Linux Mint 17 KDE Released
sfcrazy writes The Linux Mint team has announced the release of Linux Mint 17 KDE codenamed Qiana. It's based on KDE Software Compilation 4.13.0. There are notable improvements in Mint Display Manager (MDM). The multi-monitor display has improved and it allows a user to “configure which of the monitors should be used as the primary monitory by MDM.” Users can also define a background color or a background picture no matter what greeter they are using.
I only just installed Kubuntu 14.04 over the weekend. Can't be arsed to go through all that again.
Summation 2
I don't know what a "greeter" is supposed to be, but if being able to define a background color or a background picture is listed as a feature in 2014, it's not getting me interested in trying out Linux.
Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
Does this version of Mint come with any gas simulation software? This was promised *years* ago and has yet to materialise.
The main feature improvment I'd like to see on MDM would be to suck less power when it's idle. Seems in a previous version it was constantly pounding on the CPU when idle. http://forums.linuxmint.com/vi...
I ditched Linux Mint as an option for my clients when I discovered that major updates required a complete, clean re-install. I switched to Xubuntu and have been perfectly happy. Since kicking Mint to the curb I haven't paid much close attention. Is this still the case with major version upgrades?
I only just installed Kubuntu 14.04 over the weekend. Can't be arsed to go through all that again.
Suks 4 U.
What was the point of this?
When I used Fedora 20 KDE, installing updates was really weird. It worked, but the notification system was filled with a couple of weird gauges which never changed their state when the updates were installed. I was told in Slashdot that it is a distro that is not properly configured for KDE, which would mean that there were severe quality assurance problem. So is Linux Mint KDE properly configured and does the notification system make sense when installing updates?
KDE has always been my favorite environment. The consistency of things like hotkeys across apps and the ease with which they are changed is awesome. Dolphin and Konsole meet my file manager and terminal needs absolutely dead on and Linux Mint has been simplest to setup KDE distro for years. It's the only linux distro I can install and be 95% productive with after only about 10 minutes of customization - about 10 hotkey changes, and 5 app installations and I'm good to go.
I wouldn't have even noticed that, since I always do a complete clean reinstall for major updates anyway.
Avoiding incremental updates is the main reason why my systems don't turn into piles of bit-rotten cruft over time. It's also why I know where the backups are! Because users never put their stuff in sane places if they can find an insane place, and after you do a clean re-install you'll have to go find the stuff they were "permanently" storing in /var/tmp, or some random spool folder... which is when they get their lecture about using storage properly, and everybody ends up happy in the long run as the users get more knowledgeable and the data gets more intelligently placed.
I had to deal with a Centos system that had been "upgraded in place" repeatedly once... the data stores were all corrupt from accumulated hard drive errors and the users were flipping out, but since their backup regimen was no good they were just SOL.
Poppycock.
Just change your source.list ...
http://www.tecmint.com/upgrade-linux-mint-16-to-linux-mint-17/
2 seconds of google. I did this for 15 - 16 and then 16 -17.
you have clients? I assume therefore you are some 'consultant', I'd look for another career.
Installed on my laptop from usb in like 5 mins start to surfing the web.
But I have been using Linux for the entire life of Linux.
Fortunately it has nice Cinamon which I like with even AMD c-59 1 GHz with a simple netbook of chinese acer. But there doesn't fit Ubunut 14.04LTS, if freezes sometimes. I usesed vairiey of distributions without even have slightest clue what to do on that different OSs. But Linux has its common and draback Ubuntu 12.04 restricted some of my privilege to sing song, I solved it any way with the help of fourm in the canonical community. But, It's powerful than any of windows, but windows much more user friendly that's whay there is a balance between intellegent inside out fools outside, who think's Yes, I am in reality!
I installed the latest OpenSuse stable release, tried to change the theme and kde crashed, I had to ctrl alt f2 to stop and restart the kde which worked. I installed all of the updates this time which took 45 minutes(fios) and then changed the theme and it worked no issue. But, you would never have an issue like this with win 7/8/8.1 even without the updates and service packs.
All DE's that I have tried are unstable and just plain buggy. Linux distros and linux software are stitched together from smaller fragmented programs written by anonymous individuals which of course the end result is not good and what you get is Windows 98 Type buggy OS, of course there is no synergy between these unknown developers.
At least, with windows the software like gimp and blender are complete and don't need any other dependency when installing. If your internet is down and you need to redo your linux machine you are screwed. Linux distros and software are too damn fragmented and too internet dependent to make it run. Until there is a universal single api like win32(easy development and no dependency issue) to target and also with backward compatibility to a point of course, I won't be switching to Linux any time soon.