Sony Agrees To $17.75m Settlement For 2011 PSN Attack
mrspoonsi (2955715) writes with word that Sony has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit brought by PSN users affected by the 2011 breach. From the article: Sony has finally agreed to a preliminary settlement of $15m, which may be able to appease most of the customers that suffered from this attack. The PlayStation Network users that did not partake in the "Welcome Back" program that Sony unveiled shortly after their online services were brought back will be able to choose from two of several options for compensation: One PlayStation 3 or PlayStation Portable game selected from a list of 14 games; three PlayStation 3 themes selected from a list of six themes; or a three-month subscription to PlayStation Plus free of charge. Claiming these benefits will be done on a first come, first serve basis ...The settlement isn't just about free games or services. Customers with documented identity theft charges are eligible for up to $2,500 per claim.
Dead Nation, InFamous, LittleBigPLanet, Super Stardust HD, rain, and 3 others to be determined later
PSP:
LittleBigPlanet, ModNationRacers, Patapon 3, Killzone Liberation, and 2 others to be determined later.
Nothing I'd pay money for. (and per the settlement, they're valued at $9.00 per).
Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
That's going to hurt Sony's bottom line.
I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
Why does TFA mention that it is first come, first serve, but not provide a link to where a person should make a claim?
The welcome back program was:
TWO free titles from this list:
Dead Nation
inFAMOUS
LittleBigPlanet
Super Stardust HD
Wipeout HD + Fury
plus 30 days of Playstation Plus (note: "free" games, if "purchased" during this 30 day time frame remain on your account forever, I got several small/old games this way.)
The new deal, for the holdouts is worse, imo.
In order to compensate you for our insecure products and indifference to your privacy ... we're giving you more of our crappy, insecure products?
Wow, did Sony write this settlement themselves?
What a joke.
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Have companies been allowed to pay damages, as outlined and verified by the government in a legal suit, in product? Giving aways games is a marketing ploy, not a punishment.
Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
And because you don't hear about them, that means they don't happen, right?
Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
It's part of the responsibility you take on when you hold your customers financial information too keep it secure.
Sony completely and utterly failed in nearly any aspect of that, it wasn't valued by them enough to even bother encrypting.
I would feel different if Sony had even tried to keep things secure, but as it is I don't feel sorry for them at all.
If this had been a physical crime as you say, then yes the victim would be liable for the property they where holding. If I loan you my chainsaw and your house gets robbed... guess what? You can bet your ass your buying me a chainsaw. (Used or new would depend on the condition of the one I loaned you.)
I would feel bad for you if you kept your doors locked and did everything right, I would still need my stuff though. I would feel a lot less bad if I found out after the fact that you took all the locks off your house and told the local street gangs you where going to be out of town for a week....
So the consequence to Sony is they give some more games away, at ZERO marginal cost to them, increasing customer lock-in. How exactly does this deter behaviour again?
Well, it was also loss of service, not just the data breech. They shut everything down for weeks while they sorted it out. Several of my 40-60 dollar games were 100% unplayable for nearly a month, because services Sony agreed to supply were unavailable (log-on servers).
I actually had a game I had never played at the time that was unplayable (because it required a patch that I could not get, thanks to services being down), and since I broke the shrink-wrap it was not returnable either.
Sony Settled in Canada on July 10 2013. Still waiting for my games since....
m = 10^{-3}, M = 10^3.
Just a typo,
No need to get all worked up about it :)
If your security consists of
a) A poorly maintained barb-wire fence
b) A gate manned by a 75-year-old semi-dead/blind security guard named fred
And records are stored in a big box just inside an unlocked door easily accessible to anyone, then yes... they would be responsible.
It's not that they weren't a "victim" of hacking, it's that their terrible data retention and security practises put customer-data at risk and enabled the hacking.
So less than $1 per customer.
Nintendo has a huge userbase. It's just only 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of them can actually be bothered to go through the pain of the Nintendo Network.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun