The way I know they code is massively posting to Stackoverflow "Hallo, pleaze, how do I start my PC?"
And when half of the code is written and it still doesn't work send tickets to the customer support departments of whatever app or service they are connected with trying to cajole them into doing their work, like "Hallo dear mister from our payment service provider, we are developing a page for Adobe in PHP and we get an error from your system saying 'network unreacheable' please resolve this situation ASAP"
I doubt that a bot ever reaches to this level of sophistication.
It's already high time that you get your GOP back into office, the Dollar is way to high, you are creating way too much jobs and Mr O'Bahma does nto provide us with the level of comedy the world expects of an US president.
Dubya set the stakes very high, IMHO the only thing that could match his performance would be one of these teabaggers. I think that an ideal inauguration would be the guy openly carrying an AK-47 and a baseball hat screaming "Yeeehaaa" while emptying a magazine (into the air or into an appropriately situated choir of first-graders).
Wrong! It's perfect, it shows that he is an open person and more, it shows also that his is not like this Nerd O'Bamer !!! And anybody saying the contrary is a Socialist Liberal who only wants to take away our guns and discriminate against Christians!
Well, we believe what we see, and what we see is a whole bunch of industries churning out stuff. I assume that that is a valid reason for believing in the US currency, don't you agree?
OK mate, I am an European and I didn't had a clue either. And it's not so obvious in the case of Canada, it could have been anything from an association of hobby sealclubbers to the actual national postal service. Who knows how weird things can get in a country where the toilets flush the other way around !
I was also going to state that one of the basic premises is utterly wrong:
What is strenous? 5 mph? This is 8 km/h or 7:30 min/km (12:05 min/mile)... somebody "jogging" from 2001 to 2015 wouldn't even break sweat at this pace. My recovery pace is 10 km/h and my heart rate isn't going any higher than 127... Please note that this is way below the heart rate that is considered an "easy" pace (~143 for somebody with a maxHR of 185)
And the more you train the faster you can go at low heart rate. Thus, why are they talking about pace at all? This makes absolutely no sense from a medical point of view: if you want to measure effort you cannot use the parameter speed, exactly as in physics, speed has nothing to do with work.
M-O-O-T
No matter the effect of the internet, this study shouldn't have been published in the first place
I of course abandoned all this "evil" thingy quite some time ago but I am very (and positively) interested in how this move will affect the whole IT landscape. At least we will see better implementations of Mono and maybe some older games and apps running on Linux;)
Ships can launch surface to surface missiles and torpedoes as well. Ships are still perfectly capable of killing other ships. They just don't line up and broadside each other with 15 inchers anymore.
Is it only me or does this really sound utterly gay?
This study is old as hell and it resurfaces from time to time.It has been debunked so many times that is gets already boring.
What these guys did was "normalizing" the datasets of both, active and sedentary subjects eliminating the effects of smoking, etc, etc. What is compared thus makes no sense as it is not "Sendetary vs Active" but "How would sedentary people compare to active if they weren't dying earlier do to lung cancer and heart disease" or putting it in other words "How would sedentary people do if they weren't sedentary"
The very initial premise makes no sense:
"As part of the Copenhagen City Heart Study, 1,098 healthy joggers and 3,950 healthy nonjoggers have been prospectively followed up since 2001"
How can you compare that? A "healthy non-jogger" may be anything from a runner (don't EVER call us "joggers") to a bodybuilder, cyclist or swimmer, but that's NOT a sedentary person.
By definition an individual that does some activity (and is thus healthy as defined by the standards of physical fitness) is NOT sedentary. Or what is a "healthy sedentary" then? People who just by pure random chance and without doing any sort of sport do not get fat, are nimble, strong, have good balance and don't get sick? I don't say this may
And I assume that these guys aren't going to say that a fat guy with 5 heart bypasses is "healthy"... according to what parameters? Not having got a cold in the last 5 days?
Every 2-3 years a study of this type is made and rapidly debunked... but the target of these is not the scientific or sports communities but the general public and the "Wellness" industry who is eager to give credit to these studies and sell low-ass fitness programs for everybody who is too lazy to do much more than 10 minutes of thumb gymnastics a month giving them a "valid" excuse for being lazy and not feeling guilty about it.
Anyway: This is like the joke of the guy who goes to the doctor and the doctor tells him "You are deadly sick, you will only live for a year" "Can I do something?" "Yes, no sex, no drinks and avoid excitement" "Will I live longer then?" "Nope, but it will look like a hundred years to you"
In the article that you cite as Source of Wisdom and Holy Book in your crusade against Hysteria there are two considerable statistical Blunders (with capitals):
First of all: You cannot talk about statistical significance or not in a scalar value. You could with discrete values in a distribution that may seem random and where you could analyse if a given measure (such as the median or mean ) is or not statistically significant. BUT: This does NOT apply to single data point, sorry. AND this does not apply to a scalar.
