Slashdot Mirror


'Curiosity' Lead Engineer Suggests Printing Humans On Other Planets

Jason Koebler (3528235) writes "Adam Steltzner, the lead engineer on the NASA JPL's Curiosity rover mission, believes that to send humans to distant planets, we may need to do one of two things: look for ways to game space-time—traveling through wormholes and whatnot—or rethink the fundamental idea of 'ourselves.' 'Our best bet for space exploration could be printing humans, organically, on another planet,' said Steltzner."

33 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Are we our genes? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think there's a case to be made that genetically being human is far less important to being "human" than the shared culture we've developed. Organically laying out a clone of yourself is far less like yourself than raising an adopted child. This kind of program, while inspired, and theoretically plausible, doesn't actually achieve what we want to achieve.

    1. Re:Are we our genes? by timeOday · · Score: 2

      That limited definition of "clone" has recently been widely adopted simply because it is currently within reach. A full clone would be a full copy of yourself, with every neuron in place. Full cloning seems like the only rationale for "printing" people, since otherwise it would be much easier to send a frozen embryo in an artificial uterus with robot-mom to raise him/her.

    2. Re:Are we our genes? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      It's plausible in the sense that no fundamental laws are violated. It isn't like time-travel or true perpetual motion - it's just an engineering challenge. An impossibly hard engineering challenge, true. One that may take centuries to solve. But still, it's plausible.

    3. Re:Are we our genes? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      No, they are not biologically identical. They are genetically identical. The development of the brain isn't just influenced by genetics - environmental factors play a part, an there's a strongly chaotic element allowing for miniscule influences to have a dramatic effect.

      You could copy a person - but you'd need to get every neuron, every synapse done perfectly. Right down to neurotransmitter generation rates and receptor concentration, and probably a few things we don't even know about yet. Such a thing is far, far beyond current technology, but it doesn't violate any fundamental laws and so there is still a possibility that it may become possible one day in the very distant future. Much as I like the idea of immortality, I do not imagine it will occur within my lifetime.

  2. Re:Yeah, no... by fizzer06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can just imagine them into existence. And then some unicorns.

  3. The Songs of Distant Earth by Crash24 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aside from the whole organic-3D-printing-of-entire-humans angle, this isn't a new idea. Arthur C. Clarke's The Songs of Distant Earth features an extraterrestrial colony of humans descended from machine-grown progenitors.

    1. Re:The Songs of Distant Earth by almitydave · · Score: 2

      Yep, heck theoretically you should be able to fit some sperm and eggs in a small enough container and transport that. The real issue which we are pretty close to solving in an artificial womb.

      Of course you would also need some type of nano-bot self constructing army to build a habitat and laboratory, ultimately that probably a bigger challenge than the cloning itself.

      Yeah, I guess we currently have the tech to freeze eggs & sperm indefinitely, so that would solve that. I don't think you'd need the nanobots, regular macro-scale robots could handle it with prefab components and equipment.

      --
      my, your, his/her/its, our, your, their
      I'm, you're, he's/she's/it's, we're, you're, they're
  4. Re:Fine... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    The problem is if they are too realistically human, they keep leaving you.

  5. Hmmm ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, start with the magic, then?

    I wonder how we go about printing humans on other planets or using wormholes.

    Why, if only we had unlimited, non-existent technology, we could do practically anything.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Embryo by Stellian · · Score: 2

    You don't have to print humans, just synthesize a memorized genome and throw it into an artificial womb. Done to death in SciFi literature and certainly within the means of 21th century technology. It's certainly interesting if a human raised entirely by a computer can really qualify as human.

    And why do it ? Just to spread the human disease in the universe ? Why not simply send the artificial intelligence that is necessary anyway to make such a mission a success ?

  7. Re:Mad Scientists' Dream by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's print up 20,000 Sarah Palin's on Orionis IV just for the hell of it.

    Oooooh. And 5 Justin Biebers. And then televise what happens next.

  8. Out of his discipline by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish that people that are very, very smart on one particular subject or discipline would be a little more careful before they speak on matters outside of their area of expertise, especially on stuff as outlandish as what this particular individual has suggested.

    I had an interesting conversation with a man that develops re-entry systems and the test-beds used to develop and test them. He was very down-to-earth on the costs associated with launching materiel; basically in his mind it was not practical at this point to enact the scenario that Kim Stanley Robinson created in his Mars trilogy. We don't have the launch payload capacity. We don't have the landing zone accuracy. Even the concept of the kind of machinery needed to create habitable environments on Mars is too great to budget for and the machinery itself is too hard to maintain without a support structure for that maintenance. We won't be operating D9 bulldozers on other planets.

    It also came up that our country spent 4% of GDP in getting to the Moon six times. 4% of GDP let twelve men walk on the surface of another body for a few days. Without a nemesis country like the Soviet Union provided for us, there's no interest in committing any real money to getting us even back to the Moon, let alone to other planets.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Out of his discipline by BaronM · · Score: 2

      Meanwhile, Elon Musk is going to go ahead and do it anyway: http://www.wired.com/2012/11/e...

      I wouldn't bet my life on his succeeding, but I wouldn't bet it on his failing, either.

