Slashdot Mirror


Zazzle.com Thinks Depictions of Pi Are Protected Intellectual Property

Byteme writes: "A number of Zazzle.com users have had their art and products removed from the site after a man named Paul Ingrisano was granted a trademark for 'Pi Productions' using a logo that consists of this freely available version of the pi symbol from the Wikimedia website combined with a period. He made infringement claims against several websites, and Zazzle took down many clothing products that featured designs using the pi symbol. When users called them on it, they locked a public forum thread and said they're evaluating Ingrisano's complaint."

18 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. damn by zlives · · Score: 5, Funny

    i better get to work on my "/." logo copy right

    1. Re:damn by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great. Now that you have your IP laws in order, you should probably get around to doing away with your kings and queens. It's been embarrassing to have them for over two hundred years now. While you're at it, drop your official state religions, so you can go from being theocratic monarchies to secular democracies.

      But yeah, super great that your trademark laws are so flexible.

      Hey, what's wrong with a theocratic monarchy? We've been building one in the USA for the last 30 years!

    2. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sure you are joking there is one benefit of having the old monarchies remaining.
      While the kings in Europe seldom have a say in day to day politics there are occasionally leftover laws that transfer the command of the army to the king in the case of war. (The benefits of having a single strong leader in the event of crisis and so on.)
      This means that the government can't declare war on terrorists, drugs or videogames left and right.
      Or rather, they can, but declaring war gives power to someone else than the one declaring war. It becomes a lot less fun that way.

  2. Fixed link from summary by MobyDisk · · Score: 5, Informative
  3. Re:How would it infringe? by Luthair · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Zazzle is probably erring on the side of not getting sued.

  4. Re:Prior Art Exists. by Infoport · · Score: 5, Funny

    You would think so, but unfortunately all the good lawyers went somewhere else...

  5. Re:Prior Art Exists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God invented Pi. don't get his lawyers into this...

    God has no lawyers. They're all in Hell.

  6. Re:Prior Art Exists. by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the greeks invented the symbol being held as IP.

  7. Zazzle.com by cstacy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Zazzle.com. A web site that I've never heard of before, but won't ever be visiting...

  8. Re:Going after I 3 next by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slashdot mucked up the formatting. (Of course, I should have seen this in the preview.)

    Just replace "I 3" with "I <3" above.

    Also, here's his new trademark: http://trademarks.justia.com/854/81/i-3-85481027.html

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  9. Re:Almost as retarded as patenting 2 primes ! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too bad the general public is too apathetic to see how completely retarded patenting a common mathematical symbol

    It's also too bad the general public is unaware of the difference between a trademark and a patent. ;-)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Rewriting textbooks by marciot · · Score: 4, Funny

    That specifically covers the stylized "pi mathematical symbol followed by a period."

    Oh dear. I guess we'll have to fix all textbooks to remove infringing uses of pi at the end of a sentence..

    Example of infringing use:

    The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is .

    Non-infringing alternatives:

    The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is !
    The ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is :)
    , what the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter is.

     

  11. Re:Which trademark? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is the trademark: http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85785006&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch

    It's for the Pi symbol followed by a period. Literally. "The mark consists of the pi mathematical symbol followed by a period." So if I had a shirt that said "I like Pi." (using the symbol for Pi), my shirt would be in violation of his trademark. Furthermore, he might try claiming that just showing Pi by itself would be "confusingly similar." Not that he'd be successful, but he could threaten lawsuits which might make others back down due to an inability to fight a legal battle.

    He's also filed for the common Internet "I Love" shorthand: I <3 http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85481027&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch

    As he doesn't currently seem to be USING these trademarks at all, he should automatically lose all rights to them.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  12. Re:Almost as retarded as patenting 2 primes ! by drstevep · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did you seriously read the patent? The patent is using the numbers in one of the claims as part of a mechanism. Schalfly is not patenting the numbers, just their use in a particular process. He is patenting the process, which involves using a designated set of primes to perform iterative calculations to compute "partial modular reduction of cryptographic variables."

    The concept (using a designated something as a component in a patented invention) was the same in patent number 1. In this patent, gears and cogs were used to improve the efficiency of locomotives going up hills. What was patented was using gears and cogs in a particular configuration to accomplish a goal. Gears and cogs were not patented. The construction was patented.

    The same thing here. The primes are not patented. You are free to use them however you want, as long as you do not use them in this particular machine to compute "partial reduciton[s] of cryptographic variables." Go ahead, use them as seeds in the dice roll generator for your RPG. Use them as dimensions of your mansion's living room. Print them out and use the paper to light a fire. You're allowed.

  13. An address to address this at... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paul Ingrisano
    1933 73rd street
    Brooklyn, NY 11204

    Apperently, he's an arteeest.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  14. Re:Prior Art Exists. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 5, Funny

    The reason all the devils are here is that they can't stand Hell anymore. It hasn't been the same since all those lawyers arrived.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  15. Registration != ownership by American+Patent+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can understand how many in this community would think that because a trademark (or copyright) has been registered, the registrant has "carte blanche" to use it and prohibit others from using it. That is, after all, how domain registrations work...

    What a registration really is is the filing and recognition of a CLAIM to ownership rights. The USPTO does do a search to make a determination of its own as to whether the registrant has any rights in a trademark, but that is far, far from conclusive. There are examples in the caselaw where some unknown guy out in the middle of Iowa has been using an unregistered trademark, someone else comes along later registering that same or a similar trademark (innocently and coincidentally), and the registrant can't stop the little guy from continuing his use. What the registration does is to put the world on notice of the intent of the registrant to use the registered trademark, and give him an avenue against parties who come along later wanting to use it. The registrant still has to prove in court that it has ownership rights, EVEN THOUGH it has registered the trademark.

    So this "PI." trademark could be attacked in a number of ways. It could be that the registrant really hasn't used (or continued to use) it in the marketplace. The symbol is arguably so generic that trademark rights cannot be had. Sometimes trademark rights are restricted to one field of use, and others get to use it for something else. And, from the example above, it could be that the alleged infringers started using the symbol before the registrant did.

    So what our legal system prescribes is that Zazzle and their suppliers go consult with their own attorneys, competent in trademark law, and decide whether they need to change their products. That's what lawyers are for...

  16. Re:Prior Art Exists. by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good old joke:

    An Engineer died and went to see St. Peter who told him that he was sorry but could not let the engineer into heaven. At first the conditions bothered the engineer but after a while he started to make improvements. He added an escalator, running water, and after a couple of months even air conditioning. Of course eventualy God heard about the changes down below. God phoned up the devil and explained that a mistake had been made and that the engineer would have to be moved up to heaven. The devil said no, because he liked the changes too. God told the devil "This is your last chance. Send that engineer up here or I'll sue you!" The devil laughed and said "Ha, where are you going to find a lawyer?"

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.