might go with the symptoms of schizophrenia. If I were faced with gaining another 100 pounds, I might go with the symptoms of schizophrenia.

      In an ideal world, people with mental illness would be treated by psychiatrists who would spend as much time as it takes, and give them drugs based on good scientific evidence.

      The real world isn't like that. Most of the psychiatric drugs are approved and used on the basis of studies with relatively few people, and the evidence for them is weak. Many of the medical education programs for psychiatrists are paid for by drug companies and promote drugs even for inappropriate indications. Medicaid and Medicare don't pay psychiatrists enough money to survive if they used best practices, so a lot of psychiatrists are running Medicaid mills. Sometimes drugs with fewer side effects are too expensive for the state programs.

      You can't assume that just because one psychiatrist prescribed a drug for a patient, the only rational decision is for the patient to take the drug.

    26. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, and you've admitted as much yourself, even if you change from one escape to another: You still have a problem.
      If you're like most people in trouble, you need help. You just have to realize that other people are not out there "to get you", or "to be your crutch" either.

      Much mental problems arise from inactivity and overactivity (imbalance). Please observe and realize that these two go hand in hand, so:

      1) Force yourself to go to sleep at 21-22. It'll be hard and you'll probably need to just lie there for hours at first. If sleep doesn't come, take just 30 mins light activity, eg. reading, and then go back to sleep. If you can't sleep, just lie in bed. That's where you belong at night! After a week, you should feel improvement in your sleep cycle. If not: Please consult a doctor. Sleep should be your top priority.

      2) Find some physical activity you WANT to try, and just DO IT. Don't do things just because "you think others will approve": How would YOU like to spend your time, and then just do that, not anything else! If something makes you happy, DO IT, again and again! Ignore any pieous feelings of "deserving it" or not. Notice what makes you happy, and focus on that instead of intellectual mind-games. Stop justifying letting your mind play "you", for short-term relief that brings long-term problems. The ugly truth is this: Most people have enough on their plate, they don't really notice or care if you screw up or not.
      BUT YOU DO!

      3) Reduce TV and computer-time. Use a timer if you must, and do step down gently. Be gentle and understanding with yourself. It takes effort and willpower to change your habits. It won't happen overnight.

      4) Start noticing what food and liquid (water) is agreeable to your body and mind, and not. Exclude food that takes you off balance, and focus on food that provides you energy and strength. Drinks lots and lots of water during the day. It will cleanse your body and mind better than anything else!

      5) Find a group, a course, a club, eg. a true yoga class (not gym), and spend time with happy people. Try to say little in the start. There's no point in trying to load YOUR problems unto others, because YOUR problems will still be stuck on you! Listen and learn instead.

      6) Help others. Help a cat. Help a dog. Help a human being. Provide a service in the manner that seems most appropriate. This is the most effective "help for self-help" there is, and most people never experience / realize it! Don't expect anything in return.

      When you were a child, what was your dream / fantasy?
      What is your dream / fantasy now?
      What can you do NOW?

      If this sounds like sound advice (it's YOUR and only YOUR judgement), you can copy and paste this text somewhere you can get to it later, or even share it with others.

    27. Re:An opinion from a layman by phorm · · Score: 1

      Regarding getting things done: you could also try a task/reward model. A lot of behaviour change can center around patterning. Getting started is the hardest part of course, but if you start small and basically force yourself into a positive loop, a pattern is a good behaviour modifier.
      Things to get done? Make a small checklist. For example if you wanted to improve physical health, you could add some basic exercise (say 5-10 push-ups). Add a few other small tasks like "walk the dog", "water the plants" etc.

      Too many video games or too much TV VS "productive" tasks. Make them a reward. For many, they're probably already in the same brain category as sugary treats etc. So before you can game, check off those push-ups and dog walking, then "reward" yourself. Tie amounts together, so that 1h of gaming = more pushups or a longer walk with Fido.

      Maybe add in weekly goals of some larger tasks, broken into small increments. E.G. if you need to build some shelves (buy wood, cut wood, assemble, paint/stain, install in daily tasks).

      Eventually, you can help your brain break bad patterns and add productive ones.

    28. Re:An opinion from a layman by AgNO3 · · Score: 2

      100% Yes agree with that. If you have a mental illness you are the biggest outcast ever. If you last 5 limbs you have a better chance of people treating you better then those that have a variety of mental illnesses.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    29. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone with untreated clinical depression and a sleep disorder (or just with one and the other as a symptom) I agree with the parent and his smart grandparent. "Mental illness" can be extremely stressful. I see too many choices and it takes a long time to come up with the best choice. Deciding takes too long which eats up my already shortened time. As my time disappears more and more tasks start piling up Too many tasks makes me feel overwhelmed and I break down and use escapism to avoid my seemingly impossible things to do (each task for you would take 10-30 minutes to complete). I was at least able to stop playing video games, but now I'm watching way too much TV (currently on Red Dawn and slowly moving backwards through highly rated scf-fi TV shows after finishing all the well known shows).

      I get very little accomplished with all that procrastinating, which makes me feel even more depressed. I do try and get out with people, but after a night of dance club I cry myself to sleep from the stress of dealing with people and all the mistakes I made screwing up dance moves I should have known, knowing I'm a loser because I was standing on the side lines waiting for someone to ask me to dance instead of having the confidence to ask them, or people telling me I should smile more. Really please stop that. The last thing I need you to tell me is that I'm making everyone around me feel bad because I don't look happy enough. That reduces my confidence even further because then I believe everyone is bothered by me and doesn't want me around. True or not, it increases escapism and reduces healthier activities.

      How would you like to walk barefoot through a large area converted with poisonous snakes? That's what it's like all the time with crippling social anxiety. Anything you do and your inactions must be perfect or you'll be destroyed by those around you. Since just being in such a situation is extremely stressful in and of itself, you'll make mistakes.

      Research a chemical called phenibut. I was in your shoes for 26 years. I'm 28 now with highy managable anxiety and the depression has been slowly lifting for the past 2 years. I'd say I'm about 60% as depressed as I was 2 years ago. BUT the anxiety is about 15% what it was. I would do nothing but play video games and binge watch TV shows. Through college I never went to a class unless it was required of me I just studied and showed up for tests. I wish I could do it all over again now. This chemical (taken sparingly) and during social situations has saved my life. You don't feel drunk, or mentally retarded like if you took a benzo or drank alcohol, you just feel relief. In the beginning it made me feel euphoric because after feeling anxious your entire life having that oppression taken away is fucking phenomenal. I started wanting to go out and socialize if I took it instead of "wasting time" watching TV or grinding another pointless level in an RPG. After one year of using it twice a week for social situations my confidence grew, next thing I knew the drug was having less of an effect on me and that was because I already had the confidence to handle the social situations. After a year of this I only take it if I'm in a situation where I'll be in the limelight. Otherwise I have no desire to take it. Also the drug itself is self-limiting. I would surprisingly get sick of it after 2-3 days of binging on it. But be careful if you try it. But please do. It has changed my life for the better and seemingly permanently. It's like it bootstraped my confidence building. I went out and socialized as myself without a care in the world and after my mind saw that I was accepted for being myself and liked more for it even the drug became pointless. If you have more questions reply here and I'll check this for a while. Good luck to you.

    30. Re:An opinion from a layman by volmtech · · Score: 1

      You didn't mention whether or not you had a job. I suffered for years but soldiered through supporting my family. At 58 my youngest was almost through college and my wife had a job so one day, after weeks of only sleeping four hours a night I quit doing anything. Several years of taking medication only kept me from jumping off a bridge. After I was able to get disability payments I now only take Ambien for the sleep disorder but I still have the extreme procrastination problem. I can't tell you to just get over it, I know you can't. Try to do the things you actually want to do, not things you think other people want you to do.