Second of all: There is no need to ame a deep analysis to see if a number is higher than other/s, and if thsi is not obvious you will have to visit a doctor (a physic s this implies lost of grey matter, mate).
So mate, again, sorry for the calories you wanted typing, but your Guru needs a recap in statistics .
Should I point out the blunder of the 95%? I don't think is necessary, right?
What your dear potential girlfriend writes is nothing but gibberish.
You anti-climate guys are constantly repeating this stupidity filling your mouth with "models that fail" as if it were true... but can you provide any link? And please not from the Inhofe fan club and NOT related to HAARP, Big Foot or Nazis on the moon.
Just a small issue to remember: I live in a country were we used to have skating postmen. It has been 17 years since we had out last Elfstedentocht: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
But of course, the models are all failing and in fact this is not true: The Evil Climate Scientiest gather every winter here in Friesland and melt the ice in the channels with lighters.
In which way has the theory been falsified? Has AGW failed to predict that this past year would be warmer than the others before? Quite obviously NOT.
First of all, you are just answering to a random bloke who says some random idiocy pulled out of his ass. Where is the peer-reviewed evidence of all these "discrepancies ? I see it only among you climate deniers repeated as a mantra to see if it somehow becomes reality. None of you ever checks anything, Of course not: Knowing that half of you guys including your Gurus like Jimy Inhofe or Ted Cruz are Young Earth Creationists gives already a good idea of the quality of your judgements.
Well, winters and summers tend to be global, at least semi-global. Or maybe this is a hoax of the Climate Scientists too and it's winter in the USA and spring here in Holland;)
Slashdot Mirror
Oh yeah, Kuroshin.org and tons of alt.linux newsgroups in Usenet... Ah, and alt.religion.kibology!!!
LOL, when I read "Red Light Cameras" I thought they had installed a CCTV system in Chicago's Red Light district, ROFL
That's not my experience.
The way I know they code is massively posting to Stackoverflow "Hallo, pleaze, how do I start my PC?"
And when half of the code is written and it still doesn't work send tickets to the customer support departments of whatever app or service they are connected with trying to cajole them into doing their work, like "Hallo dear mister from our payment service provider, we are developing a page for Adobe in PHP and we get an error from your system saying 'network unreacheable' please resolve this situation ASAP"
I doubt that a bot ever reaches to this level of sophistication.
and this is of course: Where can I get one??? :P
The rest of the article is not relevant
They don't need to worry: The job of publishing stupid, useless and unfounded opinion pieces as studies will never be taken over by robots.
Well, I'm European we are not too well informed about the fashion trends among the US wildlife
And in the EU we will celebrate!
It's already high time that you get your GOP back into office, the Dollar is way to high, you are creating way too much jobs and Mr O'Bahma does nto provide us with the level of comedy the world expects of an US president.
Dubya set the stakes very high, IMHO the only thing that could match his performance would be one of these teabaggers. I think that an ideal inauguration would be the guy openly carrying an AK-47 and a baseball hat screaming "Yeeehaaa" while emptying a magazine (into the air or into an appropriately situated choir of first-graders).
God Save the USA!!! (I'm running for popcorn)
Wrong! It's perfect, it shows that he is an open person and more, it shows also that his is not like this Nerd O'Bamer !!!
And anybody saying the contrary is a Socialist Liberal who only wants to take away our guns and discriminate against Christians!
Well, we believe what we see, and what we see is a whole bunch of industries churning out stuff.
I assume that that is a valid reason for believing in the US currency, don't you agree?
OK mate, I am an European and I didn't had a clue either.
And it's not so obvious in the case of Canada, it could have been anything from an association of hobby sealclubbers to the actual national postal service.
Who knows how weird things can get in a country where the toilets flush the other way around !
I was also going to state that one of the basic premises is utterly wrong:
What is strenous? 5 mph? This is 8 km/h or 7:30 min/km (12:05 min/mile)... somebody "jogging" from 2001 to 2015 wouldn't even break sweat at this pace.
My recovery pace is 10 km/h and my heart rate isn't going any higher than 127... Please note that this is way below the heart rate that is considered an "easy" pace (~143 for somebody with a maxHR of 185)
And the more you train the faster you can go at low heart rate. Thus, why are they talking about pace at all? This makes absolutely no sense from a medical point of view: if you want to measure effort you cannot use the parameter speed, exactly as in physics, speed has nothing to do with work.
M-O-O-T
No matter the effect of the internet, this study shouldn't have been published in the first place
Not really when you consider that 15 inches refers to diameter not length. I don't think we have a word for that, well, other than "fatal".
Ever heard of Goatse mate???
Dunno.
I would like to know the implication of that.
