Slashdot Mirror


Neanderthals Ate Their Veggies

sciencehabit (1205606) writes Scientists excavating an archaeological site in southern Spain have finally gotten the real poop on Neanderthals, finding that the Caveman Diet for these quintessential carnivores included substantial helpings of vegetables. Using the oldest published samples of human fecal matter, archaeologists have found the first direct evidence that Neanderthals in Europe cooked and ate plants about 50,000 years ago.

151 comments

  1. That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

    Palo diet bro!!!!!!!

    1. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bros don't crossfit, hipsters do.

    2. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Palo Alto diet?

    3. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Stupid knows no borders.

    4. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm assuming you think that the paleo diet is a raw food diet, which it's not.

    5. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As if it fucking matters.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your instructor understands absolutely nothing about the Paleo diet. Seriously, read Robb Wolf's book.

      Or are you too stupid to separate veggies from grains?

    7. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 2

      It turns our that most people get the Paleo diet wrong. The diets of these people would differ wildly depending on the land they occupied.

      For many of the myths espoused on what the Paleo diet was see here.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    8. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      There's nothing inherently stupid about crossfit if serious soreness and kicking your own ass is what your after.

    9. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupidity Without Borders, now there's an organization reserving to be founded.

    10. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Just don't use it for strength training or bodybuilding. Haphazard routines full of buzzwords don't work for either purpose.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    11. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by bjwest · · Score: 1

      It turns our that most people get the Paleo diet wrong. The diets of these people would differ wildly depending on the land they occupied

      Even more people get wrong the fact that the diet part of Paleo (it's more of a lifestyle, which includes exercise) isn't about eating like our paleolithic ancestors, (which would be impossible to do) but rather eating similar to them. The main portion of the diet includes unprocessed meat, vegetables and fruits, or as little processing as possible.

      Oh, fermented foods are good as well.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    12. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Well the article does state 'The tests revealed that the poop “clearly” contained high proportions of cholesterol and coprostanol from eating meat'.
      Add in that they are unwilling to do a percentage analysis says either there methods are not refined enough to do so or the results are not impressive enough to grab the headline.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    13. Re:That's not what my crossfit instructor told me! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Or there's a bit of vegetarian agenda being pushed here (not for the first time with such research).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  2. Of course they did. Mango salsa too. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    I have seen them order the roast duck with the magno salsa.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  3. Seems strange. by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Funny

    Omnivores eating things that are edible? I thought extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof.

    1. Re:Seems strange. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Omnivores eating things that are edible? I thought extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof.

      In this case, extraordinary claims did require extraordinary poop.

    2. Re:Seems strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headline should have been "Neanderthals Cooked Their Food", but I guess vegetables are more controversial.
      I'm surprised that the headline wasn't "Neanderthals Ate Strictly Organic Food"

    3. Re:Seems strange. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Omnivores eating things that are edible? I thought extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof.

      Ohh, I hope it was gluten free.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:Seems strange. by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Poopycock!

      Every animal when faced with hunger, will try to eat anything that looks remotely edible to it. The belief that neanderthals wouldn't be eating vegetables regularly is ridiculous.

    5. Re:Seems strange. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's nice to see that somebody found some coproliths (isn't it nice that there's a scientific synonym for 'shit rocks'?) and managed to get more detailed data (tooth structure and clever isotopic work can distinguish carnivores from onmivores or herbivores; but actual digested material might even allow you to identify plant types, depending on preservation, presence of seeds, etc.); but I'd always had the impression that the 'Cavemen, like, ate meat all the time' considered so disproven as to be barely worth mentioning, given that the dental records suggested that neanderthals weren't wildly different from humans in terms of chewing optimizations, and basically every pre-agricultural society ever(except maybe inuit, since there isn't much to 'gather' on the ice) have combined some amount of hunting with some amount of gathering.

      There is a fairly noticeable change when agriculture hits the scene (suddenly all rice/millet/wheat/etc. all the time becomes a thing for the squalid underclass, minus any small livestock that can be raised on scraps); but there is nothing suggesting that hominids with alternatives ever went meat-only.

    6. Re:Seems strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the new word. Now I just need to find a way to work coproliths into a conversation today.

    7. Re:Seems strange. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see that somebody found some coproliths (isn't it nice that there's a scientific synonym for 'shit rocks'?)

      They should have called them crapoliths. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Seems strange. by Shakrai · · Score: 2

      In this case, extraordinary claims did require extraordinary poop.

      Queue image of Jeff Goldblum, taking off his sunglasses, then saying "That is one big pile of shit."

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Seems strange. by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Should be simple if someone brings up old shit just call it coproliths

    10. Re:Seems strange. by bored_engineer · · Score: 2

      . . .except maybe inuit, since there isn't much to 'gather' on the ice. . .

      They didn't really live on the ice. It was just a temporary place to use while hunting. While the Inupiat and Yupik (as well as other Inuit people) obtained (and many still do) most of their calories from hunting, they still gathered and preserved tubers, lichen, seaweed and berries. I don't think any Inuit cultivated crops, but some did practice animal husbandry.

    11. Re:Seems strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except dogs. They'll go right up and eat pretty much anything. Even stuff that other animals avoid due to stench etc.

    12. Re:Seems strange. by Axynter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dental records are not as relevant for a species that uses tools to process food; tools/food processing technologies can make any food item suitable for any dentition.

      The thing with Neanderthals is that _direct_ evidence (c.f. article) from the isotopic composition of bone collagen indicates they obtained most of their _protein_ from meat. This doesn't mean they didn't eat veggies - low protein fruits, for example, would be more or less invisible isotopically. What the isotope data tells us is that they relied on meat to a greater extent than anatomically modern humans (AMHs), to the point that their nitrogen stable isotope ratios, which are enriched with each trophic level, are as high as those of carnivores. Such high values (or even higher) can be observed in AMHs whose diet includes a significant portion of fish, because the trophic chain in aquatic systems is longer and more complex, but the carbon stable isotope values do not show evidence for significant consumption of such aquatic resources with Neanderthals. So, basically, the isotopic evidence we have so far suggests that Neanderthals obtained much more of their protein from terrestrial animals than was/is the case with anatomically modern humans.

      An important point to remember is that the isotopic values from bone collagen represent the _average_ diet over a long time span (it depends on the bone - e.g. a rib vs a femur - but it's several years). Dental calculus, and much more so poop, records the diet over a much shorter timespan, and are therefore not necessarily representative of overall diets. Dental calculus is particularly problematic in this regard because we don't understand all that well what gets preserved in it and what doesn't - a single meal of grains may leave a strong marker that will last years. Sure, you can look at dental calculus and say they ate grains, but the more interesting and/or important questions is: how often?

    13. Re:Seems strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Queue image of Jeff Goldblum, taking off his sunglasses, then saying "That is one big pile of shit."

      You should have a billiard kew shoved up your ass, sideways.

    14. Re:Seems strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omnivores eating things that are edible? I thought extraordinary claims required extraordinary proof.

      It's a commonly held myth that humans are omnivores, but we are not. Bears are true omnivores, we can just play one on TV.

    15. Re:Seems strange. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Seems to me the important point here is that they COOKED and ate plants... indicating that uncooked plants were unsuitable food.

      And as you say, poop only indicates what they ate this week. Maybe it's a seasonal crop. Maybe it indicates the hunting was poor. Maybe someone had dietary perversions.

      And maybe it was why they died out -- being reduced to relying on unsuitable foods.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. No thanks... by overlook77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look how that worked out for them....

    1. Re:No thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They obviously interbred with your mama.

  5. So that explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that explains why they died off!

  6. Paleo was right?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go figure. lol

  7. One Sample by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

    Not sure how much one sample can tell us about the diet of an entire species.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:One Sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure how much one sample can tell us about the diet of an entire species.

      It was a group poop.

    2. Re:One Sample by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to take a class on archaeological poop tasting

      --
      once more into the breach
    3. Re:One Sample by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems like it shoots down the idea that no Neanderthal ate cooked veggies.

      One counterexample goes a long way toward rejecting a theory.

    4. Re:One Sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it was said that they were only carnivores and we found evidence of them eating vegetables, then that does refute the original hypothesis for the entire species.

    5. Re:One Sample by netsavior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that they had a high rate of conversion (i.e. they digested the plant instead of passing it) it is reasonable to assume that they were ADAPTED to eating veggies, which means it was part of the reason they survived/evolved.

      Finding veggies in stool is no big deal, wild cats poop out grass all the time, it doesn't make them true omnivores.

      They found DIGESTED vegetable matter, that is the true find, and one that easily extrapolates across the entire species.

    6. Re:One Sample by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Great point, I had not thought of that. But it still does not differentiate between 95% of the calories being from meat or 5% being from meat in some average Neanderthal diet.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:One Sample by Nutria · · Score: 1

      it is reasonable to assume that they were ADAPTED to eating veggies

      The other Homininae digest plant matter, so why should we think that Neaderthal did not eat any plant matter?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:One Sample by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      It's romanticizing them, if you'd call picturing the Neanderthals as brutish carnivores romantic. In similar fashion Jean Auel popularized the theory of a cult based around worship of the cave bear, but it turned out those fossils simply turned out to be from bears who died during hibernation in caves where Homo sapiens neanderthal happened to have inhabited earlier/later.

    9. Re:One Sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other Homininae digest plant matter, so why should we think that Neaderthal did not eat any plant matter?

      Because cave paintings show hunting parties and not berry gathering parties. Because life was tough back in those days, and only Real Men could have survived. Because who needs logic when there's romantic imagery.

      I don't think there are any serious anthropologists or biologists who've argued that pre-agricultural homo species were strictly carnivorous, but if you tell modern humans that their ancestors didn't understand agriculture, many of them will confuse that with they just didn't know plants were edible.

    10. Re:One Sample by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      *Testing?....

    11. Re:One Sample by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      The other Homininae digest plant matter, so why should we think that Neaderthal did not eat any plant matter?

      Because it's a good idea to think you might be wrong. It encourages you to think of ways to *prove* that you're wrong.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    12. Re:One Sample by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Yeah? What about this?

  8. And now they are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neanderthals ate their veggies and humans ate their neanderthals.
    Humans ~7 000 000 000
    Neanderthals EXTINCT

  9. Wrong species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before people start claiming that this proves that our ancestors ate such-and-such... remember Neanderthals aren't ancestors of modern Homo Sapiens but a different evolutionary branch altogether.

    Which isn't to say that their and our common ancestors must have eaten a substantially different diet. Also, apparently there was some cross-breeding between our various ancestral species.

    So what was my point again? Never mind.

    1. Re: Wrong species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Modern humans are a hybrid species: Sapiens, Neanderthal, Desovionian, and there are genetic hints of a fourth yet unidentified subspecies that has contributed to the modern genome.

    2. Re:Wrong species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It said they ate vegetables, it doesn't say "they didn't eat meat."

      Just because I ate potatoes, lettuce, tomatoes, pickles, onions, and grains last night doesn't mean hamburger wasn't also ordered off the menu.

    3. Re: Wrong species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the fourth one was Kardashian.

    4. Re: Wrong species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think they were related to humans.

    5. Re: Wrong species by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      There are genetic hints of a fourth yet unidentified subspecies?

    6. Re:Wrong species by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Don't forget sesame seeds...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:Wrong species by Arker · · Score: 1

      Neanderthals do not appear to have been a fully separate species, but rather a subspecies or race of humans.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    8. Re: Wrong species by micahraleigh · · Score: 0

      The claims are hazy here because AFAIK all neanderthal remains are contested or discredited.

      It's like asking, "Was the metabolism of the winged horse higher or lower than unicorns? Well, ah, they interbred. Actually could you give us some grant money in the noble pursuit of answering this critical question?"

  10. 2nd comings helpings chances abound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just ask noam promotion going well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CKpCGjD8wg&list=PL456D453B409DF8D1

  11. Archeological evidence has limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, it's probably impossible to determine how many hours a week was spent by the average Neanderthal watching NASCAR on TV.

  12. Am I the only one who understood this as - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neanderthals ate their Vegeterian Neanderthal buddies?

    1. Re:Am I the only one who understood this as - by temcat · · Score: 1

      I'm another one. Hope you don't feel so lonely now.

  13. Human fecal matter? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    What does that tell us about Neanderthals?

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Human fecal matter? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Wild guess - they don't consider "human" to be equivalent to "homo sapiens sapiens"....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Human fecal matter? by stjobe · · Score: 1

      "The Neanderthals or Neandertals [...] are an extinct species of human in the genus Homo, possibly a subspecies of Homo sapiens."
        - Wikipedia

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    3. Re:Human fecal matter? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      It tells us that Neanderthals pooped, just like us. Everybody poops. Even robots.

  14. Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preference? by timrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing I'd be curious to find out is whether or not the Neanderthals were doing this because they preferred vegetables, or because they had nothing else around to eat.