    2. Re:Out of his discipline by Bengie · · Score: 2

      For many short sighted people, a nemesis is required, but for smarter people, we need to expand beyond Earth. The general rule of thumb is to have at least one offsite back-up. Life destroying things Earth wide catastrophic events tend to happen once very so often, and we're coming due.

    3. Re:Out of his discipline by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anybody that says Elon Musk is "all talk" is a fucking moron.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    4. Re:Out of his discipline by BaronM · · Score: 2

      Capable? We're capable of it now (for values of 'now' == 'using a current level of technology').

      Doing it requires some heavy lifting in a few senses:

      1. We would need to accept that the first group or groups out are most likely going to die, and that we're going to accept that as part of the learning curve. That sucks, but I wouldn't expect to have any problems finding volunteers regardless.
      2. Those volunteers would need to accept that those who survive will probably live short lives in miserable conditions working hard to build infrastructure that followers-on will benefit from.
      3. We would need to accept that doing this means dedicating somewhere between 1x and 2x the size of the annual US annual pet food & supplies budget ($35 billion) every year for the next decade or so (http://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp).
      4. We would need to provide some incentive for the volunteers beyond adventure and fame. Land grants on Mars, perhaps?

      Obviously way oversimplified, but once you take away the need to make it a safe round trip, the project gets much easier. I could be wrong; there may not be enough volunteers ready to risk their lives for a chance to colonize Mars, but I'd bet there are.

      What's holding us back isn't technology, it's a lack of societal will to devote the relatively modest resources needed to try.

    5. Re:Out of his discipline by sgtsquid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The whole "glass dome over a crater" thing is as much sci-fi as warp drive at this point. The material technology just doesn't exist and might not for a long time. It might be more appropriate for "Habitat 3.0", but it will require an established industrial infrastructure. The most likely scenario for "Habitat 1.0" is a smaller concrete dome. Look up "magnesium oxychloride cement". It can be made from magnesium chloride and water, and it will cure in the Martian atmosphere. Yes, I have tried it in a vacuum chamber and it can work.

    6. Re:Out of his discipline by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Anyplace we decide to build it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Re:Yeah, no... by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love science fiction and fantasy. Can I also imagine a bunch of hot, sexy vampire women who want to take me away from my bitch wife and fuck my brains out?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  10. The end by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see it. A billion years from now, on a planet a trillion miles away, the last remaining message from the human race will be displayed in black pixelated letters on a small rectangular display: PC LOAD LETTER.

    1. Re:The end by sconeu · · Score: 2

      And the aliens' response:

      PC LOAD LETTER?
      What the fuck does THAT mean?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  11. A lot of bits by avandesande · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many bits would it take to describe a human at a molecular level?

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  12. Rogue Moon by Algis Budrys by neilo_1701D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Old story from way back; a building has been found on the moon that contains a machine that kills people in many different ways throughout the strange building but always consistently. Almost like a mouse in a maze, the scientists figure out that if they can get through this death trap and map each method of death along the way they should be able to get further each time and eventually manage to travel out the other side. Of course it could take many lives to accomplish this so they devise a method of teleporting a copy of someone from the earth to the moon and taking a "backup" copy that shares memories with their counterpart so that when that doppelganger dies there is still a version left alive earth-side.

    The only problem is that the sheer horror of each death causes the surviving copy to be driven insane, the human mind just not able to cope, that is until they find the reckless Al Barker who's courted death all his life. It's only then that the research makes any headway.

  13. Re: Yeah, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget to print the soul. Lolololol.

  14. YOU FAIL IT by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Computer - Portman, Natalie, naked and petrified, covered in hot grits

    Just steer clear of those Sirus Cybernetics 3D printers. OMG.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:YOU FAIL IT by idontgno · · Score: 2

      Good point. The Sirius Cybernetics Clonomatic Person Dispenser would probably decant something almost, but not quite, entirely unlike Natalie Portman. And don't ask about the grits, hot or otherwise.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  15. With my luck by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 4, Funny

    the cartridge would run out when it prints my wienus.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  16. If we're rethinking human by Richy_T · · Score: 2

    Why not rethink the organic part too?

  17. Re:Yeah, no... by i_ate_god · · Score: 2

    humans do have a strong tendency towards anthropomorphism

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  18. Re:Fucking idiot by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Are we signing posts in the subject line now?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  19. Doctorow by Dripdry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom hasn't come up yet?

    Coming to terms with what it might be to actually be human... printing ourselves and transferring a back-up to that body...
    what does that mean? will consciousness go with it?

    To me, consciousness is probably just an electronic current that holds us to our memory. The terrifying moment, even if I could replicate myself elsewhere, is,"What happens when I sever that connection and transfer over/" will I just die and a perfect copy keeps living on just as I was a moment ago, or do I go with it? *could anyone tell*? It is the stuff not just of the fear of death, but no one ever knowing that makes it a nightmare.

    Sorry to post so dark... nice weather, huh?

    --
    -
    1. Re:Doctorow by amorsen · · Score: 2

      The Star Trek transporters are clearly murder factories. However, a proper quantum state teleporter would not allow duplication, and it is possible that the consciousness would travel too. Then again, it might not, and there is no way to tell.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  20. Re:He forgot generation ships and ... by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    certain fission reactor designs (fission fragment) can get a craft to 0.1 C. They are better than fusion designs for now because they can actually be built.