Slashdot Mirror


VP Biden Briefs US Governors On H-1B Visas, IT, and Coding

theodp writes: Back in 2012, Computerworld blasted Vice President Joe Biden for his ignorance of the H-1B temporary work visa program. But Joe's got his H-1B story and he's sticking to it, characterizing the visa program earlier this month in a speech to the National Governors Association as "apprenticeships" of sorts that companies provide to foreign workers to expand the Information Technology industry only after proving there are no qualified Americans to fill the jobs. Biden said he also learned from his talks with tech's top CEOs that 200,000 of the jobs that companies provide each year to highly-skilled H-1B visa holders could in fact be done by Americans with no more than a two-year community college degree.

225 comments

  1. Yay! Hopenchange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gotta wonder who Slow Joe cribbed his speech from this time? Neil Kinnock's country doesn't have an H1B program...

  2. Biden is talking coding?? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Joe Biden knows less about coding than my daughter.

    Hell, he probably knows less about coding than he knows about guns...

    Hint, Joe: firing a shotgun THROUGH your front door violates pretty much every rule about target identification that there is.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Identification? We identified you as standing behind the door already.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Stargoat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Joe Biden is a bit of a buffoon, but that thing about firing a shotgun through a front door is taken out of context. He was referring to someone's question about hypothetical end of days where target ID rules likely aren't such a big deal.

      Biden did actually advocated firing a warning shot through a window, which is illegal and presumably not during the end of days. Not very clever, Uncle Joe.

      It's kind of like the Al Gore Internet stuff. I am not Al's biggest fan, but the guy never said anything about inventing the Internet. Al Gore was instrumental in getting the Federal Government to begin using the networks, particularly for check processing. He saved the taxpayers quite a bit of money by doing this. Gore was one of the first elected officials to really get what the Internet was going to do for society.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    3. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Joe Biden knows less about coding than my daughter.

      He knows less about coding than my Grandma who just now figured out this touch tone dialing thingy... (Forget the cell phone and that pesky "send" button..)

      Hell, he probably knows less about coding than he knows about guns...

      That's not saying much... Biden generally knows nothing (or perhaps cannot remember anything) about guns or any other subject he goes into public to talk about. He's an old guy who has lied for a living so long he knows no other way, and now he's loosing what was left of his mind and is struggling to keep his story straight enough to get though the current speech without contradicting himself twice in the same paragraph.

      I'll say this, Biden is the one major reason I'd never support impeachment of Obama and why I pray he stays alive well past 2016. Biden is off his rocker and off the rails and he cannot remember from one moment to the next what he's said. We are better off with the current president than Biden, maybe not much, but enough I'm not willing to risk Biden.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by xfizik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Success in life in not measured by how well you know coding. Especially when you can hire someone who does know the stuff. It's unfortunate that politicians have little clue about things they talk about, but since I'm not American I quite enjoy these public blunders.

    5. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't pick on Joe. His job is really just being there so no one tries to kill the President. As long as Joe is number two man no one would dare.

    6. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biden is a shitbag and a loon. No doubt about that.

    7. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      Biden: What does this big shiny red button do? I guess I'll push it and find out. Hmm... Nothing is happening. I'll just keep pushing it.

    8. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Al Gore, March 8, 1999, interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, "I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      The internet was up and running before he ever got elected to any office, and no - he is no more a computer science guru anymore than he is a meteorological guru. He is a son the of Senator who got to walk in daddy's shoes and use his daddy's high dollar campaign contributors. He kept the tax money flowing to the right rich people and the kept the campaign contributions flowing right back.

      It's the American way.

    9. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Al Gore, March 8, 1999, interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, "I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      Al Gore, March 8, 1999, about 0.2 seconds later in the same interview "...I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country’s economic growth, environmental protection, improvements in our educational system." Wired magazine yanked that quote out of context and it has never been the same since.

      You may want to look up the "High Performance Computing Act of 1991", also known as the "Gore Bill". That's the one which, among other things, funded the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the National Science Foundation, without which we wouldn't have all of the nice toys we enjoy today.

      Don't take my word for it. Why not ask Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, the computer science gurus who did get the Internet up and running? While they had been working on it for some time, the RFCs describing TCP and IP weren't published until 1981, and the "Flag Day" on which the old ARPANET switched to running on Internet Protocol was in 1983.

      The internet was up and running before he ever got elected to any office

      Al Gore was first elected to the US House of Representatives in 1976 and was pushing the ideas of high speed telecommunications in his first term. Unless you are counting the 57 computers on ARPANET at that time as "The Internet" it looks like you may want to revise that statement.

      He kept the tax money flowing to the right rich people and the kept the campaign contributions flowing right back.

      That's what tax money does. Taxes pay for things like civilized society, or in this case The Internet. And Al Gore was the guy who paid the bills for the people who created the Internet. He also paid the bills for the initial development of Internet Explorer and letting AOL users onto Usenet, so he does have a lot to make up for, but when he said that he was the man behind much of the US government's support of computing and telecommunication research which led to the modern Internet, he was right.

    10. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Success in life in not measured by how well you know coding.

      Agree completely.

      Alas, talking in public about things you know nothing about tends to make you look like an idiot.

      Not that Biden needed "One More Thing" to help him look like an idiot - he's had that down for years.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by BVis · · Score: 2

      While your post is relevant and contains useful and accurate information, you have to remember who you're talking to here. Some people are impervious to facts that don't align with their ideology, so you can cite facts as much as you want, you're wasting your time. You might as well try to convince a brick wall to not just stand there.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    12. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      BVis:

      He's not wasting his time. This is the first time I've EVER seen a rebuttal to the common Al Gore "internet" quote, and it completely changed my perspective on the whole issue. I am now very thankful for Al Gore's involvement in the internet as a whole, and have significantly more respect for his future vision.

      He's also been completely correct on global warming--a topic I did not accept as fact during his VP term.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    13. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Success in life in not measured by how well you know coding.

      Crap, I've been doing it wrong all this time??????

    14. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      Al Gore, March 8, 1999, interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, "I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      Al Gore, March 8, 1999, about 0.2 seconds later in the same interview "...I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country’s economic growth, environmental protection, improvements in our educational system." Wired magazine yanked that quote out of context and it has never been the same since.

      Absolutely right. I always thought that was a bit unfair, but I didn't mind too much, because I believe Gore has always been insufficiently lambasted for his active advocacy of the Clipper chip

    15. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's also been completely correct on global warming--a topic I did not accept as fact during his VP term.

      [citation needed]

    16. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also thank Al Gore's policies for forcing military contractors to give our computers 3D imaging technology.

      You would not have those awesome FPS 3D games on XBox without the influence of Al Gore. Now who's going to mock him with ManBearPig nonsense?

    17. Re:Biden is talking coding?? by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      The point here is that both Biteme and Algore don't know whereof they speak... and prove it in their attempts.
      ...

      "National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the National Science Foundation"

      Good try but all of those existed before 1991. It's good to see that one of them is constitutional, though.

      I don't know what Biden knows, but nearly everything he seems to think he knows is wrong. (HT to Firesign Theater)

      "Unless you are counting the 57 computers on ARPANET at that time as 'The Internet'"... Yes, it counts; it counted when there were only 3. No significant change in how it worked was made when they changed the name to distance it from the US Defense Department.

      "He also paid the bills for the initial development of Internet Explorer and letting AOL users onto Usenet"

      Yes, he's done much more evil than I'd thought.

      That's what extortion does. Taxes, when they aren't restricted to constitutional and reasonable activities (like national defense/securing the borders, reasonable costs for negotiating treaties, defending people from initiation of force and fraud), pay for things like degrading civilization, enriching and empowering corrupt and power-mad politicians and their families and friends (i.e. crony socialism).

      Algore did not pay the bills. He added to the bills. He used the coercive power of the government to force others to pay for things he wanted. (And it's not just him, of course. I had a cousin, more closely related to the Kennedy clan, who was a US senator a wee bit before Algore; a Whig. He pushed through the unconsitutional funding for stretching the first telegraph line from DC to Baltimore at a time when it could have more honestly been funded via private and voluntary means as many other such projects were at the time... His brother was a US senator, too, from the so-called Know-Nothing party.)

  3. they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hours by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hours for very low pay and the will to be in a place where they can't quit and will be big suck ups not to get fired.

    It's not about skills it about this

      On average, applications for H-1B workers in computer occupations were for wages $13,000 LESS then what USC get.

    $13000 less and they get 60+ work weeks out of them as well.

  4. 2+2=? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Biden said he also learned from his talks with tech's top CEOs that 200,000 of the jobs that companies provide each year to highly-skilled H-1B visa holders could in fact be done by Americans with no more than a two-year community college degree

    So perhaps he can reconcile those two concepts and explain why we allow H1Bs when we have MILLIONS of unemployed college grads?

    Mr. Biden, I have a word of advice for you - CEOs lie. And not just a little, but as their primary (and sometimes only) qualification. You might not want to go around repeating the crap they spew to try to sway you to do their bidding. It just, y'know, make you look like a little like a Special Olympics winner, if you get my meaning.

    1. Re:2+2=? by DivineKnight · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dude, give up while you still can. They can't hear you over the sound of those campaign contributions.

    2. Re:2+2=? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It just, y'know, make you look like a little like a Special Olympics winner...

      Please don't insult the Special Olympics winners or the other participants by associating them with a career politician.

    3. Re:2+2=? by fsck1nhippies · · Score: 2

      I hate to say give up, because I agree with you. The problem is that no-one cares about their tiny issues until AFTER an election. I personally am happy with a divided congress and a president that can't do anything. Hell, it hasn't hurt us for the past 6 years (actually 14-2). When government is barely keeping up, the people are moving ahead. Stop giving and vote to the middle. Start at home and divide the hell out of your local government. At least you won't have to worry about walking your dog after 6pm with the leash in your left hand. There are 3 major political entities in our country... Republicans, Democrats, and The People. Vote that way. It can't get any worse.

    4. Re:2+2=? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure you mean they can't hear you over the sound of contributions, and special interest groups that are pushing for "amnesty." Man if I knew I could become an american citizen by pissing on the rule of law, I would have stayed in the US and said fuck you.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:2+2=? by DivineKnight · · Score: 0

      "It can't get any worse." -> It can always get worse (that's a law, up there with Murphy's law)...but I do agree with you on getting people to vote.

    6. Re:2+2=? by DivineKnight · · Score: 0

      So...that kind of begets the question, where did you move to? And how do you feel as a victim of our foreign policy? ;-)

    7. Re:2+2=? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      So perhaps he can reconcile those two concepts and explain why we allow H1Bs when we have MILLIONS of unemployed college grads?

      That one's easy, English majors who've never taken a Shakespeare course aren't worth very much. Kids graduated thinking their piece of paper was worth something......turns out it's not worth much if you can't do anything.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:2+2=? by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Biden said he also learned from his talks with tech's top CEOs that 200,000 of the jobs that companies provide each year to highly-skilled H-1B visa holders could in fact be done by Americans with no more than a two-year community college degree

      So perhaps he can reconcile those two concepts and explain why we allow H1Bs when we have MILLIONS of unemployed college grads?

      Mr. Biden, I have a word of advice for you - CEOs lie. And not just a little, but as their primary (and sometimes only) qualification. You might not want to go around repeating the crap they spew to try to sway you to do their bidding. It just, y'know, make you look like a little like a Special Olympics winner, if you get my meaning.

      You seem to have forgotten the primary (and sometimes only) qualification of politicians.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    9. Re:2+2=? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because college grads don't have a clue how to present themselves on an interview, have zero to none actual experience and no proven track record.

      Without a good internship programs implemented, to get a college graduates into the workforce; they will continue to be unemployable.