    31. Re:An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a person with Type 1 Bi-polar disorder I have to agree that life without medication(s) is almost impossible. I take my medications everyday and I am living a fairly normal life. Sometimes the Bi-polar still shows through even with the medications,but, I can still function in society 99% of the time. I hope you will see a competent psychiatrist and get the medication(s) you need to live a happier life.
      Best wishes,
      an Anonymous Coward

  2. so true :| by jtrainor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can nail this one: Mentally ill people generally don't take good care of themselves. They tend to eat worse and more irregularly, sleep odd hours, and not get to the doctor as much (for whatever reason), especially if they live by themselves and no one's looking after them.

    Basically, the severely mentally ill tend to make poor lifestyle choices a lot more.

    1. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your phrasing makes it sound like it's voluntary. Mentally ill people are often unable to make choices because of their illness, and so as a result, it's not a choice, it's just doing enough to get by.

    2. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The rhetoric of "choice" and "responsibility" is quasi-religious anyway, with no basis in science.

      The human mind is very far from rational, and what little neurological evidence we have suggests we may make decisions before we have even become consciously aware of them - it's just really good at tricking itself into thinking it is a magically rational computer.

      Rather than an artificial, binary divide between the capable and the incapable, it would be much better if we thought on a sliding scale in terms of some people being programmed to manage certain affairs better than others, and recognised that there is no fault beyond birth.

    3. Re:so true :| by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Your phrasing makes it sound like it's voluntary. Mentally ill people are often unable to make choices because of their illness, and so as a result, it's not a choice, it's just doing enough to get by.

      Doesn't really make much difference, does it? It doesn't matter whose fault it is, in the end, the depressed person is the one that suffers. That's why worrying about blame is silly.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:so true :| by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      Your phrasing makes it sound like it's voluntary. Mentally ill people are often unable to make choices because of their illness, and so as a result, it's not a choice, it's just doing enough to get by.

      True, also mentally ill people often have trouble getting good jobs if any jobs at all. Many live on government assistance and are well below the poverty line. And it is well known that poverty is correlated with a shorter lifespan. Many simply cannot afford healthy lifestyle choices, such as nutritious food or preventive medical care.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    5. Re:so true :| by Livius · · Score: 1

      It's not either-or. The mentally ill have *impaired* decision-making faculties. Their illness is not putting a gun to their head, just making decision-making harder than average.

    6. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to sound cold, but does it make a difference to the result? Voluntary or involuntary, poor lifestyle decisions mean a shorter lifespan.

      There is a difference in the treatment, but that's not what we're talking about.

    7. Re:so true :| by germansausage · · Score: 1

      Mod way up. I have a relative who has moderately severe schizophrenia. Unable to make good decisions is exactly what this condition causes. Add in some paranoid delusions and you have a person who seems perfectly ok (on a good day) but is utterly incapable of functioning in society.

    8. Re:so true :| by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      Mentally ill people generally don't take good care of themselves. They tend to eat worse and more irregularly, sleep odd hours, and not get to the doctor as much (for whatever reason), especially if they live by themselves and no one's looking after them.

      damn! you mean, I'm both a sysadmin AND mentally ill?

      I knew it. (didn't I?) oh shut up, you. no, you shut up.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get boned in the ass

    10. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like not paying hookers to come over?

    11. Re:so true :| by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      also mentally ill people often have trouble getting good jobs if any jobs at all

      The article headline and so many of the replies, including yours, seem to just focus on a tiny subset of mental illness. STOP THE NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES

      Sure, people who suffer severe and extreme levels of depression do have trouble with these things.

      But mental illness covers a huge swath of conditions.

      That skinny girl who has anorexia, that is a mental illness. That person who keeps his desk really neat at work has mild OCD which is a mental illness. Chances are very good that your boss or your grand-boss, and almost certainly your CEO and other executives, are all sociopaths, also a mental illness.

      Dyslexia, ADD and ADHD, caffeine-induced sleep disorders, dysthymia (mild depression), stuttering, insomnia, and premature ejaculation all fit under the "mental illness" umbrella.

      DON'T FEED THE STEREOTYPES. Because clearly, as you suggest men suffering from premature ejaculation due to mental issues "often have trouble getting good jobs if any jobs at all".

      Nearly every human being suffers from mental illness during their life, even if it is only briefly. You wouldn't make such broad claims about other illnesses, but mental illness has such a horrible stigma in western culture it is disgusting.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    12. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just split from here?

    13. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any scientific work worth its paper and toner would include adjustment for what you listed. There is something extra to it: most living beings, especially those with higher cognitive functions, have embedded "choke" - they self destruct, immediately or more gradually, according to their self-decoded successfulness to achieve set goals. I will not delve into definition of those goals, but we can infer that they are mapped to hormonal and psychological (where applicable) rewards. The purpose of this system is to accelerate adaptation from generation to generation, nipping out "runts" to make more room for "fared well"-s. It is evolution beyond Darwin, genome variants auto-censoring themselves even long before it comes to the moment of ultimate test of fitness. There is couple of interesting corollaries though: when there is a low population density, this self evaluation ought to be re-calibrated and should provide boost. Also, surviving through a crisis should set the death clock back a few notches. Anecdotal (yeah, I know, isn't) evidence supports this.

      Now, back to mental illnesses - most of them are adversely affecting the levels of serotonin, therefore stepping on "the choke". That affects vital functions and immune system, cutting the life short.

      So, there you go - don't skip opportunities to be happy. You'll save nothing, quite the contrary.

    14. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]
      The rhetoric of "choice" and "responsibility" is quasi-religious anyway, with no basis in science.
      [/quote]

      No basis in science means that we pretty much cannot reason about it. So I stopped reading after this sentence.

    15. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn! you mean, I'm both a sysadmin AND mentally ill?

      Or a congressman AND an idiot? (with apologies to Mark Twain).

    16. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like APK has just outed themselves.

    17. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also mentally ill people often have trouble getting good jobs if any jobs at all

      The article headline and so many of the replies, including yours, seem to just focus on
      a tiny subset of mental illness. STOP THE NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES

      Chances are very good that your boss or your grand-boss, and almost certainly your CEO and other executives, are all sociopaths, also a mental illness.

      DON'T FEED THE STEREOTYPES.

      Erm...

    18. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No basis in science means that we pretty much cannot reason about it.

      The philosophy of science has no basis in science yet we can reason about it and many other subjects in philosophy (eg I view epistemology as quite important)

    19. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all you have to care whether you live of die. Whether a choice is good or not depends on the goal. Its not that I made irrational choices are made its that I had 'irrational' beliefs (not so much anymore thankfully).

    20. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up (Yeah, I know, he's arleady at 5).

      Among the things that depression does is it kills motivation. So you don't WANT to get up and exercise, or go out and do $THIS or $THAT. You tend to just sit down in your spot on the sofa and just stay there.

      You don't want to get up and cook something relatively healthy, you'll just order fast food delivery. And as you get unhealthier, you feel worse about yourself. It's kind of a vicious circle.

    21. Re:so true :| by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the situation I find myself in. I receive nowhere near enough money to even have a healthy diet. My budget is $2 per meal. Plus I can barely take care of myself. I suffer from Major Depressive Disorder, PTSD, and social anxiety. I rarely leave the house and I am unable to form stable interpersonal relationships. Making a phone call is extremely difficult for me. I live in survival mode, that's my life.

  3. in addition to poor choices associated with ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In addition to the poor choices associated with irrationality ... remember that these are diseases of the brain. Complex syndromes that have effects beyond behavior and thinking. For example, depression is associated with pain.

    Some interesting reading: Peter Kramer's Against Depression.

    1. Re:in addition to poor choices associated with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronic finite state automata and adaptive biological neural networks work in different ways.

  4. hmm could be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...mental health patients tend to be serious smokers too, self-medicating. Anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, major depression, to name a few. (Source: was married to a psych nurse)

    1. Re:hmm could be... by qbast · · Score: 1

      Caveman style: club female over head, drag her to your lair.

  5. Nonsense. by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's not clear how mental disorders could be causing early deaths.

    This is a positively idiotic statement.