I of course abandoned all this "evil" thingy quite some time ago but I am very (and positively) interested in how this move will affect the whole IT landscape. ;)
At least we will see better implementations of Mono and maybe some older games and apps running on Linux
Ships can launch surface to surface missiles and torpedoes as well. Ships are still perfectly capable of killing other ships. They just don't line up and broadside each other with 15 inchers anymore.
Is it only me or does this really sound utterly gay?
have you heard about a thing called Aircraft carriers? Nope? Well, there are normally ships, and rather huge from what I have heard, small town huge.
Dreadmills kill your braincells. Makes you feel like a hamster.
I ran yesterday on one and I am starting to store my lunch in my cheeks.
Ride a bike while lifting weights!!!
IN the water!!!
This study is old as hell and it resurfaces from time to time.It has been debunked so many times that is gets already boring.
What these guys did was "normalizing" the datasets of both, active and sedentary subjects eliminating the effects of smoking, etc, etc. What is compared thus makes no sense as it is not "Sendetary vs Active" but "How would sedentary people compare to active if they weren't dying earlier do to lung cancer and heart disease" or putting it in other words "How would sedentary people do if they weren't sedentary"
The very initial premise makes no sense:
"As part of the Copenhagen City Heart Study, 1,098 healthy joggers and 3,950 healthy nonjoggers have been prospectively followed up since 2001"
How can you compare that? A "healthy non-jogger" may be anything from a runner (don't EVER call us "joggers") to a bodybuilder, cyclist or swimmer, but that's NOT a sedentary person.
By definition an individual that does some activity (and is thus healthy as defined by the standards of physical fitness) is NOT sedentary. Or what is a "healthy sedentary" then? People who just by pure random chance and without doing any sort of sport do not get fat, are nimble, strong, have good balance and don't get sick? I don't say this may
And I assume that these guys aren't going to say that a fat guy with 5 heart bypasses is "healthy"... according to what parameters? Not having got a cold in the last 5 days?
Every 2-3 years a study of this type is made and rapidly debunked... but the target of these is not the scientific or sports communities but the general public and the "Wellness" industry who is eager to give credit to these studies and sell low-ass fitness programs for everybody who is too lazy to do much more than 10 minutes of thumb gymnastics a month giving them a "valid" excuse for being lazy and not feeling guilty about it.
Anyway: This is like the joke of the guy who goes to the doctor and the doctor tells him "You are deadly sick, you will only live for a year" "Can I do something?" "Yes, no sex, no drinks and avoid excitement" "Will I live longer then?" "Nope, but it will look like a hundred years to you"
Well, more than oil what we have is proper beer, and _real_ football
oooooh yeah!!!!
Aaah... sorry for your waste of time typing.
In the article that you cite as Source of Wisdom and Holy Book in your crusade against Hysteria there are two considerable statistical Blunders (with capitals):
First of all: You cannot talk about statistical significance or not in a scalar value. You could with discrete values in a distribution that may seem random and where you could analyse if a given measure (such as the median or mean ) is or not statistically significant. BUT: This does NOT apply to single data point, sorry. AND this does not apply to a scalar.
Second of all: There is no need to ame a deep analysis to see if a number is higher than other/s, and if thsi is not obvious you will have to visit a doctor (a physic s this implies lost of grey matter, mate).
So mate, again, sorry for the calories you wanted typing, but your Guru needs a recap in statistics .
Should I point out the blunder of the 95%? I don't think is necessary, right?
What your dear potential girlfriend writes is nothing but gibberish.
Where is this described mate?
You anti-climate guys are constantly repeating this stupidity filling your mouth with "models that fail" as if it were true... but can you provide any link? And please not from the Inhofe fan club and NOT related to HAARP, Big Foot or Nazis on the moon.
Just a small issue to remember: I live in a country were we used to have skating postmen. It has been 17 years since we had out last Elfstedentocht: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
But of course, the models are all failing and in fact this is not true: The Evil Climate Scientiest gather every winter here in Friesland and melt the ice in the channels with lighters.
In which way has the theory been falsified? Has AGW failed to predict that this past year would be warmer than the others before? Quite obviously NOT.
First of all, you are just answering to a random bloke who says some random idiocy pulled out of his ass. Where is the peer-reviewed evidence of all these "discrepancies ? I see it only among you climate deniers repeated as a mantra to see if it somehow becomes reality. None of you ever checks anything, Of course not: Knowing that half of you guys including your Gurus like Jimy Inhofe or Ted Cruz are Young Earth Creationists gives already a good idea of the quality of your judgements.
And meanwhile in Greenland:
http://www.independent.co.uk/e...
NOAA and NASA use SATTELITES to get the SURFACE TEMPERATURE?
Mate, I guess you have gone already too far with your drinking games.
And... why aren't you building sattelites right now and setting up your very own global non-warming plot if yo uare so smart ?
Well, winters and summers tend to be global, at least semi-global. ;)
Or maybe this is a hoax of the Climate Scientists too and it's winter in the USA and spring here in Holland