    10. Re:2+2=? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2+2 = (Score:5, Insightful)

      It's rare that a moderation description is accidentally THIS accurate...

    11. Re:2+2=? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You might not want to go around repeating the crap they spew

      But that (repeating what others say, without attribution) is Biden's only ability. It's called "plaigarism", and he's infamous for it.

  5. Parrotting the words of CEOs who like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, we would just LOVE to hire people for these positions, but it's just so TOUGH... even if the position requires a 2 year degree."

    Naturally, if 200,000 such people did graduate tomorrow, the CEOs will have another excuse why this corporate welfare program needs to keep going.

    1. Re:Parrotting the words of CEOs who like this by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. The real excuse is that those locals get paid too much and are too difficult to intimidate, but that can't be made public.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  6. H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some places want them to fill lower-level rolls and low pay as it's much cheaper and they locked into the job.

    Now maybe if there was say very high H-1b min wage say 100K + COL and forced OT pay (so they can't get the work 2-3 people out of 1 h-1b) that would get rid of a lot of the abuse of the system.

    1. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, imagine if they started using H-1B workers to replace middle and upper management. Those good old boys would rally together and end that in seconds.

    2. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, imagine if they started using H-1B workers to replace middle and upper management. Those good old boys would rally together and end that in seconds.

      What makes it work is the perception that whatever you're displacing whether it's IT or development is just a matter of following procedures, something anyone could do, so the smart company hires the cheapest people possible for the job. Go immediately to 4) $$PROFIT$$. Management, however, takes skill and insight and intuition and all those other things that are difficult to measure, so they can't possibly be replaced.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Some places want them to fill lower-level rolls

      you'd actually want a kaiser for that, I think. no?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the whole computer eco-system is built on the premise that whoever is buying doesn't have a clue what the fuck they are doing. Most of the niche and custom software (think PeopleSoft which comes as a set of basic HTML blocks and a database) is something that can be built much better for a company in less than 6 months by a team of dedicated and decent programmers.

      Yet, the person buying doesn't have a clue what they are doing so they throw a few million at it and 2-3 years of H1B's and overpaid (for their qualifications) contractors to come up with a system that is more broken in the end than when it started. The same happens everywhere and at every level. Desktop software: Throw a few millions at Microsoft and Dell so everyone can browse the web and receive the occasional e-mail on a system that could run Crysis 5 when it comes out in 2020 even though a Raspberry Pi would be good enough for most of the fleet. Web software: throw a few millions in the directions of Oracle and IBM in order to serve out 99% static pages.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Some places want them to fill lower-level rolls

      you'd actually want a kaiser for that, I think. no?

      I'd love to fill a lower-level Rolls -- as it is, I have to settle for my compact....

    6. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H-1B visas, guest worker programs, whatever it may be, low-skill or not, how about a mandate that the pay must be equal to the average wage in the industry? This includes benefits. And it should be calculated on the the work performed by American citizens. Not permanent residents, but citizens, to be sure it's not abused in any way.

    7. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by BVis · · Score: 1

      Now maybe if there was say very high H-1b min wage say 100K + COL and forced OT pay (so they can't get the work 2-3 people out of 1 h-1b) that would get rid of a lot of the abuse of the system.

      Why do you hate America? Go back to your wage slave job and serve your "job creator" masters before we fire you for something like taking vacation time that you've earned.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    8. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Some places want them to fill lower-level rolls and low pay as it's much cheaper and they locked into the job.

      Now maybe if there was say very high H-1b min wage say 100K + COL and forced OT pay (so they can't get the work 2-3 people out of 1 h-1b) that would get rid of a lot of the abuse of the system.

      Or just remove the system altogether and let market forces drive up (or keep where they're already at) salaries/rates until Americans actually want the jobs.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    9. Re:H-1b should not be used for lower-level workers by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I have faith that you can get fat enough to fill a Rolls without too much effort!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. 2 year degree ya right. by musixman · · Score: 1

    Try & apply for a job at, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, etc with a 2 year degree. Good luck.

    1. Re:2 year degree ya right. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      MS does hire people with less then that.

      Google is the one that wants people with masters / PHD's.

    2. Re:2 year degree ya right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you need a PhD to program hosted adware nowadays.

    3. Re:2 year degree ya right. by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      I worked there (as an FTE) for 4 years, and my only degree is an AA (2-year degree in Nothing of Value) from the local community college. Like most at MSFT, I started as an agency temp, showed them I knew my stuff, and then got hired full-time when they had a spot open up. Thankfully I got out of there and moved to a company that treats employees like people instead of cattle, but the lack of a 4-year or higher degree hasn't held back my career one bit.

    4. Re:2 year degree ya right. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      MS does hire people with less then that.

      You're right, MS does. They also prospect people with no formal education in particular fields. One of my highschool buddies who went to University of Waterloo had 14 job offers from MS in his first year. He ended up joining them after he completed his PHD.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:2 year degree ya right. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      And about 1 in 1000 actors succeed and become movie stars.

      It takes hard work, connections- and a lot of luck.

      Unless you have all three, you lose.

      Your story is atypical.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  8. Lies, lies, lies by Cobol+God · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have years of experience in programming and management yet 99% of the time HR kicks out my resume because I do not have that BS in Comp Sci. Sorry I was self taught! I had a friend working at a bigger company that recommended me so I actually got an interview. The dept head liked me, got great responses in each of the interviews, then got an email from the dept head saying they filled with another candidate. Found out from my friend they found a guy (H1B) that they could work 6-7 days a week for less than half the salary they were discussing with me. Companies want CHEAP! I have been offered salaries under $18k a year for 6 day work weeks.

    1. Re:Lies, lies, lies by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming none of those companies were trying to hire you for programming or management position.

    2. Re:Lies, lies, lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies want CHEAP!

      So unionize... a union usually lobbies your interests.

      I have been offered salaries under $18k a year for 6 day work weeks.

      Btw, I work as an H-1B for more than 100k (+40% in bonuses), with a 40 hour work, where I more or less decide when I want to work.

      Immigration isn't the problem, it's necessary if Sillicon Valley is to remain the biggest tech hub. The problem is people not getting payed properly and companies abusing the law. You need to lobby stronger enforcement of existing regulations. Personally I would suggest you do this through a union.

    3. Re:Lies, lies, lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I am just lucky but while I have four years of school, I only have a two year degree, in electronics. 20 years ago I dove in and started writing drivers, back then no school taught DOS/Unix/NT drivers. And I can use a schematic. I consider myself lucky, because the degree problem you mention only affects me around 30% of the time I estimate. Many companies with that requirement for a four year degree waive it. unless the company is going for lowest cost. Two years ago I was unemployed for 3 months, and that really opened my eyes to what is going on with the labor market and foreign VISAs.

    4. Re:Lies, lies, lies by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      You may indeed be lucky.

      The brother-in-law waited tables for four years to get his two-year degree.

      Now he's maybe the third best waiter at the local Steak House and they take most of his tax refund each year as his annual student loan payment.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Lies, lies, lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is the corporate bean counters who have little or no knowledge of programming or other tech areas.
      Their goal is to increase earning for each quarter.
      However, they forget a basic economic truth, as-far as salary goes when hiring;
      Price is what you pay, quality is what you get.
      H-1b's is used for salary price busting but it gets over-budget projects and crap software.

       

  9. 4 year degrees have a lot theory & fluff / fil by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    4 year degrees have a lot theory with big sides of fluff / filler classes.

    While tech schools and community college have teachers who have been / still are working in a real work place doing IT work.

    the 4 years places not so much.

  10. Apprentices, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They get hired, stay here for, say, four years learning the tricks of the trade, and then what happens? They have to leave, and are banned from working in the US for an entire year. Talk about a brain drain.

    1. Re:Apprentices, sure by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Sure.

      But before you find yourself right in the middle of an empathy-fueled moment, remember how good four years at Microsoft looks on a resume in one's home country.

      That's correct... right to the head of the line at the Call Center.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  11. In other words......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that Biden could articulate or remember the bullshit that those CEOs told him, the governors and others in attendance learned practically nothing about how the current system actually works and how it is being abused. If there was another speaker, they should have opened up with "Forget everything you just heard. That's the myth from the CxO views, here's what is really going on...."

  12. Re:Mandatory IQ Tests for Politicians? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    They're smart, they just play dumb. It's more profitable.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  13. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The jobs could in fact be done by Americans with no degrees at all. This cultural indoctrination that you must have a degree must end. I've been programming for 30 years as a profession and I have never had a degree, and I'll never submit to the immoral status quo by getting one. I have both the theory, the experience, and the necessary practical skills under my belt, and all without a single degree.

  14. Liberal Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, blast me as a troll. But honestly that is exactly how I classify this. We are exporting jobs and importing workers at an alarming rate.

  15. Hahahaha by DivineKnight · · Score: 0

    "Apprenticeships"...."two-year community college degree"....rofl. Good news everyone, your Software Engineering / Computer Science degrees were silently downgraded during the night to trade-school status, meaning you are now no better off that our Information Technology 'plumber' friends. That 4-year / 5-year bachelors of science / arts program you soldiered through? Doesn't matter anymore. But don't worry...our Electrical Engineering 'electrician' and Mechanical Engineering 'mechanics' friends will be joining you soon.

    1. Re:Hahahaha by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "Apprenticeships"...."two-year community college degree"....rofl. Good news everyone, your Software Engineering / Computer Science degrees were silently downgraded during the night to trade-school status, meaning you are now no better off that our Information Technology 'plumber' friends. That 4-year / 5-year bachelors of science / arts program you soldiered through? Doesn't matter anymore.

      But don't worry...our Electrical Engineering 'electrician' and Mechanical Engineering 'mechanics' friends will be joining you soon.

      A friend of mine was a microwave engineer for a company that made military communications and countermeasures gear. He could not convince his family that he did not work on ovens. I haven't checked with him in awhile -- maybe "microwave engineers" do work on ovens now.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Hahahaha by DivineKnight · · Score: 0

      Indeed. And a friend of mine, an Electrical Engineer (used to work for General Electric, supposedly in some military missile division) has been asked to replace fuses / etc. Though I must admit that with a score of 0 for my original comment, I've either reminded some people of the reality of what lurks out there, or they simply refuse to believe it can be like that.

    3. Re:Hahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This attitude is the problem. Colleges and universities should be for people who want to expand their knowledge of the universe, not for people who just want jobs. And yet, they're being downgraded to poor imitations of trade schools so they can get more money from all the idiots who go to college/university just to get a degree.

      There's nothing wrong with trade schools, and that needs to be made clear; people who want to focus on getting a job should go to them. What is wrong, though, is turning colleges and universities into half-assed trade schools where you get the worst of both worlds.

  16. Obama picked this guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's should tell you something about his judgement.

    1. Re: Obama picked this guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you tell us what *you* think it tells us?

  17. Apprentice? by rfengr · · Score: 2

    Well hell, if the need H1B for an apprentice (i.e. entry level with low skills), that goes to show the true intent.

  18. Highly Skilled? by phizi0n · · Score: 2

    Biden said he also learned from his talks with tech's top CEOs that 200,000 of the jobs that companies provide each year to highly-skilled H-1B visa holders could in fact be done by Americans with no more than a two-year community college degree.

    How are they highly skilled if they could be replaced by 2 year community college degree holders? If any this just shows how much companies are abusing H1B's to get cheap foreign workers when they could be encouraging high school students to get these mythical 2 year community college degrees that are in such high demand.

    1. Re:Highly Skilled? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      That's a sop to allow corporations to bring in H1-B to fill our community colleges.

      Probably about half of the students in my math classes in Seattle Central are not American. Or Canadian.

      Nothing wrong with that, but it's not helping with retraining when you outsource the jobs overseas.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  19. $18k a year for 6 day work weeks. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    You can make more working full time at min wage (in a non tech job) and if you hit OT you get payed more.

    Who offered that shit pay?

  20. Re:Mandatory IQ Tests for Politicians? by bobbied · · Score: 1

    We just need TERM LIMITS for all Elected Federal offices. I figure give them 12 years in congress max. After that send them packing for home. This Strom Thurmond's 47 years, and Ted Kennedy's 40 years stuff has got to stop.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  21. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by fsck1nhippies · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am with you there. Our best employees are the ones that have not been through the debt claiming process of getting a degree. I personally find that the guys we have that went are way too comment happy. 8 lines of comment for a well named variable. The Cisco techs that we have comment access lists for port 80 traffic as "web server". IF you didn't post AC, I would love to talk more.

  22. Supply and Demand by callahan2211 · · Score: 0

    Companies want cheap labor, labor locked in with one company, and willing to work 60+ hours a week. Politicians are bought and paid for by business, thus H1-B visas and illegal immigrants are feeding labor pool to increase shareholder value and increase profits. It's not that complicated. If a politician truly cared about America and American workers, there would be no H1-B visas and no illegal immigration for low skilled workers. As a side note, Cezar Chavez was against illegal immigration because he knew that if there was a steady stream of low-skilled farm workers from Mexico, then that would dilute the power of his union. Companies would just hire from the very large pool created by illegal immigration. It is interesting that this administration had been talking about income inequality, but H1-B visas and illegal immigration lead to more income inequality not less. Again, not too complicated --- low supply higher wages, ample supply of labor lower wages.

    --
    "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
  23. College is useful for most ... by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The jobs could in fact be done by Americans with no degrees at all. This cultural indoctrination that you must have a degree must end ...

    In my 30 years of programming experience I have rarely seen a job advertisement that did not say 4-year degree or equivalent, equivalent as in on the job experience, as your experience suggests.

    ... I've been programming for 30 years as a profession and I have never had a degree, and I'll never submit to the immoral status quo by getting one. I have both the theory, the experience, and the necessary practical skills under my belt, and all without a single degree.

    Some of the best programmers I know never finished college. However they are **extremely** rare. They will read and figure out college level material over a broad set of topics on their own time on their own initiative, a broad set of topics comparable to those found in a typical degree program. However most of the self taught do not seem to be that self motivated, they may study some topics that are of interest to them but they will not have the broad understanding that the former or the formally trained typically have. Many of the formally trained are no more intelligent nor any more self motivated, but they had external motivations compelling them to study things that they had little interest in. The odd thing about many of the less interesting topics is that they often have unforeseen application to problems you eventually encounter and/or they are actually more important than you knew.

    That said, there are also many in college who really have no interest in programming and are just there to get their "ticket punched", to get a piece of paper. They did not enter the program because of any inherent interest in programming and engineering, rather someone told them it was a good career path. Such individuals do not turn out to be the better programmers either. In contrast those with an inherent interest in programming often go far beyond the work required for class and use the incredible resources found at a university to study things that otherwise would have been beyond their resources.

    So if a person has the time and resources to attend college they would do a great disservice to themselves to skip it due to some political position. You get out of college what you put in, and you will have access to resources and people you probably could not find anywhere else. And that includes likeminded peers. Its one thing to collaborate on code over the internet, its another thing to sit side by side staring at the same screen trying to puzzle something out and walking around campus bouncing ideas around. Plus there is also ready access to individuals studying other necessary disciplines. The density of useful knowledge and experience is quite high among fellow students at a university, its just a matter of finding people with genuine interests in their respective fields rather than the ticket punchers.

    1. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my 30 years of programming experience I have rarely seen a job advertisement that did not say 4-year degree or equivalent, equivalent as in on the job experience, as your experience suggests.

      Well, I have.

      But that's besides the point. When I first started programming as a job, obviously I didn't have any job experience, so there were companies willing to take you in. Everyone has to start somewhere.

      However most of the self taught do not seem to be that self motivated

      I assure you, most college students are neither motivated or intelligent, either. You're going to have to work to find talented, intelligent people, and you can rarely do that by going on degree alone. I know you later say that many people go to college just for the degree, but I'd say "grand majority" describes the situation better than "many."

      So if a person has the time and resources to attend college they would do a great disservice to themselves to skip it due to some political position.

      I can say with absolute certainty that I did not do myself a great disservice. I am an autodidact through and through, and do not fit into the formal education environment; it would only have made me miserable.

      You get out of college what you put in

      You get out of education what you put in. College is only one possible means to an end. But really, college can actually get in the way, since you'll possibly be given assignments and tests that simply aren't necessary (because you already understand that material), and if you learn much faster than the class can teach. And, as I said, not everyone is suited for the formal education environment.

    2. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can say with absolute certainty that I did not do myself a great disservice. I am an autodidact through and through, and do not fit into the formal education environment; it would only have made me miserable.

      You Are Not Alone!!

    3. Re:College is useful for most ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      count me in as one of those rare ones. I never finished college (transferred a bunch of times and lost credits so at grad time, I thought I had enough but actually didn't; got a job offer, took it and never finished school). but I've been working in the industry since the early 80's and consider myself to be completely competitive with actual degree-holders.

      its hard to get experience without a degree; but one short-cut is to go to a co-op or intern-based school (for me, it was northeastern in boston) and that got me enough starter experience to bootstrap me into the workforce. after that, no one ever really cared about my lack of a sheepskin.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      and consider myself to be completely competitive with actual degree-holders.

      That doesn't surprise me one bit, the longer someone has been in the field the less their college degree matters. It's similar to the well known phenomenon that your previous career plays a much greater role in next career than your degree, following this many people end up very far from where they started. All of college education IMO servers 3 purposes, prove a basic level of competence, a basic get your foot in the door, allow students period of time where they have more freedom/access to discover what they're interested in.

      There's nothing wrong with people who don't go for a college degree, but most should expect a hard time getting started. If they are self starters and have a strong interest in IT and a connection to get them their first job I'm sure they'll do just fine.

    5. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad that you have proven your reading and comprehension skills to be completely inadequate.

      The parent agreed with you regarding experience and not needing a degree.
      The parent then provided a comprehensive and detailed answer countering your absolutist "Don't get a degree" statement.
      The parent also provided some caveats regarding other students being there for the wrong reason.

      You immediately come up with the argument that "some students are there for the wrong reason". Despite that already being mentioned.

      Note in case you missed it. I was implying that if you'd had a formal education your reading and comprehension may have been better than they are now.

      Second note: programming for 30 years, of course you wouldn't have a degree in programming. They didn't exist in 1985.

    6. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a passionate auto didact who cares about your subject, college is not necessary. In fact, it can be a slowing hindrance. Except for a few professions, college is the place to go if you don't care enough about the subject to learn on your own. How to tell? Well, if you care about programming, you aren't waiting until an instructor teaches you how to code in college classes. You are devouring information and trying it yourself in middle school.

      I did not have a do outer or resources to teach me programming when I was a kid. The closest I got were books. I devoured the shit out of programming books many years before I even had a way to access a computer. I didn't wait until a quarter of. My life was over and I was learning in between college English and college health classes.

    7. Re:College is useful for most ... by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

      ...those with an inherent interest in programming often go far beyond the work required for class and use the incredible resources found at a university to study things that otherwise would have been beyond their resources.....You get out of college what you put in, and you will have access to resources and people you probably could not find anywhere else....The density of useful knowledge and experience is quite high among fellow students at a university, its just a matter of finding people with genuine interests in their respective fields rather than the ticket punchers.

      That is exactly what happened to me. I started college never having seen a computer. I hung around the Computation Center, watched the Giant Electronic Brains and got to know the people, which included some of the computer industry's pioneers. I learned to program by auditing classes and writing code for the Stanford Time-Sharing System. The administrator of the AI Project didn't have a pay schedule for an undergraduate, so he had to treat me as a first-year grad student. I did graduate, but not with a CS degree--there was no such thing at the time. I turned my outside-of-class experience into a career.

    8. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been working in the industry since the early 80's and consider myself to be completely competitive with actual degree-holders

      Very few people with four year degrees are good programmers at the time they come out of school. In large part, this is because very few people with PhDs are good programmers. They simply lack the experience to be good at it. They haven't tried to design and implement large systems in the company of experienced professionals, working with their decisions long enough to be able to recognize mistakes and learn from them.

      The PhD in computer science knows how to get papers published, which is not at all the same thing as programming, and certainly has little or no relevance to teaching programming. Yes, the PhD can teach toy programming, but being able to write toy programs does not a good programmer make.

      In practice, most of the "feedback" students in typical CS programs get on their programming comes from graduate students who are grading the programs. The graduate students generally aren't good programmers (where would they have learned to be good?), don't have much time for grading, aren't rewarded for being good at grading, and (in US colleges) often have trouble with English - not a good basis to provide useful feedback. If the program works and has a few comments (doesn't really matter what they say, nobody is reading them) it is almost always going to get a grade of A. Any other program will probably get an arbitrary grade. The merits of the program and the supporting documentation are irrelevant. It takes serious time and effort to reach other people's programs, and give useful feedback, a process often requiring multiple iterations, and few people in academia are willing or able to make the time (even if they have the needed skills, both personal and technical, which few do).

      As a result, students going through typical four year degree programs fail to get the kind of individual mentoring and feedback needed to take a punk kid and turn them into a serious programmer with a professional attitude and mindset.

      Graduate programs are no better.

      Fortunately, the skills needed to make this transition exist in industry in good organizations. Industry has to make up for the deficiencies of academia, thanks to the focus on "education" by people with PhDs who routinely (and many would say unethically) neglect their teaching skills in favor of research. Publish or perish!

      If this comes as a surprise to the parents of students and others who haven't seen the system, well, this comes from a failure to understand that most of the information colleges and universities are providing the parents and other outsiders is marketing. It has little or nothing to do with the realities of higher education. If this bothers you, do something about it.

      Don't make the mistake of assuming the school's "reputation" has anything to do with the merit of the teaching being done there.

      The one big advantage people with four year degrees have is their strong math and physics background (relative to non-degree holders), and that only applies to a minority of programming tasks. Very few people have the lifetime learning skills to teach themselves math and physics, so the non-degree holders tend never to catch up here. That's not necessarily a problem, because most of the people with four year degrees let their skills wither from lack of use.

      A small minority of people with four year degrees are really good at technical reading, and learned to be that way in college. This can be another advantage of the four year degree. But most students get through college (even in Computer Science and Engineering programs) without learning this skill to a high level.

    9. Re:College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is you who clearly did not read my post.

      The parent agreed with you regarding experience and not needing a degree.

      I responded with: "Well, I have.

      But that's besides the point. When I first started programming as a job, obviously I didn't have any job experience, so there were companies willing to take you in. Everyone has to start somewhere."

      So what is your point?

      The parent then provided a comprehensive and detailed answer countering your absolutist "Don't get a degree" statement.

      Straw man. I made no such absolutist statements. I was merely saying that college/university isn't for everyone, and some people are perfectly okay without it. You're terrible at reading comprehension, something you accused me of.

      The parent also provided some caveats regarding other students being there for the wrong reason.

      Yes, and I made note of that in my reply. Did you even read my comment, you bloody fool?

      Second note: programming for 30 years, of course you wouldn't have a degree in programming. They didn't exist in 1985.

      You're seriously a thoughtless imbecile. You do realize that plenty of people go to school even as full-grown working adults, right?

  24. they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hours by Entrope · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey, working 60+ hours per week is a bona fide occupational qualification for some jobs! These immigrants are just filling jobs that Americans don't want to do.

    Another problem is that these companies tend to tailor H-1B job requirement statements to particular foreign candidates in such a way that essentially every US-based candidate who might see the posting would not qualify or would ignore it (for example, because of that pay disparity or the work week or other conditions listed in the job description).

  25. Hartford Insurers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever noticed that the big Hartford insurers who have hundreds of millions of COBOL code never complain about shortages of talent? Even with all those people retiring or whatever?

    See, they have training programs. You take an aptitude test (no degree required) and if you pass, you get into a training program. If you get through that you are then given a job and a raise. If you do well during the trial period, you're given another raise.

    And it's not "code monkey" training either. It's design, algorithms, and a lot of the theory in a CS program.

    The companies mentioned by parent - companies that are MUCH more profitable that the insurers - do not have those.

  26. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    Though they do spend about 20 of those hours smoking and watching cricket matches.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  27. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    is it racist for EVERY OTHER COUNTRY, when they look after their own, first; and then (maybe) give jobs to foreigners?

    no, its not. its called 'common sense'; something that the US is lacking (and the parent poster, too, apparently)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  28. Quayle, Gore, Cheney, Biden by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    What in the hell is the deal with Vice Presidents since Dan Quayle?

    The only logical explanation is the Presidents are assured a statistically more likely term of service without an assassination attempt.

    Surely, McCain didn't pick Palin for the Alaskan electoral college.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Quayle, Gore, Cheney, Biden by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 2

      There is an old Republican tactic where you run someone that seems more moderate as President to capture the swing voters but then you run an attack dog as Vice President to appeal to the extremists in your party and keep them voting.

      Politics is theatre remember.

  29. Two years of community college heck just hire.... by Mister+Null · · Score: 1

    Two years of community college heck just hire the older workers that you let go because you thought they were too old.

  30. Why is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that no one notices when an IT project goes way over budget and is a complete failure?
    Like when we pay $500 million for a web site.
    Where'd the money go?
    Sometimes I wonder if we just hire stupid people with a language barrier to hide what's really going on.
    Hmmm...

  31. Replace our Politicians with H1-B hires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then the circle will be complete. Or at least the politicians will achieve self-awareness.

  32. Re:Two years of community college heck just hire.. by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

    Or invest in training, although they won't do this because it is cheaper to layoff someone and replace them with a H1-B visa worker.

    --
    "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
  33. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    Sigh. Poe's law once again.

    I was illustrating the absurdity of racism charges against opponents of illegal immigration.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  34. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Universities are a HUGE business with their tentacles in the government structure and in society's mind. Selling information, enforcing a feudal social model.

  35. Re:4 year degrees have a lot theory & fluff / by Nemyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're not fluff. They're just not about getting a job, but about getting an education. If all you want is a degree, go to a technical school. You'll be happy. University is (or rather, should be) for people who want to learn and expand their knowledge, even in fields unrelated with what they hope to be doing once they graduate.

    The "4 years places" you speak of so lowly may not have professors doing IT work, but they have highly knowledgeable researchers who have done stuff you wouldn't even be able to grasp for years, often decades. They're just not the people I'd ask about IT.

  36. Appre by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our best employees are the ones that have not been through the debt claiming process of getting a degree

    Biden is insisting that the H-1B program must go on because it provides a sort of "apprenticeships" to foreigners

    Well, I was from China, but am an American and I can speak with the view of a foreigner (the one from China) and that of an American and I can tell you that if America does not stop giving "apprenticeships" to foreigners one day there will be no more jobs for Americans

    The old way of giving "apprenticeships" for "foreigners" was the way I got mine - When I landed on the soil of the USA I was a young refugee without a full secondary school education

    I had my "apprenticeships" inside America because I had no place to go and after I graduated from college (with no debt, since I worked 3 jobs on the side - sometimes more than 3 jobs - while studying) I worked at American technology companies where I got further training.

    After that I started my own companies, sold some of them, and re-invested what I got into other startup and made even more

    In other words, while America provided "apprenticeships" for me this former "apprentice" stayed put in America and started businesses in America and created many job opportunities for other Americans

    On the other hand, the way H-1B visa program works is that it provides "apprenticeships" for foreigners, and they got back to their own country, taking their skills with them, start up their own businesses in their own countries, create job opportunities for their own people, not Americans

    Who loses in this game ?

    The Americans

    Who win ? The foreigners

    Folks, especially you Americans out there --- please top the politicians, no matter from which political party they came from, from destroying America from the inside out

    What Biden is doing is to cut out the innards of America and give it to the foreigners

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Appre by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't people coming here on H1-Bs, but their difficulty in turn that into a green card. The "apprentices" would mostly stay here if they could. And does anyone really want to argue that immigration of well-educated, highly-skilled engineers is bad for America?

      All the focus on the political immigration debate seems to be on low-skilled workers, and the answers aren't so easy there. But anyone who can come here and work a job that pays $100k+? Keep em coming, I say.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Appre by AchilleTalon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mod up the parent. Skilled people are a plus for America if they can stay.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:Appre by Third+Position · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Highly skilled" does not necessarily mean "highly in demand". Given that there are highly skilled Americans that can't find work, yes I will argue they're bad for America.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    4. Re:Appre by digsbo · · Score: 0

      Something's wrong on the internet. You haven't been called a racist yet.

      Oh, wait, you're foreign born. Never mind, carry on!

    5. Re: Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I could agree, but my experience with the most highly talented IT development talent from India counters this. The majority of those I talked with had a similar plan: come to the U.S., get 5 years of experience, head back to India to jump up in level (become directors or vp's).
      I don't blame them. Move away from your family and culture for money? That's not an enticing long term plan. Instead, they move away for a relatively short time then head back to the family and culture they love to be even more prosperous.
      No... The H1-B program is a way of making people more successful in their home country not to bring that knowledge and talent into the U.S. on a permanent basis.

    6. Re:Appre by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      "Highly skilled" does not necessarily mean "highly in demand". Given that there are highly skilled Americans that can't find work, yes I will argue they're bad for America.

      This hasn't been my experience. It's hard to find qualified people - they've all got decent jobs already. It's the unskilled workers that are struggling with unemployment (and underemployment).

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    7. Re: Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes
      Since they have a lower cosi bias they can always work cheaper.
      The question is who is supposed to benefit. Americans? America? Or Corporations.
      An not all H1Bs are the best and brightest. Many only have the equivalent of a 2 year degree.
      If this appentiship program is so good. Why doesn't those buissnesses enrole more Americans.
      The answer is it is not for the benifit of Americans.

    8. Re:Appre by drmoorevt · · Score: 1

      After 8 years of full time employment and graduate study here in the US, I have come to the same conclusion:

      On average, a highly-skilled STEM immigrant produces more jobs than they consume.

      I'd rather offer a path to citizenship for each graduating STEM student (and their immediate family) who have employment lined up. Then we could regulate the number of immigrant-potential-citizens at the student visa level.

    9. Re:Appre by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > On the other hand, the way H-1B visa program works is that it provides "apprenticeships" for foreigners, and they got back to their own country, taking their skills with them, start up their own businesses in their own countries, create job opportunities for their own people, not Americans

      We did not invest in this person for 16 years in the public school system. This is better than an American leaving the US after her frist job and starting up the company you mention that employs foreigners. So honestly I do not get what you are whining about.

    10. Re:Appre by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked in the U.S. for six years on TN visas. I would have loved to have gotten a green card and stayed, and invested back in the community where I lived. Unfortunately, the U.S. immigration laws aren't created to favour those from other countries who come, work, pay taxes, keep their noses clean, contribute to the community, etc. Why do people have to be refugees to get a fair shake?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    11. Re:Appre by Minwee · · Score: 2

      The skilled people are already there. They just aren't willing to work for "apprentice" rates.

    12. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I've been trying to hire mere mid-career system administrators for a year now. Three times we've tried to hire someone, and they've backed out for some reason or another. And the company I work is a good one, with significant growth prospects and a good culture. The problem is, there are other ones with similar pay and prospects.

      We're NOT going to hire H1-Bs, for various reasons, but it's oddly been a hassle finding someone to pay $80-100K a year. If people aren't finding jobs, they either don't have the skills for fields that are hiring, or they aren't trying very hard. In that case, the H1-Bs aren't the problem.

      I am not a fan of the H1-B program. I've seen too many wage slaves sending all their meagre money back to India, and getting booted out once we've trained them, only to be replaced by those who have skills but aren't close to getting their Green Card. Still, I don't know that we can blame tech employment issues on the program. Not while I can't hire someone for a pretty damn standard job.

    13. Re: Appre by purpledinoz · · Score: 2

      If this is how people from India are using the H1B program, then it makes sense that wages will be driven down. I think people from other countries like China want to stay in the US. Another problem is the H1B basically makes you a slave to the company. If you get laid off, you have to leave. Also, switching jobs is really hard. In Germany, you have one year of unemployment, then you may have to leave. This one year also gives you enough time to find another job.

    14. Re:Appre by HuguesT · · Score: 2

      This is not so insightful.

      1- Foreigners who do come to America and then leave after a short period (a few years) do not take long-term jobs away from Americans. Clearly the jobs these undertake are like internships, post docs and other temp positions, these jobs are not meant as career jobs who would be of interest to an American.
      2- Foreigners who come to America, get some training and then leave are *good* for America. These people will know and like America, will speak english, will have a network of friends and people they know back in America. If they start companies, maybe these companies will be friendly to America as well: import stuff from there, rely on American technology, and whatnot. The importance of creating goodwill cannot be overestimated.

      How people who come on a H1B for a non-training job, and then stay by being sponsored for a green card, this is a different story. But notice that these people eventually become American. This has been a recognised way to extend the power and importance of the USA for a long time, because the best and brightest come to America to the detriment of the country they leave.

      In reality the job situation in the USA is not nearly as dire as some people make it, compared with most other countries around the world. What is not so nice is that unemployed people have it very tough, very quickly. Better not fall sick.

    15. Re:Appre by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

      American are stupid/insane, they keep voting for the same people but expecting a different result.

      --
      "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
    16. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no test for "best and brightest" and there's no shortage of highly skilled American talent. The whole skills shortage is a lie perpetuated by greedy billionaires.

      American talent - and foreign visa workers lose. The number of unemployed aka "benched" foreign visa workers is shocking. They live in terrible conditions in packed tenement and unable to speak out for fear of being deported and disgracing their families.

    17. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. America is pleased to give you these opportunities and everybody here is too. You need to realize that the real America is built on everbody working together including foreigners and that spirit will keep us working together long after all other things are factored out.

    18. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The skilled people are already there. They just aren't willing to work for "apprentice" rates.

      If "skilled" in this case means "just completed a 2 year community college degree," then those people may overestimate their worth. Regardless of what DeVry tells you, a 2 year degree does not entitle you to a six figure salary. Regardless of what the University of Phoenix tells you, a 2-year (or even 4-year) degree does not qualify you to jump into any random company and be immediately productive: your first job is going to be an "apprentice."

    19. Re:Appre by BVis · · Score: 2

      I don't think you understand what "community college" is. DeVry, UofP, etc. are not community colleges, they are for-profit diploma mills that employ far more salespeople than instructors. A two-year degree or certificate from your local CC carries far more weight than a for-profit degree, and is far far FAR cheaper.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    20. Re:Appre by BVis · · Score: 1

      16? We don't pay for people to go to college in this country (no matter how good an idea it is). You get your 12, your useless diploma, and then you pay up if you don't want a job where you either 1) wear a paper hat and a nametag or 2) wade through other people's shit all day.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    21. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem we have now is that America already has a lot of highly skilled engineers and other STEM-trained workers who are jobless. If we had a serious shortage of STEM experts, or if we had only a small excess, then your logic holds that it would be good to have more. The problem we face is we have a huge excess, and that doesn't really help us. It's doing two things: driving down employment of the existing workforce (which in turn damages our economy and creates other burdens), and it's shifting salaries to foreigners who often don't spend it all here on American products.

      My direct experience with a large number of H-1Bs and other work visa options is that companies can get away with paying them a lot less. The CEO at my company believes that engineering work is not really that high-tech, and that a person managing money is worth far more than a person performing STEM work. He values finance officers because they manage his "profit" but he does not value engineers, the people that make his profit. He is not an engineer, he is a business graduate, leading a company that does engineering work. So he does everything he can to drive down the cost of engineering, which to him is salaries, lots of them. He has relatively few business people working for him, and he pays them handsomely for what they do.

    22. Re:Appre by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      Even with a good degree, a lot of times you still wade through people shit all day, just not literally.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    23. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet most of us don't have a problem with a foreign US student who graduates here, staying here and adding to our economy. That's not what the bulk of the H1-B visas do though - they bring people, educated overseas, here for jobs that US people could do for basic sysadmin, coding hacks, etc, taking jobs from the US citizens with the same (or better) skills, driving down wages.

    24. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our best employees are the ones that have not been through the debt claiming process of getting a degree

      Biden is insisting that the H-1B program must go on because it provides a sort of "apprenticeships" to foreigners

      Well, I was from China, but am an American and I can speak with the view of a foreigner (the one from China) and that of an American and I can tell you that if America does not stop giving "apprenticeships" to foreigners one day there will be no more jobs for Americans

      The old way of giving "apprenticeships" for "foreigners" was the way I got mine - When I landed on the soil of the USA I was a young refugee without a full secondary school education

      I had my "apprenticeships" inside America because I had no place to go and after I graduated from college (with no debt, since I worked 3 jobs on the side - sometimes more than 3 jobs - while studying) I worked at American technology companies where I got further training.

      After that I started my own companies, sold some of them, and re-invested what I got into other startup and made even more

      In other words, while America provided "apprenticeships" for me this former "apprentice" stayed put in America and started businesses in America and created many job opportunities for other Americans

      On the other hand, the way H-1B visa program works is that it provides "apprenticeships" for foreigners, and they got back to their own country, taking their skills with them, start up their own businesses in their own countries, create job opportunities for their own people, not Americans

      Who loses in this game ?

      The Americans

      Who win ? The foreigners

      Folks, especially you Americans out there --- please top the politicians, no matter from which political party they came from, from destroying America from the inside out

      What Biden is doing is to cut out the innards of America and give it to the foreigners

      So you are a foreigner who thinks that more foreigners should not be allowed in. I presume you do know that the US is a nation of immigrants right from the beginning and while on H1B people can apply for a PR and don't necessarily have to return back. They might as well do what you did and bring more jobs and revenue to the nation. Concerned about foreigners? Might as well go back to china and be an example of a good citizen!

    25. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try doing that as a refugee. They've got 85,000 plus kids stuck in detention on the border and THEY haven't even been given refugee status.

      H1B Visa people have a hard time converting to Green Cards likely because large companies want it that way. They pay the lobbyists and government here dances to their tune.

      "We're sorry, we are forced to exploit you for 4 more years while you can't work for anyone else and we pay you half what we would have to pay for an American. Sure we do POST want-ads, for labor, but nobody has these specific qualities because we tailor the want ad to the person we plan to hire anyway."

      I've seen want ads for companies in my area of expertise for over two years -- what's that all about?

    26. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We're NOT going to hire H1-Bs, for various reasons, but it's oddly been a hassle finding someone to pay $80-100K a year.

      It's "oddly a hassle" because you, and the rest of the tech industry, are refusing to do what the market demands: increase salaries.

    27. Re:Appre by thedonger · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't people coming here on H1-Bs, but their difficulty in turn that into a green card. The "apprentices" would mostly stay here if they could. And does anyone really want to argue that immigration of well-educated, highly-skilled engineers is bad for America?

      All the focus on the political immigration debate seems to be on low-skilled workers, and the answers aren't so easy there. But anyone who can come here and work a job that pays $100k+? Keep em coming, I say.

      I work for a company that had at least three if not four H1-B workers (as programmers), and other than paperwork and a couple grand for the lawyer getting a green card was not a problem for them. That's an admittedly small sample size. What roadblocks have you seen?

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    28. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope, it is more about expanding the possible talent pool; also those people come to live here; pay taxes and eventually become citizens.
      USA is created by immigrants; and we definitely want to keep attracting the best and brightest and we should welcome them.

    29. Re:Appre by trevize42 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a UNIX Sys admin... that 80-100k a year is likely your problem. 80-100k was competitive 15 years ago..

    30. Re:Appre by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      This hasn't been my experience. It's hard to find qualified people - they've all got decent jobs already.

      You know what that means? It means THE JOB YOU'RE OFFERING ISN'T DECENT!

      Your problem is entirely due to your unwillingness or inability to make your company an attractive prospect. Fix that instead of whining about how people aren't stupid enough to accept your shit pay/conditions/etc.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    31. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't people coming here on H1-Bs, but their difficulty in turn that into a green card. The "apprentices" would mostly stay here if they could. And does anyone really want to argue that immigration of well-educated, highly-skilled engineers is bad for America?

      All the focus on the political immigration debate seems to be on low-skilled workers, and the answers aren't so easy there. But anyone who can come here and work a job that pays $100k+? Keep em coming, I say.

      Immigration of educated, skilled engineers is bad for some groups in America. Such groups might be forced to compete with immigrants for there same pool of "diversity" jobs. :-D
      And you might, just might get immigrants not from there areas that are desired - for example from Eastern/Southern Europe.
      European immigrants - that is soo XIX century ... they are mostly white. This cannot be good for America.
      Instead of living somewhere in the US, I am living in my Carpathian den and will change next year from employee to employer - I will provide offshore services to US companies, but spend money here, not in the US.
      I would move to the US, but without permission to legally work there - I will spend my money and pay taxes somewhere else.

    32. Re:Appre by NickGnome · · Score: 2
      The problem is that the feral federal government has been giving out
      50K to 100K too many H-1B visas;
      500 to 380K too many H visas of all kinds;
      32K to 139K too many L visas;
      160K to 530K too many F visas;
      170K to 330K too many J visas;
      500 to 3K too many E3 visas;
      2K to 10K too many M visas;
      2K to 20K too many O visas;
      200K to 400K too many green cards... for decades. And their standards are far too low, and they've never run proper background investigations on visa applicants. And they've never tracked those on temporary visas well enough to make sure they've gone or can be sent back home within a couple days of when their visas expire.
      ...

      Very few H-1B recipients are highly skilled. Very few US citizen STEM professionals are highly skilled. In every occupation and every industry, there are very few who are great and many who are good, many who are mediocre, and many who are low-skilled, and a few who should be embarrassed and seek some other field in which they might be able to do better.

      Now, a very few who are indeed brilliant but ignorant should be admitted to our universities; and some 5%-10% of those should be admitted to apprenticeship programs after their first year or two, and then to paid employment employment, so long as they stand in line behind the equally capable US citizens.

      Yes, we need to find, admit, and retain that top 0.00005% or less (reality-check: let's see 7G... 0.000025%; double that to be generous; 5 out of every 100K) assuming they can also pass a proper background investigation; not drop all standards, rubber-stamp every applicant, and worsen the over-population and over-crowding to no purpose. And once they've met the standards we should eagerly accept and embrace them and help them become thoroughgoing Americans by learning about the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Federalist and anti-Federalist articles, the US constitution, American War for Independence, Civil War, apple pie, baseball, football... while bringing the best of their cultures with them.

      Yes, the difficulty of a guest-worker moving from one employer/sponsor to another means that the guest-workers must be more pliant, more willing to go along with the employer's unethical activities, less willing to blow the whistle on being under-paid or any other abuses. That's not a core issue, but a side-issue that can be taken care of after the fundamentals have been reformed. Giving them all green cards only makes the STEM talent glut (and other economic problems) grow geometricallly worse as they sponsor their friends and relatives for more green cards.

    33. Re:Appre by bitSmiter · · Score: 2

      Having taught at both a community college, and a couple of for-profit mills, I can absolutely say that the quality of instruction (and of the students themselves) is much higher at the mills.

      You pay a high price for that, and it's absolutely true that the sales team is much larger and better treated than faculty. But as a teacher used to the Mills' "get it done" attitude, I constantly found myself stonewalled at the local CC. Even over things as simple as getting copies made or printers/computers repaired.

      At the Mills, there's a copier in the teacher's (cramped/shared) work area, and 2 more in other areas that nobody minds you using in a pinch. At the CC, there is one copier for the entire building (identical to the mill copiers). It has a 3-person staff and a 24-hour minimum turnaround for orders.

    34. Re:Appre by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      1- Some of the foreigners who come to the USA and then leave after a short period (a few years) do not take long-term jobs away from Americans, and are good for the USA, and some are bad for the USA (they cost US tax-victims for all that infra-structure investment including our universities, a few bring diseases with them...).
      ...

      2- Some of the foreigners who come to the USA, get some education and/or training and then leave are *good* for the USA, while others (e.g. bin Laden, or that POW general we let go during the American War for Independence who turned around and just about caught the Virginia governor Thomas Jefferson and legislature including Patrick Henry) are bad for the USA.

      3- Some of the aliens who come to the USA, get some education, some training, and then stay and work in the USA are good for the USA (e.g. couple university profs and C*Os I've known), while others are bad for the USA (e.g. Faisal Shahzad the would-be Times Square bomber, the several Red Chinese spies caught over the last several decades and thousands more who were not caught; the Israeli who gained citizenship a few decades back and was a spy; other foreign-born university profs and C*Os).

      4- Many of the aliens who come to the USA without bothering to get a visa, or who stay in the USA after their visas have expired are bad for the USA (extra burden on education system, welfare expenditures, other crimes they commit; e.g. Uncle Omar; Aunt Zeituni, MS13); but it is likely that a very few are good for the USA.

      The brushes are too broad, and people can repent and reform. The problem is the lack of standards, the lack of sorting out the individuals, and issuing too many foreign student visas, too many guest-workers, too many exchange visitors, too many green cards. It would be different if, ceteris paribus, USA population had dropped to 10M and was still falling; then we could maybe use a couple million foreign students and guest-workers and immigrants (who whole-heartedly loved our founding principles) each year until population stabilized.

      In reality the job situation in the USA is extremely bad, compared with US history. We've almost always had low unemployment, and low consumer prices relative to wages... until recently. Indentured servants earned enough to endow several counties' educational systems. A few pennies could buy enough food to satisfy for several days. And though there were periods of inflation and deflation, Friedman & Schwartz _A Monetary History of the United States_ and other economic histories have shown that, except for the time of the War for Independence, these were small blips compared to the gyrations since the creation of the Federal Reserve board.

      That's what made it possible for people to more rapidly improve their socio-economic status, so long as they were able and willing to work. And now the US government (executive, legislative, judicial) are working as hard as they can to worsen the situation, discourage saving, discourage productivity, encourage bodyshopping and discourage employment.

    35. Re:Appre by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      > We don't pay for people to go to college in this country

      Um, what? Assuming you are here in the US, then you are simply wrong. The government pays a very large percentage of the cost of public school tuition by subsidizing in various ways, and it pays a smaller but still substantial percentage of private school tuition by subsidizing in fewer various ways. So, pretty much just like K-12, except that percentage isn't 100%.

    36. Re:Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is missing a significant part of the story here. "only after proving there are no qualified Americans", is mostly FALSE. These large companies find ways to "prove" by bending the truth and finding loopholes in the regulations. I wouldn't mind the H-1B visa program if these companies exhausted all avenues of finding qualified American citizens first. But they don't because H-1B visa holders are cheaper. There are multiple downsides to using H-1B visa holders that the companies ignore. One of these is the cultural and language barrier. The executives don't have to deal directly with the H-1B visa holders but the technical leads do. Project requirements get missed all the time because H-1B visa holders don't understand what is asked of them due to these cultural and language barriers. I could go on but I'll stop there.

    37. Re:Appre by lgw · · Score: 1

      I disagree. If you can hold down a professional job in America, you should get a green card (after only a criminal background check). If you can hold down any job in America, you should get a work visa (after only a criminal background check). The only way in which legal immigration can be bad for us is when people come here without jobs to consume federal programs. Have a job? Welcome aboard!

      If native population were growing fast, it might be a different story, but since native population is shrinking (birth rate below replacement rate), we need people, those with professional skills preferred.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    38. Re:Appre by nobodie · · Score: 1

      But consider this other news from the NYT just yesterday (for me anyway):
      http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07...
      (It's paywalled after ten articles per month)
      Why bring this up? Well this American "Master's degree" is shocking from top to bottom:
      1) a 14 page Master's thesis???? WTF, My Master's was 80 pages plus 10 pages of quant data that I made into a poster for better clarity
      2) He used end notes for his thesis paper, five effin' pages of end notes? Most of which were "ibid?"
      3) Who the hell was his supervisor? Looking at the sheer volume of copy and paste material and the sources (mostly googley available source stuff from gov or other reliable information providers) I can't believe even for a minute that anyone actually read that paper and didn't say "Whoa, this is word for word from... Oh, I see, he has an end note for the source, hmm, no quotation marks or other in-text tools like reporting verbs, phrases, hmmm, he'll need to make some changes.... hmmm, this paper is crap, but he has the sources to back it up and if he had done the attribution right it would be ok. Hmm, better send him an e-mail for a meeting tomorrrow!" How long did that take?
      4) because of 3, the War College is also, maybe equally, to blame for this trash.

      Again, what is the connection? This Masters is just like dozens, hundreds or thousands of Asian Masters degrees awarded every year. I saw many of them as a university Lecturer in Asia, and so we can consider this example, something we see as horrible plagiarism being not just not good but standard now in the Army War College as well as all over Asia. My friends, you are looking at the future of education. A world where a Master's degree will have a standardized test you have to take because you can't be trusted to do real thesis quality work because that paper exists just to get you a job. Most of my students today (but not all, thankfully not all) are in class with the goal of getting a piece of paper that gets them a job, that is their goal.
      They are supported in this by the American government, and governments all over the world who see testing as a way to standardize what people know.
      I'm pissed off, so I'll just shut up now....

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    39. Re:Appre by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's that or else they have completely unrealistic requirements for the job, are unwilling to invest in employees by training them, and sit around and whine that they can't find someone with experience in a dozen obscure and niche technologies.

    40. Re:Appre by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Or that there are more jobs than there are people to fill them. If everyone qualified already has a job, then you can offer more money/stability/whatever to fill your position, but only by poaching someone from another company. They're then in the same position as you, so there's still a skills shortage.

      From the grandparent's post though, the key words are 'mid-career'. It sounds like they want another company to train people and then they'll poach them later. The problem is that lots of companies are no longer offering entry-level jobs and the ones that do are much better at retention. If you want mid-career people then you need to start training some...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. only talked to CEOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 CEO's but not one layed off person? only 18,000 from Microsoft alone.....

  38. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

    I'm for unlimited work visas. I'm afraid neither of Indians who want to live and work here nor Mexicans who want to live and work here. I see both as positive for this is the land of opportunity and freedom.

  39. Same lies told about Canadian TFWP by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Informative

    They said that they needed Temporary Foreign Workers and it would lead to full time jobs in Canada too.

    And then the media got off their butts and figured out that it was really being used to provide cheap labour in Canadian restaurants instead of hiring local teens.

    H1-B is a giant sucking sound of jobs being outsourced to India, and I don't mean native tribal lands here in North America.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Same lies told about Canadian TFWP by callahan2211 · · Score: 0

      Basically what I said in my post, but I got 0 Karma. I think karma function is: int karma(){ return rand(0,5);} I agree with you 100% btw. How long ago did this happen in Canada?

      --
      "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
    2. Re:Same lies told about Canadian TFWP by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Happened this summer, mostly May and June. Details in Vancouver Sun and Vancouver Province and Georgia Straight, and Globe and Mail.

      Comrade Harper had to "suspend" the TFWP because it meant his Conservative Party was not going to be reelected, and was going to lose half it's seats.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:Same lies told about Canadian TFWP by BobandMax · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! If they were actually hiring Native Americans and lifting them out of poverty and dependence, I would support them wholeheartedly. All they want, as many other posters have noted, is abusable workers that they can pay sub-market wages.

      --

      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Same lies told about Canadian TFWP by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'd be happy if we could open up code shops on Indian Reservations here and help get a lot of those kids out of their cycle of poverty and alcoholism.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  40. Re:4 year degrees have a lot theory & fluff / by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

    4 year degrees have a lot theory with big sides of fluff / filler classes.

    While tech schools and community college have teachers who have been / still are working in a real work place doing IT work.

    the 4 years places not so much.

    Can't say for today, but my 4 year school I went through in 6 years (co-op programs spread things out); and near the end, most of my seminars were taught by either domain experts or people taking a sabbatical from their day job to teach what they had learned.

    The theory courses were what has kept me employed since... there's a difference between a real CS degree (being able to do the math and work the concepts) and being a code jockey. The second has a much lower glass ceiling.

  41. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Free market - they are filling jobs locals don't want to do for the money being offered - apparently it's only a one way free market - surprise, surprise, surprise. Using the car analogy Unions provide for lanes travelling in the other direction, from the top down to the bottom. Want change unionise and kill the H-1Bs.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  42. These are the guys you voted for ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

    ... if you were hoping for friends of high paying, non-government, white collar jobs, perhaps Obama/Biden wasn't the smartest choice, my coder bros ...

    1. Re:These are the guys you voted for ... by schnell · · Score: 1

      Why, because the Republicans - so notoriously unfriendly to business - would have cracked down and decreased H1Bs? Not bloody likely. At best, knowing today's Republican party, they would have upped H1B quotas but stipulated "no Mexicans" to assuage the Arizona contingent.

      Note that I say this as someone who is a GOP apostate but nonetheless is technically one of the approximately four registered Republicans in the greater Seattle area. Today's GOP sadly fails to understand that, given the rest of their pro-business policies, they would have Silicon Valley in their pocket if they just learned to stop yammering on about eeeevilution, gay marriage and "Obamacare gave me leprosy!" A lot of the tech world would flock to their cause if they stopped clinging to idiotic social conservative policies that alienate everyone in America who isn't white, Christian and over 50 years old.

      Long story short to the OP - don't use this as a tool to bash Biden/Obama, because the Republican ticket would have jacked up H1B quotas, not reduced them. If you're anti-H1B, you may not like the current administration policies but they are no worse than the alternative.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:These are the guys you voted for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you may not like the current administration policies but they are no worse than the alternative.

      Although I am not a GOP voter, I do agree with you. That and you summed up the US democracy in that one sentence...

    3. Re:These are the guys you voted for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mexicans can get TN visas of which there is no limit, unlike H1Bs.

    4. Re:These are the guys you voted for ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they are worse than the alternative because if a Republican president would have done all the IRS, NSA, and other crap that Obama has done, the press would be ripping them a new asshole everyday and twice on Sunday. They are giving Obama a pass on everything because they helped get him elected.

  43. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    Technically nativism or tribalism, although race can be a contributing factor.

  44. Resources that you can abuse... by mdelcorso · · Score: 1

    The H1-B "requirement" that causes there to be no Americans "qualified" to take the job is the willingness to be abused.

    They are made to work essentially 24/7, they get paid shit and they are treated like disposable napkins. The immorality of H1-B is absolutely disgusting.

    1. Re:Resources that you can abuse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast gulf of different attitudes to H1Bs in threads like this is amazing. 5 years out of my PhD and I have not yet met 1 H1-B who I would way that about. The only aspect of bad treatment I've seen is the years that Indian and Chinese H1-Bs have to wait for a green card, such that their job flexibility is limited and their salaries probably are a little depressed as a result (though not much from what I hear from them).

  45. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > If we're going to open up our southern border...

    The problem with H1-Bs is not that they "feruhners". The problem with H1-Bs is that they are an underclass that's at the mercy of the company that imported them. They are even lower on the totem pole than underpaid undocumented Mexicans.

    If you are an H1-B, ICE knows exactly where to find you if you get too "uppity".

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  46. You can sign a petition speak to your politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Senator blasts Microsoft for hb1 push and firing 18000 workers
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kedfVAbXNy0&sns=em
    and here is a petition to stop the hb1
    http://www.petition2congress.com/7637/abolish-h1b-visa-program/

  47. So Biden met with some Lobbyists.. this is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just doens't qualify much thought.. little thought in, little thought out

  48. Biden briefs governors. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I thought the verb was "pantsing". As in VP Biden pantsed the governors while yelling "it's going to happen! Just give in a enjoy it!"

  49. Re:Mandatory IQ Tests for Politicians?? by sumdumass · · Score: 0

    Plausible deniability..

    However, some comments made by politicians make s 60 IQ seem like a mensa candidate. I mean we have that guy from texas who thought the term black hole was a sexist and racial derogotory term. Snd there was that senator who feared an island would flip over. Of coursd nanci pelosi gives us s few good ones too.

  50. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by Entrope · · Score: 1

    Unions are an incredibly poor way to control abusive employer tactics unless workers in the bargaining unit are basically fungible -- and knowledge workers are not. A much better approach would be something like an online exchange for H-1B job postings, where US-based employees can register their interest for a job opening (along with their current and/or target salary) and see whether the job eventually goes to someone with permanent work authorization in the US and what the salary is, and perhaps see an anonymized summary of the eventual hire's qualifications relative to the posting's requirements. This would give employees most of the information necessary to (decide whether to) file a complaint either with immigration authorities or in court.

  51. College is useful for most ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I didn't see a problem with Biden's comments and makes me wonder if Computerworld is nothing more then an industry sympathizer, or worse they are being bought off buy the tech industry to make sensationalism rants instead of pointed to the facts.

    I did find a problem with his comments on companies claiming if they couldn't find qualified US born workers they can fill out the jobs with H-1B workers, I seriously question this whole "highly-skilled" H-1B nonsense, to me a lot of these jobs are nowhere near highly-skilled, and these companies are looking for nothing more the cheap, dangerously close to slave, labor. And who is really keeping an eye on these American born jobs seekers? Are these companies looking for US born workers or are they in fact being passed over for H-1B workers! Companies have a pretty pathetic application/Interview process which seems intentional fixed so they can come up with excuses to hire H-1B labor.

    I believe anyone should get an opportunity to work in any field they want, no matter where their from. But lets call this out for what it really is. Monopolistic companies/corporations looking to have cheap throw away labor, and they've proven they can buy off just about anyone of influence and political power to try and get what they want. However if the general voting populace doesn't agree with the crap their politicians are trying to lie to them over then these companies are going to lose out. This is a roller coaster topic with the public commenting on being against it, then saying its not as bad as first thought, and they change their opinions yet again.

  52. Re:Mandatory IQ Tests for Politicians?? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about all those maned mars missions.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  53. Highly Skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the jobs that companies provide each year to highly-skilled H-1B visa holders could in fact be done by Americans with no more than a two-year community college degree."

    Wow.. So is that what they regard "Highly Skilled" as in USA? Kind of explains a lot...

  54. Isn't this tantamount to an Admission of Fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    One of the requirements for an H1-b is that there is no qualified American to take the job. When these CEOs admit that these jobs can be done by Americans they are admitting to H1b fraud.

  55. Re:Open Up Borders to Everyone! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never knew you were Jewish.

  56. Re:Mandatory IQ Tests for Politicians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be careful with term limits. I support them, but one thing to be aware of is that if we had them, the lobbiests would know the system/game better than the politicians leading to them having more power to influence things... see California State Govt.

  57. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 1

    Want change unionise and kill the H-1Bs.

    I like the way you think but killing migrant workers is still illegal in my state.

  58. Re: H-1b should not be used for lower-level worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a person on an H-1B visa making 100k+/yr I'd like to comment that they do have to fill out what the prevailing salary is for your position in the application to prevent salary dumping.
    However I have no idea where the companies get those averages from or how accurate they actually are :)

  59. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The purpose of the H1-B visa program is to devalue intellectual labor within the US. That's it. Numerous studies have shown that the original claims of pursuing the brightest minds around the world is a farce -- and that there is no significant difference between foreign and domestic engineers/scientists/etc. Some H1-B VISA recipients find a way to stay here, but many will go back to their home countries and take their experience/skills with them.

    The gist of the whole thing is that STEM workers are devalued and lesser empowered than they would be. Meanwhile politicians keep pushing STEM education despite the fact that there is nowhere for them to go, especially in the life sciences.

    We either need LESS STEM/H1-B workers, or more jobs to put them in. As it stands you've got the most intelligent people in the country living like they have a high school diploma for the sheer reason that they love the work enough to endure that kind of disrespect (we can leave the CS/IT crowd out which is clearly compensated much higher). And just you wait until the workplace is filled with people that have used computers since infancy and were required to code in high school --- then your IT/CS jobs will lose value and purpose as well.

    Now is a great time to start thinking about a major change in world view and what it means to be a nationalist and what truly incentivizes the most powerful people on earth (by power, I mean intellect, not wealth and legacy). World order and basic incomes are a good place to start, but those are cans of worms I'm not trying to focus this topic on -- but as it stands, a major change will be required for the people to adapt to international politics, resources, and global issues that can no longer be ignored.

  60. If Cheney was Bush's Vader, then Biden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is Obama's Jar Jar Binks.

    There, I've said it. The guy's a complete moron who went straight from college to a seat in congress with even less real-world work experience than Obama. The one truly brilliant act of Joe Biden's professional life was that he insisted everybody call him "lunchbox Joe" and after a bout a decade, all his voters thought he had been a "regular blue collar guy" like them.

    [sarc]Now I'm probably going to end up on the "no-fly" list and get audited[/sarc]

  61. Best statement ever by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    What Biden is saying is that there is systematic and widespread abuse of the H1-B visa program.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  62. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    That's great, but you cannot ignore that it reduces the wage you can command on average in the market. Wages are prices controlled by supply and demand, and fewer opportunities are open to you because you have no degree. Yes, you can say those employers are ignorant, but it doesn't really matter.

  63. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by jrumney · · Score: 1

    The only requirement in fact is that you be willing to work in an "apprenticeship" (code word for jobs paying significantly less than market rate salaries).

  64. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main complain about H-1b is that they depress wages. I think it can be easily resolved by getting companies bid for visas with wages. With limited number of visas whoever offers higher salary gets to import the workers. The cutoff wage should be published. If it gets too low, the number of visas are decreased. If it's too high - increased.

    1. Re:Simple solution by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      I was going to post this exact idea. If these jobs are really in such high demand, the salaries will reflect that.
      It may not help the situation on the high end (e.g. H1B making $150k, instead of the industry average $200k for a given position) but it would certainly eliminate the problem on the cheap end

  65. The hidden H-1b loophole Microsoft and greedy bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Greedy billionaires want to keep a hidden loophole in H-1b visa law a secret. Under existing law it is 100% legal for companies to hire exclusively offshore for jobs in your zip code AND it is perfectly legal for companies for replace Americans in their jobs with foreign citizens on corporate visas... Also, there is NO test for "best and brightest" and most jobs filled by H-1b visa workers are entry level. The problem is thee law, not the people. Gotta love the best government money can buy.

    Get the facts www.brightfuturejobs.com

  66. Re: Yay! Hopenchange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a degree and I'm still against all this h1b visa bullshit.

  67. Provide apprenticeships to highly skilled workers? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

    Something is a bit off.

    If H-1B is for hiring foreign highly skilled worker -- people who have skills that just aren't available in the US workforce -- then how are they "apprentices"?

    Isn't an apprentice someone who is learning the trade, not someone who is teaching it to the "master"?

  68. too smart to go to college by anyaristow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This cultural indoctrination that you must have a degree must end. I've been programming for 30 years as a profession and I have never had a degree

    And I've worked with enough people who were so smart at 18 years old that they decided they didn't need to go to college that I've decided the requirement of a degree has some merit.

    Some of these people really are great at syntax and terminology, and a few of them are actually good at coding certain things, but mostly, they do things the hard way, they organize their projects around data when it is process that better defines what they're trying to accomplish, the write overly complex solutions to simple problems, they saddle their employer with unnecessary technology, and there are certain classes of problems that they simply can not solve at all. For one, why do they think it's funny that they don't know math, and that a solution involving guessing, approximation and unreasonable process limitation is an acceptable alternative to algebra?

    In short, they suck at problem solving. That's not a surprise since the first adult problem they faced, they took a shortcut.

    1. Re:too smart to go to college by Packgrog · · Score: 1

      There are also plenty of people that I have worked with that had non-technical degrees that were OK coders but had major problems when it came to supportable code or efficient, thoughtful design. These people could churn out tons of code, but the stuff was nearly always more buggy and less well-thought-out than what has been produced by people that I've worked with that had technical degrees (either CS or engineering). These people generally love whatever flavor of the month technology might come up, but that doesn't mean that they have the careful foresight to apply it effectively.

      There are a lot of extremely bright people without 4-year degrees. There are also some useless people that have them. This is what interview questions are for, to determine whether someone can apply their knowledge effectively. For all of my complaints about the BUSINESS of higher education, there is still a great deal of benefit for developers to have been instructed about the underlying fundamentals of complex logic and software design. One of the best things about my otherwise miserable university experience was that their focus was on the theory rather than specific languages, as the tools are always constantly changing, but the methodology behind their use remains the same. The developers without this "useless" education often have a harder time doing sustainable work in the long term. After over 15 years of professional experience in the industry, those with a 4-year technical degree have consistently been better developers.

    2. Re:too smart to go to college by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

      That's not a surprise since the first adult problem they faced, they took a shortcut.

      Shortcuts are not bad at all, especially when you don't actually need the thing being offered. The people you speak of do not sound like real autodidacts, but the type of people who skip over the 'boring' stuff, don't bother to research what they actually need to know, and maybe even think they know a hell of a lot more than they actually do. These types are not being discussed, and in my opinion, colleges or universities can't fix such losers.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  69. The problem is H-1B visa law, not the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The problem is the law, not the people. Watch Dan Rather explain the secret loophole in H-1b visa law that companies don't want you to know here: here:http://www.brightfuturejobs.com/the_secret

    ----
    Did you know that ompanies can fill white-collar jobs with citizens from abroad without ever seeking local Americans first? Even worse, they can displace them. But they can't do so for their blue-collar jobs because Congress made sure that blue-collar workers have the first crack at jobs on U.S. soil.

    Because Congress isn't protecting Americans' opportunity to compete for jobs in our own country, national origin discrimination is now rampant in the tech industry. It's gotten so bad that companies brazenly post "No Americans Need Apply" job ads - and the DOJ busted IBM for posted such ads.

  70. Immigration is very nuanced by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

    This issue is conflated with the general issue of immigration, and they cite H-1B immigration reform with the issue of migrant agricultural workers to further confuse people about the state of American immigration. The jobs lost to H-1B visa recipients are not the low paying menial work that the average migrant worker has no interest in, they are taking skilled jobs that could serve to help assuage the issue of unemployment in America if we would just decide to "apprentice" our own neglected youth labor population. They don't need to be put through college, just a rigorous training regiment to give them the skills to be able to learn as they work, like a real apprenticeship, not this figurative wholesale of the American economy. I have the burning suspicion that they are using the immigrant work force in IT to prevent the burgeoning industry from ever becoming unionized or some other form of coherent worker self direction. I guess the model of debt incumbent home owners not going on strike has evolved into, debt incumbent immigrants don't have the rights to strike.

    1. Re:Immigration is very nuanced by BlackHeron717 · · Score: 1

      The jobs lost to H-1B visa recipients are not the low paying menial work that the average migrant worker has no interest in,

      I meant to say that the menial work is not the type of work that the average American is interested in, obviously the average migrant worker flocks to the type of low wage work that Americans despise.

    2. Re:Immigration is very nuanced by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Finger Math, "How many American's Spouces, Desendents, and Communities suffer from the H1B virus?"

  71. They take jobs today and tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how this had not been mentioned, but virtually all the largest users of the program are outsourcing firms. I've worked with all the big ones and the people who come over are not here for apprentice work, they are generally here to collect the requirements and send the actual work back to home base. They also aren't the best and brightest, or even average - takes 5x - 25x as much time, usually several people to do the job of one, and actually end up costing more.

    Even in this thread, I've seen the same logic I've seen corporations make - I can't find anyone else for $X. First of all, that's exactly not what the visas are supposed to solve - they are specifically bit supposed to be used to undercut wages (but they are). Second, if you hire someone for X and they only so a fifth of the work as someone competent, you would be better off pasting the competent person even $4X, especially since those 5 people doing 1 persons job need a manager and an account person, etc.

  72. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Hey, working 60+ hours per week is a bona fide occupational qualification for some jobs!

    No, no it is not. It means that one person is doing the work of two, and a so-called "job creator" is expecting them to pick up the tab for their greed. Of course, it's possible that this supposed job creator cannot afford to hire enough people to get the work done, in which case they should go out of business so that someone who can fill the need and pay a living wage can fill the gap, or so that potential customers find another, more cost-effective solution which can be implemented while paying a living wage.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  73. Re: Yay! Hopenchange! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took on the 10s of thousands in student loans just to prove I could code. I was teaching my college professor ui programming that they neglected to cover in his master's degree courses. They didnt teach me much that is actually useful. That piece of paper landed me a crap local gvmt programming position. Hardly worth it.

  74. Re:4 year degrees have a lot theory & fluff / by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The theory courses were what has kept me employed since... there's a difference between a real CS degree (being able to do the math and work the concepts) and being a code jockey. The second has a much lower glass ceiling.

    I'm working 15 years as a software engineer/consultant and I learned one thing: most of the time, the crappiest code is being produced by people with a CS degree.

  75. send them home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and keep the jobs here

  76. Might that still benefit the US another way? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    No... The H1-B program is a way of making people more successful in their home country not to bring that knowledge and talent into the U.S. on a permanent basis.

    As an outsider with no bias here, it occurs to me that the above is probably in the long-term interests of the US as well. India is a big place, with lots of people, many of whom today are struggling with things we take for granted in the West. Helping to improve things like education standards and technological advancement potentially develops a vast export market for US products and services in the future and/or a mutually advantageous trading partner.

    People often look at international aid schemes as charity, and support them on that basis, but the truth is that there is often a level of "enlightened self-interest" behind government support for those schemes, because things like global security and having stable economies in your trading partners are in everyone's interest. Much the same arguments could be made, as I understand it, for the US H1-B programme.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Might that still benefit the US another way? by gothzilla · · Score: 2

      If the H-1B process increased the number of jobs in the USA and gave all of those displaced workers better jobs then you'd be right, but you're not. It's very much the opposite. Those jobs are lost and all of those people end up fighting for much lower paid work, and many times have to take minimum-wage jobs.

  77. BIDEN FOR 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe Biden is a square shooter ... BIDEN FOR 2016

  78. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by Entrope · · Score: 1

    To clarify, both sentences in the first paragraph of my earlier comment were sarcastic. Working that many hours per week might be a BFOQ in rare instances of personal service work, and maybe (I personally doubt it) some operations jobs, but there is no way it would be accepted as a BFOQ for a development job.

  79. Sign my petition to stop H-1B Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started a petition to bring attention to and stop H1-B Visas. If it can happen int he tech industry it can happen in any industry; American jobs must be protected. I hope you will sign and pass it on! Just 2 clicks (or copy/pate); the link below, then one to sign. Thanks!

      https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-stealing-american-jobs-h-1b-visas/XJXY0FN0

  80. Re:Provide apprenticeships to highly skilled worke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something is a bit off.

    If H-1B is for hiring foreign highly skilled worker -- people who have skills that just aren't available in the US workforce -- then how are they "apprentices"?

    Isn't an apprentice someone who is learning the trade, not someone who is teaching it to the "master"?

    And there's the "rub" - I don't think most of us would have an issue with bringing in an H1-B nuclear physicist, or highly trained medical professional, or the like... but those are *truly* "highly skilled" professionals that would help this country compete. But bringing in lower skilled people as "apprentices" is *not* what the H1-B program is supposed to be about.

  81. Sign my Petition to stop H-1B Visas by cuteactivist123 · · Score: 1

    Maybe petitions, work,maybe not. But doesn't it feel good to click your signature and feel like you've done something? Please go the address below and click it to stop H1-B Visas! Much love! https://petitions.whitehouse.g...

  82. Re: H-1b should not be used for lower-level worker by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    AIUI the problem is that the H1B abusers advertise a position with a low-level job title but a high level set of requirements. In this way they can appear to be paying the prevailing wage for the "position" while actually paying a lot less than they would pay for a similarly skilled american.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  83. Re:Provide apprenticeships to highly skilled worke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though I like Joe Biden and he is actually a pretty sharp guy -- at least as far as knowledge and logic. He's also a bit naive and trusting (like Jimmy Carter used to be). So it's likely hes using the terminology of the CEO's who have candy coated marketing speak.

    Seems like Biden is merely channeling the opinions of the CEOs and .1% on this topic. The CEO's think of themselves as taking someone under their wing, rather than exploiting a worker trained on someone else's dime and pocketing the savings.

  84. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    60+ hours per week isn't a requirement for practically any job. If there is more than 40hr a week of work to do they should compensate by hiring enough people, not by overworking and underpaying who they have.

    The eagerness of industry for more H1-B workers is all about their cheapness, profit, short-sightedness and disrespect for the society they grew wealthy in, NOT about necessity.

  85. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Hey, working 60+ hours per week is a bona fide occupational qualification for some jobs! These immigrants are just filling jobs that Americans don't want to do for the salaries that companies want to pay - and can get away with paying to H1B visa holders

    FTFY

    I can't count the number of times I've recently been approached by Indian service companies for contracts I would have taken if it weren't for the rates on offer.

    I'm guessing they're keeping count of how many people turn down how many jobs/contracts and use this as justification to demand temporary visas.

    If this happens to anyone else I suggest that when they say "Oh so you're not interested?" that instead of answering 'No' answer instead 'Yes but I want my rate of X per hour/day/year'.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  86. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    To clarify, both sentences in the first paragraph of my earlier comment were sarcastic.

    I find that I have a harder time detecting sarcasm online as I age. Perhaps it's all the times I've seen such sentiments promoted honestly.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  87. Obamas insurance against impeachment :-) by peter303 · · Score: 1

    A few radical republicans fantasize about impeachment. But when they realize who'd replace Barak, they'll come to their senses.

  88. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by hey! · · Score: 1

    I went back and got a degree after 25 years. It's not the *degree*, it's the *education* that matters, and I got a lot more out of the education than my younger peers. This was a new perspective on things I was already familiar with, and I was able to connect a lot of dots I wouldn't have been able to when I was eighteen. I could immediately see what stuff was good for, and I discovered a number of things that would solve commonplace problems I'd seen occur over and over again, even with personnel wit advanced degrees.

    Then I got out and discovered that the world didn't want to hire a fifty year old who'd been "out of work" (going to school) for three years....

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  89. There's only one thing you need to know about H-1B by hey! · · Score: 1

    There's only one thing you need to know about the H-1B program to see that it's not about providing skilled labor *here*: after 6-10 years of working the visa holder is kicked out of the country to make room for a less experienced visa holder.

    If H-1B led automatically to a green card, then we'd be keeping the *most* expert workers here, rather than replacing them with less experienced ones. Change that *one* aspect of the program, and it's be an asset to the US as a nation.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  90. Re:4 year degrees have a lot theory & fluff / by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    that may be right I know this one guy is a coder and went to a state school and I am finding bugs in his code all the time.

  91. Taco Cowboy tops Biden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to say that while it was likely a humorous misspeak, Americans really do need to 'top' our politicians rather than allowing corporate interests to top them in our stead.

    Y'know, like Hillary should've topped Bill so he wouldn't be getting his dick sucked by every heavyset intern with an acceptable clothed bosom.

  92. Companies ruined by imported Indian labor by NewYork · · Score: 1

    H1B is originally intended for extra-ordinary professionals like Albert Einstein, Linus Torvalds etc.

    Companies ruined or almost ruined by imported Indian labor (US)

    Found this in a business fourm:

    Adaptec - Indian CEO Subramanian Sundaresh fired.
    AIG (signed outsourcing deal in 2007 in Europe with Accenture Indian frauds, collapsed in 2009)
    AirBus (Qantas plane plunged 650 feet injuring passengers when its computer system written by India disengaged the auto-pilot).
    Apple - R&D CLOSED in India in 2006.
    Australia's National Australia Bank (Outsourced jobs to India in 2007, nationwide ATM and account failure in late 2010).
    Bell Labs (Arun Netravalli took over, closed, turned into a shopping mall)
    Boeing Dreamliner ES software (written by HCL, banned by FAA)
    Bristol-Myers-Squibb (Trade Secrets and documents stolen in U.S. by Indian national guest worker)
    Caymas - Startup run by Indian CEO, French director of dev, Chinese tech lead. Closed after 5 years of sucking VC out of America.
    Caterpillar misses earnings a mere 4 months after outsourcing to India, Inc.
    Circuit City - Outsourced all IT to Indian-run IBM and went bankrupt shortly thereafter.
    ComAir crew system run by 100% Indian IT workers caused the 12/25/05 U.S. airport shutdown when they used a short int instead of a long int
    Deloitte - 2010 - this Indian-packed consulting company is being sued under RICO fraud charges by Marin Country, California for a failed solution.
    Dell - call center (closed in India)
    Delta call centers (closed in India)
    Fannie Mae - Hired large numbers of Indians, had to be bailed out. Indian logic bomb creator found guilty.
    GM - Was booming in 2006, signed $300 million outsourcing deal with Wipro that same year, went bankrupt 3 years later
    HSBC ATMs (software taken over by Indians, failed in 2006)
    Intel Whitefield processor project (cancelled, Indian staff canned)
    Lehman (Spectramind software bought by Wipro, ruined, trashed by Indian programmers)
    Medicare - Defrauded by Indian national doctor Arun Sharma & wife in the U.S.
    Microsoft - Employs over 35,000 H-1Bs. Stock used to be $100. Today it's lucky to be over $25. Not to mention that Vista thing.
    MIT Media Lab Asia (canceled)
    PeopleSoft (Taken over by Indians in 2000, collapsed).
    PepsiCo - Slides from #1 to #3 during Indian CEO Indra Nooyi' watch.
    Polycom - Former senior executive Sunil Bhalla charged with insider trading.
    Qantas - See AirBus above

  93. Appre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bottom line is this. 18000 microsoft getting tossed in favor of H1-B's is basically letting go of the american workers in that move. This is tantamount to immigration fraud. It's going to happen all over if the H1-B is allowed to continue the way it is. It's a lose-lose either way. The entire H1-B program appears to now being gamed in favor of foreign workers getting preferences at lower pay over american workers at industry standard pay.

  94. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

    Ok, so you don't live in Texas.....

    --


    This space intentionally left blank
  95. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by NickGnome · · Score: 1
    "The jobs could in fact be done by Americans with no degrees at all."
    ...

    Thousands of STEM jobs are being done by US citizens with no degrees; but we have millions of US citizens with STEM degrees who can't get STEM work.

    OTOH, in 2012, the US government gave out over 135,991 H-1B visas, and over 153,794 H-1B visas in 2013. Maybe he was thinking of the F+OPT apprenticeships... many of which are unpaid.

    Then again, how many more able and willing US citizens would have had a decent career if they weren't constantly being undermined by these apprenticeship and guest-work programs which favor non-citizens?

    I think the most irritating thing is the way the reporters (and executives, and politicians, and their lobbyists) assert that every H-1B is "best and brightest" and "highly-skilled", when the data available suggest no such thing; and not a single reporter questions them about it. Experts differ a little, but generally come down in a range between 2% and 8% of H-1B grantees who may be genuinely excellent, bright, highly-skilled; the vast majority are mediocre lights, doing mediocre kinds of work, at below-market compensation. And US citizens aren't given a chance to bargain over pay, even if only to become and stay employed rather than dismissed without consideration, regardless of knowledge, experience, creativity, industry, past productivity, etc.

  96. H1B Suspended for at Least 18,000 Hires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft - a large proponent of H1B - announced 18,000 layoffs earlier; there are definitely 18,000 qualified candidates out in the open market. Give them each a voucher. Until they get a job and turn in their voucher, we can safely suspend the H1B program. Shut the doors. Close the office. Give those guys a well-deserved (paid) vacation. It's not like Microsoft just wants to flood the market with so many tech employees that they can underpay them and demand they feel grateful for their paycheck - they *really* just didn't have any qualified American programmers on the market. But that's changed now!

  97. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by jeIIomizer · · Score: 1

    I know I always go see my local doctor who doesn't have a degree either.

    Bad example. While anyone can learn to program and get experience on their own without college, it is difficult for people like doctors to get actual experience without some sort of institution.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  98. Re:they can't find people who will work 60-80+ hou by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

    More like they build the job posting to fit one foreign amateurs resume and then act like there is no one in the USA that could do it. The H1-B is complete fucking slavery. No raises likely and as many hours as the employer wants to put you through OR you get fired and lose your ability to stay here -- then have to buy your own ticket home. That's why our corporatacracy allows this -- employment is slavery too, but not nearly as bad. As long as you work for money you're basically in debt, so the wage slave is only slightly better off. We should be against this process not only because it costs US workers jobs, but because it is a violation of the human rights of the individuals as well. The problem is that we need government reform that represents the people not the fictious entities known as companies. Until that happens the money is the most important thing.

  99. Re:Yay! Hopenchange! by mindmaster064 · · Score: 1

    Same here. I tried college, but I was already too advanced when I enrolled and I literally bored myself out of the place. I've never had a college degree or needed one and I've worked solo, my own company, and even with fortune 500s. Generally, I never was stopped at any point due to not having that paper but I have lost to others on experience on a particular platform or whatever. Fine, I can deal. =)

  100. Long after the fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/congressman-mistakes-us-officials-for-indian-diplomats/article6251536.ece