    The mentally ill are over-represented in homeless, impoverished, drug-using (self-medicating), and other highly at-risk populations. Even with a support network, they are often unable to assist in their own care, and symptoms they describe may be attributed to excessively attributed to psychosomatic rather than physical causes. They often refuse medical care, either blanket refusal, or may specifically refuse to take one medication, or follow one bit of doctor's advice. They usually have difficulty retaining a doctor, and bounce between them, probably to progressively less-capable ones.

    The reasons are "are little understood and likely to be complex," say Dr. Hoang and colleagues, but "are likely to be influenced by adverse lifestyle and social factors associated with the presence of mental illness such as alcohol and illicit drug use, and exposure to poor housing."

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Nonsense. by PPH · · Score: 1

      They also represent the majority of the people who cross the street in the middle of a block.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Nonsense. by Mantrid42 · · Score: 2
      Your comment is completely misinformed.

      From the National Institute of Mental Health:

      Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year. When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.

      I don't have the figures for 2004, but I do have the figures for 2012 regarding homelessness. From the US Department of Housing and Urban Development:

      On a single night in 2012 there were 633,782 homeless people in the United States[...]

      Dividing by the US population in 2012 (312.8 million), we get 0.00202615728, or, 0.2%

      So 26.2% of Americans are mentally ill, and 0.2% of Americans are homeless. So no, it's not a "positively idiotic statement." The mentally all are all around us, and perhaps the reason the study can't pin down why they're dying younger is because people are under the impression that you can easily spot someone who's mentally ill. Yeah, a lot of homeless people are mentally ill. But about a quarter of everyone is mentally ill, and trying to put the mentally ill into a box means that most of those people will go untreated because they'll be ashamed of their disease.

    3. Re:Nonsense. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You're quite right, but there are other, more direct pathways to death that mental conditions can lead you onto. There's been a lot of research recently into how mental state interplays with normal physiology, such as the immune system. It could very well be that even in the absence of the things you're mentioning, mentally ill people are compromised when dealing with ordinary diseases, for example.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Nonsense. by Frobnicator · · Score: 2

      Thank you!

      It is amazing at how quickly people jump from the word "mental illness" to "homeless, homicidal, criminally insane."

      The vast majority of humanity has a mental illness at least one in their life. It may be trouble coping with a death. It may be trouble overeating or starving yourself. Most executives, politicians, and a large number of law enforcement officers are all sociopaths. Even issues like premature ejaculation can be linked to mental illnesses, either short term or long term.

      NO MORE STIGMA. "Mental illness" almost never means "homeless, homicidal, criminally insane", just like "physical illness" almost never means "hospital intensive care on life support, a living vegetable."

      Mental illness can range from the equivalent of a physical illness of a cold, or a bigger infection, or a life-long treatable condition like diabetes, or it can be severe like aggressive brain cancer.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    5. Re:Nonsense. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older â" about one in four adults â" suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.

      At that rate, the word loses all meaning, and I don't believe for a second that this higher mortality rate is reflected in over a quarter of the population. Instead, you're using an extremely wide definition.

      Your comment is completely misinformed

      No. I even quoted a relevant expert at the end of my rant, which largely supports exactly what I said.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Nonsense. by kinnell · · Score: 1

      it's not clear how mental disorders could be causing early deaths.

      This is a positively idiotic statement.

      It simply means that there is not enough scientific data to support any hypothesis conclusively, not that they have no clue whatsoever. Do you have any data to back up your hypothesis or is it just "common sense"?

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    7. Re:Nonsense. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Your comment is completely misinformed.

      From the National Institute of Mental Health:

      Mental disorders are common in the United States and internationally. An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year. When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.

      I don't have the figures for 2004, but I do have the figures for 2012 regarding homelessness. From the US Department of Housing and Urban Development:

      On a single night in 2012 there were 633,782 homeless people in the United States[...]

      Dividing by the US population in 2012 (312.8 million), we get 0.00202615728, or, 0.2%

      So 26.2% of Americans are mentally ill, and 0.2% of Americans are homeless. So no, it's not a "positively idiotic statement." The mentally all are all around us, and perhaps the reason the study can't pin down why they're dying younger is because people are under the impression that you can easily spot someone who's mentally ill. Yeah, a lot of homeless people are mentally ill. But about a quarter of everyone is mentally ill, and trying to put the mentally ill into a box means that most of those people will go untreated because they'll be ashamed of their disease.

      Pretty much by definition, the severity of a mental illness is measured by the degree of impairment to your life.

      So let's not conflate the large numbers of people diagnosed with relatively mild degrees of mental illness with the seriously mentally ill. The seriously mentally ill are quite disproportionately homeless, unemployed, dependent upon others, etc.

      The inability to manage one's own affairs and to get along with others is, not surprisingly, detrimental to other aspects of health.

    8. Re:Nonsense. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older Ã" about one in four adults Ã" suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.

      At that rate, the word loses all meaning,

      Which word, mental, or disorder?

      The fact is that more people being diagnosed with mental illness does not invalidate the finding. It's only more cause for worry, not for skepticism.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also represent the majority of the people who cross the street in the middle of a block.

      There's no laws against that most places so you've just equated mentally ill with not from a country with jaywalking.

    10. Re:Nonsense. by mpe · · Score: 1

      Mental illness can range from the equivalent of a physical illness of a cold, or a bigger infection, or a life-long treatable condition like diabetes, or it can be severe like aggressive brain cancer.

      Also a physical illness which affects the CNS might well be called a "mental illness" especially if a diagnosis isn't obvious.

    11. Re:Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also disbelieve in the Flu?

  6. Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by gelfling · · Score: 5, Informative

    Doctors have done studies for years confirming that smoking tends to moderate SOME symptoms of schizophrenia. How rain on your wedding day is that?

    1. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bi-Polar people can be too. Doctors are not able to encourage sufferers to continue to smoke, but in my experience they don't discourage it either. It seems to help. (From the very small sample of Bi-Polar sufferers I can observe).

    2. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smoking has other benefits too that aren't widely discussed.

      We should be asking if ecigarettes can achieve these same benefits without the cancer and emphysema.

    3. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, roll them with pot instead of tobacco, no known maladies caused by that - even MJ overdose is characterized by red eyes and fast pulse, compare that with overdosing on anything in your medicine cabinet

    4. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Doctors have done studies for years confirming that smoking tends to moderate SOME symptoms of schizophrenia. How rain on your wedding day is that?

      As does alcohol. It is thought that many alcoholics are mild schizophrenics trying to suppress their symptoms.

      As for the dangers of smoking, I sort of have to laugh

      Thorazine side effects

      Sedation, somnolence Weight gain, hypotension, spasms, Drug induved ParkinsonismParkinsonism, the winner - Tardive Dyskinesia

      Haloperidol

      All the above, plus it can nuke your liver. Elderly patients 1.7 times more likely to die, Produces neurotoxic metabolites, possible carcinogen (though difficult to assess)

      The same drugs that treat the mentally ill are in general, nasty-ass stuff

      And Slashdotters are all agape that these people might smoke?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by jblues · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, nicotine acts in a similar fashion to monamine oxidise inhibitor (MAO) mood stabilizers. It can be administered as required, and the dose easily controlled. I wonder if we could get the same benefits by vaping, while losing some of the negative health consequences?

      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    6. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Nicotine is a drug with significant CNS effects. Why do you think so many people take it? No surprise that it can be beneficial for some.

      It's just that the delivery system is problematic.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      The problem of the delivery system goes easily away if they use nicotine therapy products instead of smoking cigarettes.

    8. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2

      It's not the nicotine. There's naturally occurring substances in tobacco that are MAOI's. That's probably why a lot of people aren't able to switch to vaping. For me personally, it's most noticeable when drinking - a real cigarette is far more satisfying, even though totally sober vaping does it for me.

    9. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Tardive Dyskinesia

      Refresh my memory, please!

      Was he a death star commander, or did he marry a Stark?

       

    10. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Certainly, psychotropic medications can have some pretty serious side effects.

      On the other hand, they are used to treat very serious illness. Many of the symptoms of mental illnesses are dangerous. As with all medications, there is a trade off between the benefit of the medication and the detriment of the side effects.

