Slashdot Mirror


Uber Is Now Cheaper Than a New York City Taxi

redletterdave writes Uber announced in a blog post on Monday it would cut the prices of its UberX service in New York City by 20% — but it's only for a limited time. Uber says this makes it cheaper to use UberX than taking a taxi. Consumers like Uber's aggressive pricing strategy but competitors — and some of its own drivers — are not as happy. UberX, Uber’s cheaper service usually hosted by regular people driving basic sedans rather than fancy black cars, also cut its rates by 25% last week in the Bay Area, including San Francisco, San Jose, and Oakland. As a result of that announcement, Uber said its service was effectively “45% cheaper than a taxi.”

139 comments

  1. And in other news by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Informative

    The amount of insurance carried by Uber drivers is also probably much less than NY taxis.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:And in other news by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For young and invincible drivers, its usually the older more mature drivers without that attitude that end up subsidizing them.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:And in other news by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to mention that Uber drivers probably aren't paying as much as $1 million for a single taxicab license.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:And in other news by jratcliffe · · Score: 5, Informative

      NYC Taxis have to carry $100k (per person) / $300k (per incident) liability insurance. That's the same for Uber drivers.

      http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/do...

    4. Re:And in other news by OzPeter · · Score: 0

      Uber drivers are covered by a lot less when they are looking but have not accepted a fare.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:And in other news by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      so your ok with with a non taxi taxi hitting your car and then the they get to use EULA to get out of paying the cost to fix it? or what about if it was your kid that got killed and you where stuck with the bills?

    6. Re:And in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Around here, you also have to declare and insure for a 'purpose', not just a liability amount. After all, $1 million dollar liability on a sunny summer weekends only car is less than the same risk as a Taxi.

      Around here, there is, in order of increasing cost:

      Pleasure (pleasure use only, a couple days per month commuting are ok)

      Commuting (driving to and from work, not "for work" itself - different sub classes depending on how far you commute)

      Business (drive for work, meeting customers etc)

      Delivery -- For the delivery class there are sub classes depending on what type of vehicle, and what is being delivered. Pizza drivers need this I know from personal experience. And I bet anything that 'delivering people' or 'taxi' insurance is in here to, that uber drivers would be required to have it, and that many do not.

    7. Re:And in other news by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      That's a nice starting advantage!

    8. Re:And in other news by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      so your ok with with a non taxi taxi hitting your car and then the they get to use EULA to get out of paying the cost to fix it? or what about if it was your kid that got killed and you where stuck with the bills?

      What difference does it make whether it is a taxi or a private car? A taxi shouldn't be required to have more collision insurance
      for external collisions than any other car. You MIGHT be able to argue that they need more coverage for passengers but it makes
      no sense to require them to have higher coverage for external collisions just because they are a taxi.

    9. Re:And in other news by bws111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course it makes sense. Insurance rates are based on risk. Are you claiming that a car that is on the road all day long, in very congested conditions, making frequent stops to pick up/drop off passengers has no more risk of being in a collision than any other vehicle?

    10. Re:And in other news by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2

      No, not at all. My statement was only related to who subsidizes who's car insurance. Anything more was in your mind.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    11. Re:And in other news by silfen · · Score: 1

      No, that's wrong. When they are not carrying passengers, they simply have lower legal requirements, but their actual coverage is likely higher than the minimum legal requirements.

      And what difference does it make anyway? Why shouldn't the same insurance rates apply to everybody, simply based on mileage, driving history, and vehicle type? I mean, if I wanted to pick out a category of drivers to charge more, it would be mothers with children in their cars (they are dangerous), not Uber drivers looking for rides.

    12. Re:And in other news by Xicor · · Score: 0

      having to pay for a license to drive ppl around is ridiculous. in england, in order to be a taxi driver, you have to take a test saying you know at least 90% of the roads.... this is just plain dumb... we have gps for that.

    13. Re:And in other news by cheesybagel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Remember that adage that 90% of car accidents happens 5 minutes away from the departure point or 5 minutes before the arrival point? Guess what a taxi service is constantly doing...

    14. Re:And in other news by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why shouldn't the same insurance rates apply to everybody, simply based on mileage, driving history, and vehicle type? I mean, if I wanted to pick out a category of drivers to charge more, it would be mothers with children in their cars (they are dangerous), not Uber drivers looking for rides.

      Consider the scenario where you are standing on a street corner and a car comes rushing towards you at a high rate of speed. Collision is imminent. You're going to survive the impact, but you'll be paralyzed from the neck down for the rest of your life.

      If the car that crippled you was operated by an employee of a cab company, it might mean that a legal settlement would be reached such that you'd spend the rest of your life at your house with inhouse nurse care.

      If the car was an Uber driver rushing down the street to pick up a customer before becoming inpatient and choosing a different car in the app, well, I hope you have substantial insurance through your own job. When you attempt to sue Uber over your injuries, they'll say they have no liability in the matter because their driver wasn't on the clock with a passenger. And they'll exert significant legal resources to prevent creating a precedent that'll put them out of business. They'll happily spend more fighting your case than the amount for which your suing. In this scenario, you're likely to have to live at an institution to be provided needed medical care for the rest of your life.

      As for your stereotyping of mothers with infants, the most common cause of car accidents is distracted driving due to cellphone usage. Seems that Uber drivers looking for fares would strongly fit into that category....

    15. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does when the claim is rejected because of using the vehicle for commercial purposes, that leaves you with your uninsured motorist... better make sure its taken care off. Also don;t be a pedestrian getting hit by an uber "taxi"

    16. Re:And in other news by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Uber drivers are covered by a lot less when they are looking but have not accepted a fare.

      Not in NYC. Same insurance requirements, since they're all regulated livery car drivers.

    17. Re:And in other news by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Around here, you also have to declare and insure for a 'purpose', not just a liability amount. After all, $1 million dollar liability on a sunny summer weekends only car is less than the same risk as a Taxi.

      Around here, there is, in order of increasing cost:

      Pleasure (pleasure use only, a couple days per month commuting are ok)

      Commuting (driving to and from work, not "for work" itself - different sub classes depending on how far you commute)

      Business (drive for work, meeting customers etc)

      Delivery -- For the delivery class there are sub classes depending on what type of vehicle, and what is being delivered. Pizza drivers need this I know from personal experience. And I bet anything that 'delivering people' or 'taxi' insurance is in here to, that uber drivers would be required to have it, and that many do not.

      Again, in NYC, Uber drivers carry the same insurance that taxis or any other livery car driver carriers. It's commercial vehicle insurance.

    18. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between non-commercial insurance and commercial insurance. If the insurance co saw someone was using Uber, they would not cover any claims of injury when (not if) a wreck happens.

    19. Re:And in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Uber drivers carry the same insurance

      I'm not questioning if they *should*; I question whether they DO.

    20. Re:And in other news by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not according to Uber's web site.

      If you’re taking a ride requested through UberBLACK, UberSUV, or uberTAXI, your livery or taxi transportation provider carries a commercial insurance policy in at least the minimum amount required by local regulations. If you didn’t get his or her insurance information at the time of the accident, please reach out to us so we can connect you.

      If you’re taking a ride requested through uberX, some transportation providers are rideshare drivers providing transportation with their personal vehicles. Rideshare providers carry personal insurance policies. In addition, there’s a commercial insurance policy with $1 million of coverage per incident. This policy covers drivers’ liability from the time a driver accepts your trip request through the app until the completion of your trip. This policy is in addition to the driver’s own policy, but it acts as primary insurance if the driver’s policy is not available for any reason. An additional insurance policy covers drivers when they are logged into the Uber app but are not currently on a trip.

      There is also uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage (UI/UIM) of $1 million per incident for bodily injury, in case another motorist causes an accident and doesn’t carry adequate insurance. So, for example, injuries caused by a hit-and-run accident would be covered by the UI/UIM.

      For additional information, visit our blog: blog.uber.com/ridesharinginsurance

    21. Re:And in other news by countach · · Score: 1

      I don't know how it is in the US, but in some countries, all drivers must be insured against hurting third parties. You lament about how if an Uber driver hits you they are less insured than a taxi. That's cold comfort when 99% of the cars are neither a taxi nor Uber, yet they might hit you.

    22. Re:And in other news by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is easy to offer lower prices when you get to skip over the costs other people pay. It is the same reason child and slave labor are still popular.

    23. Re:And in other news by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Remember that adage that 90% of car accidents happens 5 minutes away from the departure point or 5 minutes before the arrival point?

      No, because that is nonsense. The actual* figure is 52% (not 90%) of accidents occur withing 5 miles (not five minutes). But that is not because driving within that radius is particularly dangerous, but simply because most driving occurs within that radius.

      * This figure comes from a survey conducted by Progressive Insurance in 2002. Many articles attribute the study to the NHTSA, and often exaggerate the percentage, or the distance, or both.

    24. Re:And in other news by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Not to mention driving to unfamiliar locations.

      We "normal" drivers go strange places all the time, but the majority of our miles driven are on repeatable predictable paths to and from work and school and picking up the kids at Karate. Insurance calculates all of this.

    25. Re:And in other news by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      To tack on... ...I explain this to my wife constantly. The reason most accidents happen close to your home is exactly as you said -- most driving occurs close to your home. I use it as a reason to have her buckle up even for short trips, but it's also a lesson in our house about manipulating statistics.

      Coming up next, the percentage of American's that live "near" water.

    26. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so your ok with with a non taxi taxi hitting your car and then the they get to use EULA

      As a non-party to the EULA, I'm not sure how a EULA would have force to prevent me from collecting. /corporate attorney

    27. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, taxi drivers have much more practice driving since they do it all day. So we can expect them to be involved in fewer accidents for this reason. And, as it turns out, cabbies are safer drivers than normal people: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/28/nyregion/28cabs.html

    28. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, but 99% of the cars on the road aren't there for the better part of 8 hours a day. You don't think driver fatigue and general mood matters? Uber will become regulated as soon as the first huge accident happens that really makes the news.

      Personally, I think its rather backwards to allow Uber run a taxi service without being a taxing service...Why the heck should the cab companies continue to pay the city to operate if the competition doesn't?

    29. Re:And in other news by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      The reason most accidents happen close to your home is exactly as you said -- most driving occurs close to your home.

      So don't drive anywhere near this guy's home.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    30. Re:And in other news by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, taxi drivers have many more hours behind the wheel. I thinks it's fair to say that there are many factors which contribute to both raise and lower a taxi's risk of getting into an accident.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    31. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What difference does it make if it's an Uber driver or any other driver who paralyzes you? If you think this is a serious problem, then insurance limits need to be raised for everybody, and/or get yourself disability insurance if your state doesn't already require it (many do).

      But instead of making that argument, you pick some small group of people and try to stick it to them. I wish you sincerely that you'll be at the receiving end of such stupid knee-jerk legislation yourself.

      And if you think you can get lots of money out of taxi companies, think again: they are usually limited liability. You're far more likely to recover money from a private driver if he is actually at fault.

      As for mothers with kids, that wasn't stereotyping but personal experience.

    32. Re:And in other news by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I'm not questioning if they *should*; I question whether they DO.

      ..and you've been told more than once that they do.

      That doesnt seem to have stopped you from continuing to be in the "question" state instead of the "answered" state.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    33. Re:And in other news by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is easy to offer lower prices when you get to skip over the costs other people pay.

      Its easy to prevent competition when you jack up the cost that other must pay to insane levels such as $1 million per medallion.

      Let taxis suffer the regulatory capture that they themselves created. There is no reason for anyone else to suffer it.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    34. Re:And in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

      ..and you've been told more than once that they do.

      Ah well, that's settled then.

      Then again...

      âoeI went to Geico, filled out an application and told them I was going to transport people,â he says. âoeThe application was declined as âundesirable.â(TM)â

      [...]

      You can see my dilemma. It seems to me the only way to comply with Uber by getting personal insurance would be to misrepresent my use of the vehicle, which I do not feel comfortable with. My conclusion from this indicates that if there were claims against a TNC driver and the insurance company found out that the true use of the vehicle was falsified, they would deny coverage.

      [...]

      Last week on the Lyft Lounge, a Facebook meeting area for drivers, one member posted a cancellation notice she received from Geico. The termination was for âoecommercial use of your 2012 Toyota Prius.â

      [...]

      Because of the fear over such cancellations, at least some ride-service drivers have kept their status a secret from their insurance companies.

      [...]

      Said another driver: âoeI donâ(TM)t think I should let my insurance company know because Iâ(TM)ll probably get dropped.â

      [...]

      âoeMany insurers donâ(TM)t know their customers are involved in these kinds of program,â says Pete Moraga of the Insurance Information Network of California. âoeIf these drivers arenâ(TM)t telling their insurers, thereâ(TM)s no way for them to know.â

      http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/...

      That doesnt seem to have stopped you from continuing to be in the "question" state instead of the "answered" state.

      I think moving to the "answered" state as you propose seems more than a little premature, don't you?

    35. Re:And in other news by mjwx · · Score: 1

      NYC Taxis have to carry $100k (per person) / $300k (per incident) liability insurance. That's the same for Uber drivers.

      But how much do you want to be that UberX drivers dont have that level of liability insurance. Here in Australia private car insurance (the kind everyone has on their car) does not cover business use, so if you're using your car for mini-cabbing (Uber isn't new, it's just Mini cabbing with a web 2.0 interface) your insurance wont cover you (also in my state, you're driving an unregistered vehicle because with private registration you get a tax cut off the cost of business rego). But Uber will flounder and die here because its not only just as expensive as a regular Sydney or Melbourne taxi, they're also extremely unreliable.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    36. Re:And in other news by mi · · Score: 1

      The amount of insurance carried by Uber drivers is also probably much less than NY taxis.

      If this fact does not bother you, when you are getting a free ride from an acquaintance, it should not bother you, when you are riding Uber(X).

      And if it still bothers you anyway, well, just hail an "official" cab.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    37. Re:And in other news by jrumney · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, taxi drivers have many more hours behind the wheel [aka sleep deprivation]. I thinks it's fair to say that there are many factors which contribute to both raise and lower a taxi's risk of getting into an accident.

      So far we've only come up with factors that raise the risk. What are the factors that lower it?

    38. Re:And in other news by mi · · Score: 2

      Insurance rates are based on risk. Are you claiming that a car that is on the road all day long

      A car may be on the road all day long for many different reasons. It makes sense for annual mileage to affect the cost of insurance — indeed, it is already factored in usually.

      Singling out "commercial use" does not make sense.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    39. Re:And in other news by mi · · Score: 1

      If the car that crippled you was operated by an employee of a cab company, it might mean that a legal settlement would be reached such that you'd spend the rest of your life at your house with inhouse nurse care.

      And it would be even better, if the taxis are all government-owned — in which case you'll get a truly gold-plated care, will you not? Heck, some of the poor may choose to stand on busy intersections just for that reason — would not that be terrific?

      Do I hear a proposal to nationalize all transportation? And, better yet, all other corporations? Bigger is better, is not it?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    40. Re:And in other news by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      The difference is the actual time spent driving. someone driving to make money is spending 6-8 hours or more on the road and as such their risk of being in a serious accident increases accordingly and thereby the risk they pose to the insurance company. Professional drivers or those that provide public transport are normally charged extra to accommodate for the extra risk and costs associated with that risk.

    41. Re: And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Health insurance doesn't cover in-home care, exactly his point.

    42. Re: And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when an Uber driver hits me 30 seconds after completing a trip? Uber's insurance won't pay per the page you quote, and neither will the driver's if his provider learns he was using the car commercially.

      Uber should know that many of their drivers are not maintaining commercial insurance, and that many of their drivers' policies won't cover the car at all as a result, even when the car is not engaged with uber, but especially when the car is on a commercial trip, such as my example of having just completed a fare.

    43. Re:And in other news by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      If I am hit by your acquaintance while they are giving you that free lift, their private insurance will cover my medical bills for as long as needed.

      If I am hit by a taxi from a regulated company, their business insurance will cover my medical needs for as long as needed. The fact that they have adequate insurance is something that is checked by the taxi licensing people.

      If I am hit by an Uber driver, well who knows how much insurance they have - Uber covers them for $1Million but that doesn't necessarily cover even a year in medical expenses or long term care, so I am left recouping the cost of my care from the Uber driver themselves. Uber drivers are not regulated or inspected (yet - wait for that shitstorm to hit Slashdot when it happens) so there is no guarantee that when you get into that Uber car you are actually insured at all.

    44. Re: And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe "many more hours behind the wheel" meant over a lifetime, that is, more driving experience. I'm undecided on this issue, but your misunderstanding isn't helping anyone here. The manner in which you inserted it into the post you were replying to was also reminiscent of dishonest conversational gambits (wilful misunderstanding); to get people to listen to your arguments, it might be best to acknowledge the valid points made in one direction (driving experience reduces accident risk) before suggesting your own point that frequent drivers are more likely to be suffering from sleep deprivation.

    45. Re:And in other news by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      That's only for one limited elite class of taxi drivers, the London Black Cab driver.

      The exam you're referring to is called "The Knowledge". Minicab (pre-booked hire car) drivers in London do not need "The Knowledge", but driving a black cab has a certain cachet that means they can charge higher fares - you know you're getting a driver that knows his way around beyond the cold and unadorned data that a GPS navigator can provide. The privilege for this differentiation is that only licensed taxi drivers are allowed to pick up fares off the street - all other hire cars have to be booked through their controller.

      The main problem that folks like the Black Cab drivers have with Uber is that the technology makes booking an Uber essentially as immediate as raising your hand and yelling "Taxi!", which erodes a substantial part of their competitive advantage. But as you point out, the same technology also makes their principal unique selling point (being able to navigate London without embarrassing pauses to flick through an A-Z) rather less relevant as well.

    46. Re: And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that link proves cabbies are more likely to be in an accident than normal drivers since the study was done per million miles and a taxi will reach a million miles much faster than your average driver.

    47. Re:And in other news by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      That's rather low, UK car drivers insurance covers £1m minimum which is currently about $1,7,100,000.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    48. Re: And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The argument was about coverage, not rates.

      Yes, there are plenty of reasons their rates are higher, but that's not the point. Their coverage doesn't need to be higher.

    49. Re:And in other news by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Again, Uber in NYC is different. All their drivers (including UberX drivers) have commercial licenses, and are driving Taxi & Limo Commission certified cars, with commercial plates.

    50. Re:And in other news by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Again, in NYC (not everywhere, NYC is the exception), Uber drivers, including UberX, have to have commercial licenses, and their cars have commercial plates. They also have commercial insurance.

    51. Re:And in other news by jythie · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, those rules reduced the number of taxis and congestion in NYC. There is a real game theory problem here in that any one company wants as many of its own cars in the field as possible, but if every company is doing that the roads get worse then they are. Uber is not feeling this too much since they are still pretty small, but the original problem is still there. Too dense a population, not enough road, and too much individual profit to be made.

    52. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxis reduce congestion dumbass. Less taxis = more people taking their own cars.

    53. Re:And in other news by jythie · · Score: 1

      For most people in NYC, the alternative to a taxi is walking or public transportation, not taking their own car.

    54. Re:And in other news by Wycliffe · · Score: 2

      Rates are based primarily on number of miles driven which is already included in most insurance.
      I can see the rates being higher for someone who drives more (or possibly for someone who does
      more risky behavior if you can prove taxi driving is more risky) but there is no reason their
      COVERAGE should be required to be higher. If a motorist is only required to have 10k of coverage
      for hitting a pedestrian then why should a taxi be required to have more?

    55. Re:And in other news by mi · · Score: 1

      If I am hit by your acquaintance while they are giving you that free lift, their private insurance will cover my medical bills for as long as needed.

      No, actually. Auto insurance policies have caps on them — $1mln is very common for private cars. Rich people are encouraged to pay for additional coverage (so as not to loose their house to a litigious victim), but it is not mandatory.

      If I am hit by an Uber driver, well who knows how much insurance they have

      The "who knows" argument — also known as spreading FUD ...

      Uber covers them for $1Million

      Yep, that same $1 million....

      there is no guarantee that when you get into that Uber car you are actually insured at all.

      Nor is your acquaintance guaranteeing you, his insurance has not been canceled last week...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    56. Re:And in other news by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      for most people in NY now.

    57. Re: And in other news by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      What happens when an Uber driver hits me 30 seconds after completing a trip?

      Sorry, it's in the same quote, but I forgot to bold that part:

      [...] An additional insurance policy covers drivers when they are logged into the Uber app but are not currently on a trip.

    58. Re:And in other news by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Pleasure is usually the catch-all for when your needs don't really fit into any other category. It implies joyriding, and is one of the most expensive.

    59. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lose their job if they don't keep it. Same way somebody loses their job at an insurance agency if they don't keep up with their Insurance License.

  2. What? by ottothecow · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It was more expensive than a taxi in NYC?

    Every other city I have used it in, UberX was at a fair discount to a regular taxi...after all, why would you hop a ride in some random person's car (whom you will have to provide with directions because they don't know the city) if it costs more than an actual taxi service? The only thing more expensive was the black car (limo) service.

    --
    Bottles.
    1. Re:What? by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      It appears so.
      http://www.taxiautofare.com/us...

      I didn't know taxi fare in NYC was so reasonable. I guess there is more competition in NYC. They also make up for it in quantity. Many other places the taxis sit around waiting for fares much longer.

    2. Re:What? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I've horrible luck with NYC taxi drivers knowing the city.

      By cross street, address, or landmark.

      I don't fucking know how to get to the city courthouse, because I don't fucking live here, ugh. It's gotten a lot better in the last 5 years with smart phones, but a lot of them did not know the city, or have GPS up until then.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:What? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Because that said random car will actually stop for you during peak hours, and all the taxi-holding medallions won't because they're overwhelmed. Have you ever tried hoping into a taxi that won't even slow down to pick you up?

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tend to stop when you hurl a brick through their windshield.

    5. Re:What? by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cab fares are regulated in NYC. Competition has nothing to do with it. http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/ht...

    6. Re:What? by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      Well...during peak hours, Uber X will go into surge pricing and cost far more than a taxi anyways.

      Usually when there is surge pricing, I just use Uber to hail a normal taxi (in cities where this is possible). With a normal taxi, you pay a small fee to Uber, but otherwise the rate is straight-meter. Of course, that still won't help if literally every taxi is full, but it gets you better odds than simply standing on a single street corner and waving your hand.

      --
      Bottles.
    7. Re:What? by saikou · · Score: 1

      Plus don't forget the "surge pricing" which, for some reason, always happen when you actually want to use the Uber :P As in, when it's raining, holiday, blah-blah

    8. Re:What? by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cab fares are regulated in NYC. Competition has nothing to do with it.

      Shhh,

      If you listen carefully you can hear the Randian's heads pop.

      Everywhere I've travelled, the less regulated the taxi industry the more they take the piss and rip off customers. Thailand is a good example, in Bangkok taxis are cheap. From the Airport to the city centre is 400 Thai Baht + 70 Baht in tolls (approx 30 Baht == 1 USD), that's a distance of 35 KM and includes an airport fee. Taxi's are well regulated in Bangkok (its the same story in Singapore).

      In Phuket, a taxi wont even turn on the engine for less than 200 Baht, it's less than that to get into a taxi in Australia. Taxi's aren't regulated at all, they operate like a Mafia using violence against their competition, ripping off customers. They sit there all day turning down paying customers because they aren't paying enough. The local Phuket govt isn't interested in doing anything (since the recent coup in Thailand, I've heard the army has been attempting to clean the taxi mafia up).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, it is truly a mystery why other people want to use Uber at the same time you do, when "it's raining, a holiday, blah bah blah". and it is truly a mystery why they need to raise the price (and driver payment) to make sure that there's an Uber for everyone at those times.

    10. Re:What? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between regulation and anti-corruption.

      Uber is showing that a deregulated system can work. You need true competition though and a government to enforce anti-monopoly policies and crack down on mafia corruption. Many cities over regulate the taxi industry and limit the number of cabs to a ridiculously low number to keep prices high. In your other case a mafia (a semi governmental entity in itself) is doing the same thing. //Randians are crazy, but there certainly is room for balance.

    11. Re:What? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Uber is showing that a deregulated system can work.

      Not really.

      What Uber is trying to do is operate outside the law.

      Because of this, Uber is one serious accident away from complete failure, doubly so in Australia. One serious crash and the insurance companies will come for blood. They'll pay out to the victims (including the passenger, but not the driver) and then come after Uber itself for compensation. That billion dollars in capital wont last long.

      Uber is not a new idea, it's what is called "mini-cabbing" which has been around in London and other cities for years.

      I used Thailand specifically because I knew someone would come back with the "but deregulation" angle. In Thailand there is no restriction on using a private car as transport. When I go there I can and do use them because it's a nicer car (a new Camry vs an old one) and its cheaper for long distances, this does not affect the prices of taxis in Phuket, where regulation does not exist nor diminish the number of taxis in Bangkok where its heavily regulated.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Confused by the blurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UberX has always been substantially cheaper than taxis.

  4. Re:No thanks. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Enjoy using your million-dollar taxi medallion as a coaster from now on.

  5. Reminds me of public transport here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Deregulation;
    2. Big newcomer with huge financial backing undercuts established companies;
    3. Everyone flocks to newcomer;
    4. Established companies reduce routes or go bankrupt;
    5. Newcomer uses new position to engage in gradual programme of regulatory capture;
    6. Newcomer boosts prices way above previous companies;
    7. Newcomer shuts down less profitable routes, because see 5.

    Bus services here used to be comprehensive and cheap. Now all the short routes are dominated by one company.

    1. Re:Reminds me of public transport here by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yeah and do not forget. They get the regulatory capture because they are 'too big to fail' and there are 'no alternatives'.

  6. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the part where you think a medallion prevents any of that.

  7. and if an accident occurs will uber get to use fin by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and if an accident occurs will uber get to use fine to get out having to pay up like a real taxi?

  8. Subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty easy to undercut taxis when you are subsidized by venture capital (and therefore ordinary people's retirement funds etc.) and don't have to obey any of the same regulations.

  9. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you think that the average taxi driver is some how morally superior to 'random strangers'(who have to pass criminal and background checks)....I know you haven't been in many cabs.

  10. One key clarification by jratcliffe · · Score: 4, Informative

    UberX in NYC is somewhat different from UberX in most markets. In NYC, UberX uses licensed livery cars and drivers (who have livery licenses, commercial insurance, etc), the same as Uber Black, etc., and the standard car service companies. The only difference between UberX and Uber Black in NYC is that UberX will have less nice cars (typically Camrys vs. Town Cars).

    This is very different from UberX in SF, LA, etc., where it's pretty much "got a car? got a license? congrats, you're an UberX driver!"

  11. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm certain our first story about Uber accepting Bitcoin will shake things up quite a bit.

  12. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I welecome the change. Bitcoin makes othewise smart people stupid. The arguements with uber are a thousand times more palatible.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  13. Well Sure by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's easy to undercut the competition when they adhere to regulations and you don't.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Well Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that as if it's a bad thing...

    2. Re:Well Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yes. We are not all corporate cock sucking, libertardian fuckwits like yourself.

    3. Re:Well Sure by Noah+Haders · · Score: 0

      it's easy to undercut the competition when the competition is a government-protected unionized racket that uses political arm-twisting and actual arm-twisting to keep their monopoly in place. The "regulations" you speak of are only in place to keep better businesses from entering the market. Sucks to be them, good for consumers. I am not shedding tears.

    4. Re:Well Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /|\
      roman_mir

    5. Re:Well Sure by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Uber announced in a blog post on Monday it would cut the prices of its UberX service in New York City by 20% — but it's only for a limited time

      A limited time X; where X is infinitesimally greater than the time it takes to establish a critical mass which will lead to a monopoly? Just wondering :D

  14. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I welecome the change. Bitcoin makes othewise smart people stupid. The arguements with uber are a thousand times more palatible.

    Well, some of them are.

    But you have to admit, a lot of the arguments are Bitcoin-level stupid.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  15. Re:No thanks. by Shados · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the only reason I use Uber (though I push it a notch and use Uber Black, even though its pretty expensive).

    When I need to take a cab at 4 AM to go to the middle of nowhere (I don't have a car, as I only need this like twice a year or something, not worth it), hailing a shady dirty taxi who'll bitch and moan about me asking to go somewhere unprofitable isn't exactly my preference.

    Uber (Black) has been doing quite nicely. Up the standard of normal taxis, even if you have to double the price, and I'll happily use them again.

  16. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they will simply refuse to pay for any injuries or damages. Remember, you agreed to indemnify Uber from all liability as part of the EULA you agreed to by using Uber.

  17. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by PRMan · · Score: 1

    Yep. I'm so stupid I'm about to retire in my forties. With coins I bought less than 2 years ago. What an idiot I've been.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  18. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by PRMan · · Score: 1

    If you mean anti-Bitcoin stupid, then yeah, I agree with you.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  19. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that this is an important characteristic for you use a normal taxi and do not use Uber. People should decide the insurances they want, not you or the government.

  20. Auditable logs? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    One thing that you get from taxis that you don't get from Uber (or clones) is an assurance that the rates will be metered fairly.

    I use Uber Black whenever its available because I trust the company and I enjoy the product. That doesn't mean that I don't acknowledge the need for some regulation in the taxi market. We tried going all gypsy before and it didn't work very well - hell, DC was annoying until just a few years ago with random pricing.

    Uber could choose to work with the cities and go in offering full (anonymous, 1 week delayed) logs of all trips with pricing information. Any city inspector could take a trip and then compare his calculations to his receipt and, when it appeared publicly, the log records. There are many things they could do in fact if they weren't intent on being assholes and pretending that all regulations were dumb.

    Hell, pre-negotiated pricing through the app with an add-on congestion charge would also work around many of the complaints.

    The worst part about this is that this weird obsession with the Lyft market may well bring down the wonderful, "traditional" Uber Black service. And that would be a shame.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:Auditable logs? by Noah+Haders · · Score: 1

      One thing that you get from taxis that you don't get from Uber (or clones) is an assurance that the rates will be metered fairly.

      Uber could choose to work with the cities and go in offering full (anonymous, 1 week delayed) logs of all trips with pricing information. Any city inspector could take a trip and then compare his calculations to his receipt and, when it appeared publicly, the log records.

      You say you've taken Uber before, but you make this uninformed statement? Every time you complete an Uber ride (or Lyft ride), you get an email saying the exact distance and exact duration of the ride, then the costs associated with each and the sum to the final bottom line. It also includes a map of the area you traveled, with a bright line showing the path of the trip. So this takes care of concern for your "metered fairly" issue. Sounds like you're an astroturfer for the taxi cartel.

    2. Re:Auditable logs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're an astroturfer for the taxi cartel. Again with the Slashdot cliches. If everyone who was ever incorrect here was actually an astroturfer, this would be the comments section of the China Daily. Besides, with the number of tin foil hats around here, Slashdot is possibly the least productive place for astroturfing on the web.

  21. When will we have Uber for airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When will we have Uber for airplanes? There are many private pilots who would love to make some money by flying paying passengers yet FAA requires some pesky commercial pilot license. How can we "Uber" that license requirement?
    There are so many rules that I would like to "Uber"...

    1. Re:When will we have Uber for airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is BlackJet, and now there's also Blade which is essentially Uber for helicopters.

  22. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by bws111 · · Score: 1

    You do realize there may be people injured in an accident who are not customers of Uber, right?

  23. Uber astroturfing marches on... by smoothnorman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where's the posting which shows that Uber, which is bank-rolled against the small time (typically immigrant) taxi owner, is now coupled with ALEC ("the notoriously evil American Legislative Exchange Council" aka Koch brothers)?: http://slog.thestranger.com/sl...

  24. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Either way.

    As in most things, there are moronic arguments on both sides of the Bitcoin/Uber debates.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  25. laws about that by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    The FAA has some very clear and very strict laws about that. A private pilot can not charge for transporting passengers. The on;y exception to this is that a passenger can pay for, at most, their share of the cost of expenses such as gas. That means if a private pilot transports two other people, each can pay for up to 1/3 of the costs for gas and such but the pilot must pay for his own share. And those costs absolutely can not include things like annual or hourly maintenance costs. If you luck out and find a pilot already making the same trip (I did once) you can get a great deal and help defer some of his costs. But you're not going to see private pilots legally offering their services on any wide spread basis.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  26. immigrant taxi owner? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Never priced a medallion I guess. They don't own the taxis.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:immigrant taxi owner? by smoothnorman · · Score: 2

      They do in Seattle and SF and Chicago at least (often, but not always Sikhs). they started as drivers and now own a medallion. often they are paying off loans for it. and along comes Bezos backed Uber...

      the cities demanded that they buy them to do business. now some of these cities are negotiating with Uber. how does your trusting immigrant business owner feel now?

  27. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Well, I made $90 billion investing in Bernie Madolff related investments. I'm not the stupid one.

      I also make $10,000 a week working from home, you can too! Just follow my link for more details https://ipromisethismultilevel...

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  28. Re:No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the part where it's trivially easy to troll the Aspergers nerds of Slashdot.

  29. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because we all know that no one on the Internet lies.

  30. Cash Cab with Ben Bailey? by acidradio · · Score: 1

    So how will this affect Cash Cab? Will Ben Bailey now have to put a pink mustache on the front of his vehicle? Will people have to use an iOS app to get a ride? Will people be required to fist-bump Ben Bailey as they enter the car?

    1. Re:Cash Cab with Ben Bailey? by kramerd · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, since Cash Cab was cancelled for the 2nd time in 2012.

  31. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by temcat · · Score: 1

    I guess those people won't have indemnified Uber then?

  32. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People should decide

    And is democracy or the size of your wallet a better approximation of "people", please?

  33. But how many bodies can it fit? by rsborg · · Score: 2

    When I need to take a cab at 4 AM to go to the middle of nowhere (I don't have a car, as I only need this like twice a year or something, not worth it), hailing a shady dirty taxi who'll bitch and moan about me asking to go somewhere unprofitable isn't exactly my preference.

    I will take that recommendation, though I hear Uber SUV can fit more bodies in the rear. I wonder if heading over to Patterson incurs surge pricing? Will the driver help you unload your "luggage"?

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:But how many bodies can it fit? by haneefmubarak · · Score: 1

      When I went to NYC about a week ago (first time!), I took an UberX to my relatives' house. The driver was very friendly, the pricing was quite reasonable, and he did indeed help unload our luggage.

  34. Re:and if an accident occurs will uber get to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are of no concern to a corporation

  35. Re:No thanks. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Who is going to rob, rape, and/or murder you? The person being tracked via satellite who is specifically responding to your request for a pick up? It's not even worth it to try and rob an Uber driver. You would need a stolen phone and credit card in order to be able to do that, otherwise it's pretty easy to prove exactly who was there. It's not like with a taxi that you can anonymously hail, shoot them while they're sitting in the seat, take everything and go.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  36. Get an education, cabbies. by kuzb · · Score: 0

    If your job is going to the way of the dodo, then get off your ass and learn something that isn't. I have no sympathy for people who spend their lives in bottom-of-the-barrel jobs only to be surprised that they're being replaced with a better system.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    1. Re:Get an education, cabbies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last cabbie I talked to had a Master's degree in IT, and I've also met one with a Master's in Psychology. Nearly every cab driver I've spoken to had at least a Bachelor's. Stop being so self righteous. The state of the economy right now is such that people can't always get a job that befits their level of education, and the state of higher education right now is such that many for-profit universities charge tens of thousands of dollars for degrees that aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

  37. Re:Uber is the new Slashdot buzzword. sorry Bitcoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin makes othewise smart people stupid.

    Wrong, it reveals the stupidity of people who had up to that point successfully hidden it from view.

  38. Temporary Sale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the whole point of Uber is it's always cheaper than a taxi. Guess not.

  39. Also stop paying attention hear home by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Because you are used to the area, you do not think about driving as much near home - instead thinking about what you will do where you are going or when you get home, when you are close. It's easy to grow inattentive and miss a change that leads to an accident.

    Picking someone up and dropping someone off has none of the risks of familiarity since each situation is different.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Cab companies are not LLCs by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

    What difference does it make if it's an Uber driver or any other driver who paralyzes you?

    Difference being that Uber is sucking up around $213,000,000 per year by avoiding significant insurance coverages that their competitors are having to pay. They're offloading this chunk of the insurance burden on their 'independent contractors' who are not able to cover injuries like a $1 Billion / year revenue company can.

    What does it matter? It's the difference between being compensated properly for a life-changing injury caused by an 'independent contractor' working for Uber and suffering "tough luck" by getting zilch in compensation. Compensation is the deciding factor between institutionalized living or as normal-as-possible life for the remainder of your years.

    And if you think you can get lots of money out of taxi companies, think again: they are usually limited liability.

    That corporate structure doesn't work the way you think it does. An LLC is created so it can implode in the face of a liability claim and protect the owners. If Yellow Cab were operating as an LLC, they would have dissolved after the first accident by one of their cabs.

    Instead, in the big cities like New York and Chicago, the cab companies are trying to shield themselves from liability in the same way as Uber-- the drivers are independent contractors.

    1. Re:Cab companies are not LLCs by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      In the UK all drivers must have insurance by law which is minimum 1 million public liability. Is this not true in the US? And if insurance is mandatory then insurers should have rules re hiring out their car, if they don't then it's their own fault if they have to pay out, that's how insurance works.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    2. Re:Cab companies are not LLCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxi companies are not the big companies you think they are, even the big taxi companies. In most cities, the government issues medallions or licenses or the like, these are bought by private individuals in most cases, some by taxi companies, sure, but most are not. The individuals lease the rights to their medallions to the cab companies who then lease them on a daily basis to the drivers who will pay a $100/day or more for that lease. The cab company makes its money on the difference between what the subcontractors (drivers) pay it and what it pays in the medallion owners (that $100/day or so) plus any other associated fees minus operating costs. While $100 per driver per day might sound like a lot, there are expenses on their part, like the cost of the cabs which is non trivial, plus the management costs of their operation. Don't get me wrong, I am not arguing that the cab companies are poor by any stretch, just its not in the Billions either.

    3. Re:Cab companies are not LLCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1 million? Holy shit. Insurance in the US for just $300,000 is about $2,000 per year for a 40 year-old adult with a clean driving record. No way could we afford three times that much. Most auto policies in the US specifically state that they do not cover damages that occur while using your car for hire.

    4. Re:Cab companies are not LLCs by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Each state has its own rules on that issue. Most have pathetically low requirements (a quick Googling shows that most places require $50k)

      That being said, I believe $100k/$300k (injury per person/total injury per accident) is the typical policy

    5. Re:Cab companies are not LLCs by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

      It's $1,7100,000 due to exchange rate. And it doesn't cost more, I think it's less on average due to better standard of driving here. Yes insurance on average costs about 20% more this is partly due to the pound being strong, dollar weak. Also of note is that there is a fraud epidemic happening at the moment, the price of insurance here has doubled over the last 7 years.

      So higher liability does not equal higher insurance because those higher amounts are extremely rarely if ever claimed.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  41. Game show by Smerta · · Score: 1

    "Cheaper than a New York taxi"... umm, "What is a bar of gold, Alex?"

  42. "Now" is the key word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once their competition is in the drain, do you think they will not increase their fares? Or find other reasons to charge more?

  43. Making enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By now the average NYC taxi has built up so much I'll will and resentment it will be decades before any of the cab using public can shed a tear over their fate.

  44. not so bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure that it's cheaper. There are a lot of variables like distance, time, weather if they decide to increase prices, etc... I did just take my first ride for Free using promo code ubersummertime30 when I downloaded the app.. I plan on using the service again and can update on prices then..