Climate Change Prompts Emperor Penguins To Find New Breeding Grounds

An anonymous reader writes Researchers have discovered that emperor penguins may not be faithful to their previous nesting locations, as previously thought. Scientists have long thought that emperor penguins were philopatric, returning to the same location to nest each year. However, a new research study showed that the penguins may be behaving in ways that allow them to adapt to their changing environment. Lead author Michelle LaRue said,"Our research showing that colonies seem to appear and disappear throughout the years challenges behaviors we thought we understood about emperor penguins. If we assume that these birds come back to the same locations every year, without fail, these new colonies we see on satellite images wouldn't make any sense. These birds didn't just appear out of thin air—they had to have come from somewhere else. This suggests that emperor penguins move among colonies. That means we need to revisit how we interpret population changes and the causes of those changes."

Comments

HUH?

[NetNed]

OK, and this is part of climate change how? They have done it for years, but now it's part of "climate change"?

Re:HUH?

[PolygamousRanchKid]

If you apply for a grant to study penguin breeding grounds . . . you won't get it approved.

If you apply for a grant to study penguin breeding grounds . . . affected by global climate change . . . you can have all the money you want.

No Evidence

[Jane Q. Public]

Any connection to "climate change" was purely speculative on the part of the article writer.

The research actually suggested that Emperor Penguins always had changed locations periodically. There is no evidence that modern times are in any way different.

The only thing this is "evidence" of is that lots of people today will try to blame anything and everything on "climate change".

Re:No Evidence

[drinkypoo]

If anything, this research actually weakens any argument that recent relocations are due to climate change, because it suggests that that they always have done it, long into the past.

It does no such thing. It neither strengthens or weakens that argument. The climate has changed before. This particular change is projected to be more severe than prior changes which these penguins have been through, which is why it's interesting.

Re:No Evidence

[NeutronCowboy]

Actually, it used to be speculated that changes in nesting populations of Emperor Penguins might have been due to Climate Change. Instead, this particular research indicates that those changes might be fairly normal migrations between nesting sites.

What we have here is science using new data to falsify an old assumption. Science to the rescue! As is article-reading.

Re:*ALL* Species adapt

[Wycliffe]

*ALL* Species, without exception, adapt to their environment or go extinct. That is how they survive.

FTFY

Read the Article and it Contradicts the Headline

[thepainguy]

They thought decreasing numbers were due to birds dying, but they were actually due to birds changing breeding locations (for unknown reasons).

Basically, and contrary to the headline, the article says they don't know enough about penguin breeding behavior to draw any conclusions.

"Over five years in the late 1970s, the Southern Ocean warmed and at the same time the penguin colony at Pointe Géologie, declined by half (6,000 breeding pairs to 3,000 breeding pairs). The decline was thought to be due to decreased survival rates. In other words, researchers thought that the warming temperatures were negatively impacting the survival of the species...'It’s possible that birds have moved away from Pointe Géologie to these other spots and that means that maybe those banded birds didn’t die,' LaRue said. 'If we want to accurately conserve the species, we really need to know the basics. We’ve just learned something unexpected, and we should rethink how we interpret colony fluctuations.'”

P.S. Want to know why people are skeptical about climate change "science" and advocacy? It's because of blurbs like this one that say one thing in the headline and something else in the linked-to article.