      The meds you mention, Thorazine and haloperidol, are pretty old school BTW. These days newer atypical antipsychotics would usually be tried first.

    11. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same drugs that treat the mentally ill are in general, nasty-ass stuff

      Depends. The first drugs that were tried to solve mental dysfunction were generally sledgehammers and they are nasty-ass stuff.

      As time and science progress, more innocuous drugs begin to surface. Stuff that can actually manipulate the underlying bio-mechanisms instead of smearing them all over the landscape. That's true of many types of drugs, but especially true of those that can affect the brain.

      But there's a long way to go yet before we can do a DNA test and come up with something that precisely targets each person's individual needs with no side-effects.

    12. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice.

    13. Re:Schizophrenics are HEAVY smokers by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, nicotine alone has been shown to relieve some of the negative symptome of schizophrenia (it's one of the few things that will). There may well be other helpful components in tobacco.

      Naturally, that discovery left psychiatrists scratching their heads. If only they had a drug like nicotine, but what? Hmm, what to give these patients to help their negative symptoms....

      So now, there are a couple very expensive, less effective drugs with worse side effects that were developed that they can use.

  7. Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Since the most recent Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry says that essentially all of us are mentally ill, WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHGGGHHHH!!!

    1. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2

      Dude, no one gets out alive. Ever.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Since the most recent Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry says that essentially all of us are mentally ill, WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHGGGHHHH!!!

      The older I get, the more I realize they might have a point.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      We are all mentally ill to one extent or another, we all will die.

      As far as the DSM folks are concerned those are billable episodes. Your credit card, please.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I burnt one!!

    5. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know they say nobody lives forever.

      As long as the curve approaches infinity, I'll be happy to be well down the long end of it.

    6. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the most recent Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Psychiatry says that essentially all of us are mentally ill

      No it doesn't.

    7. Re:Hmmm... Seen DSM5? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Life is a serious illness . . . no one has survived it yet.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  8. Not an absolute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My grandmother was mean, smoked and nuts. She lived to 96 years old. Good thing she didn't live a healthy life or we would still be stuck with her! Everyone was glad when Death finally gave in and took her. I think he was scared of her.

  9. Medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many medications for the mentally ill can drastically shorten life span.

    1. Re:Medication by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Citation?

    2. Re:Medication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Medication by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Wow, anecdotal evidence. You do realize that not all mentally ill people are being medicated, because there's plenty of conditions for which there is no medication?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  10. This is new? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, this shouldn't be a surprise. Mental illness can include and/or lead to anorexia, compulsive overeating, apathy and depression leading to sedentary lifestyle, suicide, dangerous risk taking behavior, homelessness, poor nutrition, drug abuse including excessive smoking and drinking, and taking lots of prescribed medications.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  11. Re:This is unauthorized content by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    There are no pandas allowed on Slashdort and this article has been reported to the frog queen. Shoes must be LISP.

    For a (content-) Free Internet?

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  12. "Funded by Wellcome Foundation" by storkus · · Score: 3, Informative

    If the name doesn't ring a bell to younger Western audiences (and not to be confused with an Asian supermarket chain, apparently), it is now part of Glaxo-SmithKline (GSK):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

    1. Re:"Funded by Wellcome Foundation" by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      If the name doesn't ring a bell to younger Western audiences (and not to be confused with an Asian supermarket chain, apparently), it is now part of Glaxo-SmithKline (GSK):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

      And? Plenty of heart disease research is funded by makers of heart medications.

    2. Re:"Funded by Wellcome Foundation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burroughs Wellcome, the pharma business was sold into GlaxoWellcome, later to become GSK.

      The Wellcome Trust is an independent charity, the 2nd biggest biomedical research funder on the planet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellcome_Trust

      I suppose at a paranoid stretch you could imagine they have vested interests, but only as much as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has via their funding from Microsoft......

  13. Re:Capitalism... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I doubt that.

    http://www.webmd.com/mental-he...

    There are probably reasons but it will not be as obvious as that. Some of these countries have real reasons to be depressed or suffer anxiety disorders and yet score low in a survey by the WHO. Japan for instance has numbers so low the research said it is unbelievable and it is highly capitalist.

  14. Sigh by sleepypsycho · · Score: 2

    Yet another thing to be depressed about...

    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn... time to pour another drink.

  15. why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why do people insist on studying, helping, fixing the mentally ill or the drug abusers? What about those who are "healthy" but run into unfortunate events (car crash, cancer, getting laid off)? If we're going to treat society as a single organism, wouldn't we want to give to the most capable rather than the least? Where is this constant need to fix people coming from?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by sleepypsycho · · Score: 5, Informative

      A number of reasons
      1) Basic human compassion
      2) Mentally ill and drug abusers affect the healthy. Drug crime is rampant with a high cost to society. Even if all drugs were legalized, as I believe they should be, there would be still a heavy price, just as with alcoholism. These would include car crashes, unemployment, failed businesses, etc that you mention.
      3) As someone with depression, it seems worth fixing.
      4) Mental illness is just that, an illness.Why do you draw a distinction between cancer and mental illness. How is someone with cancer "healthy"?

    2. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      Why do people insist on studying, helping, fixing the mentally ill or the drug abusers?

      Healthy human compassion.

      What about those who are "healthy" but run into unfortunate events (car crash, cancer, getting laid off)?

      We care for them too.

      If we're going to treat society as a single organism, wouldn't we want to give to the most capable rather than the least?

      That would be a false dilemma. If the two options were mutually exclusive, what you said would make sense. As it is, what you said is just idiotic.

      Where is this constant need to fix people coming from?

      Again, basic human compassion. You should try it sometime...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many mentally ill and drug abusers were "healthy" and ran into unfortunate events.

    4. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived and travelled abroad long enough to see that people are people - essentially the same everywhere in the world.

      But people have vastly different economic opportunities depending which countries they are born into. In some countries, poverty is rare and temporary: a person of ordinary ability can relatively easily find meaningful work that pays enough to live comfortably. In other countries, poverty is common and almost impossible to escape: what few jobs are available pay so little that even basic necessities are unaffordable. Fundamentally, an economy can only consume as much as it produces. If most people in an economy don't have productive jobs then it will be impossible for most people to have a comfortable level of consumption. So, yes, figuring out how to structure an economy to provide productive jobs to ordinary people is one of the most important questions facing humanity.

      But it's a false dichotomy to say that we can't also help people with mental illness and addiction. One thing that's striking about the USA, for example, is how many people have far more than they need - huge houses, multiple late model high-end SUV's, designer handbags, etc. Sure, we could have a productive economy that is mostly producing luxury goods for a handful of ultra-rich. But we don't have to: we could also have a productive economy that provides almost everyone with a comfortable living and also makes progress toward solving the big problems of the world - poverty, disease, conflict.

    5. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people insist on studying, helping, fixing the mentally ill or the drug abusers? What about those who are "healthy" but run into unfortunate events (car crash, cancer, getting laid off)? If we're going to treat society as a single organism, wouldn't we want to give to the most capable rather than the least? Where is this constant need to fix people coming from?

      Unless you propose leaving them to die on the street (which I'm getting a strong whiff of) or imprisoning them, those people are going to exist somewhere and have a cost. Helping the capable the opportunity to be their best does not preclude helping the weak; it is both less expensive to society and also fosters the kind of culture that is worth living in.

    6. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to treat society as a single organism, wouldn't we want to give to the most capable rather than the least?

      Don't then, its giving stupid results. After all you think you know the purpose of this hypothetical organism.

      Why do people insist on studying, helping, fixing the mentally ill or the drug abusers? What about those who are "healthy" but run into unfortunate events (car crash, cancer, getting laid off)?

      What of those suffering PTSD after going to war for us, or have mental illness after years of abuse?

    7. Re:why the focus on being your brother's keeper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, it costs $60k/year to keep people in prison, why not just pay them $50k/year as long as they stay out of trouble? It would be a net savings of $10k/year, plus free up man power from guards, expanding the economic pie. Of course life isn't this simple, but it is a naive example of the concept of helping people to save money. Not helping people tends to increase crime, which is more expensive in real money and even worse once you include the opportunity costs.