  15. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    You are asking the wrong question. There is no reason to suppose that Neanderthals preferred vegetables, since the conclusion is that they ate both vegetables and meat. I like meat, but I also eat vegetables. I do not eat vegetables because I prefer them to meat. Nor do I eat vegetables because I have nothing else around to eat. I eat vegetables because I like them (and sometimes because they are good for me).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  16. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by will_die · · Score: 2

    It was done as a bar bet after of bunch of shepherds were out drinking beer.

  17. Maybe they liked them both by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Good question, one I guess the paleo environmental folk might be able to shed light on (what species of flora and fauna were in the area). But folk can really like a big steak when they are hungry and equally really enjoy fresh picked fruits on a hot summer's day, there doesn't need to be a conflict on a taste front. From a survival strategy perspective it makes sense to be happy with either hunted or gathered food sources, reduces your risk of starvation. Your tribe's not going to survive that long if you turn your noses up at eating nuts from a nearby grove of hazelnut trees and insist on walking for 8 hours to maybe track down some meat. Enjoying both increases your chances of doing well.

  18. More surprised about cooking by robstout · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised Neadrathals ate veggies. Look at their teeth. Cooking food though, that's pretty cool.

    1. Re:More surprised about cooking by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      The heat really opens the flavor of the brontocarrots and tomatosauruses.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  19. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've always assumed that if they were hunter gatherers, part of the 'gathering' is likely to be food derived from plants.

    If it has teeth like an omnivore, and poops like an omnivore, it's probably a freaking omnivore.

    I should think not long after they got fire, they started cooking stuff.

    My guess, they collected anything they knew they could eat, and ate it.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  20. Coming soon... new releases... by ThatsDrDangerToYou · · Score: 1

    I will be publishing my own fecal matter soon. Pre-order yours today!

  21. "Direct vs Indirect" Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is so direct about this evidence?

    Our evidence for animal and plant intake comes from the top of
    the white layer of combustion structure H44 and its overlying
    deposit (Fig. 1C). This ash layer has shown to be microstructurally
    well preserved, not reworked by bioturbation, and is overlain by a
    sandy clayey sediment (La8) with a sharp contact. Several
    millimetric phosphatic coprolites with micromorphological features
    resembling those reported for human coprolites [28] were
    identified in thin sections manufactured from oriented blocks of
    sediment collected from stratigraphic unit X, near the samples
    reported here. These coprolites are autofluorescent under blue
    light, have a massive groundmass and contain numerous
    inclusions, possibly the remains of parasitic nematode eggs or
    spores [29,30]. (Fig. 1D).

    Here we used the ratio proposed
    by Bull and coworkers [11] [coprostanol+epicoprostanol/5bstigmastanol+
    epi-5b-stigmastanol] in order to distinguish between
    omnivore, pig/human (.1), and herbivore species (,1). The value
    obtained using this ratio (1.78) suggests a human origin.

    It still sounds like indirect evidence to me. Is "direct evidence" a precisely defined term in this context?

    1. Re:"Direct vs Indirect" Evidence by Axynter · · Score: 1

      It's direct evidence in the sense that they analyzed products of human digestion rather than archaeological materials presumably associated with diet. Examples of indirect evidence for diet would be, for example, stone tools presumably used to process a particular type of resource (e.g. meat), or animal bones found in archaeological assemblages. So, for example, if I find that 90% of the bones found in an assemblage belong to juvenile reindeer, I may argue based on this indirect evidence that the makers of said assemblage were specialized reindeer hunters (this may well be wrong though).

      Still, the first sentence in the abstract is wrong. The evidence they presented is no more "direct" than the evidence provided by stable isotope analyses of bone collagen, and I'd argue that at this point is less reliable.

    2. Re:"Direct vs Indirect" Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.

  22. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    I suppose it depends on what you mean by "weaker". I don't think that experiments are going to tell us much at all about what neanderthals ate, so in this case observation would seem to have the edge.

    Is there such a thing as "observational" and "experimental" science though? I see a lot of experimental work behind observational studies, and a lot of observations behind lab experiments.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  23. Cooked! by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

    It's not just that they ate veggies, they cooked them. Was there any other animal which we know that cooked its own food besides us?

    --
    Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    1. Re:Cooked! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it depends on how we define 'cooked'.

      Spiders and flies do that thing with the enzymes. Crocodilians sometimes age their meat before eating it. Leafcutter ants promote growth of fungus on the plants. Honey involves a couple of steps where you change it from one form to another.

      Are any of these what we'd call cooking? Probably not. Does it imply that a very long time ago other critters figured out that sometimes you need to take steps to make something edible? Absolutely.

      If we define 'cooked' as involving heat or flame ... well, I don't think any other animal has been observed making direct use of fire. At least, not that I've ever heard of.

      If we define 'cooked' as 'somehow transformed to make edible', well, then maybe.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Cooked! by abies · · Score: 1

      No, because animals do not control fire. But there are animals which warm/freeze/ferment/marinate/flavor/wash their food (not all done by same type animal of course). But cooking as in 'having control over 200+C heat source' - no.

    3. Re:Cooked! by itzly · · Score: 1

      Not really a big surprise given their big brain size. It's virtually impossible to get enough calories on a daily basis on a diet of raw foods. Cooking food makes the nutrients much more accessible for the digestive system. Here is a TED talk about this subject: https://www.ted.com/talks/suza...

    4. Re:Cooked! by Arker · · Score: 1

      "It's not just that they ate veggies, they cooked them. Was there any other animal which we know that cooked its own food besides us?"

      If you expand 'cooked' to the more generic 'prepared' then plenty of animals would qualify. In fact if you consider things like pickled herring and kimchee 'cooked' then we could probably argue that many animals do cook their food - crocodiles, for instance, are known to stash their kills in underwater caches for long periods before eating which 'cooks' the flesh using the chemical processes of decomposition, the resulting meal is roughly as 'cooked' as lutfisk or surströmming.

      But no, I cannot think of any animals outside of hominids that have learned to start and control fires, which is a prerequisite for 'cooking' in most senses.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    5. Re:Cooked! by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      Thaks for you answer. I wish could make my rhetoric questions sound "rhetoric".

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    6. Re:Cooked! by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean rhetorical?

      Also, a rhetorical question. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:Cooked! by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if an animal figured out how to use natural fires (grassfires, forest fires) to cook a particular animal. But once they smell the smoke, they all run away.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    8. Re:Cooked! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've read of predators (most of which don't mind scavenging) who've learned that a fire means once the fire is out, there will be free food lying around in the burned area (animals that didn't make it out in time, and mostly suffocated).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  24. Modern kids by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    Great...so even Neanderthals ate their veggies...and yet we struggle getting our kids to eat anything green.

    1. Re:Modern kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps we shouldn't tell them to not behave like Neanderthals.

  25. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he was differentiating because you can not create an experiment that would be neanderthals living in a population so that you could observe and see the results. He was saying with this idea, all you can do is look for things left behind and observe.

  26. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Math is the only pure (experamental) science.

  27. In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by tepples · · Score: 1

    humans ate their neanderthals.

    Only in the "Little Red Riding Hood" fairy tale sense where "eating" is a metaphor for sex. Cro-mags and Neanderthals are believed to have been different breeds of one species, which interbred to form modern man.

    1. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec. Gramma fucked the Big Bad Wolf?

      And then she climbed into his testicles? And the Woodsman castrated him to free Gramma?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    2. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Sounds very oedipal.

      How does that make you feel? Does it make you resent your father? What are your first memories of your mother?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by tepples · · Score: 1

      The traditional telling is embellished. Hoodwinked gets some parts right but is also embellished. Given what fairy tale logic, here's what probably happened: The wolf sexually assaulted Granny, took her clothes, tied her up, and locked her in a closet.

      But my point is that most ethnic Europeans have some alleles of Neanderthal origin.

    4. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      But my point is that most ethnic Europeans have some alleles of Neanderthal origin.

      Hmmm .... I'm no geneticist, but doesn't everybody? Since they're our collective ancestors, how could you not?

      Or are all of the non-Europeans somehow descended from something else but ended up being exactly the same?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      They are not our ancestors. We share a common ancestor.

    6. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      They're considered an offshoot rather than a direct lineal ancestor (at least for most of us ... I'm not too sure about our CEO).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:In the same sense that your ancestors are dead by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, Africans south of the Sahara don't have any Neanderthal genes, nor do many (most?) Asian and American populations. Some Asian populations also have Denesovian genes, and another subset has genetic input from a hominid we can only refer to as "unknown" since we don't have any samples of its genetic makeup. The book 'Children Of The Ice Age' has quite a bit of interesting research about Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons. Did you know that population density was so low in ice-age Europe that a person would probably meet no more that 30-50 other people during their entire life? Inbreeding is much less of a threat than most people think.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  28. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I think he was differentiating because you can not create an experiment that would be neanderthals living in a population so that you could observe and see the results. He was saying with this idea, all you can do is look for things left behind and observe.

    Bingo

  29. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you even read the article?

    The predominance of coprostanol and a near absence of 5-stigmastanol among our samples indicate that the Neanderthals from El Salt had a meat-dominated diet.

    Please tell us more about how samples indicating a dominance of meat and flesh are indicative of an "omnivorous diet". Looks like Slashdot will mod anyone up these days, even if it's painfully obvious they didn't read the paid-advert *cough* I mean article.

  30. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by hey! · · Score: 1

    In my experience you tend to crave what you habitually eat. The Hmong forage for Solanum nigrum -- black nightshade -- a plant that is not only inedibly bitter for most people, it's actually poisonous if you haven't spent years working up a tolerance to its toxic alkaloids. And here's the kicker: black nightshade grows wild here in the US and the old folks here go looking for it in the woods, even though they can buy meat and non-toxic vegetables in the supermarket. They grew up with the stuff, so they crave it.

    The single most powerful feature our species has is behavioral flexibility. The same plant that is a side dish providing auxiliary nutrients today could be famine food tomorrow if the hunt doesn't go well. If a plant is nutritious and abundant in the environment, I'd expect local humans to eat it with enjoyment.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  31. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    You get your food from a grocery store, where everything is plentiful.

    Thus your anecdote has no bearing on the question.

    Go camping for a week without food, and have to scavenge for yourself. See what you 'prefer'.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  32. same species, different race by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Species means you cannot have fertile interbreeding. But we could and did interbreed. Up to 5% of European and Asian genes are neadertal.

    As discoveries accumlate it looks more and more like neadertal did most of same cultural things as homo double-sapiens: composite tools, fire, language, art, clothing, etc. The degree of culture may have been different.

    It also appears neadertal had larger and more complex brains than double-sapiens.

    1. Re:same species, different race by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Species is much more subtle then no fertile interbreeding. Example, ring species where you have types a,b,c and a can breed with b, b can breed with c but a can not breed with c. There are examples (big cats I believe) where the off spring are fertile if a is male and b is female but infertile if b is male and a is female. Then there are the species that are fertile across species but aren't turned on by the other species or have different breeding seasons so don't breed.
      Basically species are more of a spectrum then boolean and when it comes to modern Humans vs Neanderthals it is border line whether sub-species or separate species.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    2. Re:same species, different race by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Then there are the species that are fertile across species but aren't turned on by the other species or have different breeding seasons so don't breed.

      So, the opposite of James T. Kirk then?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:same species, different race by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Kirk is more like a male dog, tries to breed with everything including legs without caring about species or pretty much anything but getting his rocks off.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:same species, different race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Up to 5% of European

      Does that explain why those Europeans are so violent? They constantly start wars and recently decided to try to exterminate an entire religion. We all know that is the way of their kind. Do we need to start a program of not allowing those violent people to breed? I know we certainly do in the US. Their violent decendants are now Republicans here and rule nearly every aspect of our lives. They are flooding the streets with guns despite that not being something any human would want to do. That must be their Neanderthal part acting out.

  33. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Please tell us more about how samples indicating a dominance of meat and flesh are indicative of an "omnivorous diet"

    OK, sure, from the fine article, which apparently you didn't read:

    The tests revealed that the poop "clearly" contained high proportions of cholesterol and coprostanol from eating meat, but it also included significant plant sterols that "unambiguously record the ingestion of plants," the researchers report today in PLOS ONE.

    Sistiaga says this is the first "direct" evidence that the Neandertals actually ingested plants, because the biomarkers were in their fecesâ"and not just on their teeth.

    Ergo, omnivorous diet.

    From the second article, in the conclusions section:

    Taken together, these data suggest that the Neanderthals from El Salt consumed both meat and vegetables, in agreement with recent hypotheses based on indirect evidence.

    So, the paper is saying that, it would appear that they ate vegetables.

    Looks like Slashdot will mod anyone up these days

    Post something intelligent under your own account, and you too can be modded up.

    Otherwise, STFU.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  34. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Go camping for a week without food, and have to scavenge for yourself. See what you 'prefer'.

    I already know the answer to this: room service.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  35. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    If you "go camping for a week", you are probably going to be eating berries and mushrooms, with possibly a fish.

    You probably are not going to be eating fresh elk.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  36. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    It does not matter. There is no reason to suppose that Neanderthals preferred vegetables, nor that they preferred meat, since they ate both. While it is possible, probably even likely, that their diet consisted primarily of whatever they could find that was edible, it is unlikely that they chose vegetables ONLY because that was all they could get or because they preferred them to meat.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  37. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    That's kind of my point.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  38. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    It's simple. If they didn't eat their veggies, they wouldn't get any dessert.

  39. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Did half the country take a "Hmong Cultures" class a couple years ago? I must have missed it. During the past two years or so, I have seen several references to the Hmong people, with no explanation of who they are. If I mentioned "the plight of the Nukak", I would certainly have to include a reference to their location and what their plight is.

    Am I the only one here that only knows the Hmong because of repeated googling about them?

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  40. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    Go camping for a week without food, and have to scavenge for yourself.

    Scavenge? Most of the people here are Americans. We don't carry around these huge quantities of belly-fat for nothing. Sure, you laugh at us now, but just wait until we're in a survival situation and the rest of you start dropping like flies. ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  41. Ad hominem. by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    I have been calling certain sorts "Coprophage" for years. Not one has yet understood the term.
    I was not popular in school

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    1. Re:Ad hominem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The book Twilight of the Mammoths actually covers a lot of the fossil evidence taken from the coproliths of now extinct North American giant ground sloths. Interesting shit. ;)

      Posting anon so as to not undue moderation.

  42. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    Did half the country take a "Hmong Cultures" class a couple years ago?

    In a manner of speaking.....

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  43. Organic poop used to fertilize veggies... by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, vegged out Neanderthal "Stone-agers" were confused by yucky veggies and just ate their poop.

    The original "Hole Foods" was born.

  44. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    That explains a lot. I never saw that movie, but I'm sure many here did.

    Thanks for the reply. :^)

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  45. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    OK. I thought you were going for the "alpha male eats freshly killed flesh" angle.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  46. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Unless there's running involved. Or climbing. Or anything physical.

    I don't need to outrun the bear, I need to outrun you.

    And if it comes to it, the fattest guy will feed more people.

    So, the survival strategy is to make sure you're around at least 2 people who are fatter than you. That's what I do.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  47. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    I don't go into the woods without my 1911, so best of luck trying to turn me into your meal. :)

    Also, I run marathons, and do 15-20mi cross country hikes.....

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  48. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by dryeo · · Score: 1

    There's also mutations where one group can handle a poisonous plant or often fungus that will sicken or kill another group. We see this with milk where Europeans often have a mutation allowing to digest milk and other groups don't. Really the ideal diet varies on sub-type of human and what was available in their ancestral homes.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  49. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    LOL, well, you did say "we" in regards to all of that belly fat.

    Which means, at least implicitly, you were in the category of people who wouldn't do so well in a survival situation.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  50. 50,000 year old poop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    biodegradable my ass!

  51. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Please tell us more about how samples indicating a dominance of meat and flesh are indicative of an "omnivorous diet".

    Not enough samples. Their diet was probably highly seasonal, with not too much plant matter in the winter.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  52. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Arker · · Score: 1

    Only someone who knew nothing at all on the subject would have thought they were carnivores. No apes are carnivores!

    The interesting parts of the article didnt make it into the headline. As usual.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  53. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    I was mostly just going for the cheap shot at my fellow countrymen.

    Truth be told, food is really your last priority in a survival situation. An unconditioned person can easily go two or three weeks without food. Someone starting out with a better fitness base could go longer. Your priorities are shelter and water first, in that order. Realistically speaking, unless you're in Alaska, there aren't too many places in the United States where you can get far enough away from civilization for starvation to be a factor before you can find civilization.

    I carry water purification tablets on my hikes, in the "just in case" category, (i.e., I'm stranded and run out of bottled water) but I don't bother with food beyond what I need for the day hike.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  54. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by hey! · · Score: 2

    Some of us are old enough to remember the Vietnam war, which in turn brought us in contact with the long running civil war in Laos. Anti-communist Hmong from Laos fought alongside Americans and after both Vietnam and Laos fell to the Communists many Hmong refugees were resettled here in the US along with their families.

    I remember this story about S. nigrum from a newspaper account back in the 80s about foraging by local Hmong refugees. There were lots of stories about Hmong settling in, and because this was pre WWW you read them because you read pretty much everything in the paper that was even vaguely interesting.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  55. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    Well, now, I'm an ameteur, but isn't the assumption that brain development required to be a higher mammal requires gigantic amounts of protein intake?

  56. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Arker · · Score: 1

    I didnt see the movie the other poster mentioned, but I know the Hmong nonetheless. If you are older you might remember them as the 'Montagnards' or mountain men who allied with the US in Vietnam. Quite a few made it out and settled in the US at the end.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  57. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Arker · · Score: 1

    It does require some protein but that does not require exclusive or even preferential meat eating. Apes typically supplement a primarily fruit and veggie diet with various types of easy to acquire "meat" - insects of various types, termites in particular, are commonly consumed for supplemental protein. Larger animals are killed by Apes very rarely, and consumption of the corpses is even rarer, not entirely unheard of but certainly not part of the normal diet.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  58. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

    Thank you for the additional information. I'm not old enough to remember Vietnam. I was born during it, in 1970.

    I knew a lot of "Vietnamese" moved to the US after the war, but that was how they were always mentioned. As far as I remember, I never saw the term 'Hmong' until a couple years ago.

    Also, since I grew up in the upper midwest farm country, our local paper certainly didn't have stories like that one. I remember finding an old copy of one a little while ago (probably at my mom's house), and was surprised that the front section was only 8 pages. The sports and culture/classifieds/comics sections were only 6 pages each.

    Anyhow, thanks again for the post.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  59. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Not really. While you can go for a long time on sub replacement calories, you do need something. The vast majority of people will start going major league ketogenic, then hallucinate after about 48 hours. Try it sometime. If you're trying to 'survive' - and by that I mean you are in a dangerous situation that requires physical and mental effort to stay alive, starving isn't the best way to ensure survival.

    That said, as soon as the TV and Twitter shut down, the majority of the US populace will be frozen in place, catatonic and confused. Easy pickings for the Zombies.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  60. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    I've done week long water fasts without hallucinations. The scientific literature is filled with examples of people surviving 30+ day long hunger strikes with nothing more than water. I'd concur that it's far from optimal, but securing a source of food is the last item on the survival checklist for a reason. Shelter and water are far more important. Next in line is fire. I'd really like to know where you can get lost in CONUS (particularly east of the Mississippi) where starvation is going to become a factor before you are rescued or can find civilization.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  61. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I thought the assumption was that had apes learned to fish as humans did, they would have evolved brains like ours.

  62. Re:Huge pile of assumptions by Arker · · Score: 1

    I dont know where you got that but I have studied human evolution a bit and dont recall ever seeing such an assertion. Humans are adaptable and certain groups are very good fishermen, but there is no evidence I am aware of that fishing was ever more than a minority lifeway, or a supplemental skill. There was a time when significant human expansions occurred through a 'beach-comber' style of gathering, but that was MUCH too recent to have had anything to do with the evolution of the brain, which was already done long before.

    And the other apes HAVE evolved brains very much like ours, btw. Far more like ours than like anything else.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  63. Vegetables don't run very fast . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it seriously, please. Vegetables don't run very fast and the majority of vegetables don't have claws or sharp bitey things. Vegetables may lack a few aminos that a big brained omnivore needs, but are a more efficient subsistence food source from a hunter-gathering standpoint..

  64. Really? by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    Using the oldest published samples of human fecal matter

    Is that what the cool kids are saying now? "Mom, I'm going to go publish for a while, don't worry, I'll spray some Glade"

    Footnote: A quick perusal of Amazon's self-published material indicates the likely answer is yes...

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  65. The Popular Paleolithic Diet by assertation · · Score: 1

    Seems to be on even slimmer psudeo-scientific ground.

  66. Wasn't everyone antediluvian vegetarian. by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Once again science just proving the accuracy of Genesis :)

  67. Not more violent... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Europeans are not any more violent if you know your history (or read today's newspapers). What might be different is that Europeans have been more *organized* and invented more *technology* and therefore have done a much better job carrying out the violent tendencies that exist in all humans.

  68. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vast majority of people hallucinate after a 48 hour fast? Citation needed.

  69. Re:Vegetables out of necessity, or out of preferen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's primarily because a week isn't long enough to develop the hunting skills necessary to catch an elk (or deer). It doesn't really have any indication of what you'd eat of your spent your life under those circumstances.

  70. Study swigned by the famous Dr. El Obvio by Optali · · Score: 1
    Amazing finding.

    This clearly demonstrates that a subspecies of Homo sapiens; H. sapiens neandertalensis had after all the same feeding habits than the rest of the Homo sapiens species!! Amazing. Who would have told?

    Another spectacular finding for the team of Dr. El Obvio, preferred disciple of Prof. O'Bvious.

    Hail to them!!!

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast