LinkedIn Spam Lawsuit Can Continue
Charliemopps (1157495) writes "A lawsuit filed in September 2013 in the Northern District of California alleged that LinkedIn misled its users about the number of times it would attempt to invite their contacts using their name. LinkedIn tried to get the suit dismissed but Thursday Judge Lucy Koh ruled the suit can continue."
...once they build a community.
They "offer" you to be in contact with all e-mail address book every time you login.
They also send you mails that looks as if contact of your contacts was trying to reach you.
This is bad behavior.
I hope they get into troubles.
I get LinkedIn spam from people I've never heard of.
If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
I saw it a few days ago, but then I found out my /. cookies got deleted and had to manually log in again. I told it to use classic theme.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
PCworld doesn't honor my unsubscribes as well, E-harmony is a mega spammer, Wellsfargo doesn't Honor my unsubscribes. I have tried numerous times to use the unsubscribe links, taken screen shots of the successful unsubscribes. What do I do now? reporting to spamcop is useless Oh and Comcast spectator refuses to honor my unsubscribes too. All proven with screen shots Any advice??
Jack of all trades,master of none
I once got LinkedIn invitations in the name of a American who was totally unknown to me. When it finally occurred to me to search my correspondence for his name, I learned that this was a banned Wikipedia editor who had written one email to my professional email address to advertise his evidently psychosis-induced website. I had never answered.
Here is my complete correspondence with LinkedIn after I found this out.
----- My first email to LinkedIn ----- Mon, 23 May 2011 08:37:04 UTC
It is an impertinence to send "invitations" to people who are not even
using your service, based on email address books of your users. It is
almost criminal to repeat them periodically and not to include the
usual spam opt-out links with these unsolicited messages.
I keep getting such reminders "from" a person who I do not know and
who was banned from Wikipedia for stalking and making threats.
You *will* add the following email addresses to your "do not contact"
list. Your confirmation that you have done so will be the last
communication that I will receive from your servers.
[my 2 email addresses deleted]
----- My second email to LinkedIn ----- Tue, 24 May 2011 10:58:27 UTC
May I ask you to confirm that you have received the message below and
that it will be handled. I am somewhat reluctant to go public with
this incident.
[quotation of my first email deleted]
----- First email from LinkedIn to me ----- Tue, 24 May 2011 11:03:21 UTC
We’ve received your message and we’re working to get you an answer. If you have a Premium account or you’re a LinkedIn Ads customer, we strive to reply within 24 hours. For all other members, we do our best to respond within 48 hoursbut at times we do see delays. We’ll get back to you soon!
[quotation of my *second* email deleted; I never received such a confirmation for my first email, even though this one looks like an auto-response]
----- Second email from LinkedIn to me ----- Wed, 25 May 2011 15:40:33 UTC [55 hours after my first email]
Hi Hans,
Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention.
Per your request, the email addresses provided have been added to our "do not contact" list. You will no longer receive any email from LinkedIn or our members on these email addresses. If you decide at a later date that you want to set up a LinkedIn account, you will need to first contact us to have your email addresses removed from the “do not contact” list.
If you have further questions, please feel free to reply to this message.
[some first name deleted]
LinkedIn Customer Service
Have a separate mailbox that you divulge to corporate entities without hesitation, but can still open it on per-need basis. This way all spam goes directly to recycle bin.
I just blocked LinkedIn today from being able to deliver SMTP to my mail server.
Some linked-in dickhead (link sausage? haha) thought it was a good idea to send an invite to a public mailing list that I run.
No matter how I flag certain messages as spam they keep appearing, and when I tried to open a ticket they played dumb. Also they open a lots of popup windows, I have to redefine my adblock rules constantly. Their prices are also outrageous, and they fully well know it, or else wouldnt show them in a shady way, payment 40 dollars/month for a year... In my privacy settings I disabled the permanent invites to others to endorse me, at least some advantage of having an account there.
If you support LinkedIn or have an account there, then YOU are part of the problem. You're not only implicitly endorsing spam, you're generating it, supporting it, and funding it.
If you don't support LinkedIn and have blacklisted or firewalled them: good. That's the correct professional response to any abuser/attacker.
If you haven't blacklisted/firewalled them, then you'll want this:
8.22.120.0/24
69.28.147.0/24
199.101.161.0/24
199.101.162.0/24
199.101.163.0/24
216.52.242.0/24
Remember to block all IP traffic bidirectionally so that LinkedIn can't reach your network and so that anyone on your network can't reach them. This is especially important if you run mailing lists, since LinkedIn will spam those too. I also recommend checking to see any of the spammers who work for LinkedIn have managed to get on your mailing lists: if so, unsubscribe and ban them.
That you represent SoylentNews.Org in some capacity I suspect & that you're "trawling for users" here to leave & go there imo @ least... I've seen the technique used before, so I think I am dead-on correct here (this includes the "F Beta" + "funny joke" type offtopic forums sliding technique "First Post" posts too, which I even point out a way to get to classic easily everytime regardless of redirects for using hosts).
In any event, me being right or wrong - Good luck!
Maybe it'll work out for you but I think you're going to have an uphill battle. Give it time though, & do NOT give up!
I say that, regarding "uphill battle" since this place is so "established" & what-have-you, over a LONG period with many members (lol, 1/2 of which I think are sockpuppets really though).
Still - I've been meaning to check the place out @ some point myself (on the suggestion of Hairyfeet to me by email actually), & I've seen the frontpage there - it looks JUST like classic + yes, I read it uses the sourcecode for this site as well.
However: /. serves a purpose for me (since it's largely travelled, in the "top 20" lists & what-not), which admittedly on my part, is MUCH like what I suspect you're up to above (& it has its "ups-N-downs" sides for me personally)
* Still, today is not that day, BUT that day *may* be coming in the future!
APK
P.S.=> Good luck - I get "trolled" a LOT here (which I think you all know) & it's actually helping me though (when they go offtopic + use illogical ad hominem attacks vs. using facts on the topic @ hand) - that gets old though, so perhaps, it's time for something new! Maybe my New Year's Resolution will be that (preparing for the inevitable off-topic trollers here, lol!)... see ya & stay cool!
... apk
That's DIFFERENT than /., & would be EASY to implement? The ability to KNOW who downmodded you - simply the right to face a detractor/naysayer that doesn't use facts and "hit & run" modbumbs (as gmhowell here calls it).
You do that? You've got me @ least (lol, IF you want me & very probably others as well in a heartbeat - since I am farily certain NOBODY likes it done to them, in unjustifiable downmods + other rephensible things because of it...)
APK
P.S.=> That is the SINGLE MOST annoying thing about this site - since it breeds an atmosphere of deceit and yes, face it, abuse (via sockpuppetry etc, & we all KNOW it goes on... heck - I've caught a few here doing it over time now (wow, first time I ever thought of it... I've been coming here for a decade on the New Year 2015 in fact!)...
... apk
I get constant emails from both of these companies. The traditional methods I've used in the past to stop unwanted contact from other organizations have not worked. These two companies represent the worst of the new internet.
This doesn't work anymore. Companies like LinkedIn are wise to this practice. They're using current users' address book and past correspondence to find contacts. That means if you ever emailed your mother, your boss, or a random guy online, and they join LinkedIn, your real email address is now in their database.
1 thing I *REALLY* like is that while monitoring the connection, you guys don't have a 'zillion things' attaching to me (like /. does ordinarily, & that I use a firewall filter to remove as well as custom hosts files in combination with it (doubtless trackers)).
APK
P.S.=> I just had to let you know that was something nice to see, since that means connections there ARE faster... apk