  16. Re:More reason to support treatment for mental hea by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    It's called acute lead poisoning.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  17. Smokeres lose 13.4 years not 8 by jblues · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, heavy smokers lose ~13.4 years and not 8-10 as the article quotes. Is the shorter life span due to the side-effects of medication?

    --
    If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
  18. Can't be right. by fyngyrz · · Score: 0

    The demographic for Fox News viewers is mainly old folks. If this study were true, the demographic for Fox News viewers would be dead people.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  19. certificate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that why the expired slashdot certificate still has not been updated?

    Connecting to slashdot.org (slashdot.org)|216.34.181.45|:443... connected.
    ERROR: cannot verify slashdot.org's certificate, issued by â/C=US/O=GeoTrust, Inc./CN=GeoTrust SSL CAâ(TM):
        Issued certificate has expired.

  20. Some effect as well as some cause by sleepypsycho · · Score: 1

    Poor health can contribute to or directly relate to mental illness. Some in the study probably suffered from other illness but were not diagnosed. It must be just fraction of the measurement but it might be an important one.

  21. "Reduces"? Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't believe it's possible to assign cause/effect with such studies. The headline should read "Mental illness assoicated with reduced lifespan"

  22. Smoking marijuana affects mental health too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good time to point out that many studies have drawn links between marijuana use and depression (worsening with chronic use) paranoia, schizophrenia, risk of psychotic episodes and prolonged psychosis. It's no wonder that many mentally ill people self-medicate with marijuana which provides temporary relief but exacerbates their conditions in the long run.

    I mention this because drug advocates commonly claim that smoking marijuana is safer than smoking tobacco, and while the lack of nicotine negates a cancer risk, marijuana is by no means safe for your mental well being.

    And hey, there's always the simplest option: don't smoke anything. There's a reason we attribute long life and good health to "clean living".

  23. Still alive by cute_orc · · Score: 1

    I have OCD and Hypochondria and it is badly affecting my life. But slowly and steadily I am getting out of it. Never went for any medication. No one even knows about it except my family.

  24. Medication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Diagnosed mentally ill people tend to get psychopharmaceutic medication, stuff that kidneys and liver have a hard time dealing with intentionally since it needs to accumulate and thus maintain a somewhat constant level in the bloodstream.

    So how many of those deaths are attributable to liver or renal failure?

  25. Are geniuses having short lives ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say that true geniuses are only a hairline away from craziness

    So if craziness can shorten your life, would geniuses' lives in danger as well ?

    1. Re:Are geniuses having short lives ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish pedophiles would live shorter lives, but they seem immune to this.

  26. Sounds a lot like people I know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... generally don't take good care of themselves. They tend to eat worse and more irregularly, sleep odd hours, and not get to the doctor as much (for whatever reason), especially if they live by themselves ...

    Have been in the IT field for umpteenth of years and people working around me fit the description to the "T"

    Sleep at odd hours ? Check !
    Eating junk ? Check !
    Don't take good care of themselves ?
    If it means not taking regular bath, not brush teeth at least twice a day, and so on ... Check, check, check !!!
    Not going to doctors ? Check !
    Live by themselves ? Check !

    Looks like a lot of geeks may fine themselves facing St. Michael at the pearly gate earlier than others ...

    1. Re:Sounds a lot like people I know ... by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Therefore, you have to be mentally ill to work in IT! :-)

    2. Re:Sounds a lot like people I know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It's no joke. This fields attracts outliers like crazy.

  27. BOLLOCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who doesn't know GOD and is living in sin has mental illness whether they know it or not. So don't let some poor soul with a lot of authority tell you you're sick. And don't let someone suicide you out without giving them the fight of their life.

    Phishing: TFA is helpful as life insurance disinformation only, very suspect indeed; always an agenda. So dismantle the VA you dx, guaranteed to turn it into a complete debacle, dissing countless veterans who served this country faithfully. What a scam, having experienced the administration of outlanders prying into my medical records illegally and without consent, 2blocking doctors and always trying to hang me with my own words, short leashed my entire adult life. The n0w0 no doubt.

  28. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Medications Commonly Prescribed For Mental Illness Reduce Lifespans As Much as Smoking

  29. One word... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Psychoneuroimmunology. (Yeah, it's a long one.)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  30. Old Research by elbonia · · Score: 1

    This isn't anything new . Also people with epilepsy have it particularly bad

  31. medications and other causes of early death.. by strstr · · Score: 0

    this study is terrible because the psychiatrist has not actually
    linked the issue to mental illness and he doesn't mention once mental
    health drugs causing the problems. in fact studies have been done that
    show it's mental health drugs causing a drop in the average life
    expectancy by 25 years on average:
    http://www.oregonstatehospital...

    also a study done and published in the American Medical Association
    showed that on average pharamacuticels were causing 100,000 deaths per
    year when correctly prescribed and not due to side effect issues or
    misprescribing:
    http://themindunleashed.org/20...

    Direct link to study publication:
    http://www.oregonstatehospital...

    Anti-anxiety and sleep aids are also tied to causing a 17.5% increased
    chance for instant death in your sleep, as well as increases in
    cancer. In these two studies:
    http://www.thedailybeast.com/a...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    There's a reason the United Nations and World Health Organization also
    are calling for a ban on forced psychiatric treatment and consider
    treatment forms of torture:
    http://www.oregonstatehospital...
    http://www.oregonstatehospital...
    http://www.oregonstatehospital...
    http://oregonstatehospital.net...

    Scientists "Antipsychotic drugs are schizophrenia's hidden gulag":
    http://www.newscientist.com/ar...

    Drugs like Prozac also cause a 12 fold increase in risk of suicide and
    homicidal tendencies. Zyprexa also causes mania in bipolar people and
    induces first time psychotic episodes. How could it not be that when
    all this is known they don't mention it once in an article about
    people with mental illness having reduced life spans?

    More articles and videos about medications causing severe illness and
    the over diagnosing of people. BTW, another cause of death for people
    with mental illness is the chronic abuse and neglect they face in
    forced treatment programs and treatment in general, and also
    experimentation and abuse by the government. More details on this
    here: http://www.oregonstatehospital...

    Documentary video covering the abusive history of psychiatry here:
    http://cdn.oregonstatehospital...

    Looks like the study linking the drop in life expectancy to mental
    illness and recommending that people receive medications as treatment
    is heavily flawed. :)

    -Todd Giffe

  32. Funded by http://muengineering.in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stressed life is more dangerous and harmful than smoking

    http://muengineering.in

  33. This is a long time and well known issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been working with SED and SMPI clients as a Crisis Case Manager and supervisor for 13 years. This is very well known. Factors include mentally ill people are much less likely to seek medical services, more likely to be poor, usually impulsive, lack access to or knowledge of services other than medical, often have less family and social supports, some psychotropic drugs are very hard on the liver and other organs, often self medicate with alcohol or illicit/prescription drugs, the list goes on and on. Oh, and dual diagnosis play a part in this too (addiction/mental illness).

    As a side note, now and again when I hear someone make comments that they feel it's unfair that mentally ill people shouldn't get SSI or SSDI benefits because they are just lazy, I think to myself that I wouldn't trade places with most of them for anything. ANYTHING. I've seem people in their 40's with bodies of a 70 year old and minds of a 10 year old living in 2nd and sometimes 3rd world conditions. SSDI/SSI/Medicaid benefits do help but not much. After rentand food there usually isn't much left, if any. Now and again we are able to find jobs for our clients but it's not easy finding a job for a 40 year old bipolar alcoholic with an IQ of 70 with a limited work history.

  34. Mental illness and short lifespan .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A new meta study from researchers at Oxford concludes that mental illness is just as big a factor in shortening lives"

    The main cause in shortening the lives of the mentally ill is the cocktail of toxic chemicals that they are forced to take by the mental health profession. These cause, as an example, loss of concentration, memory loss, thyroid problems, type two diabetes, obesity, heart failure and so on. The cure these types of drugs provide is that; the patent is so preoccupied in not falling down or shitting themselves, they're not a bother to anyone ..
    --

    The site's security certificate has expired!

  35. Miracle I am still alive by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Reading the actual paper I thought: "Wow. Should have been dead by now".

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  36. buh by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Another attempt by the Criminal Democratic Party to justify stealing money. It won't work. Anyone still believing the leftist ideas is beyond help.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:buh by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Another attempt by the Criminal Democratic Party to justify stealing money. It won't work. Anyone still believing the leftist ideas is beyond help.

      I'd worry - indications are that you may have a short lifespan

    2. Re:buh by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Another attempt by the Criminal Democratic Party to justify stealing money. It won't work. Anyone still believing the leftist ideas is beyond help.

      I'd worry - indications are that you may have a short lifespan

      Not sure if you are doing it consciously. In case if you are not only lacking awareness, but are also lacking self-awareness, let me help you out here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    3. Re:buh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might believe exactly the same things as you so have knowledge from that. But hey you can link to wikipedia so you must be correct then. I could link to any number of possibilities but without justification I have no believe in them as reality.

    4. Re:buh by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Leftist ideology is based (and this is provable) on voluntary insanity. The fact that he is a leftist and goes around calling other people crazy (as is implied by his comment) is pretty good evidence that he is projecting. I wasn't sure if he knew that he was doing that. So I provided him with a link to help him learn about his (possibly self-imposed) condition. The link didn't prove anything. It was only there to help him start reflecting on what he was doing.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    5. Re:buh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leftist ideology is based (and this is provable) on voluntary insanity.

      I'm calling you out, prove it.
      I'm unaware that even insanity could be proved let alone stating an ideology is based on it.
      There are many ideologies in the left and you haven't specified any particular one so presumably all of them.
      The only way that'd work is if you define people who have different opinions as insane.

      The fact that he is a leftist and goes around calling other people crazy (as is implied by his comment) is pretty good evidence that he is projecting.

      No it isn't. That's just something you apparently believe but has no justification unless you manage to prove the whole set of left ideologies insane.

      Also I'm from the UK where this report was done and am unaware of any such party over here.

    6. Re:buh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry quick addendum; I'd agree his comment wasn't exactly brimming with good argument either.

    7. Re:buh by superwiz · · Score: 1

      The only way that'd work is if you define people who have different opinions as insane.

      Or if I prove my premise. This:

      There are many ideologies in the left and you haven't specified any particular one so presumably all of them.

      doesn't quite rise to a reductio ad absurdum.

      I'm unaware that even insanity could be proved let alone stating an ideology is based on it.

      There are certain faculties whose lack would be considered insanity. Which is to say that these faculties are necessary, rather than sufficient, conditions for sanity. Thus insanity can be, from time to time, ascertained even if sanity cannot be.

      Chief among faculties viewed as required for sanity is the ability to make a discerning judgement. Therefore, any call for suspending a discerning judgement is a call for voluntary insanity. The call to not be "judgemental" is such a call and it stems from the main leftist premise (which I have not yet stated, but will do so in the next paragraph).

      The main premise of all leftist philosophies is that equality (or, more precisely, similarity) of outcomes, in response to similar efforts and similar opportunities, is more desirable than inequality of outcomes due to inequality of efficacy of those efforts.

      They have, over the years, realized that this is a hard sell and have attempted to rebrand their fight for equality of results as a fight for equality of opportunities. But they want nothing like the equality of opportunities. They wish to hamper opportunities of the more capable and improve opportunities of the less capable in order to produce more equal results. In order to make their views seem less monstrous, they often attempt to argue that the simple way to observe inequality of opportunities is to look at the inequality of results. But that, again, is absurd because given equal opportunities, different results would be achieved by individuals of different talents.

      The left often makes an attempt to vilify and demonize those who would point out the logical error in their reasoning (the one stated in the previous paragraph). But any attempt to argue through vilification of a logical argument is an attempt to get people to suspend their faculty of reasoning. This also is tantamount to requesting that people accept voluntary insanity.

      Another faculty that is necessary to sanity and which is hindered by the leftist ideologies is the ability to make a decision. Decisions result from inner products of impetuses and opportunities. The left attempts to argue that moral relativism is a virtue. But moral relativism brands all actions equal (or, at least, less discerned than they really are in value). Thus it removes the ability to pick one action over another and severely hampers the impetus to act. In the face of reduced impetus to act, all opportunities become worth less (albeit not worthless). The ideology thus leads to the inability of people to better their lot in life (even of the people who have talents and are presented with opportunities) . That is insanity (if not in a medical sense of the word, then certainly in the colloquial one).

      I'm calling you out, prove it.

      I've had these arguments too many times already. Repeating them is tiresome. If you challenge me, at the very least, you could not do it as AC.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    8. Re:buh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for actually replying, most do not.
      The reason I do as AC is not for you but so that others in the future will have a harder time spying on me. Sorry that it leads to difficulty of identification for debate purposes :(

      My premise is that people are, when born, morally equal and that we should make efforts to help our fellow man if they are in a less fortunate position. This is a believe and Ayn Rand followers will probably disagree.

      I do not believe people are only motivated to act from greed and that making this as the basis for society is a very myopic view. It does not reward actual improvements to society but merely an ability to make money. The current system seems to lead to a very disproportionate wealth distribution which I would argue isn't a proportinate contribution. This leads to others having less than is proportinate to their contribution. This problem has apparently been amplified through time leaving the current crazy (in my view) wealth distribution in the world.

      I can see the moral dilemma with no rewards though. I think people should act correctly no matter what and I try to do so although I don't always succeed and I measure my success by this yard stick. Different people are motivated by different things and having some wealth inequality is helpful motivation but the amount is what I dispute. Also society in general judging people by wealth as a proxy is not smart as there is little causative relation between morality and wealth that I can see. In fact the correlation I've witnessed would suggest the opposite. Obviously that's morality from my POV.

      I would not see anyone starve, be homeless or without medical attention if it is possible otherwise. Obviously there are practical limits on that medical attention and I think NICE (National Institute of clinical excellence) gets a lot of unfair stick for trying to logically evaluate the situation. The best way we have at the moment is partial wealth redistribution through tax. Yes its not ideal but we do not live in an ideal world.

      People are generally not satisfied with surviving ok though so will still perform useful tasks even if they are motivated by greed - or self improvement if you prefer :)

      Also a good education system is a corner stone of opportunity, but this, unless you are lucky, seems to be somewhat lacking within the state system.

      If you count this a left wing I hope that at least you don't count it as insane.

      If by the left you mean the people who stopped assisted places at public schools (which are 'private' in the UK) to insist everyone who can't pay must have a bad education I'd agree they're dogmatic ideologs cutting of someone else's nose to spite someone else's face.
      I wouldn't say proved though as I don't believe anything that isn't a priori true can be proved and people can't be shown to be a priori true (other than oneself). This might be a stricter standard than most hold to though.
      I do see you could define insane=left and then by definition it would be true but that doesn't seem very useful. Accuse the left of being sinister instead ,)

      -S

    9. Re:buh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I made a mistake:
      'which I would argue isn't a proportinate contribution.'
      should be :
      'which I would argue isn't proportinate to their contribution'

      -S

  37. Re:This is unauthorized content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a feeling you're at risk. :(

  38. Drops of Jupiter by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but it is the lesser of two evils when compared to a healthy person.

    That may be true on a statistical level however I personally know 4 people (plus their immediate family members) who lives were turned upside down by a combination of Zoloft (anti-stress) mixed with regular, but not excessive, alcohol consumption (anti-inhibitor). One of them (a 60yr old male with no police record) ended up in jail for attacking some cops, another (40yo male) was arrested and thrown into the local lock-up for threatening neighbours and the police who turned up to investigate.

    The problem (from this layman's POV) is that unintentional abuse is easy and GP's hand out behaviour modifying pills like jelly beans. Humans needs some stress to function in a human society, take away the bodily symptoms of stress (adrenalin rush, etc) and you have basically removed the person "social filter". Lying, cheating, etc, no longer makes their heart beat a little faster so their brain is left wondering what "everybody else's" problem is, and why are they are suddenly being "picked on" by everybody. Whatever selfish bullshit pops into their head (ie: old fashioned "temptation") is simply acted upon without guilt. In other words a human's "moral compass" does not (and cannot) operate normally without stress. OTOH, I have known (or known of) many more than 4 people where such drugs have worked as advertised but mostly because their loved ones were on watch for behaviour changes and they read the warnings about mixing them with alcohol.

    Stress is normal, panic attacks are not. There's a huge difference between the two that is quite often ignored by GP's in a ten minute consultation. Chronic panic attacks can almost always be traced back to a traumatic experience or more commonly an abusive and erratic parent.

    Disclaimer: My ex-wife was treated with zoloft in the late 90's for life long panic attacks brought about by her soiciopathic (and incestuoes) father, she was the proverbial "swan" - plenty of social graces but peddling like crazy under the water. She was on the pills for about 3yrs, the change in personality did not happen overnight, it was subtle and gradual, or at least it was too subtle for me to connect it with the pills. However I can tell people from experience that when it gets to the point where your partner of 20yrs starts lying to your face like a chocolate drenched two year old, blaming the pills that were prescribed a year ago is not the first reaction. Our first grandchild was born about 5yrs ago, the ex threw away the pills and cut down on the wine, she has since apologised profusely to our kids and myself for her behaviour and gone back to being a swan. Thing is, once a family has been broken it tends to stay broken, given a 10-15yr of "water under the bridge" we all have the capacity to forgive the most egregious transgressions in a loved one, but very few of us have the amnesic ability to simply forget a "life changing" experience such as a "bitter" family break up , to paraphrase "Drops of Jupiter" - the return of a life long friend from the "soul vacation" of mental desperation is as good as it ever gets.

    The following advice for treating stress/depression comes from personal hindsight, seek professional help if you need medical foresight.
    1. Visit a GP to get a referral to a qualified psychologist.
    2. DO NOT fill a prescription from the GP without first consulting the qualified psychologist you acquired in step 1.
    3. DO NOT mix mind altering recreational drugs such as alcohol or weed with mind altering prescription drugs.
    4. RTFM.
    5. If everyone seems to be treating you like an arsehole, then it's a safe bet you're behaving like one.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Drops of Jupiter by flyingsquid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If antidepressants are really the answer, why does America, with one of the highest rates of antidepressant use, also have one of the highest rates of depression in the world? If they were really effective, people should be less depressed, and in fact there's more depression and mental illness than ever. There's increasingly concern that antidepressants are actually making things worse. In the short term, antidepressants can be effective in managing the treatment of depression, for some people. The problem is that they can cause long-term changes in how the brain functions, such that the person becomes dependent upon the drug. This means that on quitting antidepressants, the depression is more likely to return than it would have been if it had simply been left to resolve itself. There have been a number of studies published that suggest that the long-term outcome of mental illness is worse when antidepressants are used. As far as I know, there isn't a single study that has shown that outcomes for depression are improved long-term- over the course of 5-10 years instead of 5-10 weeks- by the use of antidepressants.

      Maybe antidepressants do have a role in treating mental illness, but given the risks- increased risk of suicide, the highly addictive nature of some of the drugs (especially ones with short half-lives) and the risk that they can make people worse than when they started, these should be a method of last resort for severe clinical depression, NOT a first-line treatment for everyone who seems moderately sad or anxious. There are a *lot* of things that have been shown to be potentially beneficial- cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, light therapy, sleep therapy, and supplements like Omega 3 fatty acids, vitamin B, D, zinc and magnesium, cutting down on carbohydrates- which come without the risks posed by antidepressants.

    2. Re:Drops of Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If antidepressants are really the answer, why does America, with one of the highest rates of antidepressant use, also have one of the highest rates of depression in the world?

      This XKCD illustrates your reasoning pretty well.

      If antidepressants really is the answer, it makes perfect sense that America, with one of the highest rates of depression in the world, also have one of the highest rates of antidepressant use.

    3. Re:Drops of Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I took some anti-anxiety meds for a little bit, but I'm a very introspective person and found my shift in reasoning scary to the point if it causing more anxiety. I'm very conscience of my thoughts, and shifts in my thinking makes me reexamine myself.

    4. Re:Drops of Jupiter by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      America has one of the highest antidepressant use in the world because it qualifies you for social security when you're unemployed for a long time, and have bills to pay. It's like this: are you broke? We got a pill for that too!

    5. Re:Drops of Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your first two examples sound like mania induced by antidepressants. If you are still in contact with them you should suggest they see a psychiatrist and investigate whether they have a bi-polar disorder that may benefit from mood stabilisers.

      I don't have any references with me but if you Google antidepressant triggered mania or hypomania you should be able to find the stats on this occurring.

      Sorry to hear about the difficulties loved ones suffering from mental illness has caused you, it can be a difficult thing to deal with.

    6. Re:Drops of Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If antidepressants are really the answer, why does America, with one of the highest rates of antidepressant use, also have one of the highest rates of depression in the world? If they were really effective, people should be less depressed, and in fact there's more depression and mental illness than ever.

      I wonder what the rate of depression in America be if antidepressants weren't available. Assuming, of course, that antidepressants _are_ effective (clinical trials for their approval by the FDA would indicate that to be the fact) then it would be logical to think that depression in America would be _worse_ without them (not better).

      Which should prompt the question, why is the rate of depression in America so very high?
      And the answer to that is apt to be rather political. Which of course makes the average American depressed.

  39. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan has a very high level of social stigma associated with mental illness so not surprising it is under reported.

  40. An opinion from a layman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The ubiquitous use of medications like mood stabilisers (lithium and valproate) and neuroleptics (called antipsychotic by pharma marketing) need their bit of attention. The demotivating effect of these drugs causes many to lose interest in taking care of themselves, and that knock-on effect can most likely shorten lives. But with so much mental health 'research' funded by big pharma it is unlikely that enough good unbiased research will be done in the area, certainly not enough to counter the sheer weight of 'it really works' stories that big pharma stuff into the literature.

  41. in addition to poor choices associated with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the 'diseases of the brain' thing needs more scrutiny. Consider a computer analogy: a broken gate in a processor will cause software malfunctioning, and that's clearly a 'disease of the processor' but a software bug will also cause apparent malfunctions and is that a 'disease of the processor', and in both cases, can a hardware fix work? While there's little doubt that mind functioning is strongly connected to the brain, the case that psychological or behavioural 'abnormalities' are attributable to brain malfunctioning needs to be made, and hasn't been made: it's more dogma than science. The idea that mental illness is understandable as a malfunctioning of the brain is one of the myths of modern medicine.

  42. Depression and Willpower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does Depression affect Willpower. Consider the role of Willpower in Rehabilitation. If one has no desire to live or work how can one have desire to regain the ability to walk, talk, feed, or bathe? How about caring enough to take medicines?

    Personally, having spent years fighting depression but being otherwise very healthy, I look forward to my first catastrophic illness so I can finally have an excuse to "punch out" once and for all.

    It doesn't make sense, and I don't expect that it ever will. It's a feeling. It's not rational. I want to feel better, but I doubt I really ever will. All I can do is compartmentalize until I can move on.

  43. Wellcome Trust != GSK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wellcome Trust is an independent charity set up by the same guy who set up Wellcome (now part of GSK) and is the UK's largest non-government source of research funding. It is not the research-funding wing of GSK.

    Honestly, if you knew anything at all about science funding in the UK you would know this. You have demonstrated that you do not know anything at all about research funding in the UK and would have done better to keep your mouth shut.

  44. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate
    This puts Japan 10th. This seems to indicate people not admitting it rather than not suffering it.

  45. Re:More reason to support treatment for mental hea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mentally ill are more likely to be a victim of violence than to commit violence.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17182626

  46. Those whom the gods would destroy... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    Syphilis drives you crazy, and then kills you. It doesn't kill you and then drive you crazy.
    Any disease or genetic condition which slowly kills you is likely to make you depressed first.

  47. Re:This is unauthorized content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sardaukar86: Is 244 greater than 1? Watch this folks, hahahaha.

  48. so true :| by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

    Mode up more. I love how they says we don't know why. REALLY, its not self obvious why those with mental illness struggle with pretty much every thing in life from social to physical.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  49. thought experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these are completely made up figures, but bear with me:
    assume that 5-20% of population smokes
    assume that 5-20% of population has a moderate to serious MI
    assume that 20-80% of the population with MI smokes (believe me, a lot do)
    this means that a SIGNIFICANT percentage of the target market for tobacco is the mentally ill, including those officially disabled by a MI. targeting a protected class of citizens for sale of an addictive, carcinogenic substance must might be considered evil by some of us.

  50. ROTFLMAO: See everyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK you hypocritical, stalking cunt. by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @04:25PM (#47094629) Homepage

    LMAO - Yup: I just KNEW that'd get some good "rational discourse" outta ole' Sardillo. Now, if we could ONLY get him to understand basic math better (like 244 is greater than 1) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comment... where Sardaukar86 had to "eat his words' yet again, vs. his SUPERIOR, apk!

    Again you wilfully misrepresent your argument.by Sardaukar86 (850333) on Monday May 26, 2014 @04:25PM (#47094629) Homepage

    How do you figure? Oh, that's right - you don't! Basic math eludes you. Clue: 244 of your /. peers proved you wrong vs. your 1 and you lose again to the SUPERIOR, apk.

    1. Re:ROTFLMAO: See everyone? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Now, if we could ONLY get him to understand basic math better (like 244 is greater than 1)

      Is that all you got, APK? Really? Loser.

      How do you figure? Oh, that's right - you don't! Basic math eludes you. Clue: 244 of your /. peers proved you wrong vs. your 1 and you lose again to the SUPERIOR, apk.

      Well then, superior arsehole APK, perhaps you can explain your 'basic working' then? How exactly do 244 up-mods counter my opinion of you? What is this '1' that you speak of? Have you forgotten all the other people who have very low opinions of you? What about all the down-mods you've received? Your data is meaningless without that, loser.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  51. What he's got is you by the nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a 244++:1 ratio of your /. peers liking his posts vs. your 1 & you "eating your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... so tell us - How did they taste? LOL!

  52. APK's claims are hollow, so is his reasoning by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

    But that doesn't stop him from posting inanities online as the above post demonstrates.

    You are beaten, you are out of ammo, you have nothing to fight with, you suck. Loser.

    --
    ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  53. "Argue with the numbers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    244++:1 against you from your /. peers while you (lol) "eat your words" http://it.slashdot.org/comment... & that is just plain fact right there in black & white. Go argue with the numbers while you 'eat" (your words, lol).

  54. ask the right question by SylviaCaras · · Score: 1

    Psychiatric medications cause obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes (metabolic disorders) and shorten life span by 15 - 25%. It's important to separate effects of illness and effects of treatments for illness.

  55. Such "rational discourse" (lol, not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such fine language also (not). You sound so intelligent (sarcasm).

    1. Re:Such "rational discourse" (lol, not) by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I remember the last time I heard someone say "not!" like you do all the time - it was in school. That's right - your behaviour is visible to all for what it is.

      Oh, and as for my use of language, yup, it's just what you deserve. Actually, what you really deserve is to be skinned - very slowly - over a fire. Fortunately for you that's illegal and I'm in another country, so swearing at you is going to have to do. Hope that's ok! :-)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  56. Why don't you answer the question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  57. Re:Capitalism... by sjames · · Score: 1

    In japan, mental illness carries a high stigma, so it is not talked about. Note in the article you pointed to, the reported figure is implausibly low, but the use of benzos (used to treat anxiety disorder) are the highest in the world. They also have 700,000 reported Hikikomori with estimated actual numbers of about 1% of the population. Meanwhile, suicide is the leading cause of death in males 20-44 years old. Yeah, it's just peachy there.

  58. Please don't forgett X-ray emitting TV-tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A longt-term study in Australia showed, that regular daily TV-consumption has an impact on people's statistical lifespan similar to smoking.
    Animal-experiments suggest, that the X-ray radiation from cathode-ray tubes prevents nerve-cells in the central nervous system from regeneration upon stress-situations.
    I suggest a strong correlation with hyperactivity in children, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

    1. Re:Please don't forgett X-ray emitting TV-tubes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did they find the control?

  59. Crazy People Smoke...A LOT by anomalous3 · · Score: 1

    Since this is a meta-analysis, it doesn't take into account a lot of other factors; many people with mental illness come from or end up in lower socioeconomic places. But more than anything else, people with mental illness SMOKE. Not all of them, and not all the time, but tobacco usage among the mentally ill is 70% higher according to the CDC than it is amongst everyone else. In this case the correlation is almost a doozy.

  60. Cuckoo's Nest by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is the bad food Nurse Ratched feeds them?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  61. LMAO - I'd LOVE for you to try it... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, it's "ok" for YOU to stalk & harass others 1st -> http://news.slashdot.org/comme... ,b>& as far as you PUNY threats, motherfucker? TRY IT...

    Motherfucker: I will fucking END you! It wouldn't be some '1st" considering @ least once a month due to the madhouse city I live in, I have to do that to little fucks like you, QUITE frequently!

    APK

    P.S.=> I shit you not you little piece of hypocritical shit - it'd be my pleasure you splatter your ass all over the pavement... apk

  62. No you didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 244 > 1? YES or NO will do nicely.

  63. Not a mystery by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    I'm severely depressed, due to severe guilt and shame over things that happened in the past, although I've learned ways to hide this from most of those who don't know me. Drugs have never worked (over a 20+ year period of trying many). And frankly I don't expect to live long because I don't want to live long. My depression is at least as much a burden to my family as it is to me. They are relatively young and deserve a fresh start, with someone better than me. Though I lack the courage to end my life quickly, and though I fear the possibility of becoming even more disabled and thus even more of a burden, I do manage to live in ways that I know will increase my risk of dying sooner rather than later. This is NOT something I'd recommend to other depressed people, as most depression can be treated and some of it results from unmet needs (love, affection, attention, etc.) which are endemic in the sick "culture" of the U.S. and other Anglophone countries, but can change. Also I am not a burden merely because I'm depressed, but for a variety of other reasons as well, not germane to this discussion. So I'm not suggesting that others follow my lead, but that they get the help they need (not just medical but also societal) as much as they can. But as for myself, it is not any great mystery that I'm going to die reasonably young. I eat crap, too much of it and too infrequently. I drink the strongest alcohol I can stand and lots of it. Lots of caffeine too, often on an empty stomach. I take on a great deal of stress, so as to reduce the stress in the lives of others I care about. I work very hard and save every penny I can, and have as much life insurance as I can reasonably afford. I purposely drink unfiltered water even though we have filtered water available, and expose myself to carcinogens at every opportunity (though not other toxins necessarily, and I take great pains not to expose others). I volunteer for every bit of dangerous or dirty work I can. I sleep only enough to be able to work (and just barely). I never see the doctor, and have instructed those around me not to consent to any medical treatment if I am not conscious. I realize it might happen anyway, but only against my explicit wishes, and only for as long as it takes for me to wake up. I have untreated sleep apnea, GERD, high blood pressure, possible diabetes, and probable early-stage renal failure. In the short term I keep myself reasonably healthy and able to work, since my role as a human ATM is the only useful one I have, but, over a longer period of time, I understand that my risk of death from stroke, heart disease, diabetes, liver failure, renal failure, and cancer is much higher than normal, and I will not consent to treatment for any of the above, so, once one of these hits me, it is more likely than not that my death will ensue reasonably quickly, freeing my family from the burden of putting up with me, and making the world a much better place in the process.